Entertainment For Lively Minds
"HELLO, HELLO, I'M (not) BACK AGAIN.....AS A MATTER OF FACT.....I'M NOT BACK"......edited title
AS A MATTER OF FACT, HE'S BACK!
I heard today that Gary Glitter is making a comeback. Get your rotten fruit and eggs ready and start practising. His concerts started off being a bit on the camp side, then turned into being funny but who on earth would pay to see him in 2012? I promoted Gary Glitter's first ever concert, at Newcastle City Hall, when Rock n' Roll part 2 was No 1.
REMEMBER HIM THIS WAY: I've met him very briefly twice since (both times long before he became a national disgrace) and I have to say that I have always found him to be the most arrogant, conceited, full-of-himself creep I have ever encountered in the music business. What the hell was Mike Leander doing with this guy?
Mike Leander launched Gary Glitter and unlike Mr Glitter, Mike Leander was a huge talent and everyone who ever met him respected him. I recall, with great sadness, having a drink with Mike not long before he passed away.
DO YOU WANT TO TOUCH HIM? Not bloody likely.
- More from OZRECORDS.
- Login or register to post comments










One Of Me Mates
worked in a bank where the fiance of the Glitter Bands bass player also worked.
When the twosome got married, GG was invited, but did not turn up, much to the relief of the Bride & Groom. Me mate told me that The Glitter Band (who all turned out to a man) had nary a good word to say at all about The Leader Of The Gang.
ahem!
Two drummers? Check
Glitter Beat? Check
Perfect fairground music? Check
Terrace Chants? Check
He may well be a loathsome individual but he made some fucking fantastic pop records. The KLF wouldn't have sampled him otherwise.
oh no he didn't.
In fact Mike Leander made the records. Gary Glitter could barely even sing but he was a serious strutting poseur. Check out Mike Leander. Therein lies the real talent that was the "glitter" project. Glitter himself always was a total prat. The "Glitter" sound was very good but that's Mike Leander, who sadly passed away almost 16 years ago: Leander started his career as an arranger with Decca Records in 1963 and Bell Records in 1972 and worked with such artists as Marianne Faithfull, Billy Fury, Marc Bolan, Joe Cocker, The Small Faces, Van Morrison, Alan Price, Peter Frampton, Keith Richards, Shirley Bassey, Lulu, Jimmy Page, Roy Orbison, Brian Jones and Gene Pitney. He created, produced and was key writer for Glitter project.
Leander also worked as a producer/arranger with Ben E. King and The Drifters on the Atlantic record label and was the arranger on The Beatles' "She's Leaving Home" from the Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album (the only time The Beatles recruited someone other than their producer, George Martin, to provide orchestration.
He was executive producer of the Andrew Lloyd Webber/Tim Rice concept album Jesus Christ Superstar and in the late 1960s wrote scores for several films, including Privilege with Paul Jones and Jean Shrimpton, Run a Crooked Mile with Mary Tyler Moore and Louis Jourdan and The Adding Machine with Billie Whitelaw and Milo O'Shea.
In the 1980s he wrote the musical Matador, which gave Tom Jones a hit album and single A Boy From Nowhere. The way Glitter was seen on TV news jumping out of the car and then, sort of....shook himself into an "I am the King of rock n roll" stance....when arriving for his first UK court appearance is a picture which speaks better than a million words.
Brilliant
I didn't know all that. That was fascinating. I love stories about the "hidden" figures in rock and roll.
I knew the name Mike Leander from somewhere, and it's the "She's Leaving Home" arrangement! I always liked that arrangement: it seems to get short thrift just because it's not George Martin.
Not quite fair
The objection is that it is much more saccharine than Martin's very austere arrangements, and therefore more conventional. Still lovely though
With you all the way Mr Drayton...
Glam rock was the music of my teens. Loved it then & still love it now.
The man (GG) is a piece of shit, however, I still love his music.
Find it astonishing.
He'll get lynched, won't he?
Yesterday on Twitter he told Joey Barton that he'd accept no lectures from the likes of him. Now, Joey Barton's no saint, but Glitter's a convicted child molester. Bit of a difference.
It will almost certainly
turn out to be a hoax.
Won't it?
If the press think there is a story/cheap buck to be had from it
The double G will be rehabilitated.
Mark my words.
Even by talking about him...
...we're giving him publicity. Who in their right mind would want to go and see this man in concert?
No one in their right mind..
.. except the prurient, and the voyeuristic. And there will most probably be plenty of them. These shows, if they actually happen will most probably be successful. The publicity that it will receive alone with see to that. Unless of course the publicity has a go at the audience. If that happens it may be a different outcome
I always wondered why the rolling eyes and the creepiness didn't freak people out more at the time. But these were the days when weird characters like Jonathan King in the music industry were common place.
And of course it's true that the talent lay at the doors of certain Mr Leander. It's just a shame that people like him seemed to be at the mercy of characters like Paul Gadd to make a living.
But I remember people saying mainly "whatever you say about Garry Glitter, he could certainly put on a show". Now those same souls are saying "The man (GG) is a piece of shit" about someone they never met.
saying "someone they never met. is a piece of shit"
I am / was the person who made that comment Marky.
How do you know that I have never met him?
You dont know, & you are making an assumption, exactly the same as I did when I said he was a piece of shit.
Easy mistake to make isnt it ?
Also there are two things there Marky
It is one thing to go along to a show which you know to be amiable crap performed by somebody who you assume is a showbiz pro and well aware of their ridiculousness, and another thing altogether to discover that person to be a long-term paedophile.
A lot of the reaction doubtless does come from people who are enraged because they feel cheated of a benign and rather silly memory from growing up. Its moot as to whether that's an overreaction because nothing excuses Glitter's activities and its possible to make your mind up about that entirely separately to opinions on his musical "legacy".
But if you mean - keep the tabloids out of the formulation of criminal law - for all our sakes - I completely agree
I predict shares in bacofoil will...
... plummet.
I saw GG in 1985 at Cheltenham racecourse. He was rubbish.
If it,s true..
then the reality freakshows will probably make him a very rich man again..sadly.
Met him
in the backstage area after 'Quadrophenia' in Hyde Park. ('95/'96?)
I have to report he was an absolute delight - charming, funny, self-deprecating and a delight to chat with.
Make of that what you will.
How old were you?
.
40
Same as your IQ.
Just a spot of laddish Carry On style humour
surely?
That's what it was meant to be...
maybe some sort of wincing, winking emoticon might have helped.
No offence meant - it was just sitting there so I kicked it.
Agree
Thought it may invite that response, but too lazy to avoid it.
Stick to
protecting the honour of the defenceless maidens, precious.
Hmmmm
I remember when I had my first drink too.....
As many will have suspected
it's a fake: http://glitterontwitter.tumblr.com/
Stick. End. Wrong. Again.
"The UK needs legislation in place to ban registered sex offenders from using digital communications without supervision. Internet Service Providers should have to monitor and police just who they are letting online. Imprisonment should be imposed when sex offenders fail to follow this legislation."
Nope. Let's re-write that, shall we?
The UK needs common sense in place to stop parents from letting their children use digital communications without supervision. Internet Service Providers cannot conceivably be expected to monitor and police just who they are letting online. Shame and humiliation should be imposed when parents fail to demonstrate any common sense.
Spot on
Another example of people bodyswerving personal responsibility and expecting the state to do it for them.
Hmmm
True to an extent. And people who abdicate responsibility for their children's safety are contemptible. But its also a case of the popular press demanding 'ACTION ACTION ACTION' immediately to stop these sick perves (sic) - in between complaining about pettifogging regulations and the inexorable increase in power of the bowler hatted Whitehall mandarins. In other words pandering to the more vicious prejudices of their readership while making no attempt whatsoever to inform or explain. Half the tabloids carry ads for chat lines and video channels that fall into the category of 'flinging filth at our pop kids'.
EDIT - re-reading that I realise I am agreeing with you at high volume but I may as well leave the post up. Appearing/disappearing posts affect my limited sanity
Appearing/disappearing posts affect my limited sanity...
...Mine as well.
Am I imagining things, or has this post been somehow removed/ censored?