Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Holding back the music

AndyPage's picture

Sometimes an artist will lengthen their odds of success by deciding on a terrible band / album name, or perhaps even dreadful artwork.

I honestly think that Dogs Die In Hot Cars' album of splendid XTC-ish power pop would have stood a better chance if they hadn't been saddled with that awful name.

The View's second album, a far more adventurous and varied work than you might imagine, was blighted by the twin crimes of stupid name ('Which Bitch?') and artwork that looked like it had been scrawled in the playtime of a delinquent 3-year-old.

And of course Hard-Fi's notorious 'No cover art' campaign for their last album made it look like one of those albums in Woolworths where they had lost the sleeve and replaced it with a generic one. The songs were really good actually, if anyone got that far!

Can you think of any other cases where artists have voluntarily shot themselves in the foot in such a way?

0

Counting Crows

No matter how good their music may or may not be, a lead singer with a haircut like this is just taking the piss

2
mojoworking | 19 July 2011 - 7:16am

I'm listening to John Peel on A.U. FM

He's playing a track from the new Elliott Smith album.
"Two more from that Billy MacKenzie session later..."
*edit* s**t wrong thread. In my alternative universe such f**k ups will be impossible

0
STD | 19 July 2011 - 7:56am

The Beach Boys

Quintessential example. That name wasn't designed to be good for more than a couple of years. Stopped making sense right around 1964.

0
lukobe | 19 July 2011 - 8:18am

The Gaylads

may have outstayed their welcome, name-wise, too

1
mojoworking | 19 July 2011 - 8:48am

As did

Gay Dad

Another band that were badly held back by their name: their first album is actually really good

2
Nick | 21 July 2011 - 4:19am

Another one

is Daft Punk

0
mojoworking | 21 July 2011 - 4:32am

I Am Kloot

Just how successful would this (wonderful) band be if they were called something a little less off the wall - if they were called something like, erm, Elbow, perhaps?

1
Paul Waring | 19 July 2011 - 9:30am

Does It Offend You, Yeah?

I've never listened to them, partly because of that name.

Did we have a thread about this before? I think we might have done.

2
Rosbif | 19 July 2011 - 11:16am

Yup

I, too, have never intentionally heard of the aforementioned beat combo. I imagine them to be a bunch of stick-trousered Hoxtonite popinjays that invite the caption 'God help us if there's a war' (copyright M.E. Smith).

0
Jon | 19 July 2011 - 5:53pm

Very many rap/hip hop artists

have shit names and with such a cornucopia of crassness to choose from it's difficult to know quite where to start. But for me Gnarls Barkley is such a rubbish moniker I can't imagine ever listening to them by choice.

Even saying the name out loud seems like a crime against humanity.

0
mojoworking | 21 July 2011 - 4:35am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd