Entertainment For Lively Minds
Heroes to Zeros
On an earlier posting I was bemoaning the fact that I seemed to be suffering from musical burnout. A couple of people here suggested I listen to more radio. So last night I put a tentative toe back in the water and tuned into Radcliffe and Maconie.
At the end of the show they played the new single by Mark Knopfler, and it got me thinking as to why I am clueless about the sweatbanded plucker’s output over the past 20-odd years.
Back in the day the Dire Straits and Communique albums were sublime. By Making Movies and Love Over Gold the cracks were beginning to show, but not enough to put me off. Then, along came the monster that was Brothers In Arms (and Money For Nothing). From that point on I found it almost impossible to listen to them, let alone admit to ever liking them.
This is not an isolated incident. A similar fall from grace applies to UB40. First four albums, great. Red, Red Wine and Labour Of Love comes along and aforementioned LP’s are winging their way to the Record and Tape Exchange.
I was never a big Billy Joel fan but could see the appeal of Springsteen with a piano schtick of the early albums. Then, you guessed it, along comes An Innocent Man.
Sure, they got a lot of new fans and made shedloads of money. But what would you rather have, short term success or a body of work which stands the test of time?
And while we’re at it, any more examples?
- More from Uncle Sil.
- Login or register to post comments









I Was Thinking About This ....
...at work when Manfred Mann's Eartband came on. Huge clutch of poppy singles and then into a cul de sac. Same goes for Roy Wood, ELO and so many more that just fizzled away into what - touring America and being too busy or needing artistic merit??
Did you enjoy the sweatbanded plucker's new song?
( I really like it, reminds me of the Chieftains' 'Give The Fiddler A Dram'.)
re People having ginormous hit albums with lesser material - so what?! Now the fuss has died down - 25 odd years later... - just play their other stuff you DO like.
Border Reiver
On first listen I was impressed (features the brilliant John McCusker). Gonna check the rest of it out on Spotify. Maybe I'm not suffering from musical burn out after all...
U2 (twice)
1. Rattle and Hum (perhaps, the most crushingly disappointingly rubbish follow-up to brilliant LP, ever.
Despite exonerating themselves with the decent Achtung and Zooropa, they did it again with the bloody terrible
2. Pop
Lost interest in them after that.
Up to a point...
I agree they went down the toilet after Zooropa. But to my ears Rattle and Hum is nearly as good as The Joshua Tree.
Rattle and Hum
is my first port of call when in the U2 section of the CD rack. I think its tremendous.
God Part II anyone?
no thanks, me neither
I...umm...ahem...errr
quite like....
*deep breath*...Pop!
*Get's coat and runs for the door at break-neck speed*
Stereophonics
Not a fall from grace, more running out of ideas (or can no longer flog the original idea)
First two albums were exccedingly good - still listen to them
Just Enough Education to Perform - OK
You Gotta Go There To Come Back - what is this?
Language. Sex. Violence. Other? - its not getting any better
Pull The Pin - has its moments, but still a case of Hmmm
The Hepworth Constraint
Tusk saw off Fleetwood Mac, by the time of Physical Graffiti Led Zeppelin were seen as pretty much a spent force, most people abandoned Elvis Costello after his incursion into George & Tammy country, and even ABBA might as well have departed the scene after Arrival instead of soldiering on, for all most people cared.
It's just the Hepworth Constraint at work again: even highly successful acts have a period of three years in which to do all their best work, plus a year on either side for their rise and fall from grace. It's quite easy to identify which segment of an artist's career this applies to - it's the ones that all the songs that people shout out for at gigs come from.
Ludlumism
Love the title, Archie.
How about The Valparaiso Obfuscation? Just kiddin ;-)
Any other Word-related Ludlumisms anyone?
The Mossman Prophecies
Oh.
The Lewry Exigency
(to keep the voting arrows or not)
The Ellen Hilarity
Ha HA HA Ha! (cue bleeding ears among podcast listeners)
The Hepworth Constraint
Can this be cured by the Ellen Manoeuvre?
Re: ABBA
I would suggest that good though the Arrival era was, they produced even better work (sophisticated adult angst, to a disco beat) on subsequent albums The Album, Super Trouper and The Visitors.
Except
Physical Graffiti was Zeppelin's best album. It's not a discussion Dave...
It's got bloody 'Kashmir' on it... what more can one want?
OK then...
'Trampled Underfoot'
'The Rover'
'Custard Pie'
'Ten Years Gone'
'In My Time Of Dying'
'The Wanton Song'
Not a bad record, is it?!
But...
I think David's wrong about this. He has an understandable tendency to move towards laws and generalizations. The original post was about Knopfler; I think all of his solo records have a lot to recommend them - it's just that the first Dire Straits record had a sound that seemed fresh and new with Sultans on it. I went through a period where I just listend to his solo records for a couple of months and apart from a tendency to slighly mellow out I think if we had changed the song writing credits to R Thompson and had Richard sing them then I think critics would have said that they were a welcome return to form and tunefulness.
I think artists can't recapture 'attention' which is entirely different from producing good work. For Elvis I think King of America is his best work (1986) and Blood and Chocolate is remarkable from the same year!! But I really like The River in Reverse (2005) with Allen Tousaint.
I agree with David on many things but not on this. It's a bit too glib. Plus he also claims that the 2nd side of The Band is no good which has deeply troubled me in terms of his judgement.
But it works
You seem to think the Constraint is about quality, but it's really about hipness. It's not about retrospectives or reappraisals; it's about the period during which the NME was phoning your manager rather than the other way round.
Since we've raised Elvis Costello, he serves as a good example of just how accurate the Constraint usually is. Elvis's "arrival year" was 1977, with the first album as his up-ramp. He then rode the plateau of peak hipness for three years ('78-'80) with This Year's Model, Armed Forces and Get Happy. His slip-from-the-spotlight year, 1981, was marked by the oops-he's-losing-it-a-bit albums Trust and Almost Blue.
Yes, he's had a few blips of success and re-encounters with magazine covers since then, but the peak segment of his career remains as clear as day. Look at it this way, at his gigs, how often do people call out for songs from Blood & Chocolate rather than for "Alison", "Detectives", "Pump It Up", "Radio, Radio", "Chelsea", "Oliver's Army", "Accidents Will Happen, "Can't Stand Up...", "Peace, Love & Understanding" or "High Fidelity"?
With another of the examples I mentioned, Led Zeppelin, the Constraint is even clearer. They released albums over an eleven-year period, but the bulk of the setlist at their O2 reunion was made up of songs from their 70-72 heyday. Can you imagine how pissed off people would have been if, instead of "Whole Lotta Love", "Stairway", "Rock and Roll", "Black Dog", "Dazed and Confused", "Moby Dick" and so on, it had been "Here's another one from Houses of the Holy we hope you'll like." A recipe for certain disaster.
Not to split hairs but
I am enjoying this robust discussion and since this is about pop culture not anything academic I guess it doesn't really matter (can you hear the but coming like a freight train runnin') BUT in your post, Archie, you did say a few years to do their 'best' work. Now you say the constraint is about hipness. That is as you say an entirely different matter. I don't recall David's original thing about the constraint - i remember him talking on the pod about this sort of thing. But even so, I think that there is often a slide from a hipness discussion into quality. I did say in my post that they don't capture 'attention' so I deny the allegation in the first sentence.
The Zep example seems axiomatic, I agree. But there are enough exceptions that they don't prove the rule.
I continue to be amazed that anyone ever wants to hear Stairway again... but that's not relevant.
I realised it wasn't "best"
Precisely because of "Stairway", which everyone is obviously beyond sick to death of. But it really was hip once, honest - I remember it well.
And yes, of course there are exceptions. Most notably, there are the returnees, who manage to slip back under the spotlight - often under a quite different musical guise - after a long time in the wilderness. They include Tina Turner (with Ike, then solo in the '80s), Joe Cocker (Woodstock era, then Eighties), Paul Simon (with AG, then Graceland era)
Elkie Brooks and Robert Palmer (with Vinegar Joe, then solo in the '80s), Rolling Stones and The Who ('64-66, then 70-72-ish), and, of course, the one special case of two consecutive three-year heydays, The Beatles (1964-69).
But, in most cases, the rule of the single three-year reign really does apply - T.Rex, Slade, Queen, Dire Straits (who started all this), U2, REM, Oasis... the list goes on and on.
Just to take one example from that top-of-head list, Queen. Their heyday was 1974-76. The shout-out test works here too. Although nobody would be too upset if, towards the end, they didn't play some of the later hits like "Radio Gaga" or "Crazy Little Thing Called Love", a Queen gig without "Killer Queen", "Somebody To Love" or "Bohemian Rhapsody" would have been simply unthinkable.
and another thing
As a Queen fan - best albums were up to Day at the Races and then they become popular and sold out.....
Trouble is people remember Queen for their commercial naff tunes - "I want to break free", "radio gaga" and "we are the champions" are 3 good examples rather than remembering them for say "Good 'ol fashioned lover boy", "Liar" and "Brighton Rock".
Personally Queen needs to be laid to rest - Queen with out Freddie is just pointless - Paul Rogers is not not a patch on him and I would not waste my money listening him ruin Queen classics - if indeed they did play them......
In what way is 'Good Old Fashioned...'
less "commercial and naff" than 'I want to break free'?
Not sure about REM
Personally, I'd be delighted if I saw them and they played nothing later than Document. I suspect that a significant section of their audience would be bewildered.
There is a reliable test though - the live one, as you allude to above. When an act tours, do they play songs from their new album plus others from a specific heyday and nothing in-between? If so, they fit your hypothesis. If they play a set that stretches through their career, including songs from the previous 2 or 3 albums, then they don't.
I think we could all come up with lists for both.
Actually after thinking about it
The Dire Straits example doesn't work at all.
First album 78 (Sultans, Wild West End)This album is very successful
Communique 79 (Lady Writer)
Making Movies 80 (Romeo and Juliet, Tunnel of LOve,Skateaway)This album is
Love Over Gold 82 (Telegraph Rd, Industrial Disease
Brothers in Arms 85 megastardom.
So three year period doesn't seem to apply.
I understand if we are all past this topic.
Costello, agreed; LZ, not really...
Taking your last paragraph, Archie, I admire your cunning selection of "Houses Of The Holy" as an example of an LZ album with (relatively) few friends, but your point wouldn't have worked had you chosen "Physical Graffiti", which contains several of the band's most popular numbers, especially "Kashmir" and "Trampled Underfoot" (and "In My Time Of Dying" and "The Rover", come to think of it), which would be very vocally in demand at any future reunion gig. In "hipness" terms, too, it probably constituted a second peak of the band's popularity with the public, and critical credibility. I clearly recall that "Physical Graffiti" was THE big album story in all the inkies for a period of several weeks around its release.
So I really do think the Hepworth Constraint doesn't apply to LZ, whether in terms of hipness, quality, or popularity.
F F's Sake!
I know people have me and Mark Henry Ellen so blurred in their minds that they greet us with each other's names but let the record reflect the fact that Mark Ellen is the one who said he's never heard the second side of The Band's second album because he was afraid he wasn't going to like it as much as the first side.
Neither one of us said that it was "no good".
You're Dec,
he's Ant, right? :-)
well...
I shouldn't have said 'no good'. I was just being lazy since I knew it was slightly more nuanced than that. My recollection is actually that someobdy said that the 2nd side was no where near as powerful as the first. Given that it starts Jemima Surrenders and finishes with King Harvest it stuck in my craw. I thought it was you. I must be wrong. Shall I dig the pod out and let the record show...?
Believe me when I tell you that I yield to no one...
...in my love of The Band's second album but the fact that the first side starts with Across The Great Divide, Rag Mama Rag and - for God's Sake - The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down and the second side doesn't pretty much proves the point. Doesn't mean the other side is poor. It's just not as good. In 999 out of 1000 cases albums begin with the songs the band and the producer consider the best. Anyway, how did we end up splitting hairs like this?
I am going to say this really quietly and feel safe in Australia
Because I can take or leave "Night They Drove..."
Well, there's no hope for you
You're just wrongity-wrong to the power of wrong in the land of so wrong.
with a side-order of wrong from me.
He is more wrong than...
Wrong Jock McWrong the most wrongity-wrong man in Scotland!
Because of Robbie Robertson's...
...guitar solo on "Unfaithful Servant" alone, Side 2 wins every time.
Archie, Are you really...
...really writing off Tusk, Physical Graffiti and The Visitors, all of which are fantastic albums?
No
But the world's record-buying public did at the time, and that's what counts.
Again, it's not about quality in hindsight; it's about hipness at the time.
What is it
with you and "Physical Graffiti", Archie?
OK, from Wikipedia, but nonetheless:
"Physical Graffiti was commercially and critically successful; the album is 16 times platinum (though this only signifies sales of 8 million copies, as it is a double album) in the United States alone, and has come to be regarded as one of Led Zeppelin's defining works. In 2003, the album was ranked number 70 on Rolling Stone magazine's list of the 500 greatest albums of all time."
Ah.
Er, exception that proves the rule then, innit.
In defence of Mark Knopfler
A couple of years ago he made an excellent record with Emmylou Harris. It has a song on it called "This Is Us", which is one of my favourite records of the century.
Can I second that?
'All The Road Running' their 'Raising Sand'.
Beachcombing
The opening track.
He does wistful very well.
Thirds for This Is Us
A brilliant love song about long-married folks reminiscing with their photo album. Sailing To Philadelphia, with James Taylor, is another great Knopfler collaboration.
Simple Minds
Life in a Day
Real to Real Cacophony
Empires and Dance
Sons and Fascination/Sister Feelings Call
New Gold Dream
and then....
Sparkle in the Rain
...and onwards and downwards at a rate of knots.
Too true
Long, long way from up here:
...down to the likes of this:
(squirm)
Genesis
Said many times before I'm sure. In love with the Gabriel incarnation. Rated very highly 'Trick of the Tail' but they had lost some magic. With 'Wind and Wuthering', Hackett's involvement was noticeably reduced but there was still hope. With Hackett's leaving, 'And Then There Were Three' and 'Duke' there were serious doubts but still some wonderful moments. With 'Abacab' they lost me and Genesis became 'The incredible shrinking Phil Collins Band'.
More rubbish as they became more popular...
I was never a Gabriel fan - those strange costumes put me off - for me Trick of the tail/And then there were 3/Duke were the best albums - plus Seconds Out gets a thrashing on my ipod.
In fact I listened to live stuff from their last tour and compared with Seconds Out - the latest stuff was dull, populist and played with little feeling.
You become popular and your work suffers because you compromise....happened with Queen too
ELO
From Eldorado to Out Of The Blue, although Discovery through to Balance Of Power still had some good tracks on them
XTC bucked the trend they came back after their seven year strike with perhaps their best album Apple Venus Vol 1
As for Billy Joel I think Innocent Man is one of his best albums,it is after it when he came unstuck.
Radiohead
They lost me at Kid A and never regained the initiative. For a few years I thought, hey, maybe this is all my fault not them. Maybe I need to open my mind and my ears. But now I'm over it. Can't listen to their stuff anymore apart from the seminal OK Computer and the Bends.
Take the best songs from Kid A and Amnesiac
and you have an album to challenge OK Computer and the Bends honest, I might even post a spotify playlist called Kid Amnesiac if you are lucky
Yes but ...
... that would be 'In Rainbows'.
here we are
Kid Amesiac: http://open.spotify.com/user/marbles22/playlist/1yTrhjhgJI807Abq14cIRA
whilst I respect
your commitment to creating a new album from two (I like that sort of logic, for example could one brillient film be fashioned from Kill Bill 1 and Kill Bill 2?)
I feel obliged to state that Kid A is a masterpiece. It was a grower not a shower. But once its there it stays there. It is beautiful, precise and artistically satisfying.
My favorite radiohead album though is still OK Computer, followed by The Bends, but Kid A comes in at number 3.
However Amnesiac is awful and I haven't liked any of their albums since then.
Pablo Honey is under-rated I think to be honest: http://open.spotify.com/album/2y8VvhQOgtAEljf5fQDIJ1
Anyone Can Play Guitar, Stop Whispering and Thinking About you are all unrembered but they are great songs. That album shows the band finding themselves and is refreshing for that. Unlike later stuff which sounds like they have disapeered into themselves.
Disagree
The opening track is startling jawdropping
Title track curiously beautiful (great in the Sopranos).
National Anthem isn't exactly easy listening, but its gripping, compelling stuff.
How to Disappear Completely (the first "normal" track) is the best on the LP.
Downhill from there, but a brave album with substance nonetheless.
Having said that, have never gotten to the end of Amnesiac on the solitary occasion I gave it a go (day it came out)
Unlikely comebacks
Few people in 1990 would have predicted Weller would have come back with the fantastically invigorating Into Tomorrow, let alone create the brilliant Wildwood album within another couple of years (much better than its far bigger selling successor Stanley Road, I feel). One of the most impressive comebacks ever.
Here, here. Wildwood still
Here, here. Wildwood still sounds brilliant and is a very rewarding listen to this day. I'm with you on Stanley Road, too. Although, I am not sure that 22 Dreams is as good or as revolutionary as was posited on its release last year.
22 Dreams
Is good but not great. A lot of the shine was derived from the fact that it was just SO much better than Illumination, Heliocentric or the God awful covers album.
paul weller
i was a jam fan right from the word go, i still have my original copy of the "in the city", i bought everything by the jam on vinyl, on cassette when i went to uni. and the boxset on cd), i stuck with him through the style council years(criminally underated material that kicked-off the acid jazz thing, imho)... and his solo stuff blew all that away, more than just a return to form.
then came "heliocentric".
i tried to like it, bloody awfull, self indulgent nonsense.
Good but...
...nothing like as good as its overlooked predecessor, 'Paul Weller'.
Am on Spotify
giving the Knop's new one a go. I like it a lot. A hint of Richard Hawley on some of them.
Oasis
Surely Oasis are a cardinal example of the heroes to zeros. One superb (debut) album, massive selling follow-up which isn't as good and then a very slow and often undignified slide into being their own tribute act.
Good spot, Paddy.
And probably most relevant because I don't think anyone can disagree with it.
Oasis
are definately the first band that sprung to my mind.
Blue Öyster Cult
The first four albums were great but then came a steady slide.
Archie applied malleus squarely to the nailular cephalic region with his point about songs shouted for at gigs.
The constraint works but slightly shifted
In BOC's case I'd say the era in question mostly covers 74-77, i.e. "Secret Treaties" to "Spectres". Eric Bloom once said the two songs they couldn't avoid playing were "Reaper" and "Godzilla". Since "On your feet..." is also from that time you could argue all the best songs from the first three albums are also covered. Sort of.
Stevie Wonder?
Took a precipitous plunge down the bowl after 1982's mighty That Girl. His last album was a particularly sorry listen.
But Stevie did do
Music of my mind
Talking Book
Innervisions
Fulfillingness First Finale
Songs In The Key of Life
All in the space of four years - I'm not sure The Beatles even top that run.
They
don't
Let's agree to differ
Help! (released August 1965)
Rubber Soul
Revolver
Sgt Pepper
White Album (greatest album ever made - It's not a discussion etc etc)
Abbey Road (released September 1969)
Plus they'd recorded, if not released, Let It Be and then there was the Yellow Submarine soundtrack which included Hey Bulldog, much revered in other blogs of this parish.
Then there was the Magical Myster Tour EP, a bunch of glorious singles not included on the albums such as We Can Work It Out/Day Tripper, Paperback Writer/Rain, Strawberry Fields Forever/Penny Lane, Lady Madonna, Hey Jude/Revolution, Ballad of John & Yoko.
Not a bad shift really.
yeah but
Sgt Pepper isn't very good which makes it 3+3
not very good because...
?
Myth
and the musical reality are hard to separate in all matters Beatles.
The ears never do their work unaided when it comes to Fab work. Filters of yearning, loss, memory, desire - always all at play too.
No similar myths surround Stevie Wonder's work in the early 70s. It is unalloyed genius.
Granted
Although given I was born in 1964, my appreciation of their work isn't anything to do with being there at the time - they'd been and gone before I took any notice.
I still think that period was extraordinary on its own merit, remastered or not. For my ears, that is genius of the highest water too.
Pass the chutney dear boy and come listen to this Sylvian record.
The Zeitgeist
Sgt Pepper is associated too closely with the first summer of love. I certainly wouldn't put it anywhere near Rubber Soul, Revolver, Abbey Road or The Beatles. I was flabbergasted to read that it was the most popular remaster in the UK ,although not anywhere else it seems.
Perception or reality?
Most people think of Sgt. Pepper's as being the album where they went all hippy-trippy, but if you look closer it's not the whole story. Yes, there is Lucy in TSWD and Within You Without You but many of the other themes of the album are more kitchen sink than Haight-Ashbury:
With a Little Help...
She's Leaving Home
When I'm Sixty Four
Lovely Rita
Good Morning...('time for tea and Meet the Wife')
A Day in the Life (minus the 'I'd love to turn you on' part)
Getting Better is a tight little pop song that would have fitted easily on Revolver. Fixing a Hole is trippier but still a lovely, simple song.
I think 'Pepper' is tainted by association with the prog excesses it spawned, but the album itself is very much representative of what the Beatles did better than any of their peers - socially aware, fantastically melodic pop songs.
yep
couldn't agree more
Jefferson
Jefferson Airplane..................Jefferson Starship.
Wow.
Politically, Jerry Rubin's Yippie/Hippie/Left Wing credentials were 'slightly' compromised by his slavish devotion to the 'free' market of the Reagan era.
Watch this space for Redknapp's fall at Tottenham.
REM
Opinions will vary as to when the slide began, but surely all wil agree - slid they did.
For all the claims that Accelerate is a return to form
I much prefer Reveal.
There's controversial!
Around The Sun
is better than Accelerate
You must really hate
You must really hate Accelerate!!! I was so burnt by the "Sun" that I have no interest in buying an album by them ever again. In fact, sometimes it feels as if I have altogether gone off them. But somebody on here a while ago inspired me to give a really hard listen to Up and I thought it was okay, better than I thought.
Green
And downhill at a startling rate of knots thereafter.
Tried again to listen to Automatic for the People again the other day. It really is turgid.
I disagree
REM are definitely a band that disprove the hepworth theory, I reckon they had 12 (ish) great years, Murmer '81 through to Automatic '92 (I think). Not a bad run, all told, and some of their subsequent albums have been pretty good.
Not entirely true
After the ghastly awfulness of Monster (utter crap, bar "Tongue") - New Adventures in Hi-Fi wasn't half bad (hit and miss, but the high points were (are) sublime).
Listened to Up once and once only. "Daysleeper" apart, didn't really hit any spots.
Wide berth ever since (given the hideous singles they've released subsequently).
I'm with John
Automatic For The People really was just that. Going-through-the-motions-on-autopilot toss for all the johhnys-came-lately, probably at the behest of the record company. But they tucked Find The River on the end just to remind us what they could do when they wanted.
What the romans did
After 'Automatic...' they have been more hit than miss but I still maintain they have had about 12 good years. The IRS output was pretty much peerless but apart from at least 6-7 classic albums what else have they done......
Not many bands manage 3 good albums so REM are well above 'par' IMHO.
"Probably at the behest of the record company"?
Why do people blame everything they don't like on anyone but the act? Isn't that the one that's got most of the songs on it that most people like?
Surely that second sentence
Surely that second sentence could not have been written by a seasoned journo? Was drink involved?
David..
"Isn't that the one that's got most of the songs on it that most people like?"
Which, presumably, is why it sold a lot. Which, presumably, brought joy to the record company who were pleading for something with a few more crowd-pleasers on it. And I still cite Everybody Hurts as the case for the defence. Crude, cliched, clodhopping, emotion-by-numbers vocals lumped over an equally crude arpeggioed guitar line. Pap for the masses. The band were taking the piss. That is not an REM song.
Sorry?
Drive
Try Not to Breathe
The Sidewinder Sleeps Tonite
Everybody Hurts
New Orleans Instrumental No.1
Sweetness Follows
Monty Got a Raw Deal
Ignoreland
Star Me Kitten
Man on the Moon
Nightswimming
Find the River
Looks to me like a fantastic selection of brooding menace (Drive), brooding menacing lust (* Me Kitten) quirky commerciality (Man on the Moon, Sidewinder) dark beauty (Try Not to Breathe, Nightswimming, Find the River) and, yes, heartfelt sincerity (Everybody Hurts). OK, 'Ignoreland' I could indeed ignore but it remains one of the greatest rock albums ever.
"Going-through-the-motions-on-autopilot toss" indeed! I think over-familiarity has perhaps blinded you to its true qualities.
What about
Nightswimming? Sweetness Follows? Both beautiful songs. And I reckon the likes of Sidewinder, Everybody Hurts and Man On The Moon have suffered in many people's revised evaluation through their sheer overplayed ubiquity, ditto Losing My Religion.
Just wrong, Lenny
I've said it before, I've said it again : REM are overrated - a band that can turn a very pretty tune at war with a loony poet frontman. AFTP boasts their best pretty tune:'poetry' ratio and sold accordingly. That said, I agree about Find The River being a thing of the utmost perfection, you little speedy head.
Prince
Downhill all the way after Sign of the Times.
Diamonds and Pearls
and "squiggle" are both pretty good, in my view.
There's loads of good stuff
in Prince's output since his alleged (ahem) purple patch, as I've mentioned on here countless times before. Sure, the quality control is somewhat wonky at times, but there are gems on most of the albums he has produced, and occasionally he sustains the goods across a full album (I would suggest The Gold Experience and his most recent two sets as evidence). Going back to Archie's main thesis about the three-year peak period of fame and popularity, obviously Prince 1984-87 nearly fits into this, although I would venture that a run of 21 sold-out nights at the O2 some twenty years after this 'peak' isn't bad going for someone whose popularity has apparenty waned.
The Gold Experience
Agreed to the power of whatever.
I would go so far as to say that 'Gold' itself out-Purple Rains Purple Rain itself, in its guitar frettowankery bit, if you know what I mean...
Welcome to the Dawn, anyway...
Gold
I first heard this live in Sheffield at the end of a stupendous concert, way before the CD was finally released. By good fortune I was about ten rows from the front, which at the Arena feels mighty close. He didn't play any of the 'hits' which, to me, made it even more special as 'one for the die-hards'. Sublime moments were the unholy scream during Endorphinmachine; his solo piano rendition of I Love U In Me (amazement all around); and this astonishing new song at the end (title then unknown) complete with Mayte floating above the audience through a cascade of golden foil, and the final guitar wigout going onandonandon...
just a fantastic (gold) experience...
that three year thing...
bands don't channel creativity from the great beyond, it's more like they embody a certain number of influences and ideas at large in the (global) culture, recombining them into tunes ... for a brief period (3 years?) maybe they embody something quite resonant for many people but then a new generation comes along (the ones who were only going through puberty when you were selecting your university of choice/looking for a job) ... and so the circle turns ... if a band stays 'hip' after three years then they've pulled of something rather incredible, almost like feeding off their own kinetic energy to keep going...
The three years rule is not mine
I have always credited it to Louis Menand who coined it in an article in The New Yorker. I think it's a very useful lens to look at people's careers through. I think it was Archie who said on this very thread that your three year period produces all the songs that the majority of the crowd call for at concerts.
springsteen
that doesn't work for the boss as the crowd are likely to call for a track from anything from asbury park to the rising.
(arm in a sling so can't do caps)
True, but
Let's see him try to play an E-Street Band gig with nothing at all from Born To Run or Darkness. There'd be a riot. He could do a show with nothing at all from any other two albums and I doubt anybody would even notice, much less care,
(By the way, the Constraint doesn't work for Springsteen also because of his forced three-year hiatus after BTR.)
I think they might notice if
I think they might notice if nothing from Born in the USA, Archie.
The constraint also doesn't work for Springsteen because he went stratospheric with Born in the USA nearly 9 years after BTR.
You could
press CapsLock. Shirker. :-)
The Cure
After Wish (1992) they produced Wild Mood Swings, Bloodflowers, The Cure and 4:13 dream, four horribly average albums. There are a few highlights contained on each (Jupiter Crash, Anniversary) but compared to their previous efforts these albums are almost inlistenably unoriginal and tired sounding.
Wrong about Knopfler
His solo work is excellent without exception. His fanbase is still immense. I tried to get tickets for one of his 5 nights at the Albert Hall - sold out. His stadium gigs have been on sale a week and are nearly sold out. New CD is excellent. He is a perfectionist in his stage performances and a much underrated songwriter.
Regarding Costello I have a theory that the reasons for the preference for his earlier songs is that they were all singles - a format that is no longer popular. Same thing applies to David Bowie, Elton John, Rod Stewart etc etc. Singles put artists into the homes of a wider audience - we dont listen to this music in the same way these days but certainly with Costello he has written songs in the latter part of his career that are the equal of his earlier catalogue and in some instances better. His last album sold 80,000 in the first six weeks of release - certainly not a 'Thriller' scale release but respectable in this time when people illegally download.I think we have selected memories and rose tinted glasses when we compare the past to the present. Live for today I say.
Might there not be another reason?
Most of us only have a certain capacity for listening to music. When people know ten records by a particular artist they don't need any more. They would prefer to deploy their excess enthusiasm elsewhere. Nothing wrong with that.
Agreed
I'm something of an admirer of his. Still enamoured of the first three Straits albums. Really did not like Brothers In Arms at all, mainly due to the polish of production thats all over it like cellophane over a chav's sofa. That and the fact that songs like 'One World' and 'Ride Across The River' seemed so formulaic and charmless after the richness of his earlier stuff.
Unlike most here though I've found his solo output of much more interest than Straits. He's become a folkie. Comparisons with the likes of Thompson and Hawley are on the money. For nothing else he deserves great great credit for songs like '5:15am', 'Shangri La' and 'Beachcombing'.
Oh, I have purchased but not yet received 2 tickets for one of the 5 nights at the RAH next year. It's pretty much likely that Mrs B will not want to come with me this time having seen him twice already (she's not a fan really) so if her ticket does become a spare I shall keep you in mind, Mr Turner. If you can bear the idea of meeting up with a total stranger! Let me know if you're interested or not and I may be in touch nearer the time.
The real power of Spotify
What I was trying to convey in the original post is that I didn't have an opinion one way or the other regarding his solo work as he went completely off my radar after Brothers In Arms.
I take your word that his solo work has been first class. And what I've heard of the new album through Spotify has been rather impressive. So much so I'm gonna buy Get Lucky this weekend. And check out other solo stuff. The real power of Spotify.
Philadelphia
I first listened to this on the way from back from a god-awful day of rugby in Diss.
Dark, pouring rain, and a hellish drive. And it simply passed me by like...like...well, I was home before I knew it. That album just blew me away. Still does. Lyrics, musicianship.
I have very very few "go to" albums. 'Philadelphia" is one of them.
is there a direct correlation
..between the slow decline in the quality of material and the assertion in interviews that said album is 'the best thing we've ever done'/'back to basics'/'it's our best since....'?
REM, The Stones and The Cure all serial offenders on all three counts of the above
circles
As per my earlier comments, I agree (with Steve T) about Knopfler and as intimated, think that his popularity in an earlier ( 25-30 yrs!!) ago has prevented an appreciation of his solo work which in some ways resembles the much more lauded Richard Thompson. But Archie's point was and David's and Menand's (as it turns out) is that there is a focal point, an intensity which produces a receptiveness in the audience which the artist simply does not recapture. That is, of course, the nature of pop music and it is independent of the quality of the work. It's partly why The Beatles run is amazing still though such a different era, much less competition in terms of pop culture as a whole and their career was so extraordinarily compressed. The Stones really had a five year run with a brief flirtation in 81 with Start Me Up as a single. I wonder if there is a sense in which by the time Start Me Up hit the charts they were actually able to break through to a newish audience and hence, in a way were a new band for that moment.
In Paul Williams work on Dylan he refers to the relationship an audience has with the artist and talks about the whole process of initial romance with the audience, the difficulty in sustaining long terma and wide spread connection with that audience. I think that is a rich source for consideration.
Simply Red
Another group that lost it....as Hucknall's waist line increased, their creativity diminished.....
I was unaware
that they even had it in the first place.
Ooh.....Picture Book
A great record.
Although he's great
in his new career as Bianca's daughter Tiffany in 'Enders.
Sick Boy's take on all this.........
Sick Boy: It's certainly a phenomenon in all walks of life.
Renton: What do you mean?
Sick Boy: Well, at one time, you've got it... and then you lose it... and it's gone forever. All walks of life: George Best, for example.
Had it, lost it. Or David Bowie, or Lou Reed...
Renton: Some of his solo stuff's not bad.
Sick Boy: No, it's not bad, but it's not great either. And in your heart you kind of know that although it sounds all right, it's actually just... shite.
Renton: So who else?
Sick Boy: Charlie Nicholas, David Niven, Malcolm McLaren, Elvis Presley...
Renton: OK, OK, so what's the point you're trying to make?
Sick Boy: All I'm trying to do is help you understand that The Name of The Rose is merely a blip on an otherwise uninterrupted downward trajectory.
Renton: What about The Untouchables?
Sick Boy: I don't rate that at all.
Renton: Despite the Academy Award?
Sick Boy: That means fuck all. It's a sympathy vote.
Renton: Right. So we all get old and then we can't hack it anymore. Is that it?
Sick Boy: Yeah.
Renton: That's your theory?
Sick Boy: Yeah. Beautifully fucking illustrated.
Just the kind of witty, well-informed banter...
...that young folk with a penchant for 'shooting galleries' use down Leith way every day of the week ;-)
My favourite bit of Leith patter...
...was overheard on the bus. Mother to young (pre-school) daughter:
"Beaujolais! Fuckin' sit doon!"
Status Quo?
I know a lot of people love them but the move from a really quirky group in the late 60's with some wonderful non hits and 'b' sides to plodding rock (from 'Down The Dustpipe' onwards) has always been a mystery to me.
One 'hero', one 'zero' in my book.
Message to Andy Barrons
I did get a ticket for one of his enormodome gigs but would like to see him at RAH so if your GLW decides to give it a miss let me know. By the way no aversion to meeting complete strangers - I do it as part of my job. Even met someone off this site already - we went to a gig together and the night has historic resonance now as it was the night that Michael Jackson snuffed it!!
That's grand
I'll keep you posted
Beta Band
All this talk of Heroes to Zeros puts me in mind of the album of the same name by the late lamented Beta Band. The cover is at the start of this rather fab video of my favourite track from that album:
Forgot How Good
The Beta band actually were, may well stick on the DVD later of High Fidelity at some point of the weekend as well.
Air
Briefly fell in love them after discovering Moon Safari and Premiers Symptomes at the turn of the millennium, but then fell instantly out of love after witnessing a truly awful gig at Shepherds Bush Empire, when they were promoting 10,000 Hz Legend.
They seem to have regained their credibility, but are forever tainted to me.
U2 are the biggest culprits
all went down hill after Achtung Baby if you ask me.
Menswear
feted as the THE NEXT BIG THING in the early 90's, big-upped in all the music press weeklies, even the Grauniad lauded them as the saviours of moderm music, Select magazine putting them forward as the hip sound of young London, and so on...
then they cocked it all up by going on tour, and making the mistake of actually letting people hear their songs(which were mostly thinly disguised wire cover-versions), and getting chased by outraged mods in the streets.
the album came out to the sound of a bubble bursting, and a stable door being bolted too late.
i hear the singer was last spotted working in carphone warehouse.
This is stretching
the notion of 'heroes' unfeasibly long.....:-)
aye
good point there...
;-)
Could be in a lot of trouble here but
I've always thought that Stevie Wonder was a great singles act and that his albums contain a lot of self indulgent rambling filler. I respect the fact that he took on complete control of his material at a ridiculously early age and appreciate that the musicianship is superb, I just don't think the songs are very good.
Oh
I must admit I am tempted to riposte with an unkind remark. But, could you give an example of these 'not very good' songs on the albums between Music of My Mind and Songs in the Key of Life?
Absolutley with you Kid A
I managed to miss OK Computer somehow for years - don't know how - and Kid A took a huge hold on me via long car journeys and listening at work - it is a very beautiful and sad record. The lyrics seem to be stronger too. Its certainly a grower and a stayer, an 'album', the songs work best all listened to together, 'The National Anthem' is a magnificent dance track by the way. Amnesiac has some fabulous songs but doesn't hang together.
I only came to listen to OK Computer later and it has a brilliance but seems shallow, heartless by comparison. I have shared this thought with friends and have all sorts of dents in my head as a result.
Elton John
I think the old duck is the classic example. The run he had in the early 70s is matchless. Since then, apart from the albums that specifically imitated these, all downhill:
1970 Elton John and Tumbleweed Connection
1971 Madman Across the Water
1972 Honky Château
1973 Don't Shoot Me I'm Only the Piano Player (bit dodgy) and Goodbye Yellow Brick Road
1974 Caribou
1975 Captain Fantastic and the Brown Dirt Cowboy
Rod
takes the biscuit in the hero to zero stakes for me.
Agreed
But for about 3-4 years he really was special.
Lawrence (still a hero to more than zero)
from Felt?
went from making shimmering indie guitar songs to very lo-key indie midi-pastiche with Go Kart Mozart(note the Manfred/Springsteen reference) and Denim...
his music is still very much worth hearing(i play his stuff a lot when i need to), but i doubt he'll ever write another "primitive painters"...
Time to play the RT card
I came onboard in the mid-80s, so I'm not the full Fairport crowd,
but surely his run extends way beyond the 5 years.
Tom Waits too? Or is that 2 5 year runs?
...back to Brothers In Arms
Haven't played it since 1986.
The likes of Walk of Life and Money For Nothing still make you die a little bit (slowly) when you hear em on the radio / in the supermarket.
...to be fair, some of the tracks were fair enough, no?
I'm thinking back of So Far Away, Latest Trick and the title track. They had a bit of depth to these ears, great tunes and the arrangements were impressive.
I also must declare my interest in Knopfler's wonderful Auf Wiedershen, Pet title tune.
Kraftwerk and Marvin Gaye Anyone?
Reissues may not be as great as the hype but well over the 3 year watershed at least from Autobahn to Computer World.
And then frankly it goes wrong...Electric cafe and Tour de France soundtracks are very poor.
Marvin Gaye - from Lets get it on to Hear my Dear and then he falls off a cliff only clawing his way back up with Midnight Love.
Have to agree with one or two other entries though - Stevie Wonder living proof that you can borrow genius but never keep it. (and yes Mr McCartney that means you and Van Morrison as well)