Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Having lived with 'Smile' for a week

Chimney Singing Cheryl Cole's picture

and had it on constant rotation during that time, I think I still prefer Brian Wilson's 2004 version. As Lucas Hare posted, it sounds more like a complete album and I think the addition of a female voice lifts the harmonies above the original, particularly on 'Our Prayer' and 'Surf's Up' - the 'dominoes' bit is incredible.

Of course, old man Brian's voice is not perfect, but overall it sounds more vivid and colourful than the original which seems to suit it rather well.

It might be that I'm so much more familiar with the 2004 version, so that it sounds like the original to me, in the same way that I'm always disappointed that Led Zeppelin don't sound more like 'Second Coming'.

0

Having lived ...

with both my own attempts and various bootlegs over the years, it's too familiar to me to really excite me. I've listened to all the variously-assembled new editions (been up the allotment), and while I'm pleased it's "out there", I think the central problem remains.

The fact is that "Heroes & Villains", which really is the central pool of the album into which many of the other tracks dip, is not that great a composition. Melodically, it's almost club-footed for a Brian Wilson tune. Downdowndowndowndowndowndowndown etc., and the "chorus" is an a-melodic chant. The single, let's not forget, was something of a failure and a disappointment after "Good Vibrations", and there simply isn't enough substance there to warrant the re-use of sections in other tracks, certainly not enough for a suite with variations on a theme.

The only other song on the album with the sheer quality of imagination and execution as G.V. is "Surf's Up"; for the rest, there's rather too many middleweight compositions and half-formed ideas that seem more like creative dead-ends than just needing more work.

As much as I like B.W.P.S. for its sense of completion (and his Paris concert was one of the best I've been to in my life), I'm not entirely convinced by that, either.

It all comes down to "interesting", ultimately. And, apart from G.V. and S.U., emotionally enengaging. Brian's artistic distance and (dare I say it) pretension are all over this. "Pet Sounds" was him writing and singing right from the heart. Tony Asher's lyrics express human emotion; V.D.P's lyrics are a whole different kettle of ballgames.

0
Burt Kocain | 7 November 2011 - 11:00am

That's an interesting point

about Tony Asher v Van Dyke Parks.

I was thinking that the other day as I listened to Pet Sounds, but also some of the earlier stuff like 'Don't Worry Baby' and 'In My Room' - the warmth of those records both in their sound and emotionally is incredible soothing and affecting. They strike some kind of deep wordless connection within my soul.

'Smile' doesn't do that, expect in isolated moments like you say, in lines like 'I heard the most wonderful thing, a children's song' although I'd add 'Wonderful' and 'Child is The Father of The Man'.

it is however, a carnival for the ears and to me, it's in the detail of it rather than the songs. Loads of little melodies, some of which only last a couple of bars.

1
Chimney Singing... | 7 November 2011 - 11:08am

That bit about Zeppelin and 'The Second Coming'...

Are you *trying* to make me splutter coffee all over my keyboard?!

1
Patrick Crowther | 7 November 2011 - 11:19am

Yes

I was hoping it would stick your keys together and stop you making nasty comments about the Stone Roses. Did it work?

In all seriousness, yes I do feel like that. I heard Second Coming before any Led Zep stuff, although I read countless times that it sounded like them. The closest I got to checking out LZ at the time was seeing Page and Plant on the Glastonbury TV footage in 95, which I thought was godawful and seemed to go on forever. At the time, as is entirely correct for a teenager, I was only interested in buying contemporary music - as CDs were £16.99,I wasn't shelling out for Zep. I got into them in around 2002.

Because of that, 'Love Spreads', 'Breaking Into Heaven' 'Tears' and 'Driving South' are my template for what I thought Zep should sound like. Don't get me wrong, I love Led Zeppelin, particularly II, but Percy's wail and his lyrics stop me from being obsessed by them. I prefer Ian Brown's singing and his lyrics. I also think the Second Coming has more funk to it. Love Spreads has a groove that I don't hear in Zep.

I'm not saying that Second Coming is better and obviously I recognise what a brilliant, incredible band Zep were, but I heard it first so it had more of an impact.

5
Chimney Singing... | 7 November 2011 - 11:44am

I like you.

Where do I subscribe to receive your newsletter?

0
Six Dog | 8 November 2011 - 12:10pm

I rarely have any news to let

And I can't tell if you're being sarcastic.

I have written a book in which a friend of mine gets framed for a crime I committed at a tequila party simply because we had the same standard issue regulation Britpop haircut.

0
Chimney Singing... | 8 November 2011 - 12:53pm

No sarcasm....your post captured my thoughts perfectly.

Fellow Roses acolyte.

*Thumps chest* Black Power salute.

0
Six Dog | 8 November 2011 - 3:21pm

Excellent

I'll come to for back up next time it all kicks off!

0
Chimney Singing... | 8 November 2011 - 6:27pm

Add me to that

for years I hated Zep with a vengeance. Endless plays of Mothership made me like them in the end and while I appreciate their greatness I'll never love them for exactly the reasons you state.

0
ian s | 8 November 2011 - 10:42pm

and shhhhh *whisper it quietly* but

John Bonham is not a great a drummer as legend has us believe....

*backs away quietly*....

0
Six Dog | 9 November 2011 - 10:53am

There's quite a convincing argument...

...doing the rounds amongst Smile Scholars at the moment that it makes a much stronger album if you just concentrate on the 13 actual songs that Brian worked on between October 1966 & May 1967, when the "album" was officially scrapped & ignore all the fragments & not-quite-songs in favour of something that could conceivably have been released at that point.

Which gives you - in my favorite order, yours will differ...
Side 1
Our Prayer
Heroes & Villains
Do You Like Worms
The Old Master Painter/You Are My Sunshine
Cabinessence
Wonderful
Good Vibrations

Side 2
The Elements Suite:
Vega-tables
Wind Chimes
Mrs O'Leary's Cow
Love To Say Da-Da
Child Is Father Of The Man
Surf's Up

2
MarkHagen | 7 November 2011 - 11:33am

As Whispering Bob would say ...

Mmm. Nice. But (and it's a big one) The Old Master Painter/Sunshine remains a puzzling interlude, not an actual Brian Wilson song. CIFOTM, like Da-Da, is more of a chant than a fully-realised composition, and both found a home in later years, "Child" making a superb tag for S.U., and "Da-Da" morphing into the near-perfect "Cool, Cool Water." And Mrs. O'Leary's Cow is virtually unlistenable (the up-down theme better used in Cabinessence) except for car-wreck fans.

There's a reason the album was never finished - it really wasn't as good as it needed to be (and Brian knew it). A few short months later, of course, Brian lost it (and us) completely with "Smiley Smile" (an album it took me decades to enjoy, and then only as the stereo boot version, which blows away the dull-sounding mono.) Hard to say, but I don't think Brian was a basket-case during Smile, he seems pretty in control in the studio, but he certainly wasn't making a whole lot of sense during "Smiley Smile".

0
Burt Kocain | 7 November 2011 - 1:27pm

Brian does seem compos mentis

on the session recordings. There is only one telling bit during the 'Our Prayer' session where he asks if anyone is 'feeling any acid' but otherwise he sounds fully in control of things and commands the Wrecking Crew through endless re-takes. If there are tapes of him losing his cool, they've remained in the vaults to save the old boy his blushes.

On Smiley Smile, recorded in his home studio, it sounds like they're all rolling around off their noggins..not just Brian.

I rather like Smiley Smile. It's a strange little footnote in their history especially now it's overshadowed by the real thing, but it's got some curious little tunes on it like Little Pad, Whistle In and With Me Tonight.

0
Dr Volume | 8 November 2011 - 2:47am

If you haven't got the stereo

Smiley Smile, PM me. It really is a revelation.

0
Burt Kocain | 8 November 2011 - 7:26am

Interesting

I get your point about the song choice / period. I've got a very nice Smile mix which is as follows :

1. Our Prayer - Gee
2. Heroes & Villains Pt 1
3. Heroes & Villains Pt 2
4. Do You Like Worms
5. Cabin Essence
6. The Elements Intro
7. Vega - Tables
8. Water Chant
9. Wind Chimes
10. Fire
11. Good Vibrations
12. Holidays
13. Wonderful
14. Look
15. Child Is Father To The Man
16. Surf's Up

0
jazzjet | 8 November 2011 - 8:53pm

Mrs. O'Leary's Cow aka Fire

worked much better in a live context, those drums just sounded epic and seeing the string section put on their fireman's hats always made me chuckle.

0
DogFacedBoy | 7 November 2011 - 2:26pm

Yes.

And yes. But it's an unpleasant experience on the album - and not in a good way.

0
Burt Kocain | 8 November 2011 - 12:36am

In any guise...

...it still moves me more than Sgt Pepper or Pet Sounds. It would have been so perfect for 1967, too. At times it comes across like Pepper with a heart, with a smattering of The Basement Tapes thrown in for good measure.

(And I can start to understand Wilson's frustration that The Beatles got there first; and not just with that year's output. From the fairground music of Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite to the second side of Abbey Road, Brian Wilson seemingly thought of all this before The Beatles did; bound up in an album that wouldn't see the light of day for 40-odd years.)

But, as I've said before, the album was finished by its creators in 2004, and recorded with a band that sound satisfyingly like The Beach Boys. The great pity about Smile's two versions is that one isn't finished and one isn't by The Beach Boys. For the rest of my listening life, I will be wishing one was a bit more like the other, and that's that.

3
Lucas Hare | 7 November 2011 - 8:30pm

"...one isn't finished and one isn't by the Beach Boys"

That nails just how I feel. We have two renderings of what SMiLE could have been, but still no definitive edition. And maybe that's how it should be given the events that have transpired since 1968.

1
stimpy | 8 November 2011 - 1:15pm

100% agree

there is a perfect compromise somewhere in there, The Beach Boys vocals and instrumentation with BWPS's 'flow'. The difference for me is that Brian's solo version is conceieved as a performance in 3 parts and each section flows into the next within each part while the Beach Boys version is, by necessity, assembled from fragmentary recordings ad feels assembled. There are gaps that stop the album from gaining momentum. That aside, some of the performances are wonderful and the full Child is Father/Surf's Up segue is incredible.

0
ian s | 8 November 2011 - 10:47pm

I'd really love

for you to have a go at telling us why it moves you, Lucas. There's nothing adversarial in this - add all the SMiLEY emoticons you want! I'm impressed by the music, find most of it enjoyable, but apart from a vague sense of, I dunno - loss? in Surf's Up, and a genuine spiritual uplift from Good Vibrations (at least, the original 45 version), it doesn't stir my emotions in anything like the same way as Pet Sounds, which I always think of as White Soul Music. The lyrical directness and honesty of Pet Sounds is a conduit for human emotion - VDP's lyrics ... uhhh ...

0
Burt Kocain | 8 November 2011 - 12:45am

Well...

One of the reasons is that it's a melodic thing. I don't read or really understand the nuts and bolts of music, and have no intention to; so there's something intangible for me in melody that moves me. As long as it's something I can't quite pin down, I know that it will last that little bit longer. Smile is full of little moments like this. It's got that rare combination of being able to go straight for the heart whilst remaining curiously out of reach, which keeps me coming back for repeated listens. The only other album that's ever really done this to me is Music From Big Pink.

Don't get me wrong: I love Pet Sounds. There's just something slightly removed about it for me. That almost shouldn't make sense - God Only Knows, You Still Believe In Me, I Just Wasn't Made For These Times; these are as good as songs get - and yet Smile takes me somewhere else. I think it's braver, more cohesive, more elusive...by the time you get to the end of the album, I find I've been taken to places that no other music has taken me. To end where I began, I'm not entirely sure why this is. And, as far as I'm concerned, that's the way it should be.

3
Lucas Hare | 8 November 2011 - 1:06am

Very well said

I love Pet Sounds too but feel much the same way as you do. On the other hand, I find the SMiLE music - in various different permutations - simultaneously thrilling and very moving. It never runs dry.

1
Barry Vaughan | 8 November 2011 - 10:47am

Jan and Dean

did a marvellous version of 'Vegetables.'

0
ianess | 8 November 2011 - 1:23am

And

Their pasta dish was to die for

1
fedoraboy | 8 November 2011 - 1:31am

Lil' Linguini From Pastadena?

?

0
Burt Kocain | 8 November 2011 - 9:46am

I'm happy to have

the material out there, in top quality sound and now I can enjoy it for what it is..a fascinating, occasionally heartbreakingly beautiful audio jigsaw puzzle with lots of pieces missing. (Maybe Brian knows what is missing..but he's migrated to Disneyland and I'm not sure he's coming back)

It's hard to appreciate the record if you've already heard the 2004 remake, in a way I wish this set had come first. The fact that Mark Linnet and Alan Boyd used that as a template means it shows up the gaps rather a lot, but nevertheless they've done a cracking job with the material at hand, including flying in demo vocals for 'Barnyard' for example to try and patch that together..which works really well and they've really created the definitive versions of Vega-tables, Surfs Up, Wind Chimes and Wonderful.

It's hard to compare it to Pet Sounds, since that is such a fully realised piece of work.

On Pet Sounds he's freed from writing Surfin' USA and he's gleefully getting all his crazy jazzy chord changes and twisty turny melodies and letting it run wild.

Listening to the Smile CDs, you can hear he's just been getting off on finding strange harmonics from repetitive patterns. He gets fixated on little melody lines and two-chord parts and just wants to try them out on endless variations with different combinations of whatever instruments the Wrecking Crew can play. If you left him to his own devices and he didn't have the pressure of being 'The Beach Boys' songwriter he could have probably written some incredible Steve Reich type instrumental LP instead...but what he came close to doing was combining that approach to music with commercial 1960s Pop.
In comparison to what he was doing, Sergeant Pepper was just Revolver with some fancy string arrangements.

0
Dr Volume | 8 November 2011 - 3:37am

think I will wait

expect it in the bargain bins within a week of xmas

0
Junior Wells | 8 November 2011 - 6:49am

Despite buying the huge book on 'Smile'....

.....in about 1993, I'm really pleased that over the years I've turned down the opportunities of bootlegs and (although picking it up in an Oxy for 99p) never actually played the 2004 album.

A clear case of less being more I feel, because listening to it over the last week has been a revelation.

I'm now all primed for the Basement Tapes (again, I've got several books on that!) for the same reason.

0
ranger | 8 November 2011 - 10:40am

I got into Smile backwards...

having bought the 2004 LP first (that followed the documentary on Brian Wilson re-recording Smile).

What I can add to this argument is that having never heard Surf's Up before that point, the re-recorded version instantly became my favourite track. However, when I compared it with the earlier version (was it on Sunflower? I can't remember) I ditched the 2004 version and have always listened to the original version (well, whichever "original" it was).

All of which is a complicated way of saying that Brian Wilson's voice is a bit shot these days.

1
Kit Hogue | 8 November 2011 - 11:17am

You've noticed

the elephant in the room that everyone else appears to have ignored. Have the bootleg - listened to it often. Have the 2004 version - winced through it once.

0
ianess | 8 November 2011 - 12:25pm

Does anyone else think...

... the version of "Heroes & Villains" on the bootleg Smile (A Stereo Reconstruction by Purple Chick) sounds much clearer than on the new official release?

0
Formbyman | 8 November 2011 - 8:08pm

I find it moving & sad

Some songs/performances are ephemerally beautiful (Heroes & Villains, Cabinessence, Wonderful, Wind Chimes, Surfs Up) but overall, the modal approach is so fractured it hurts to listen to. It really is the sound of a mental breakdown. It's a lot better when you remove the non-songs & Surfs Up is definitely best placed at the end. I'd put Good Vibrations at the beginning of side two as people definitely need cheering up at that point.

In 1967 it would have been compared to Sgt Pepper, obviously. I doubt it would have been a big seller. The Beatles had all the production values but were very focussed on songs (you can debate their quality).

However, I compare it more to The Piper At The Gates Of Dawn, written by another maverick genius who also was damaged by drugs and mental illness. Piper is, amazingly, more coherent, less exquisite but more rounded. Despite its sidetracks into experimental sound & tenuous hold on structure, it seems more whole. I guess that's because it was actually finished at the time (with a little help from his friends).

In any case, SMiLE would have made 1967 an even more pivotal year for rock music

0
tiggerlion | 8 November 2011 - 9:44pm

Good point....

.....and 'Piper' was very much one person's burden (like 'SMiLE') whereas the pressure was shared around a bit more with the HJH's LP.

I wonder if the HJH's had split during the sessions for 'Sgt. Pepper's' (maybe if Brian Epstein had died a year earlier), and that record had come out exactly as it did in '67, whether we'd all now be saying, 'Here, where's 'Penny Lane'? Where's 'Strawberry Fields'. They definitely would have been on the LP.'.

Given record company paranoia over getting product to the public every three months in the 60s, I'd argue that this is probably 'more' like 'SMiLE' would have been like if it had actually been released in '67!

0
ranger | 8 November 2011 - 10:05pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd