Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

"HELLO, HELLO, I'M (not) BACK AGAIN.....AS A MATTER OF FACT.....I'M NOT BACK"......edited title

OZRECORDS's picture

AS A MATTER OF FACT, HE'S BACK!

I heard today that Gary Glitter is making a comeback. Get your rotten fruit and eggs ready and start practising. His concerts started off being a bit on the camp side, then turned into being funny but who on earth would pay to see him in 2012? I promoted Gary Glitter's first ever concert, at Newcastle City Hall, when Rock n' Roll part 2 was No 1.

REMEMBER HIM THIS WAY: I've met him very briefly twice since (both times long before he became a national disgrace) and I have to say that I have always found him to be the most arrogant, conceited, full-of-himself creep I have ever encountered in the music business. What the hell was Mike Leander doing with this guy?

Mike Leander launched Gary Glitter and unlike Mr Glitter, Mike Leander was a huge talent and everyone who ever met him respected him. I recall, with great sadness, having a drink with Mike not long before he passed away.

DO YOU WANT TO TOUCH HIM? Not bloody likely.

1

One Of Me Mates

worked in a bank where the fiance of the Glitter Bands bass player also worked.
When the twosome got married, GG was invited, but did not turn up, much to the relief of the Bride & Groom. Me mate told me that The Glitter Band (who all turned out to a man) had nary a good word to say at all about The Leader Of The Gang.

0
geacher53 | 19 January 2012 - 10:47pm

ahem!

Two drummers? Check
Glitter Beat? Check
Perfect fairground music? Check
Terrace Chants? Check

He may well be a loathsome individual but he made some fucking fantastic pop records. The KLF wouldn't have sampled him otherwise.

10
Mr Drayton | 20 January 2012 - 8:42am

oh no he didn't.

In fact Mike Leander made the records. Gary Glitter could barely even sing but he was a serious strutting poseur. Check out Mike Leander. Therein lies the real talent that was the "glitter" project. Glitter himself always was a total prat. The "Glitter" sound was very good but that's Mike Leander, who sadly passed away almost 16 years ago: Leander started his career as an arranger with Decca Records in 1963 and Bell Records in 1972 and worked with such artists as Marianne Faithfull, Billy Fury, Marc Bolan, Joe Cocker, The Small Faces, Van Morrison, Alan Price, Peter Frampton, Keith Richards, Shirley Bassey, Lulu, Jimmy Page, Roy Orbison, Brian Jones and Gene Pitney. He created, produced and was key writer for Glitter project.

Leander also worked as a producer/arranger with Ben E. King and The Drifters on the Atlantic record label and was the arranger on The Beatles' "She's Leaving Home" from the Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album (the only time The Beatles recruited someone other than their producer, George Martin, to provide orchestration.

He was executive producer of the Andrew Lloyd Webber/Tim Rice concept album Jesus Christ Superstar and in the late 1960s wrote scores for several films, including Privilege with Paul Jones and Jean Shrimpton, Run a Crooked Mile with Mary Tyler Moore and Louis Jourdan and The Adding Machine with Billie Whitelaw and Milo O'Shea.

In the 1980s he wrote the musical Matador, which gave Tom Jones a hit album and single A Boy From Nowhere. The way Glitter was seen on TV news jumping out of the car and then, sort of....shook himself into an "I am the King of rock n roll" stance....when arriving for his first UK court appearance is a picture which speaks better than a million words.

7
OZRECORDS | 20 January 2012 - 10:25pm

Brilliant

I didn't know all that. That was fascinating. I love stories about the "hidden" figures in rock and roll.

I knew the name Mike Leander from somewhere, and it's the "She's Leaving Home" arrangement! I always liked that arrangement: it seems to get short thrift just because it's not George Martin.

1
Stephen Merrick | 21 January 2012 - 10:05am

Not quite fair

The objection is that it is much more saccharine than Martin's very austere arrangements, and therefore more conventional. Still lovely though

1
FakeGeordie | 21 January 2012 - 10:10am

With you all the way Mr Drayton...

Glam rock was the music of my teens. Loved it then & still love it now.

The man (GG) is a piece of shit, however, I still love his music.

0
jackthebiscuit | 21 January 2012 - 1:50pm

Find it astonishing.

He'll get lynched, won't he?

Yesterday on Twitter he told Joey Barton that he'd accept no lectures from the likes of him. Now, Joey Barton's no saint, but Glitter's a convicted child molester. Bit of a difference.

0
Bob | 20 January 2012 - 8:56am

It will almost certainly

turn out to be a hoax.

Won't it?

2
mojoworking | 20 January 2012 - 9:19am

If the press think there is a story/cheap buck to be had from it

The double G will be rehabilitated.

Mark my words.

0
BernkastelCues | 20 January 2012 - 12:22pm

Even by talking about him...

...we're giving him publicity. Who in their right mind would want to go and see this man in concert?

0
Colin H | 20 January 2012 - 12:27pm

No one in their right mind..

.. except the prurient, and the voyeuristic. And there will most probably be plenty of them. These shows, if they actually happen will most probably be successful. The publicity that it will receive alone with see to that. Unless of course the publicity has a go at the audience. If that happens it may be a different outcome

I always wondered why the rolling eyes and the creepiness didn't freak people out more at the time. But these were the days when weird characters like Jonathan King in the music industry were common place.

And of course it's true that the talent lay at the doors of certain Mr Leander. It's just a shame that people like him seemed to be at the mercy of characters like Paul Gadd to make a living.

But I remember people saying mainly "whatever you say about Garry Glitter, he could certainly put on a show". Now those same souls are saying "The man (GG) is a piece of shit" about someone they never met.

1
Marky | 21 January 2012 - 4:44pm

saying "someone they never met. is a piece of shit"

I am / was the person who made that comment Marky.

How do you know that I have never met him?

You dont know, & you are making an assumption, exactly the same as I did when I said he was a piece of shit.

Easy mistake to make isnt it ?

2
jackthebiscuit | 22 January 2012 - 9:13pm

Also there are two things there Marky

It is one thing to go along to a show which you know to be amiable crap performed by somebody who you assume is a showbiz pro and well aware of their ridiculousness, and another thing altogether to discover that person to be a long-term paedophile.

A lot of the reaction doubtless does come from people who are enraged because they feel cheated of a benign and rather silly memory from growing up. Its moot as to whether that's an overreaction because nothing excuses Glitter's activities and its possible to make your mind up about that entirely separately to opinions on his musical "legacy".

But if you mean - keep the tabloids out of the formulation of criminal law - for all our sakes - I completely agree

2
FakeGeordie | 23 January 2012 - 11:07am

I predict shares in bacofoil will...

... plummet.

I saw GG in 1985 at Cheltenham racecourse. He was rubbish.

1
Billybob Dylan | 20 January 2012 - 10:04pm

If it,s true..

then the reality freakshows will probably make him a very rich man again..sadly.

0
iggypop | 20 January 2012 - 10:19pm

Met him

in the backstage area after 'Quadrophenia' in Hyde Park. ('95/'96?)
I have to report he was an absolute delight - charming, funny, self-deprecating and a delight to chat with.
Make of that what you will.

3
ianess | 21 January 2012 - 2:29am

How old were you?

.

18
Cobweb Steve | 21 January 2012 - 7:45am

40

Same as your IQ.

5
ianess | 21 January 2012 - 1:39pm
fortuneight | 21 January 2012 - 6:04pm

That's what it was meant to be...

maybe some sort of wincing, winking emoticon might have helped.

No offence meant - it was just sitting there so I kicked it.

5
Cobweb Steve | 22 January 2012 - 10:54am

Agree

Thought it may invite that response, but too lazy to avoid it.

0
ianess | 23 January 2012 - 1:40am

Stick to

protecting the honour of the defenceless maidens, precious.

0
ianess | 23 January 2012 - 1:43am

Hmmmm

I remember when I had my first drink too.....

4
OZRECORDS | 21 January 2012 - 8:16pm
Fraser M | 21 January 2012 - 8:44am

Stick. End. Wrong. Again.

"The UK needs legislation in place to ban registered sex offenders from using digital communications without supervision. Internet Service Providers should have to monitor and police just who they are letting online. Imprisonment should be imposed when sex offenders fail to follow this legislation."

Nope. Let's re-write that, shall we?

The UK needs common sense in place to stop parents from letting their children use digital communications without supervision. Internet Service Providers cannot conceivably be expected to monitor and police just who they are letting online. Shame and humiliation should be imposed when parents fail to demonstrate any common sense.

11
Vulpes Vulpes | 21 January 2012 - 10:26am

Spot on

Another example of people bodyswerving personal responsibility and expecting the state to do it for them.

6
BernkastelCues | 21 January 2012 - 12:11pm

Hmmm

True to an extent. And people who abdicate responsibility for their children's safety are contemptible. But its also a case of the popular press demanding 'ACTION ACTION ACTION' immediately to stop these sick perves (sic) - in between complaining about pettifogging regulations and the inexorable increase in power of the bowler hatted Whitehall mandarins. In other words pandering to the more vicious prejudices of their readership while making no attempt whatsoever to inform or explain. Half the tabloids carry ads for chat lines and video channels that fall into the category of 'flinging filth at our pop kids'.

EDIT - re-reading that I realise I am agreeing with you at high volume but I may as well leave the post up. Appearing/disappearing posts affect my limited sanity

2
FakeGeordie | 23 January 2012 - 10:57am

Appearing/disappearing posts affect my limited sanity...

...Mine as well.

Am I imagining things, or has this post been somehow removed/ censored?

0
jackthebiscuit | 23 January 2012 - 8:55pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd