Intelligent Life On Planet Rock

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Have we tired of 'edgy' comedy?

Five-Centres's picture

I'm not alone when I say I'm thoroughly enjoying Miranda on BBC2. If you're not aware of it, it's a thoroughly old-fashioned sitcom (in the nicest sense), which stars Miranda Hart as an under-achieving doofus with a push mother and ghastly friends who think she should be more like them.

What's new and refreshing about it is that it doesn't have the remotest bit of grit, meanness or edginess about it, neither does it have any swearing. It's even got a 'You have been watching' bit as the end credits roll. It's a joy.

And it's a hit.

It actually comes as a blessed relief, an antidote to the seemingly endless darkness that has enveloped comedy over the past few years. Perhaps to watch something so simple and light at 830 on a Monday night is just the ticket. In fact, can you remember the last time a comedy show was scheduled at that time on BBC2? Well, it was KYTV in 1992 (correct me if I'm wrong), fact fans.

Is edginess on the way out? Just asking...

2

Yes, we have...

... and, yes, I find Miranda, first and foremost, very funny and, now that you mention it, in the context of all the nastiness, a pleasant relief.

0
Colin H | 25 November 2009 - 2:19pm

What I call

a breath of fresh air. Another fan here.

0
Happy Castle | 25 November 2009 - 2:45pm

It's not what you call "a

It's not what you call "a breath of fresh air", it's just a breath of fresh air.

1
Andy Lynes | 25 November 2009 - 3:25pm

That isn't what I'd call pedantry

It's just pedantry

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 26 November 2009 - 10:05am

I was just trying to be

I was just trying to be funny - it's what Miranda says to her mum in the show when she uses the phrase "what I call".

0
Andy Lynes | 26 November 2009 - 10:16am

And he's

being Miranda

0
Five-Centres | 26 November 2009 - 10:38am

No offence taken

I got it... and chuckled. :-)

0
Happy Castle | 26 November 2009 - 12:24pm

It is like a pendulum

Edginess was once fresh yet it is now stale. A couple of years ago I'd have laughed at the sort of swearobatics spewed forth by the likes of Frankie Boyle or Charlie Brooker but now it's just irritating. So the pendulum swings back to more traditional, clean humour.

0
Torres Bounce | 25 November 2009 - 2:23pm

Hmm…

Not sure I'd lump Charlie Brooker in with Frankie Boyle. Brooker seems to me to be a moralist at heart, while Boyle and his ilk are more 'anything for a cheap gag'.

0
David Rothon | 25 November 2009 - 2:29pm

Yeah they're totally

Yeah they're totally different, but similar in the sense that they throw swearwords around like eight year olds showing off to girls.

0
Torres Bounce | 25 November 2009 - 2:33pm

I *heart* Charlie Brooker

and I really enjoy Miranda.

Not sure what that proves.

0
Hannah | 25 November 2009 - 3:28pm

Go for those pigeons, Whiskas!

What's wrong with me then? I find it a hatefully unbearable throwback, bringing nothing new to the table. And....here's the rub, if memory serves, the show featured an Anne Frank joke two weeks ago. I shall withdraw and leave you all to it.

2
vorgongod | 25 November 2009 - 2:35pm

?

?

0
Chris G | 25 November 2009 - 2:44pm

yes I was searching

I-player for anything to watch (erm Tank Commander Gary no thanks) and stumbled upon "Miranda" and would described it as pleasingly daft. I laughed out out several times (thick of it only got one laugh from the last episode). I liked the 4th wall stuff and the prat falls and like you say the warm heartedness of it. Also a none standard lead is a good thing, so I'm glad it's a hit. Only caveat is not sure they "man mad" plotline can last too long as it could get tiring but well we will see.

0
Chris G | 25 November 2009 - 2:41pm

1) It's not funny

2) It's not edgy

It doesn't have to be 2) to be 1), but 1) is a minimum requirement for a comedy programme in my book.

I don't think that it's a sign of anything - there have always been middle of the road sitcoms on telly. Can anyone tell me why the BBC keep putting Flight of the Conchords on at odd times on digital channels? I'd have thought it would be perfect for 9pm BBC2

1
clarker | 25 November 2009 - 3:02pm

Flight of the Conchords

I seem to find this slightly less rib-tickling than its reputation suggests. This is largely because of their self-description as "formerly New Zealand's fourth most popular guitar-based digi-bongo acapella-rap-funk-comedy folk duo".

The fact that this bears no relation whatsoever to a realistic scenario reduces its hilarity factor by a huge amount as far as I'm concerned. Spinal Tap, for example, was funny precisely because it was a whisker away from being a plausible documentary about a rock band. FotC, on the other hand, is just a blatantly made-up vehicle to allow multiple comedic scenarios to be shoehorned in.

Recently, I find I have the same lack of tolerance when it comes to literature. Virtually all books I enjoy are now non-fiction. Same with TV series- the crucial thing is that they have to be totally plausible to work, which is why I can't be bothered with Spooks. It's testament to the acting ability and production values of Life on Mars that this kept me gripped despite its ridiculous premise.

0
DougieJ | 25 November 2009 - 3:32pm

I think lack of edginess

was a big part of OP's point. I do however find Miranda funny despite it going against all my instincts. I have found myself literally laughing out loud several times during the programmes that I have watched, or even, as this evening, just had on in the background.

It's just a good, silly, old fashioned sitcom with jokes. Which works.

0
phlanth | 30 November 2009 - 1:24am

Am I alone in finding Miranda cringingly unfunny?

And poorly acted?

Modern Family on Sky is very, very good though.....and not in the least "edgy".

1
John Waite | 25 November 2009 - 3:02pm

no

poorly acted i don't think so, but a rubbish sitcom most definitely ... i watched it on iPlayer a couple of nights back and was nearly moved to pen a posting here ...

the basic premise is tired and repetitive (sexually unsophisticated upper class 'big girl' lusts after beefcake but fails to land him while eccentric mother is desperate to marry her off; cutie blonde proletarian flatmate having sex all over the place), the humour telegraphed, the self-exploitation cringeworthy, the class assumptions antiquated and the jokes are sometimes borderline pathetic ("ooh my bum's so big it got stuck in a primary school kid's chair!!! ooh i'm embarrassed!!!")

fair enough, the performers give it a good go, but the material and the set ups are bloody awful ...

2
Glenbervie | 25 November 2009 - 3:42pm

I think you might be right

I think you might be right about all of that, but for some reason I really enjoy the show and it has me laughing out loud quite often, including the school kid's chair bit. The only other comedy that I've really laughed at recently was Louis CK's Shameless stand up show that was on cable recently.

0
Andy Lynes | 25 November 2009 - 4:37pm

I like the school chair bit

because it wasn't over played too much

0
Chris G | 25 November 2009 - 4:48pm

i was very bored tonight

so watched Miranda on iPlayer ... the episode (no5, Excuse) played out at the pace of an almost theatrical farce and its momentum didn't quite save the day (the date scene was excruciating) but best episode yet I think ... also because Sarah Hadland spent some time in a vest ... not the most PC reason for liking a sitcom, but hey ...

0
Glenbervie | 7 December 2009 - 11:05pm

Louis CK

Is in the really rather brilliant 'Parks and recreation' sitcom.

It'll properly never show over hear so give it a download.

0
MrSib | 25 November 2009 - 8:09pm

Modern Family

Agreed on Modern Family (assuming its the one thats just started on the US networks) - well written and played - and well - almost believable - a point made by others on the blog.

0
Andrew2 | 25 November 2009 - 3:52pm

When you say "poorly acted"

Do you mean that subjectively or objectively?

0
Molesworth | 25 November 2009 - 5:58pm

Stop that now

and go and stand at the back of the class

0
Glenbervie | 26 November 2009 - 12:17am

Chiz. Yes sir

I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective
I must not confuse subjective and objective

0
Molesworth | 26 November 2009 - 9:44am

You certainly

made that comment unadvisably :-)

0
Mikhail | 26 November 2009 - 12:25am

Some parts are very good

I find "Miranda" 75% eye-rollingly bad, 15% smile and 10% actually funny (mostly in the glances to the camera).

0
jburton | 25 November 2009 - 3:24pm

Is it really too much to hope

that we can enjoy both sorts rather than having to oscillate between the two extremes?

1
Fraser M | 25 November 2009 - 3:30pm

No

I 'kind of' like Miranda (not wildly enthused but don't find it objectionable) though the thing I find most interesting is that it is a radio comedy that's come from Radio 2, not 4. And it's pretty much exactly like the radio version, too.

But then sometimes I like Jimmy Carr or Frankie Boyle (though I wish he'd give up with the Kerry Katona 'gags' because it's a bit like kicking a puppy). And I pretty much always find something good in Charlie Brooker's stuff, usually because as I read I generally think," oh good, it's not just me who feels like that."

Both is good. I like it that way.

0
illuminatus | 25 November 2009 - 4:59pm

No one said

It wasn't allowed. We have choices.

0
Five-Centres | 25 November 2009 - 3:46pm

I suppose the

issue is whether we will be in a position to make such a choice.

There's been a lot of debate nationally about offensive comedy recently (Stewart Lee, Richard Herring, Brendan Burns, Jimmy Carr, Frankie Boyle etc etc) and whether the neutering of the BBC in the light of Sachsgate will cause the general state of broadcast comedy to swing towards less controvertial material. I'd just rather both could be available to those who want to watch it, rather than the endless polar reaction to whatever is the current paradigm.

1
Fraser M | 25 November 2009 - 4:53pm

Up to a point, Lord Copper

I have certainly tired of edgy comedy but I saw "Miranda" and felt it suffered from just the same "I'm sure this ticks somebody's boxes but wouldn't it be better if it were funny?" syndrome that afflicts "The Thick Of It" and similar operas d'edge.

0
David Hepworth | 25 November 2009 - 5:40pm

Horses for courses

I really liked the Jo Brand hospital comedy which was like a cross between the two.

3
Five-Centres | 25 November 2009 - 5:46pm

Miranda

takes huge spoonfulls of Frank Spencer, Frankie Howard and Terry and June and mixes it into a very watchable, very funny, traditional British sit com. A pat on the back to whoever comissioned it and I for one hope it's the first of many. I'm an unashamed lover of the 70's British sit com in all it's forms. However, as the appaling My Family proved, bad comedy is bad comedy. It doesn't matter if is edgy or family friendly it just has to be funny. I have my Frankie Boyle tickets for next year and he can insult anyone he likes, me included as long as he makes me laugh.

2
daveross | 25 November 2009 - 6:02pm

It's the recession I reckon

I haven't seen Miranda so can't comment on that prog. But I do think that in times of relative hardship, there is something warm and cosy about old fashioned stuff. Our mindset changes and I think this is why the Ross/Brand saga was so ill-received. The laddish days of Chris Evans/Loaded/Britpop wouldn't have happened in a recession.

It's the same as for anyone with children, especially young children, they will be slightly more in tune with mushy stuff and this extends to comedy.

0
kb | 25 November 2009 - 6:11pm

Miranda gets a thumbs down in our household...

... nothing to do with being "non-edgy" or otherwise, just don't find it funny.

0
Nicodemus | 25 November 2009 - 6:22pm

was its current time slot

straight after Top Gear on Sundays specifically chosen to annoy people who were hoping to watch Match of the Day 2 at 10pm, but now how to sit through this garbage first - or is it the only way they can get people to tune in?

1
bargepole | 25 November 2009 - 6:41pm

Edginess in general

My neighbours (up here / down here in Southport) love Richard Clayderman, Cliff Richard & The Shadows, canal boats and line dancing. They wouldn't even turn on TV comedy these days because it's all gone for them - they won't watch Miranda because they have been systematically chased away by years of "edgy" programmes which they were repulsed by.

Me? I like a bit of edgy but, to be honest I rejoice when I hear Desmond Carrington, David Jacobs et al on Radio 2 and cannot bear the fact that they are being slowly but surely edged out by more trendy, edgy personalities.

Slightly off-topic rant over. Thanks for being there!

0
Dion Ashton | 25 November 2009 - 8:04pm

long may DC & DJ

contiune but you can't blame the BBC management for looking round for some replacements they are 166 years old between them I think DC dog is getting on a bit even...

0
Chris G | 25 November 2009 - 8:43pm

I think DC is still great

but poor old David J, while being as suave as ever he was, is starting to sound a little slurred now. He must be in his mid-80's. Then again, so must Brian Matthew and he's not sounding so bad.

0
illuminatus | 25 November 2009 - 8:51pm

yep he's 81

2 years younger then other 2 born a month apart in 1926 the year of the general strike!

0
Chris G | 25 November 2009 - 8:57pm

The Thick of Shit!

just caught up with the latest series via iPlayer (and iPlayer Grabber because the BBC iPlayer Desktop doobery doesn't work on a non Intel Mac) - maybe it's me but this is entertainment, I *heart* it muchly

0
James Blast | 25 November 2009 - 8:13pm

Still Game

can I get a (Weegie/Jock) witness?

much comedy and the odd pathos - a classic never bettered

0
James Blast | 25 November 2009 - 8:21pm

Now You're Talkin'!

But then I was a lover of the magnificent Nesbitt, who has few if any peers. I think Gregor Fisher is a latter day Ronnie Barker when it comes to character comedy. He and Billy Boyd were wonderful in a recent series called Empty, which is clearly destined never to see the light of day again.

And it's scary to think that Isa (Jane McCarry - aka Me Too's Granny Murray for all you CBeebies watchers) is not even 40 yet.

Seems the Scots are good at sitcoms.

1
illuminatus | 25 November 2009 - 8:29pm

Still Game - brilliant

Still Game is such a great show, big shame they're not planning to make any more, despite the brilliant Isa/Navid cliffhanger at the end of the last Christmas special... and my parents (as "unedgy" as you can get) love it to death.

I'm in the "thumbs-up" camp with Miranda - it's old-fashioned, derivative, obvious, and I laugh like a drain through the whole thing. As opposed to (say) The Thick Of It, which my head keeps telling me is funny, but which I don't actually laugh at.

Frankie Boyle has always been drawing from a shallow well, and it dried up a long time ago - Charlie Brooker is in a different class.

0
Metal Mickey | 26 November 2009 - 11:57am

At the risk of being shouted at

Edgy comedy - yes it was good/fresh a couple of years ago when comedians started pushing the boundaries, now its just a bit too common-place (seemingly everyones trying it, and sadly doing pretty much the same gags).
Some of it is still bearable (Charlie Brooker), some of it gets on my tits (Frankie Boyle (same three gags (Peadophilia, Kerry Katona & Josef Fritzel).

The best/most amusing/absolutely not edgy stand-up acts I've seen for ages are Rhod Gilbert, Sarah Millican & Michael McIntyre (grabs tin hat and ducks).

0
Rigid Digit | 25 November 2009 - 8:30pm

Nothing wrong there

While I like Frankie Boyle I do wish he'd lay off the Katona 'gags'; they're just a bit...dull now.

Rhod Gilbert I have no strong opinion on, though I think Millican and McIntyre are just dandy. I'm not sure why McIntyre gets a rough ride. He's mainstream and he's funny. It's not like he was like Ben Elton and sold out, he knew where he wanted to be and good luck to him. I happen to like him rather a lot.

Brooker is rather unfairly lumped into the 'edgy' category, I think. (Not that far) beneath the misanthropy is a liberal, thoughtful sort of guy, who just happens to be a fantastic writer. His Monday Guardian column about Mariah Carey being just one case in point.

1
illuminatus | 25 November 2009 - 8:41pm

Sarah Millican not edgy?

Unquestionably excellent, but she definitely has her edgy moments; I've heard her do rape gags before, for example.

0
Fraser M | 25 November 2009 - 10:39pm

Went to iPlayer

to give it a go. Then realised who Miranda Hart was and didn't bother. Maybe she's improved, but I found her woefully unfunny when she did the Celebrity Fame Academy thing a couple of years ago.

0
badartdog | 25 November 2009 - 10:13pm

More Miranda Hart stuff.

Not Going Out. Written by Lee Mack and Andrew Collins. A proper sitcom with proper characters and good gags and storylines and all that. Not particularly edgy but the odd post-watershed smutty bit here and there which worked well in a traditional sitcom format. I thought it was great. So the BBC failed to recommissi.. recomiss.. reccom.. bugger.. cancelled it.

I do find Miranda Hart a bit wooden and monodimensional, though.

0
lennylaw | 25 November 2009 - 11:36pm

Not Going Out

Has just finished a run in NZ. I picked up on it quite late on, but got to really like it. The "duck comfit" line was ROFL, LMAO and indeed LOL.

0
Austin | 25 November 2009 - 11:47pm

Miranda

may be a nice lady but she is embarrassingly stiff and humourless on TV. The radio series of her show was just the same - rather shrill and unbearable.

'Edgy' comedy isn't a new invention but the alternative to it isn't just to do an nth generation photocopy of an old Hi-De-Hi script. Of course some of it, like including the 'You Have Been Watching' end titles, is knowing n post modern but just doesn't work for me.

I don't think taht this rather sickly swallow makes an anti filth summer. The three funniest things on TV atm for me are The Thick Of It and Curb Your Enthusiasm and Harry Hill's Tv Burp. I like me satirical, observationsl and downright surreally silly in equal measure.

'Father Ted' was silly, slapstick, had no swearing (the feck it did!) but was funny, innovative and had some classic lines n scenes.

And Charlie Brooker is right about everything.

0
DogFacedBoy | 26 November 2009 - 10:03am

I yearn for...

George and Mildred.

The vicar mistakenly taking George's jazz mag collection to the church jumble sale... that's my kind of humour. Classy and sophisticated...

0
Patrick Crowther | 26 November 2009 - 10:44am

The problem with "edgy" comedy

or at least discussion of it, is that the edge lies somewhere different for each of us. My edge may be your hinterland. My take on it is that art forms should be judged by their primary characteristics not by secondary considerations such as fashionability, edginess or whatever. So is Miranda funny? Yes, sometimes. For me.

0
ceepee | 27 November 2009 - 3:59pm

Just seen it.

I have a strange crush on her.

0
dannyboy3000 | 29 November 2009 - 10:43pm

Has everyone here forgotten Little Britain?

The swingback against edgy comedy to being all bright lights and wacky and studio audience happened four years ago. Is that the time it takes The Word readership to catch up?

The fundamental flaw in thinking about studio sitcoms nowadays, and I'd use Chris Addison's Lab Rats as a prime example, is that they are only thought of as a light alternative to Ricky Gervais and co. When if you look at all the great studio sitcoms like Steptoe and Son and Porridge, they had a mountain of darkness mixed in with all the boffo gags. Often at the same time.

The idea that edgy can only be on film and wacky can only be in a studio is comedy illiteracy by those in charge that should know better.

0
Extra Texture | 30 November 2009 - 11:23am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2010 Development Hell Ltd