Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

I Don't Do iPods

Mondo's picture

But my trusty old Creative Zen (four years service), is getting a bit creaky, looking crazily dated and needs replacing while I can still backup the contents.

I want to upgrade, but don't want an iPod (heard to many horror stories). I'm not overly fussed, about games, vid or photo capabilty. Ideally a large capacity - 80gb or upwards - pure mp3 player is what I'm after. Microsoft's Zune is tempting, but so are the latest Creative models.

I'm sure this has been asked before, but can the Word Massive point me in the right direction for reviews or recommendations on the 'best of breed' mp3 players

0

Why

make life difficult for yourself? Get an iPod!

0
Johan | 18 August 2009 - 2:47pm

I like the idea and style

But I know to many people who've had wonky batteries, collections wiped or reformatted and all sorts of system failures.

Also I want my mp3s to stay as mp3s not be converted.

0
Mondo | 18 August 2009 - 2:53pm

your mp3s will stay as mp3s

I'm not sure of the availability of many 'jukebox' machines nowadays. I think for the size you're looking for the iPod might be what you want. For me, migrating from my 40gb iRiver was a piece of cake.

a) wire up external HD bought for the purpose of long term music storage
b) copy entire contents of iRiver to the external HD; that's 40Gb of mp3s
c) plug in new iPod and point it at the external HD.
d) Watch a bit of telly while it imports all the stuff you have on the external HD
e) Any new stuff I rip goes automatically to the external HD. I've chosen that the stuff gets ripped as mp3, not as any Apple proprietary format
f) stuff i download goes there too.
g) If the laptop fries tomorrow, I still have the music on the external HD

Your fears of batteries frying and so forth are well founded. There's also a chance your laptop will stop working, the dishwasher will leak or the fridge defrost when you don't want it to.

I'm no Apple fanboy, but i'm very happy with the bit of kit I've got.

*edit* also the ability to pop it into those speaker dock things is jolly cool. Since getting a luverly little JBL number, I'm now listening to music in my living room, where the only electrical appliances on are the ipod, the speakers and a reading light. No distracting computer!

0
ivan | 18 August 2009 - 3:02pm

listeningto MP3s through external speakers in the living room

hmm

the equivalent to listening lossless or a cd but with your fingers in your ears IMO

0
Junior Wells | 19 August 2009 - 10:43am

perhaps.

I'll tell you what, Tony. Give me the money and space for a decent stereo system and we'll work something out. Until then, i'll make do with what i have.

*edit* Tony - my post might have seemed a bit sniffy; it wasn't meant to! Tradeoff has to be done between circumstances and a desire for audio nirvana. As somebody who NEVER owned a record player, the notion of having a mad big sound system is alien to me. In fairness, I know I'm missing out, but to tell you the Gods honest, the present lass i'm seeing thought my living room was 'mantastic' enough, what with the Playstation3, the laptop, the Wii, the widescreen telly, the Sky plus and the mahoosive DVD collection. Flinging a sound system in the mix might be a bit much!

0
ivan | 19 August 2009 - 12:00pm

Collections wiped

A story to make a Word reader's hair stand up like quills upon the fretful porpentine. At the weekend my iPod refused to sync, giving error (-48) as the reason. Various webpages' advice didn't help and, worse, the entire contents of the iPod had been wiped.
Last night I reset the iPod to factory settings and synced it again, only to end up with barely 100 songs on the iPod. I sourced these to the main hard-drive and was mildly consternated to find through Explorer that the external hard-drive where my iTunes live appeared to be a) unformatted and b) completely empty. After much swearing as I contemplated the loss of my music library from both PC and iPod I shut everything down and rummaged among the dusty wires to discover the reason for all the trouble - a loose connection to the external hard-drive.
Wiped collections - it's not always Apple's fault.

0
Gatz | 18 August 2009 - 3:26pm

Well....

As far as I'm aware the only MP3 players with that capacity these days are the iPod and the Zune, unless you go for a larger media tablet thing from Archos. The rest use flash memory and therefore have restricted capacities.

0
JQW | 18 August 2009 - 2:49pm

ipods are fine

had my 30gb ipod for 3 years and its good. The two others in my family have them too and we can succesfully update all 3 using itunes. Get some decent headphones - the ones supplied by apple are crap!

0
andrewdavidlong | 18 August 2009 - 2:53pm

I've had my 120gb ipod for two years and it's not let me down

yet.

It's so much nicer than anything else around. Go for it, you'll be glad you did. All my ipods have been fine.

0
Five-Centres | 18 August 2009 - 2:56pm

I would also go with an iPod

I've had an 80Gb model for about four years with no problems and prior to that one of the early 40Gb models (I'm an 'early adopter'). If you want something smaller, the iPod Touch gives you the capability to access the web over wifi and you can download some great applications.

0
Handsome.P.Wonderful | 18 August 2009 - 3:02pm

40gb 'early'?

I've still got my 1st Generation iPod - a whole throbbing 5gb of music with the 2-inch grey LCD. Be still my beating heart :-)

0
stimpy | 18 August 2009 - 7:30pm

Hmmm

I've just checked on the 'bay 120gb pods for £150 very, very tempting.

You've certainly cleared up some myths and misinformation for me.

And those docking doo-dahs. Yes even Mrs C likes the look of those

0
Mondo | 18 August 2009 - 3:11pm

on the docking doo-dah front

I would reccomend a Denon to connect to your existing set-up. V good/mid range pricing.

Stand alone docks - can't go wrong with B&W Zeppelin or Bose - Both offer good sound and generally meet approval from the all important SO/FPO/GLW contingency

0
Sheev | 18 August 2009 - 3:18pm

Heard one

of those Zeppelin docks recently. It sounded superb.

0
Johan | 18 August 2009 - 3:19pm

Ooh they are..

A bit pricey but well worth the investment.

0
Neil Dyson | 18 August 2009 - 5:40pm

Logitech Pure Fi Anywhere 2

Brilliant. Great sound, charges your iphone as well and best of all has a rechargable battery built in that will allow you to grab the speakers, take it into the garden or bathroom and listen to your pod. It also comes with travel adaptors and a decent carry case.

0
Leedsboy | 18 August 2009 - 8:17pm

But, In the Name of Christ...

Dont get the Cambridge Audio docker.

Despite the claims on the box it doesen't charge your pod which rather defeats its own purpose (to quote Jake la Motta).

Piece of crap which wasnt even worth the 20 quid I paid for it.

0
goatboyuk69 | 18 August 2009 - 10:20pm

Mine does

Well at least I think it does. I stick it in the dock and don't seem to have to charge it up much by other means. I'm not technical in the slightest, don't understand much of this discussion and got my docking station as an unexpected present but I quite like it. Sounds not fantastic but okay.

0
Janice | 19 August 2009 - 12:20pm

Don't do it Dave

don't go with the herd with their Ipods.
how about a n96 nokia phone which you might get "free" with your contract it's got only 32 gb memory admitedly but they sound good syncronise easily and work with variety of formats also make phone calls and takes pictures!
http://www.nokia.co.uk/find-products/all-phones/nokia-n96/features

0
Chris G | 18 August 2009 - 3:18pm

Do do it Dave

Go with the herd - they are right this time.

Otherwise Canute or Ostrich Position are the brand names to watch out for...

0
Sheev | 18 August 2009 - 3:21pm

baa, baa, baa

baa.....

0
Chris G | 18 August 2009 - 3:23pm

Never one of

my favourite Beach Boys tracks...

0
Sheev | 18 August 2009 - 3:29pm

dude, that's a sheep noise

you're making. They move in flocks (or trips, it seems) and not 'herds'...

http://www.ucgc.org/terms-for-collections.htm

0
ivan | 18 August 2009 - 3:32pm

goats actually....

flocks,herd, packs, schools, pods, only dead fish go with the flow....

0
Chris G | 18 August 2009 - 3:35pm

alright...

leave the semantics for a moment (and yeah - i know - i started it!)...when discussing a consumer durable like an mp3 player, is it a good reason to forego a fairly reliable bit of hardware on the sole grounds that 'everybody else has one'? (I know you didn't say that, but I'm basing that on the word 'herd')

I mean, I say this as somebody who bought an iRiver in 2004, but that was on the grounds that it had more capacity than any iPod available at the time, and it also had a radio. I liked the idea that it *wasn't* an iPod, but that wasn't the clincher for me, rather it was a case of 'did it do what I wanted it to?'

since then, the iRiver's packed in, I listen to most of my radio in the house, rather than on the move, and the capacity of an iPod is 3 times what my old thing could do, so the iPod is a no-brainer.

Are you a refuse-nik for the sake of it? I mean, don't get me wrong, the Nokia you linked to is a wonderful gadget, but it's not a quick'n'dirty mp3 player that affords instant linkage to a dock in the car/kitchen whatever...

I appreciate the notion of personal taste, and that we're defined by our tastes, to an extent. That surely applies to albums and movies and books. But mp3 players?!?!?

0
ivan | 18 August 2009 - 3:50pm

I use my nokia 95

everyday as mp3 player no probs, if your dock has line in it will connect instantly (even comes with a decent cable) i've played it through my hifi no probs. Never saw the need to carry two gadgets around. It's got speakers which when i'm not playing grime tracks at the back of the bus are plenty good enough for listening in hotels rooms etc.

It's got a fm radio and lots of other stuff. You do have to juggle tracks to free up space especially with podcast but I rarely listen to them twiceso that's no bother
When it broke down vodafone mended it no question even when it was more than year old.

so as iphone user are finding why do need an ipod.

0
Chris G | 18 August 2009 - 4:04pm

Because an iPhone *is* an iPod

The thing that makes an iPod better than the rest is iTunes - it's simple, easy to use and 'just works'.

0
stimpy | 18 August 2009 - 7:33pm

I-tunes vs media player

never seen that much difference between them use mediaplayer most days with no problem. Only time i bought something from Itunes it was bobbins so buy stuff from amazon now for one off tunes.
I have feeling Ipod are popular because people don't even think of buying anything else , can't be good for future developement of the field. Just thought I'd put forward a very well performing alternative I'll leave you all to your brushed aluminium uniformity.

0
Chris G | 18 August 2009 - 8:36pm

You didn't buy something from iTunes

You bought from the iTunes Music Store - something completely different.

iTunes is the software application which manages your library, plays your music, manages podcasts and syncs your playlists to your iPod.

As an aide, it also provides a method of accessing the ITMS.

I've been using iTunes since 2002 and have never bought anything from the ITMS. In fact, I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I've even used iTunes to access the ITMS.

Maybe it's a Windows/Mac thing? Is the version of iTunes on Windows different to the proper version?

0
stimpy | 18 August 2009 - 8:41pm

there was a version problem

at the time and my tracks that I bought from itunes store had drop outs in them and didn't play very well (plus I had to convert them to get them to play). There didn't seem to be a way to gain redress so I got the tracks elsewhere. i'm sure it's fine never been back only use Itunes/music store to download podcasts now.

0
Chris G | 18 August 2009 - 8:49pm

Same thing

I use iTunes under OSX & Windows and it's pretty similar in both. In fact, apart from a few things being on different drop downs, the only major thing I've found different is that on the Mac you can drag a track or album out of iTunes onto another drive (very handy for making a quick SD card compilation for the car) and in Windows you can't.

The main reason for plugging an ipod into a Mac instead of a Windows PC is surely that the desktop icon is matches the colour of the ipod!

0
JohnW | 19 August 2009 - 1:31pm

I assume you mean you can't drag music....

from Itunes to a SD card using Windows?

I haven't got Itunes so I've no idea, but dragging anything out of My Music(where my music is stored)to a SD card using Windows couldn't be simpler.

0
bigsteviecook | 19 August 2009 - 2:03pm

I've used both Mac and Windows iTunes

and I haven't seen any difference in how I use them. I drag and drop tracks, great big piles of tracks between drives all the time without a hitch on Windows, just as I did on the Mac.

0
SimonL | 19 August 2009 - 5:33pm

Things ain't what they used to be!

Yep! I've just tried it again in Windows and it works fine. I'm sure it didn't last time! That's my story anyway.

0
JohnW | 19 August 2009 - 9:33pm

I started out using Media

I started out using Media Player for playing/ripping music back in the dark Windows 98 days and it was dreadful. I walked away as soon as I could and never looked back. I tried some early versions of iTunes and found them pretty terrible too. Slow, buggy, awkward. I use iTunes only for loading my iPod these days. It's vastly improved now but I still don't like it as a library manager or player.

These days I use MediaMonkey (the free version is pretty good to start with, but the extra paid-for features are worth the small outlay) because it handles my frankly huge music collection absolutely flawlessly. MP3s, WMAs, AACs, OGGs and FLACs handled without problems. It has some extremely sophisticated tagging capabilities, rips and burns CDs faultlessly and also looks -far- better on the Windows desktop than either Media Player or iTunes.

I have had a sexy black 160GB iPod for a good while now and have had no problems whatsoever with it. Previously I had a (second series?)20GB which died (the smoke escaped) after I dropped it for the third time. It was still under warranty and I managed to persuade PC World to deduct the price of it from that of a 40GB replacement (Result!) which gave me a few years of good service until the hard drive eventually died. Until recently I had a 4GB Nano as well as the 160GB beast but gave that to my sister on her recent 60th birthday, along with a 25 quid iTunes voucher.

My only regret is that I would have got a smaller 'pod if I'd realised what a hassle it would be choosing what tracks to put on a player of that size when your library is over twice it's capacity. Especially using bloody iTunes.
Then there's the length of time it takes for the thing to fill up... nip out for a curry and it's still loading when you get back!

160GB is overkill really, IMO, unless your entire collection will fit with a bit of room to spare for expansion. In such a scenario it would be ideal.

Watching movies on an ordinary iPod is stupid. The resolution just isn't good enough. A PITA. That goes for photos too - a pointless exercise. There might be some justification in loading photos onto an iPod Touch, I suppose, but personally I think they're way overpriced for the capacity and I wouldn't waste my money.

0
Mike_H | 21 August 2009 - 8:20pm

mine

sends you hugs and kisses and pictures of people kissing and hugging :D

I'm convinced and although an Apple user of many decades, I never felt the need until now. It's a piece of art too - a design classic that will look primitive in 5 years.

0
James Blast | 21 August 2009 - 11:14pm

I feel like that about much Apple hardware

as the shelf of old Macs (and Apples II & III) in my loft will testify. Although they all still work, they're just there because I can't bear to throw away something so perfectly designed.

0
stimpy | 22 August 2009 - 10:45am

Got a Zen

And an Ipod and the annoying thing is that the Zen is a much better machine in my opinion.But not enough storage.

0
Doug B | 18 August 2009 - 3:22pm

I've got a Zen 8 GB

but its almost full, whenever I have the cash to spare for an upgrade or my current player craps out on me I want to upgrade to at least 16 GB. I've gotten stuff off the i-tunes music store and converted it to mp3 but only as a last resort, Canada doesn't have much selection in the way of good official pay mp3 options. We've been promised mp3 downloads for Amazon.ca for nearly four years and so far the results have been nill.

0
TheAwesomeSound | 13 September 2009 - 1:33am

"Microsoft's Zune is tempting"

I had to check, and Google tells me I'm right.

Out of the 110,000,000 sites on the web, and throughout the entire history of the internet, that particular phrase has only ever been uttered once: on this very page.

0
Fraser Lewry | 18 August 2009 - 3:30pm

Space age, slinky and designed by Spock

That's how they look to me. And the reviews aren't bad either

0
Mondo | 18 August 2009 - 3:54pm

Have you

informed Dave Gorman yet, Fraser?

0
KDH | 18 August 2009 - 4:18pm

No point mate

It's four words, not two...

0
Red Umpire | 18 August 2009 - 4:45pm

As far as this search concerned...

It's not even four words... it's a single phrase.

0
Fraser Lewry | 18 August 2009 - 4:50pm

Zunes

I so want them to be better than they are. And even the new one, which is fairly trick with a lovely screen, is still saddled with media player and not itunes.

0
Leedsboy | 18 August 2009 - 8:19pm

Also, last I heard...

... the Zune isn't available in the UK.

It's kind of like how we all know about the Amazon Kindle but they aren't for sale here.

0
Dr Yang | 18 August 2009 - 8:46pm

available - ish

I bought a Zune via ebay about a year ago.

It had a better screen than my ipod, and was OK for managing music, up to a point. At 30Gb, the Zune management software on the PC was struggling much more than iTunes on the same PC managing 110Gb.

Good screen, OK battery life but the iPod / iTUnes is better overall in my experience of a large collection.

Whatever you have as your portable device, you should back up your main music source on the PC (or Mac).

0
el hombre malo | 18 August 2009 - 10:35pm

Batteries for ipods

Another ipod bugbear was the battery life of early models (ie my 3G 40gb). Well, mine finally gave out a couple of weeks ago and tempted though with new kit I was the pod itself was fine, just not holding any charge. £12.99 recorded delivery saw us with a new, improved life battery. Fitting it took 20 mins following a step by step video on the company's site. I'm sure other battery providers are cool too, and they clearly do these for more recent models too, so you don't need to worry about the battery going and being unreplacable. Google your chosen model and replacement battery if you want to be doubly sure For the tech-afraid you can send your model of rec del and they will fit a new battery for you for around £30.
Oh, and no loss of hard drive data in the process either.
Of course do not do this while you have a warranty...

0
Moseleymoles | 18 August 2009 - 3:33pm

Just to confirm

I too had A Man change the battery in our family's oldest iPod (we have 4 between us) last month for £30, with all music kept intact - easily worth it if only to save the days I'd have spent reloading a new one...

iPods are great - sometimes the herd/flock/phlange is right!

0
Metal Mickey | 18 August 2009 - 3:48pm

I was A Confirmed Ipod Nay Sayer

but I honestly love it. Couldn't do without it. I've got a 120gb classic and it's given me so much freedom in my listening. Go with the pro-vote and don't use the accompanying earphones. Get Senheiser CX300 in ear jobs and life will never be the same again. Ignore the Zimm who doesn't like them. He dosen't need to.

0
RobertC | 18 August 2009 - 3:37pm

Headphones comment is vital

I wonder how many people have thought their ipod too quiet and rather disappointing sonically, and have stuck with the dreadful ones apple bundle in. This was an issue right from the start and uncharacteristic of apple not to make some progress on.

0
Moseleymoles | 18 August 2009 - 3:42pm

I'd upgrade to Sennheisers probably

the PX 200's are my plugs of choice

0
Mondo | 18 August 2009 - 3:57pm

So that settles it then

You're getting a 120gb ipod and there will be no more arguments about it.

0
Five-Centres | 18 August 2009 - 3:58pm

I don't know. I don't know

It's like one of those from Blind Date summaries (Graham was it?)

The Zune - all the space, great functionality (including wi-fi for file transfer) - but it is Microsoft.
iPod - looks, functionality and storage - although prone to melting down and taking the collection with it.
Creative - I've used Creative for years and been problem-free - but has everything I want apart from space.

0
Mondo | 18 August 2009 - 4:25pm

On the theme of failures and horror stories

you have to bear in mind that there a roughly a squillion iPods in use, so you are gonna hear lots of stories about them failing. It stands to reason.
The mantra is clear - BACK IT UP - BACK IT UP - BACK IT UP!
Everything fails eventually.

Go with an iPod my friend - you wont regret it.

ps.
Depending on your requirements, you may want to wait a couple of weeks. Apple are gonna update the whole iPod range on September 9th.
"The event is likely to bring us new iPods with GPS and camera capabilities. We're also expecting to see the 16/32/64GB iPod Touch varieties with $199/$299/$399 price points."
http://9to5mac.com/September-apple-event-2009

0
ChaosandMorphine | 18 August 2009 - 4:16pm

I'd hold off

for a couple of weeks - the new models will probably be out in September. I'm hoping for bigger memory (160GB+), which oddly, given the move to video on iPods, doesn't seemed to be the way things are moving.

0
KDH | 18 August 2009 - 4:17pm

Nooooooooo...

Apple are ditching hard disk devices in favour of solid state memory. If you're lucky there'll be a 64gb flash iPod/iTouch but that'll be the biggest for another year or so.

0
stimpy | 18 August 2009 - 7:36pm

Wait!

In about three weeks Apple are due to announce iPod updates as they do every September. I'd wait and see what they announce before you splash out. It may be that something more tempting is announced, or if not, the older models may be got cheaper.

0
Danny | 18 August 2009 - 4:20pm

I Don't Do Audis

for the same reason; every second car on the M4 is a bloody Audi.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 18 August 2009 - 4:24pm

In my experience

In my experience every second Audi A4 is driven by an aggressive tw@t.

0
Mike_H | 22 August 2009 - 3:51pm

IPOD!!!!

I had an iPod Nano for the past two or three years until the battery failed. That cost me 100 quid at the time, the iPod Classic with 120 gigs replaced it earlier this year for the princely sum of £165 from Amazon. And it is lovely. 20,000 songs on it right now, still with about 20 gigs left to fill. Got some Sennheiser headphones at the weekend and the whole thing sounds beautiful. And all the speaker dock thingys are great, and portable. We have our music systems packed away, just a speaker dock that moves from room to room and sounds great to my ears.

Even got some of the Mondo mixes on and they sound great on it!! And as for iTunes, you can set what it converts tracks you burn to. My iTunes is set for MP3, and quite high quality.

(If you have ever downloaded, for sample purposes only, a track from my blog, that's an MP3 normally pulled straight from the iTunes, dumped on the desktop and uploaded to my filestore. It's pretty simple)

0
SimonL | 18 August 2009 - 4:37pm

8Gigs is enuff for anybody

well is enough for this person

I am very late to iPodness although a long time Apple user, my 8Gig tOuch is just perfect for me, it has games, apps, vids as well as music - it's lovely

BTW, I'm suffering withdrawl symptoms - no WordCast again!

0
James Blast | 18 August 2009 - 8:07pm

Maximum Gigs Only

The sheer joy of being able to listen to anything from your entire catalogue, whatever , whenever, beach, bed, barber or guillotine.. Go on. You're worth it.

0
RobertC | 18 August 2009 - 8:20pm

iPod myths

There are a lot of myths about the iPod.

For example:
1. Poor battery life
2. You have to convert your collection to AAC
3. You can only buy from iTunes
4. It is somehow difficult to sync the same library to more than one device
...etc.

The truth of the iPod is that it is well-designed, just works when you plug it in, is very simple to use, and has a mass of accessories designed for it. Also true is that the default headphones are very poor.

After three years of constant, heavy usage, my first iPod died due to a hard disk fault, after I dropped it. I'd used it for an average of four hours a day, every day for this period. The battery was still managing 8 hours charge. I reckon I got extremely good value for money, and don't reckon I've ever used a gadget this much.

A modern design classic.

0
Andrew Bradley | 18 August 2009 - 8:22pm

A lot of sense spoken here

I've had two iPods. The first was (is) a 5G, the second and 80G classic. I've had the latter for about a year and the former about 3. The only reason I bought the classic was because the od 30G 5G ran out of space. The lack of space is the reason why an iPod Touch doesn't interest me for now.

I've never had a battery problem: the latest one is chugging along like a trooper with perfectly fine life after a year.

And although I rip most of my stuff as AAC at 256kbps I also have alot of legacy mp3 files at rates up to about 320kbps. All lovely. And I can rip video to watch on the move from BBC iPlayer, so I can watch episodes of Only Connect or Psychoville at my leisure of the bus.

The sound quality is not actually the best there is, but is perfectly good. I've listened to Sony players belonging to a couple of friends, which sound very spiffy actually. My biggest problem with phones is usually the lack of decent headphones, being saddled with proprietary conectors and sockets. If this weren't the case I'd probbly use my phone (a nokia 6220) much more than I do for music and leave the iPod at home.

Never had issues with iTunes either. Used to use it on a PC but now run it without incident on an iMac. I don't do auto sync and have the hard disk backed up with Time Machine so if the iPod goes west, the tunes won't, especially now tht the music's not DRM'd

0
illuminatus | 18 August 2009 - 8:51pm

My Classic's battery lasts about an hour

after about a year and a half. That's a lot of deterioration in a short time.

0
peterafifer | 18 August 2009 - 10:17pm

Best to be careful

Hold off for a couple of years and make sure they're not just a fad.

0
David Hepworth | 18 August 2009 - 10:18pm

Didn't

Alan Sugar actually say they were just a fad?!

0
Johan | 18 August 2009 - 10:30pm

that's why he's a successful

property developer.

0
Chris G | 18 August 2009 - 10:32pm

Someone should fire him

just for the emailer phone thing.

0
Leedsboy | 18 August 2009 - 11:02pm

At the risk of sounding geeky and/or smug

(but I don't care) the reason people lose their entire music collection is because they don't back it up. And whether you're a Windows / OSX / Linux user, it's your failure to do this most elementary of tasks that will totally mess you up. But then there's a lot of people who need to be burnt to realise that fire hurts...

I think the iPod is a superb device, pretty much whatever model, and Apple deserve a lot of praise for making it platform agnostic. However, I do sympathise with the battery life problem. My iPod touch has never come near to hitting a claimed 36 hour playback life. But I wouldn't change it for anything on the market.

0
Mark JF | 18 August 2009 - 10:35pm

Nearly neutral

The ipod is not entirely platform agnostic. You have to decide which side of the fence it should be on when it's new and after that you can only update the firmware on the chosen OS. Other than that though....

0
JohnW | 19 August 2009 - 1:30pm

Sorry to join the herd

Buy an iPod. If your music disappears - and I believe that could happen on other mp3 players - then you should have backed it up.

0
Lucas Hare | 19 August 2009 - 12:48am

iPod - the only way to go

I'm on my third iPod. My original 30Gb had a ridiculously short battery life. But I've since had an 80Gb 5th gen and a 120Gb 6th gen. I need the large capacity because I use Apple lossless files which are somewhat bigger. I haven't had any problems with my later generation iPod and think that although there is the issue that everyone has one, it also means that the accessory possibilities are endless. I also use a Graham Slee Voyager amp which enhances the sound no end (one thing about iPod is that the later generation have worse sound than the earlier ones. There has been a 160 GB before but it had so many problems that Apple withdrew it, perhaps they've sorted it out now. So get an iPod - but wait to see what's coming out in September.

0
Simondrsmith | 19 August 2009 - 8:58am

the future's looking Apple - but what about playlisting?

Thanks for all the comments, exactly the the sort of crunchy feedback and sound advice I've been after. The 120gb Classic seems to be exactly I need.

One last question though - playlisting.

A key feature of my trusty ol' Zen is the ability to resequence tracks within a playlist, on the player, and on the the fly.

It's a function that's invaluable to me as I make mixes and for my own site and guest mixes around the net. I've also used it to compile music for several parties, a couple of podcasts, work out set lists for very occasional DJ stints and plan the music for our wedding from the service to the first dance.

Creative pulled this feature after the Zen, which is why I've stuck with mine.

But can you do this on a pod? Throw tracks into a playlist and resequence the order while on the move?

0
Mondo | 19 August 2009 - 9:52am

Zen

I have a 4gb Zen that I use as a paperweight, too hard to sync, especially from iTunes, constant freezing, scratched window, limited storage... my 120g iPod classic is awesome!!

0
Silverdog | 20 August 2009 - 7:01pm

You're not the only Zen user in the village

I've resisted the ipod invasion for much the same reasons as yourself, but I have to say that I'm almost embarassed these days when I pull out my chunky old 60gb Zen Vision. It's actually only 2 years old but in comparison to those sleek little ipods it feels like I might as well be brandishing an 80's brick-phone.

But my impression is still that the sound and the playlist function are better. Is this not still the case? I'm a little upset that there's nothing else out there to improve upon it - whither all the options of couple of years ago? And why aren't Creative trying to target those of us who might want to upgrade?

0
Uncle Monty | 19 August 2009 - 9:46am

Playlists on the 'pod

Make them on the go, on the tube; edit or resequence them on the computer when you get home. Not sure if you can resequence on the move, though.

0
Lucas Hare | 19 August 2009 - 10:17am

you can't...

...I just tried!

0
Red Umpire | 19 August 2009 - 11:00am

b@lls!

Thanks for testing David - perhaps I'll have to keep the Zen for sequencing comps, mixes etc, but use the pod for general listening.

I can't believe this function seems to be a no-no on all formats Apple or Creative. It's a fab feature and one I've been using the since the days of minidisc.

0
Mondo | 19 August 2009 - 11:29am

you can do this on my nokia

* I know I'll bet my coat worth a try you've got to admit*

0
Chris G | 19 August 2009 - 11:39am

I have a 16Gb Zen....

....on which I keep my favourite music. I feel no need to carry everything I have around with me....then again, I only use mine when out walking or cutting grass etc. I don't have to commute.

What I like about this model is that it has a SD card slot built in. I bought 3 x 8Gb SD cards before going on holiday recently and filled one with music videos, one with audiobooks and the last with new music. So, technically, it can be used to store as much data as I like.

0
bigsteviecook | 19 August 2009 - 10:30am

The crowds got it right for once

Had a 20Gb Creative Zen Touch. Still believe it was better than the iPod currently available at that time (Feb 2005).

Got sick of the small hard drive capacity.

Borrowed someone's iPod Classic for an hour to test it. Sounded fine to me and to two others who I asked to check the sound quality.

I ordered the 80Gb Classic in April 2008. Then I realised that even though I struggled to imagine filling it, I might still kick myself a year later. So I cancelled the 80Gb and ordered the 160Gb model. Within about two months I was over the 80Gb limit.

Close to a year and a half later I'm still using it everyday for about three hours. Never once crashed on me or gave me problems of note. Just treat it like a princess that will throw a wobbly if you don't treat her right and it will always work.

One problem is that once in a while it will suddenly pause in the middle of a song for a second before continuing. I assume it has run out of cache memory and is taking a second to refill it. It's irritating and a stupid design flaw. One of the great strengths of music is that it flows so this pause is very disruptive. I have since accepted the flaw and have embraced it as a "good" thing. I like the fact that it wakes me up and focuses my attention on the music if I've been drifting away. Question: I had one album in Apple Lossless and it always had that one second pause every time I listened to it; anyone know if Lossless is a cache problem for the Classic?

The sound might be slightly flat, less 3D, than my Creative Zen (which still works and is always plugged up to my sound system with a 3.5mm jack). It sounds good, but maybe has a glacial quality to it that makes things sound very expensive. I have no issues with it. I use Sennheiser CX-300 headphones.

To sum up, the iPod is the best option and I wouldn't buy a music player from any other company now. Also they are currently the only hard drive players on the UK market, and they might be discontinued this September (I've heard that Apple are very hardcore and will discontinue profitable products in the name of innovation).

------------------------

How On The Go works - Hold the centre button down on the artist/album/song for one second and it will flash indicating that it has been added to a On The Go playlist. Repeat until you have finished selecting the content of the playlist.

As far as I'm aware On The Go cannot add songs to the list of songs that you are currently listening to. It's fiddly and inflexible in comparison to the Creative Zen Touch. It does work though and I found it easy to give up some old listening habits like queuing up my next album in advance.

0
LOUDspeaker | 19 August 2009 - 11:02am

160GB

I think it's a particular problem for the 160GB models which, as I mentioned in my previous post were discontinued by Apple because of these sorts of issues. I really wanted a 160GB version but was put of by the feedback on Amazon from disgruntled users (although there was plenty of positive feedback too). I hope that Apple will produce a larger version eventually but can imagine, as previously mentioned, that the will probably end up going down the 'solid state' memory route which may postpone the time when higher capacity iPods are available. Hey but it'll be great to have 'solid state' on electronic equipment again. I had a tape recorder with soli....(ad lib to fade)

0
Simondrsmith | 19 August 2009 - 11:22am

I've had a 160GB model for about 18 months now.

It's my first and only iPod and, apart from one brief scare where it froze inexplicably for a day or so a few months back, I've never had a moment's trouble with it - no battery issues, nothing. It's a lovely bit of kit, and I can't believe I held off on getting one for so long.

0
Joey Jones | 20 August 2009 - 4:58pm

Moi aussi.

The 160gb iPod Classic is a triumph of form and purpose. It's not as sexy as the iPod touch but the combination of ALL THAT MUSIC (even at high bit-rates) in a small package that works in my pocket, in my car and around the house, is a sheer joy.

I used to carry nearly 200 CDs in the car ! Not the originals, of course - hard drive failure isn't the ony way to lose stuff.

I'm really disappointed that devices like, and including, the iPod seem to be moving away from the larger capacities. I already can't get my whole iTunes library on my iPod and the prospect of going down to 120gb if this one fails, horrifies me.

All the indications are that in the short term at least, capacities will be kept small until flash memory prices fall to manageable levels (I thought the 160gb was discontinued for poor sales, not quaility issues ?), but that could take 2 years.

Can we not get a 240gb until the flash catches up ? You also need to develop an acute paranoia about backing up. Think once, think twice, think backup.

0
ainsley009 | 20 August 2009 - 11:30pm

Have I Got this Right ?

Apple may discontinue Ipod this September ! Where would that leave the user ? Any thoughts Loudspeaker, as you and others seem to know a lot about techno stuff. They recently supplied me with a 120gb Classic as a replacement for an 80gb with a battery fault. No problem. If this is so, could I continue to use it for it's natural lifespan. It's under warranty until next summer.Would Itunes be configured to work with new products etc. Sorry for all the questions, but would appreciate your thoughts if you have the time. This kind of thing gives me the 3am blue meanies.

0
RobertC | 19 August 2009 - 3:26pm

No

They're just looking to replace the type of storage, from hard drive (boo!) to solid state (hooray!)

Solid state storage = less moving parts = increased reliability.

0
Fraser Lewry | 19 August 2009 - 3:28pm

I don't quite understand

what is the difference i.e where is your music stored and does it sound any better/worse etc. ?

0
RobertC | 20 August 2009 - 10:52am

No difference in sound quality

but a huge improvement in reliability with solid state.

The hard disk iPods store the music on a teeny hard disk inside the iPod - it's spinning all the time the iPod is playing. The newer solid state iPods use computer memory, similar to that in a memory stick. Being a mechanical, moving bit of 'machinery', the hard disk is susceptible to failure through mechanical failure whereas the solid state memory has nothing mechanical to fail.

If you're really worried about sound quality then the big change came when Apple changed their DAC supplier from Wolfson to Cirrus - iPods post 5G use the integrated Cirrus chip; everything prior to that used a dedicated Wolfson DAC.

0
stimpy | 20 August 2009 - 11:35am

Thanks for that

Stimpy. A lot of you have given me valuable info re. techno questions recently, and I'm becoming a lot more savvy with it all. Many thanks.

0
RobertC | 20 August 2009 - 11:53am

SS less frustrating

The other advantage of solid state storage is that you can get at the data faster. After using a Nano on a daily basis I took the Classic on holiday and was quite frustrated by the delays in access. I must have lost a whole 30 seconds of my life!

0
JohnW | 20 August 2009 - 12:57pm

I wasn't fully aware

of the chipsets but it does explain the difference in sound between my 5G and my classic now. I think the 5G sounds a touch brighter, with slightly better top end.

0
illuminatus | 20 August 2009 - 8:11pm

No No No

Check this out for more info
http://9to5mac.com/September-apple-event-2009

0
ChaosandMorphine | 19 August 2009 - 6:27pm

if one must listen to an ipod through speakers

have a look at these

bought for my daughter - sound great and of course rca plugs for other inputs

http://www.aktimate.com/

0
Junior Wells | 19 August 2009 - 11:10am

I've only got a little one

I don't really see the point of having all your music with you all the time.

And if you do - the need to have it backed up is particularly critical.

Ipod is simply a means to an end for me - listening to music/podcasts - whilst travelling or discretely when The Light is watching something about lives of misery or re-designing suburban houses to become things of infinite light and space.

If you are a DJ or a musician I can see why you may need more functionality. But I am not.

I don't watch videos on the move except on long plane journeys when the selection available is more than sufficient - and indeed with youngish kids the only time I see anything new.

So for me, my little 8GB Nano is more than sufficient. I love the way it looks and feels too. Frankly, I get a small techo-erotic frisson every time I use it.

0
Sheev | 19 August 2009 - 11:46am

What??

"I don't really see the point of having all your music with you all the time"

Really? That's the best thing about it. Especially on holidays.

0
Five-Centres | 19 August 2009 - 3:59pm

For ages I used a Nano...

....and one of the things I *liked* about it was that it didn't have so much storage space. I don't want all my music with me all the time, any more than I want all my furniture with me all the time, or even, in the nicest possible way, my family with me all the time.

This year we went on the same holiday as we've been on for the last few summers. Each summer we take less stuff (clothes, toys, amusements etc) and each summer we come back thinking we took too much. I think it's a modern disease, this desire to carry everything with you.

0
David Hepworth | 19 August 2009 - 5:12pm

precisely

More than happy with the old 2gb Nano. That held 500 songs - more than enough for an entire holiday.

Let alone a quick tube trip or to blot out Design Location Dancing on Ice or whatever

0
Sheev | 19 August 2009 - 5:27pm

I'll tell you what the modern disease is

people moaning about having all their music with them.
I find it utterly incomprehensible that the opportunity to do this can be spun into a negative.
I understand the notion of having less space being good as it makes one pick only the best of the best, but to compare having all your music with you to having all of your furniture with you is just ridiculous.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 19 August 2009 - 6:43pm

Seconded

the big difference is that, due to the ephemeral nature of all those lovely bits on the iPod disc, it really is no more effort to carry 120Gb of storage than it is 2Gb. Not like humping a sideboard around at all. The marginal utility of having all that extra stuff is enormous. Alright, you may rarely be overtaken with the urge to play Zappa's 'Prelude to the Afternoon of a Sexually Aroused Gasmask', but if you are you can scratch that oh so transient itch.

0
illuminatus | 19 August 2009 - 8:39pm

It's so useful though

If I thought even 10 years ago I could carry my entire record collection around with me in a thing the size of a fag packet I'd never have believed it. But it's what I'd always wanted.

Perhaps it comes from being shipped from pillar to post - it meant I had to travel light and never had all my records with me in any one place. Now I do.

But that's just me. However, I still don't understand why, as a music fan, you wouldn't want all your music with at any one time.

0
Five-Centres | 19 August 2009 - 5:18pm

Same reason

that although i've got some nice suits I don't want to wear all of them at the same time

0
Sheev | 19 August 2009 - 5:28pm

Do you play all of your music at the same time then?

Of course not. The suit analogy doesn't add up.

Now you're just being contrary.

0
Five-Centres | 19 August 2009 - 5:30pm

I want

all my music with me as I can never decide what I want to listen to, relating to what mood I'm in. Favourite artists one day can become (almost) the last thing I want to listen to the next.
In all honesty, it's not all my music anyway - Apple will have to invent a 500GB iPod for that, and I currently have about 30GB worth of music that is held in suspension as it won't fit on my present Classic, but I'm told the 1TB iPod is only a few years away...

0
KDH | 19 August 2009 - 5:48pm

Not contrary

just saying how and when I use my Ipod. Which is - I make a choice (indeed a range of choices) from the available selection -which is stored on my laptop - which is with me pretty constantly anyway.

The notion that I might sudddenly want to hear James Chance's Contort Yourself when I have not sought it out for at least 15 years is implausible.

If the urge is overpowering - I shall exercise restraint until I am able to do so.

Or fire up Spotify

0
Sheev | 19 August 2009 - 5:57pm

also don't you just

play you ipod on shuffle anyway. Also with all you music collection I bet you play same 30 songs most often.

0
Chris G | 19 August 2009 - 6:12pm

Shuffle

works much better on my 4gb nano and its fine for day to day stuff. But I do like my 40gb old photo ipod for holidays and am tempted to get a classic while they are still made.

0
Leedsboy | 19 August 2009 - 9:48pm

if you are into lossless you need to get a 160

.if you can find one

0
Junior Wells | 19 August 2009 - 11:53pm

shuffle

I carry all 24,000 songs with me, but also about 80 various Smart & Genius playlists that are very varied in content. If I played the same 30 songs I would not own as many as I do (all purchased not pirated by the way)

0
Silverdog | 20 August 2009 - 7:10pm

Converted Creative User

Used to have a 60GB Zen until I lost sound on one channel. 3 years service, quite happy, but by then Creative only suuplied a 30GB machine. So reluctantly I went to an 80GB iPod 2.5 years ago and never had a problem. We now have 4 iPods running in the house from the same library and the latest Nano is the only one we have had trouble with. As it was bought 09/2008 I sent it back last week and a new one is one the way with the personalized engraving replicated. No cost, quibble or problem, UPS collection and TNT delivery all at Apple's expense. Cannot complain.

Sound was better on the Creative but with good isolating buds and sensible volume limits it is not too noticable.

Plus the immense amount of Podcasts available so easily through iTunes makes for a better experience than the limited Creative versions.

0
NHLamont | 20 August 2009 - 5:19pm

Lost mp3's

Maybe I am just paranoid... all my music files (24,000+) are stored on a 500gb Lacie external hardrive, and that plus all my jpegs (3-4,000) photos are backed up to a portable external Passport hard drive.

I have a 120gb iPod that I am very happy with, especially once I learned how to reset it. I love the 'genius' feature. Everytime I add music I will always "update my genius" so that when I do mixes they stay current to recent uploads.

As for the sound of mp3's being lost, look at all the space gained!! I have a pair of Bose Companion II speakers and the iPod plugs directly into the speaker, no dock, no fuss, no mess. I did the big stereo with tower speakers 30 years ago and to be honest the 'pure sound of vinyl' was only good until someone scratched the surface or the weather got humid, and when the music was played LOUD.

Having 23,000 songs sitting on my bookshelf with the opportunity to play any song within seconds is priceless!!

0
Silverdog | 20 August 2009 - 6:47pm

Genius Rocks!

I'll often buy an album, import it but only know a few songs on it. I'd like to give every new album i acquire the necessary time to breathe, but sometimes I don't; Genius is a great way to have new stuff constantly thrown at me - I build it around a song I like and the 'pod churns out a few like it that I might genuinely not have found otherwise.

0
ivan | 20 August 2009 - 10:42pm

You're not

paranoid.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 20 August 2009 - 6:52pm

I only bought one because

• my new car had an input
• I was fed up with CD-Rs all over the place
but
• mainly The Wordcast, honest, not being sucky or owt it's a perfect companion on a wet Tuesday and it's so nice to have them all stored in one handy to access place

I do listen to music but I like to hear old geezers ranting and raving about things that don't really matter.

thank you (the) Word

PS. more Mark Ellen and Andrew Harrison pls
no offence Frazer and Mr. H

0
James Blast | 20 August 2009 - 9:11pm

It's not an issue...

...because I was born in 1958, had a Binatone "portable" record player in '72 which pretty much obliterated all of my LP's, Binatone (wasn't rich) cassette player which destroyed all my tapes, then moved on to Hi-Fi separates, bought a Phillips CD solid state and a Linn Axis turntable, Rotel amp, Monitor Audio speakers, expensive cables, Creek tuner..well, you get the picture. My iPod Classic 80GB is the love of my life, I can listen through Bose sounddeck or headphones. I've backed everything up onto an external, but this happiness can't last forever. 15.000 songs, TV shows, audiobooks, CD's burned, games etc. What happens when the battery is fucked? I tried to change one on a Nano and screwed it up. And I've worked in places when I've downloaded songs and then been made redundant. No back ups for them. Compare the iPod to even the last generation Sony Cassette Walkmans (I paid about £80) and you realise what a wonderful world we live in. Why shouldn't you have all your music with you? It's the aural equivalent of sucking your thumb. Put shuffle mode on today whilst walking and the bugger came up with Dinosaur Jnr, KRS1, Ivor Cutler, Gallon Drunk, Big Youth, Beyond the Fringe, The Queers, Patsy Cline and NWA. Fantastic. I'll personally kill myself when my iPod dies. And shove it up my arse when you bury me.

0
chabsy | 20 August 2009 - 9:49pm

in the unlikely even that you're a Mac user

getting your tracks off the iPod back to the desktop iTunes is easy enough if you grab the wonderful Senuti (see what they did there?), which lets you copy files back from the 'pod to the 'puter.

Great for moving video files especially (because I've a nicely hi=speed connection at work).

0
illuminatus | 20 August 2009 - 10:41pm

"It's the aural equivalent of sucking your thumb."

Beautifully summed up.
(I'll personally kill myself when my iPod dies. And shove it up my arse when you bury me. - Pure poetry)

0
ChaosandMorphine | 20 August 2009 - 11:45pm

ipods

I have my music collection backed up on my computer, but I also backed it up to eight DVD's - 8,000 songs - took about 2 hours. That way, even if my computer fries, gets nicked, whatever, I have the collection backed up. Definitely recommend it
I use a Bose something or other with built in speakers to listen to the thing. Sound is just about OK, and battery life isn't an issue coz it's permanently being recharged, but sometime in the future when the kids are a bit older I definitely want to find some means of listening to my music with some of the quality I remember from my vinyl collection. At what stage in our life exactly do we trade shitty sound for convenience?

0
rodge | 20 August 2009 - 9:55pm

ChaosandMorphine

now, you're not being sarky you little monkeys are you?

0
chabsy | 21 August 2009 - 3:15am

No.

I wish I'd written it.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 21 August 2009 - 10:21am

Ipods and Apple Tv

What I have learned over the years.

1) iPods don't last forever. My black 1G Nano only works for a few minutes at a time now. Repair shop said the motherboard may have gone as the battery is okay.

2) The Nano sounds better than the iPod Touch which replaced it. But you get used to Touch sound over time and bass booster helps in the music settings.

3) Apple TV is not a lemon of you like music. My Apple TV was bought cheaply as it was refurbished by Apple. It - and not my computer - transmits to two Airport Expresses around the house which are connected to my stereo systems. This means my 10,000 tracks or so are easily accessible through the free Remote app on my Touch will allows me to skip track, change volume and hit the Genius button. The other things the Apple TV does - You Tube access, photos, movie downloads - are useful but not as essential as its use as a fantastic jukebox. It also needs plenty of ventilation as it runs hot!

4) You will have hard disc problems at some time. Experience has taught me to keep my collection on a external hard disc and every so often back it up to DVDs. When I get new music or podcasts the computer keeps them locally until the odd time I connect the hard disc and save the new content to it. When I am there, I turn on the Apple TV in Itunes preferences and it updates my apple tv with the new content.

5) Getting DVDs onto the Touch takes ages. For me. it's not really worth doing for a film you'll watch once. But it is worth taking the time for live music DVDs that'll you'll watch again and again.

5) This sounds complex but it's not really. When I'm on the train or in the house just wanting to listen to a track , it's about the music not the device. Apple's skill is making complex things simple. People forget they didn't invent the MP3 player - they just improved it!

0
russell123 | 23 August 2009 - 8:44am

Mac minis are cool

I use a Mk1 MacMini (with a bit more memory and a 250G hd) as my always on music server and it runs nice and cool so is probably a better choice than Apple TV (I've no idea how much one might cost on ebay these days) for a music only server.

0
JohnW | 23 August 2009 - 9:31am

That's why I never understood AppleTV

I always thought that the Mac Mini was a much better move. Slightly pricier yes, but you got more for your money.

0
illuminatus | 23 August 2009 - 2:18pm

All this technobabble is giving me a headache

Can we talk about makeup and shoes now, boys? :-)

0
Black Type | 23 August 2009 - 9:41am

I've spent many fruitless hours

looking into this Francis, because the EU Ipod volume cap renders me incandescent on prinicipal. All the info I found on the net said that ipod Classic was the only one that could not be rectified. Does volume booster work on it after all ? Otherwise, much as I love my Ipod, its future replacement or equivalent will be purchased from the US where they do't have this ridiculous fascist H & S nonsense.

0
RobertC | 30 August 2009 - 9:46am

There was a piece of software called 'go-pod'

which altered the firmware of the iPod to remove the volume cap. I gather that most other solutions simply increase the gain of all your tracks - with, of course, consaequent clipping of tracks already encoded at a high gain.

0
stimpy | 30 August 2009 - 11:04am

Just downloaded Gopod

and it says ' Ipod not detected '. Has Mrs Cravat (my firewall) struck again ?

0
RobertC | 30 August 2009 - 11:55am

Just done a quick trawl

Apparently, Booster only works on Apple Macs. Does anyone have any alternatives ?

0
RobertC | 30 August 2009 - 9:49am

iPod volume

@Jamsodonnell - I don't think iPod VolumeBooster excludes any models, but it does only work with Macs. I did a Google search a while ago for my partner who, inexplicably, uses Windows, and there were various alternatives. If you go to the VolumeBooster url - http://volumebooster.tangerine-soft.de/ - there's a link to Windows versions

0
Toffee the Cat | 31 August 2009 - 7:49am

Thanks Francis

after many attempts I finally managed to download EUPOD Volume booster ( my pc didn't let me in to 90% of them ). The problem is the appliction is saying that it can't detect my ipod, even though it's fecking plugged in and itunes is open ! I'm starting to despise my pc and Windows. It keeps thwarting and bullying me like some overbearing bitter Edwardian spinster. I give up. It's getting personal - I am always at war with the bugger. The more confident I get, the more it delights in terrorising me.

0
RobertC | 31 August 2009 - 8:53am

P.S.

does ANYONE know how I can get Eupod going ? My FPO is my bloody PC.

0
RobertC | 31 August 2009 - 9:00am

Update

I found out from tech sites is that EU pod programme needs to find/read the drive where my Ipod is located. Any life saving genius know how to do this ?

0
RobertC | 31 August 2009 - 10:26am

Don't use this

if you have an iPod classic. Just read the user reviews and it wipes your entire collection of music.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 31 August 2009 - 11:54am

I don't have an iPod....

.....but I assume you're connecting it via a USB port on your pc?

If so, hit Start>My Computer

and you will see all of the drives connected to your pc. It'll be connected to 'Devices with removable storage'.

Your pc hard drive is usually C and your CD/DVD drive may be called D or E.

On my pc, when I connect my Zen, it shows up as H or I.

0
bigsteviecook | 31 August 2009 - 12:00pm

Thanks

Stevie. I've tried that and I can find it where you say. However, I found conflicting opinions on the net re. Eupod, some saying it works well and others saying it can corrupt the pod and is then ok if resynced. I'm a bit confused so maybe I should leave it, could be a can of worms.

0
RobertC | 31 August 2009 - 1:37pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd