Hitsville or Soulsville?

After watching the splendid BBC4 documentary on Stax, I was wondering what the Word community's response would be to this question - if you had to make a choice, which would it be: Stax or Motown? Why?

Nailing my colours up, I'd have to go for Stax. They had a groove that the Motown silly symphonies just couldn't match.

Stax

They were records designed to be listened to, whereas Motown were records designed to be bought. Nowt wrong with that, but it's not the same thing.

Archie Valparaiso | 1 August 2008 - 11:25am

I think I get it

but it does beg the question what should you do with a Motown record once you'd bought it.

I'd go with Motown but just 'cos they did pop music at least as well as anyone else ever did.

Lee Rimmer | 1 August 2008 - 11:50am

I refuse to choose

we'll be gettting back to the old which is "more real debate" next.
Plus the film showed Stax where trying to sell record just as hard as Motown.
If I had to choose I go for Motown for the daytime stax for nighttime!

Chris G | 1 August 2008 - 11:29am

I meant the writers, arrangers and musicians' motivation

not the people in the office. I just think Smokey Robinson was probably more interested in having hit records than Dan Penn was, and that Diana Ross was more driven by the possibility of becoming a star than Mavis Staples was. I may be wrong, but that's the impression I still have when I listen to both.

Archie Valparaiso | 1 August 2008 - 11:40am

I think that's calumny on smokey and diana

the soild gold cadillac they sold off when they when stax went broke was presumably some kind of poem or love note to their higher calling.
Lets' just say they both loved muisc and weren't afraid of turning a shilling.

Chris G | 1 August 2008 - 11:49am

Ah, but death-throes Stax

is a whole nother kettle of fish. I meant Stax up to about when Isaac Hayes started releasing records under his own name. (Lucas'll understand. Er, Lucas? Where is Lucas?)

Archie Valparaiso | 1 August 2008 - 11:57am

Oh so it's comes down

to an exact time frame. So a few months seperate stax from good and bad, that's a handy argument.

Chris G | 1 August 2008 - 1:05pm

Read Guralnick's

Sweet Soul Music. It's all in there.

Archie Valparaiso | 1 August 2008 - 1:30pm

Ahh the ultimate pub gambit

I read it in a book.

Chris G | 1 August 2008 - 2:02pm

Motown or Stax,

how could I possibly choose? Sometimes I want something sweet, at others I want something salty. Sometimes it's the Temps doing "My Girl", and sometimes Otis.

nigelthebald | 1 August 2008 - 11:31am

All you need is Love

There was a comment on "All you need is love" part two to the effect that Motown was black music for white people.

Twangothan | 1 August 2008 - 11:44am

It does't mean it's true

or indeed makes any sense other than to be poorly veiled put down.

Chris G | 1 August 2008 - 1:03pm

And is a bit arse about face

I bet they didn't plan it that way. But actually, it's progress at least as before black music for white people needed white people (Bill Hailey, Elvis Presley et all) to front it.

Sounds to me like the way forward rather than the put down intended in the programme.

Lee Rimmer | 1 August 2008 - 11:55am

Silly silly silly

Many more white artists were players and writers for Stax, but to say that Stax was white music for black people would be as offensive as the motown slur. There is no colour to music: it is a SOUND. Vision is the sense for colour. Pedantry aside, it doesn't matter anyway. Cat fleas bite dogs.

Retropath2 | 1 August 2008 - 1:26pm

Well said,

that contributor! I've been bitten by both, and the itch is an exquisite pleasure.

nigelthebald | 1 August 2008 - 2:04pm

Why choose????

Blues or folk??

Punk or Free jazz???

Electro or Funk??

etc etc

Bang Em In Bingham | 1 August 2008 - 12:12pm

Because it's fun...

...and is purely intended as an exercise in prompting discussion, not to actually decide which is better. The very fact that you don't have to choose is what makes the game stimulating. Of course, we have different moods and different vibes that need satisfying and that might be The Four Tops this afternoon and Otis this evening.

That said, I do feel that if in some absurdly-twisted universe it came to an up-against-the-wall-gun-to-my-head-had-to-choose scenario it would be Stax. Before the meltdown.

Con Coleman | 1 August 2008 - 1:17pm

Motown.

The standard of songwriting, playing and singing was equal across both labels. But Motown had a sparkle that Stax didn't have.

And listen to those arrangements; magical, simply magical.

Stax had the dirty grooves, but Motown had that absolute sparkle!

SimonL | 1 August 2008 - 1:55pm

Or to take it a step further

Who do you prefer? The Funk Brothers or the MGs?

Crowdedmouse | 1 August 2008 - 2:26pm

Now that's the difficult one..

....because in the one sentence you have who I consider to be the best musicians ever....oh wow, now you've got me thinking....

SimonL | 1 August 2008 - 2:59pm

Devil's in the detail

Aye, good question. Now that I think about it I'd have James Jamerson over Duck Dunn. But overall?

Taken as a unit in their own right - ie, not as a backing band - the MGs gave us one of the greatest singles of all time and I can't think of any Funk Brothers singles off the top of my head.

Con Coleman | 1 August 2008 - 3:04pm

The Meters

I thank you.

collibosher | 1 August 2008 - 4:19pm

Motown for me.

Serious tuneage. Always want to like the Stax stuff more than I actually do.

Badgerous | 1 August 2008 - 3:57pm

Or take it a step further still

Books or film?
Pictures or music?
Telly or beer?
Sex or dinner?
(Clue: you are allowed to like both. Or all)

Retropath2 | 1 August 2008 - 4:23pm

Would anyone seriously

pick telly over beer?

Lee Rimmer | 1 August 2008 - 4:51pm

Books, music, beer...

Jeez, that last one's a toughie, though. It was all going so easily until then.

Badgerous | 13 August 2008 - 8:32pm

You are allowed to like both. Or all.

Yes, yes. We know. But we sometimes like to know why we like them. Or why some people like one over the other.
Personally I've always found sex and dinner to be a tad messy. It's a bugger to clean up.

Crowdedmouse | 1 August 2008 - 4:45pm

Theres an old joke......

...about the new service introduced to the old folks home, to liven them up a bit. Anyhow, day one and it starts, and the virile young social worker (probably, unless thats an oxymoron) bounds up to Ethel and says, loudly, down her ear trumpet: "Supersex!".
Ethel thinks for a moment before replying.
"Soup, please"

(Boom, boom!!)
P.S. Some of you will tell this joke tonight.

Retropath2 | 1 August 2008 - 5:00pm

Why do we have to choose?

Is there about to be a shortage or something?

And I can't believe nobody's mentioned the key difference between the two. One was Southern, the other was Northern. Everything else flowed from that.

Oh, and which was the most integrated?

David Hepworth | 3 August 2008 - 9:31pm

Hot on the Heels

...of the North/South contrast, is the Teen/Adult contrast. It's been repeatedly documented that one of Gordy's mission statements was that the songs had to speak to teens and their concerns -- losing a boyfriend/girlfriend, having a boyfriend who's "bad" but only she sees his inner good, etc. This dovetailed with Gordy's insistence on songs being written in the immediate 'now': "My baby's leaving me" versus "My baby left me". Auditioning the final product through a three inch car speaker insured it would be what teens would want to hear while cruising... it all adds up to a genius bit of demographic targeting (absolutely no disrespect intended, because the songs ARE brilliant regardless of marketing).

Stax, on the other hand, was more of an organic continuation of the jump blues and r'n'b tradition that had preceded it. It was the sound of the roadhouse, with all its attendant smoke and whiskey-soaked vibe, where you might get rolled in the parking lot. Adult concerns, not so much American-Bandstand-ready, with a few more years and failed relationships left behind.

As far as integration goes, Mark E. Smith claims that The Fall were almost signed to Motown (supposedly Motown execs heard the opening of "The Classical" and killed that idea). I guess I don't know enough about MES's veracity to judge whether it's an apocryphal tale or not. But I do know that Soupy Sales was signed to Motown. Still, the Funk Brothers were a long way from being integrated.

scooter | 7 August 2008 - 5:39pm