Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Has Dr Who jumped the shark?

BigJimBob's picture

Am I a bit sad? I am not a Dr Who obsessive, but for me this was the only Must Watch in Real Team event today. Me, I thought it was not a little overblown. I have noticed that some bombast is slowly creeping into the scripts over the last year or so, but this ep had the whiff of ripe Camembert which was slightly redeemed by the last 20 minutes or so. I know there are a few proper buffs on the site, so what is the Massive view?

0

John Simm apparently only read

a little online discussion of his previous appearance and said the main criticism was that he was 'camp and OTT'. So he has purposely ramped it up just to annoy the fan boys. Then again the Master is a half dead, unhinged psychopath genius so subtlety isn't required.

This is a big bold n bombastic send off for La Tennant. Its Xmas Day family entertainment. It had that fella from Hi De Hi in it n a randy June Whitfield. Tramp canibalism! The Cribbster!

Wish Murray Gold's music would sod off but all in all wonderfully bonkers.

And an ex Bond n the return of Them Fellas in time for part 2. Bring it on!

2
DogFacedBoy | 25 December 2009 - 9:26pm

With you

regarding the music - makes a lot of the dialogue unintelligible.

0
Black Type | 26 December 2009 - 10:19am

I thought it was pretty good

So not exactly overwhelmed. There was plenty to enjoy in the main meat of the story and it was an improvement on most of the previous Christmas specials. I did enjoy last year's cyberman episode, but the Kylie one was poor, and The Runaway Bride, well, it had Catherine Tate. Not my favourite actor by a very long way, which is unfortunate for a Who fan given the whole of the last series.
The end-of-an-era feeling was cranked up to a high degree, but understandably, and that was fine. My main problem with the episode was the lengthy exposition by Mrs The Master as she chucked that stuff (what was it exactly? And how was a prison guard complicit?) at her regenerating dead husband.
What has stood out about the Russell T Davies Who's is that he can do great moments, and handle long story arcs crossing multiple stories, but the in-between sections, which is to say episodes as they are braodcast, are very inconsistant. I put this towards the higher end, and will certainly watch the finale on New Year's Day, but I'm looking forward to where Stephen Moaffatt takes the show next.

0
Gatz | 25 December 2009 - 9:35pm

The last few minutes

made me wonder if someone's been watching Being John Malkovich!

0
Douglas | 25 December 2009 - 9:39pm

Or Aphex Twin

Or Aphex Twin


2
Andy Lynes | 26 December 2009 - 12:40pm

I have a feeling

that Stephen Moffat may take it closer to the Jon Petwee/Tom Baker era, but (obviously) with better effects. Certainly, his previous scripts have had more of the scary frisson from that period.

0
BigJimBob | 25 December 2009 - 9:41pm

Dr Poor

It was rubbish,the last 10 mins aside. Weak story too, a real drag and Simms was over the top. As much I respect Davies and Tennant, it definitely feels like it's time for them to leave.It's been hyped to death and just didn't cut the mustard for me, bit of a Matrix rip off at the end too. Bah humbug!

0
David Wright | 26 December 2009 - 10:35am

I liked it

Dr Who has always been prone to camp, overblown set pieces, and I thought the cliffhanger, including the exposition of why Dalton was there, was just brilliant. I've always loathed Tennant, though - even before Dr Who, he just pulled the same three or four faces in lieu of actually acting. His "intense" face is particularly irritating - "like he's lost a contact lense" as a friend of mine put it. I thought Simm showed exactly how it was possible to do overblown and ridiculous but still make it seem like you believe it, and completely overshadowed the gurning Paisley lad. And some of the scene in the junkyard was, as another friend said, "like a pilot for a gay tramp-wrestling show - BBC3 would commission it, too".

1
Joe Muggs | 26 December 2009 - 11:13am

It seemed to me

that Davies had decided how the Doctor's fate was going to be sealed, and then worked his way back to the start. I enjoyed it though. Simm is brilliant, as ever. I am very much looking forward to the new Doctor, whom, as I understand, is going to be a much darker and more troubled character. I am also very excited about Moffat, as he was responsible for writing "Blink" the best episode ever, made all the more remarkable by the fact that the doctor was hardly in it.

0
Futurenoir | 26 December 2009 - 11:52am

My problem with this episode

My problem with this episode was that too many characters had too many different plans, none of which the audience was allowed to understand.

The people bringing back the Master wanted him back. Why?

The Green people had invaded the Immortality place. Why?

The black couple were trying to build a gate. Why?

The narrator character was building up to something bigger. What?

The woman in the telly had a different plan all of her own. What?

Towards the very end, some of these were explained tokenly but most of them were hanging around for the most of the episode. Far too needlessly confusing and complex to be the big Christmas blockbuster everyone wanted. It's a total set-up for next week's. We've reached the end now - the time for setting up should be gone.

Then, I have some questions. Why does the Master want to live in a world populated entirely by himself? It just seems like he stumbled accross a grand master plan by accident, and shoved it through. And if we're not supposed to know that the T.Ls are back until the final scene, why show Dalton in T.L. costume about halfway through the episode? Frustrating, when I was SO desperate to love it.

0
Jonah | 26 December 2009 - 12:52pm

Its Part One

of Two. all will become clear next week and all your questions will be answered

Either that or RTD will press the reset button again and people will just go 'Waaaahhhhh!!!'.

1
DogFacedBoy | 26 December 2009 - 2:35pm

I get that...

... and it's a valid response.

But that was a Christmas day ep. It needs to exciting in itself - Christmas is not the time to look so constantly and rigidly ahead. I'm not asking for anything super-sophisticated. Just that, on everyone's fave day of the year, they broadcast an episode that doesn't just have us all wishing the time away until the next instalment. While the episode's still going on.

If they didn't think they could do that with the first part of the Doctor's finale, this story shouldn't have been set/broadcast on Christmas day.

0
Jonah | 26 December 2009 - 6:45pm

Alternatively

if there is one thing that is 'classic Who' is a good old cliffhanger and thats what we got.

Yes we could have had all our presents at once but you'll have to wait til New Years Day - the beginning of a new Doctor and a new year. They couldn't resist that, now could they?

Must add that the scenes with Cribbins in the episode were all great ('She's a Cactus!') - both funny, honest and utterly believeable . I fear he may make me weep like a frakkin baby next week.

If anyone is interested he is doing a Q&A followed by a screening of the 'Dalek Invasion Of Earth' movie (with his brilliant comic roboman canteen scene) at the NFT next month.

http://www.bfi.org.uk/whatson/bfi_southbank/events/bernard_cribbins_in_c...

0
DogFacedBoy | 26 December 2009 - 9:16pm

One of the best

I thought Simm was far nastier and less panto villain this time, Tennant played down the wide-eyed chirpiness and there was hardly any helter-skelter running and shouting the plot over ridiculously loud music.

Davies does seem to like doing two almost separate stories in these two-parters (eg Sontarans) and he's risking a bit of Mail outrage with mention of Christmas being a pagan celebration and Simm scoffing turkey/chicken in one go.

I reckon Cribbo's a Time Lord and the woman in the telly's the Doc's mum.

0
Olthwaite | 26 December 2009 - 4:46pm

A nerd adds

behind Lord Dalton at the end there are two figures covering their faces - is one of them Doctor 11?

0
DogFacedBoy | 26 December 2009 - 4:54pm

And a pedant writes

What sort of idiot would park and run a mobile food van on a desolate industrial site?

It was fairly typical Russell T Davies - lots of loud music instead of decent dialogue or plot and lots of people running about with the audience have little idea of what was going on.

0
Neil Jung | 26 December 2009 - 5:51pm

They were handing out free food to the homeless

You may well ask why the homeless were hanging about in a desolate industrial estate but, in an episode where NOTHING made any sense, it's one of the more trivial worries...

0
Darcy | 27 December 2009 - 1:59pm

Too slick nowadays...

*this* will always be Doctor Who for me...

0
Patrick Crowther | 26 December 2009 - 7:21pm

Too slick...

... many people of a certain age state this preference, and I don't really understand it.

I was too young/not born to watch any of the classic series at the time, but I've seen it since and some of it is actually quite technologically advanced for television of the period. The theme music particularly (first entirely electronic piece of British music, was it?); the ultra-modern Dalek design; a detailed prosthetic like Davros' face; and those gorgeous sets, which must have cost a pretty penny. I'm not saying it was 100 percent cutting edge, but it can't have been embarassing. It scared people.

The same is true now; it's still pieced together on what is very definitely a television budget. The CGI is nothing compared with stuff being done elsewhere - for example, that John Simm blue skull effect is just as unbelievable, comparatively, as the stuff done in the old days. Calling The End of Time Part 1 over-slick when, on the very same day, people were in the cinemas watching Avatar, is a bit weird I think.

1
Jonah | 28 December 2009 - 4:41pm

or this

"Now begins the reign of Sutekh the Destroyer. I shall crush this miserable world and hurl it into the outermost depths of space! My vengeance starts here!"

0
DogFacedBoy | 26 December 2009 - 8:50pm

God, yes! .....

.... the Pyramids Of Mars! "Marcus, I'm your brother!" As a dyed-in-the-wool Sci-Fi afficionado, it pains me to see how bloody awful the new Who has become, with its tedious guest appearances, and that Torchwood spin-off, what were they thinking?! Give me any day of the galactic week the terrifying likes of Tom Baker in the City Of Death, or the Talons Of Weng Chiang : howzthat for a pitch? Doctor Who-as-Sherlock-Holmes meets Fu Manchu and a 25th century mutated despot on the run in Victorian London, with added giant rats and a killer android called the Peking Homunculus!

Best Regards,
Freaky Trigger

0
Freaky Trigger | 26 December 2009 - 10:36pm

"Kneel, insect!"

to which you reply "NO!"

0
Patrick Crowther | 26 December 2009 - 10:48pm

The most terrifiying episode for me

as a 5 year old boy was the Autons, who looked like showroom dummies, because at the time we stayed next to a tailor shop ...

3
Douglas | 27 December 2009 - 11:30am

Old v new Who

I loved the Pertwee/Baker episodes as a nipper but I bought Ark in Space a couple of years ago and it was awful - flabby writing padded out to various artificial end-of-episode cliffhangers. One of the 'larvae' looked like bubble-wrap.

Pertwee's first episode was pretty poor too, although Troughton's surviving Cybermen episodes were terrific - the electronic music and muddy black and white adding an air of menace.

The new Who has a tendency to cram everything in - the episode with the single Dalek was far more effective than the shouty, breakneck Davros one.

I was nearly going to write that the new Who was better, but then I think about the Green Death, the Daemons, Pyramids of Mars, K9...

0
Olthwaite | 27 December 2009 - 12:26pm

That's because...

it was bubble wrap!

0
Patrick Crowther | 27 December 2009 - 7:30pm

I always thought

Troughton was best, although Peter Davidson was under-appreciated. There were some really good scripts around then, for example Enlightenment.

0
BigJimBob | 28 December 2009 - 12:53pm

Spoiler alert

Quite apart from the fact that it was all complete nonsense (and the last few minutes with the multiple Masters was just laughable), doesn't this show that Russell T Davies has only one idea for a Dr Who story, and will keep flogging it as long as possible?

The Daleks are all dead. No, they're not.
The Cybermen are all dead. No they're not.
Rose is gone forever. No, she isn't.
(Billie Piper is a good actor. (No, she isn't).
The Master is dead. No, he isn't.
The Time Lords are all dead. No, they aren't.

Thank God Davies is going. An episode written by him is guaranteed to be awful.

0
ratbiter | 27 December 2009 - 3:38pm

Not fair

He has two ideas (or three if you count 'someone pushed a button and it made all the bad stuff stop').
The other is clear from previous series finales:
Gosh! The daleks evolved from humans!
Gosh! The cybermen evolved from humans!
Gosh! The toglaphane evolved from humans!

0
Gatz | 27 December 2009 - 6:15pm

I have followed Who since late Pertwee / early Baker.

I thought it were alright. It's a kids' show after all (I know, I know...) Not meant to be serious, is it?

I think Tennant is a fine Doctor & I'll miss him - have to agree that RTD has probably run his course as chief writer - I suspect he knows this too. DT is bowing out at the right moment & I hope he gets the finale he deserves.

What about the new fella? The Work Experience Doctor. A place holder for a better known actor, unwilling to fill Tennant's big shoes right away, is my theory. I'll give him two series tops. He might surprise us though - Peter Davison had to follow the mighty Tom Baker into the TARDIS & he did a cracking job - I wish the new incumbent well.

0
prezbo | 27 December 2009 - 4:32pm

Better known actor?

If he does well (and, throwing caution to the wind, I think he will), then by this time next year he'll be one of the best-known actors in the country. You can already feel publications like the Radio Times and the Tabloids itching to hype him.

If he mucks it up, which I don't think he will, then your prediction will be scarily accurate. But I do think that the next regeneration, when it comes, has to be a surprise.

0
Jonah | 28 December 2009 - 3:02pm

You are dead right. Everyone knows his name,

before he's even begun.

I was thinking about the older, better established names that were in the frame - doomed to be unpopular following DT. Matt Smith has everything to gain & little to lose, supposing the team behind him comes up with the goods, and I hope they do. It was a good move casting him - it will bring another new wave of fans & we Brits will always root for an outsider.

Surprise regeneration - yes - if they could keep it under wraps that would be great, but what with the Interweb and all, you can't keep anything secret these days!

My hope is that Smith will get a good run & then morph into Bill Nighy or Sanjeev Bhaskar... Perhaps!?

0
prezbo | 28 December 2009 - 3:58pm

Nighy

Great idea! One of the few older actors who could keep the kids watching, I'd warrant.

Plus, I still think wishfully of the days when Patterson Joseph (Johnson from Peep Show) was the odds-on favorite...

0
Jonah | 28 December 2009 - 4:47pm

Bill Nighy

the more famous he gets the less he alters his acting until every role becomes the same slighty batty old suave sod.

Patterson Joseph would have got my vote too. But I'm not gonna damn the new bloke until at least he says two lines at the end of the finale. This is the law of the internet.

And someone else must post - OMG!!! HE IZ SO FITT!!!! LOLZ

2
DogFacedBoy | 28 December 2009 - 4:52pm

Patterson Joseph would have been great...

I read an interview where he hinted that he'd have been up for it, but didn't get the call. Not sure what happened there. Maybe next time!

0
prezbo | 28 December 2009 - 4:54pm

Anyone been watching

... 10 minute Tales on Sky 1? The Patterson Joseph episode has been easiy the best so far.

0
Jonah | 28 December 2009 - 6:17pm

I would have prefered...

...Chiwetel Efijior, but I think he's gone Hollywood now. A missed opportunity?

Chiwetel Ejiofor
Chiwetel Ejiofor Pics

0
doomah | 28 December 2009 - 7:50pm

I read somewhere

that Richard Ayoade (AKA Moz from the IT Crowd) was under consideration. I was hoping it was true. I reckon he would have been great. Maybe next time??

0
BigJimBob | 28 December 2009 - 6:29pm

as long as

he had Garth Marenghi as his sidekick


0
DogFacedBoy | 28 December 2009 - 7:26pm

Then maybe

The Master could be reincarnated as Dr. Lucien Sanchez:


0
BigJimBob | 28 December 2009 - 8:06pm

SPOILER ALERT

Pirate footage from New Year Day finale - all is revealed


1
JeffLeopard | 27 December 2009 - 6:30pm

the Kandyman

was the 20th Century equivelant of

truly the nadir of both incarnations of the series

1
DogFacedBoy | 27 December 2009 - 6:47pm

Nadir

I may be the only person in Britain who quite liked that one. That series alon had two episodes which I thought worse: The Idiot's Lantern and Fear Her.

1
Gatz | 27 December 2009 - 7:11pm

Any episode that

contains a scratch band knocking out Don't Bring Me Down and the soundtrack containing other ELO beauties can't be all bad. And until Kay unmasked he wasn't half bad.

Fear Her was rubbish though - the last bit with the Olympic torch was just totally cringe making. A true embarrassment.

1
illuminatus | 30 December 2009 - 12:06pm

Oh hang on

Fear Her was also bloody rank. Not just for the 'scary drawing' monster but Huw Edwards rubbish acting doing the commentary to the Olympic Opening Ceremony.

No, my mate who hates the rest of Nu-Who liked the 'Love and Monsters' ep, the contrary git! Then again he has just got a man crush on Marc Warren

0
DogFacedBoy | 27 December 2009 - 8:02pm

Usual RTD stuff, really

Lots of running around and special effects hung on the flimsiest of storylines. In fact, I'm not sure there was a plot - just a series of events loosely tied together with RTD's usual deus ex machina stuff. I know it's a show for children, but they can and do follow a plot - they'll probably find it more enjoyable and affecting too.

AS a result, so much of it did not make any sense at all - all that prison stuff (nice to see a medieval great hall in the middle of a Victorian prison), and was it just me or did Berny Cribbins go into the church at night then had a great view of the stained glass window as daylight streamed through it?

That said, I thought John Simm was much better this time around. Nicely mental, but with some thought and melancholy behind it. And I am inordinately excited about the Time Lords reappearing.

0
Philip Stout | 28 December 2009 - 3:54pm

Right Said Fred

My mum spotted a little continuity error..there was blossom on the trees near Wilf's house and it was supposed to be Winter.

I quite enjoyed it, especially the Aphex Twin tribute at the end and agree it was nice to see the Timelords back complete with their built in head-rests.

I just hope for the new season they tone down *very loud* the orchestral pomp of the music and get Belbury Poly or Broadcast in to do it all on 1980s synths and washboards..far scarier. Worst thing about it is those sawing cello's and brass splattered all over the top of the, otherwise ace, remake of the theme tune.

0
Dr Volume | 28 December 2009 - 5:26pm

Hear all about it, yakerty yak

or The Human League


0
DogFacedBoy | 28 December 2009 - 6:08pm

Animated Criticism

Some Doctor Who fans have had their criticisms of Russell T Davies animated, using genuine transcripts from online Doctor Who fan forums. And are more often than not, bloody funny. Warning - The language is not family friendly

The Last of The Time Lords Review
Two Doctor Who fans "Rob" and "Rani" review the Russell T Davies penned 2007 series end, John Simm's first appearance as The Master

The Doctor's Daughter
It is reported that David Tennant is dating Peter Davison's daughter Georgia Moffet, who also appeared with Tennant as his onscreen daughter in Doctor Who. Rob does not approve

Goodbye Russell
One Doctor Who forum writes a gushing tribute to Russell T Davies leaving. Another feels the need to balance opinion with some serious non-gush

Christopher Eccleston
A heated discussion on why the Ninth Doctor looks like "some pub bloke taxi driver who just came out the bookies"

0
Extra Texture | 29 December 2009 - 10:04am

Those....

...are magnificent.

0
Davy H | 30 December 2009 - 1:31pm

The

one discussing Hartnell having it away with Carole Anne Ford is Dr Who forums in a nutshell

0
DogFacedBoy | 30 December 2009 - 4:35pm

Bring on the Moff

RTD deserves total respect as the executive who made Who more popular than ever, making a show that Proves Family TV Can Still Exist etc. But the episodes that he actually writes are generally among the weaker of the series. Whereas Steven Moffatt's ones, from the demented Empty Child ("Are you my mummy?") onwards, are usually the best (the one in the library apart.)
I thought the Christmas Day one was just about well acted enough to cover up for a pretty shambolic script. Never mind marking time until tomorrow's finale, it's marking time until Moffatt's proper new series for me. Not sure about Matt Smith just yet - he was the weakest actor in the otherwise wonderful Moses Jones - but let's give him a chance until Patterson Joseph hopefully gets the job as Doctor 12.

1
Vexed | 31 December 2009 - 11:27am

Stop the whinging

For God's sake. Without RTD Doctor Who would still be a mouldering old joke about cardboard sets and men in rubber monster suits. I think too many of you view the 'good old days' through rose tinted specs. Yes Pertwee and Baker were good, but the show tailed off badly after the Peter Davidson era. RTD revamped it brilliantly and, a few weak episodes aside, it has been 'must-see' viewing ever since. The special effects are generally superb, the villains have been handled with reverence to the past and despite Tennant's occasional tendancy to gurn, he's been a brilliant Doctor. The final story arc where he's facing his own demise is a corker. The Xmas day episode had an elegaic feel to it, and do some of you really want everything explained to you as it goes along? The whole point of a two parter is that there are questions to be answered. I look forward to what Moffat and Smith will do with the series. Give them a chance instead of writing them off, as some of you seem to be doing. For those of you who don't like the series, stick to your Tom Baker videos. ;-)

1
Dark_Matter | 31 December 2009 - 1:12pm

all the RTD 'haters'

will be saying the same about Moffat in 6 months - "its not as good as 'Blink', he should stick to writing 'Press Gang' etc".

As you say w\o Russell this new version would never have flown or had the emotional base it has. Yes he has a small bag of tricks that he uses too often but the internet makes him out to be some kind of talentless hack.

All Who showrunners\producers seem to get a kicking, thats what they are there for. Except Verity Lambert who was ace.

Am interested to see if Moffat's 'Sherlock' project with Mark Gattis gets off the ground as Mark's plan get his Lucifer Box novels on the screen floundered.

0
DogFacedBoy | 31 December 2009 - 1:20pm

Respect is due to RTD for getting Who back

but that doesn't mean that everything he touches turns to gold.

I just think he could do better. I may be wrong as it was a long time ago, but I seem to remember his other work - things like The Second Coming - having a plot thread and progression that at least had some sort of internal sense, which too often is lacking from RTD's episodes.

It's frustrating to have problems solved by whipping out a sonic screwdriver, "reversing the polarity", rebooting or some other such out-of-the-blue device. That sort of laziness serves to undermine the sense of jeopardy that was always central to Dr Who.

0
Philip Stout | 31 December 2009 - 5:21pm

Doctor Who coming back had nothing to do with Russell T Davies

It was coming back anyway. He just got the contract.

0
Extra Texture | 31 December 2009 - 9:09pm

Ahem...

Not that you've denied this, but it's success had everything to do with him.

One one side of the Atlantic, as has been well documented, David Simon was realising T.V. as a novel, treating his viewers as adults who could appreciate the minutaie of a developing story.

This side of the pond, RTD was engaging in a paralell process with Who, inventing a new televisual structure. Uniting the best of best of both worlds, here was a series format which wowed the casual, one-off episode viewer, yet also thoroughly rewarded the fan who tuned in every week, with plot arcs, character development, and the sheer joy of contrast between each broadcast No show has ever targeted both types of viewer, so simeltaneously, so well.

The skill of his innovatation is just as signifigant as Simon's.

0
Jonah | 1 January 2010 - 5:09pm

And above all this

w\o RTD scripts and as head honcho its unlikely that we would have got a brilliant casting choice of Christopher Eccleston who gave the series some serious credibility with his acting chops. He said all along what attracted him was RTD scripts.

Its sad that the heavy workload (and inner disputes) wasn't to his liking but the series success is built on the foundations he set in place during that 1st series.

W\o RTD n CE we would probably have ended up with Alan Davies accompanied by Ferne Cotton and it would be dead in the water

RTD also bought in Moffat, Mark Gattis, Paul Cornell and Gareth Roberts and more as writers. Yes he took the contract offered him but it was a hell of a risk to take. To bring the show back convincingly due to the deteriation of the original series and the hackneyed sarky view of the sci fi fandom - who'd want that task?

0
DogFacedBoy | 1 January 2010 - 5:28pm

Ahem, ahem

In respect of your contentions, I would argue that Aaron Sorkin and Alan Ball conceived of similar ways of constructing 'adult', novelistic TV (for The West Wing and Six Feet Under respectively also the creators of The Sopranos) somewhat prior to Mr Simon. And in the genre of sci-fi/fantasy, I would argue that Chris Carter and Joss Whedon created the similar balance of stand-alone episodes alongside strong, engaging story arcs so much better in The X-Files and Buffy.

0
Black Type | 1 January 2010 - 6:54pm

To rephrase...

It's very possible, and understandable, that you prefer Buffy, but in terms of sheer description, I disagree strongly.

In the first 3 years of RTD Who, it was perfect for the occasional viewer, as each week it's a totally new adventure, with new characters, enemies, locations and plots. Every episode, new viewers and fans discover all this, together. In Buffy, the wide principal cast is the same week to week, and new locations and sets are rarely employed. New viewers have to catch up with regular viewers, who have backlogs of infomation on all this stuff.

And at the same time, in-series DW also builds itself as a soap, with character arcs and developments. Buffy does this too, and just as well, but its hardly as suprising because the same characters and location has been there all along.

I'd make a similar case with The Wire. Perhaps other shows had used the structure to a similar standard, but none had made it so extreme, so crystal clear. The plot break between one Sopranos episode and the next, for example, is almost always big. In The Wire it never is. Six Feet Under, I must admit, I don't really know.

0
Jonah | 2 January 2010 - 12:52am

they got rid

of the sonic screwdriver in Davison's time as it was too often used as a 'get out of jail free' card and so was sad to see it return.

But you're right, Rustie is too fond of reversing the polarity which is what made the end of the Torchwood: Children Of earth so dumb. he was doing ok up to that point.

0
DogFacedBoy | 31 December 2009 - 5:57pm

just for interest - if you're interested...

this is what sci-fi writer Charles Stross has to say about technology in Star Trek:

http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2009/10/why_i_hate_star_trek...

and this is what he says about Doctor Who:
(scroll down to Oh no, Russel T. Davies, no!)
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/

0
Glenbervie | 31 December 2009 - 10:00pm

Just saw the part II

Still nothing to really change my mind. It was a single 1 hour ep stretched over 2 and a bit hours....

0
BigJimBob | 1 January 2010 - 8:56pm

Yeah cos

they really could have packed all that in to an hour

Wasn't perfect by any means but at least all those goodbyes to the old companions suggests that Moffat is starting with a clean slate. That's RTD's world and its gone.

Then again, I thought that when Rose buggered off the first time.....

0
DogFacedBoy | 1 January 2010 - 9:14pm

dittoed comment ignore

soz

0
BigJimBob | 1 January 2010 - 8:59pm

Wish it was a clean slate

But Moffat is plainly going to have to do an episode revealing that the mysterious woman is the Doctor's mum, probably in the same one revealing where the Master buggered off to.
Also, "Verity Lambert the only producer whose era wasn't slated"? You're forgetting Philip Hinchcliffe (golden mid-period Tom Baker), whose episodes are most similar to the ones Moffat has so far written in tone.
As mentioned, I think RTD has been a brilliant producer, I just think his own scripts were generally hammy and lacked internal logic. It was all about the set-pieces, and he didn't seem to care too much about how the dots got joined. Which is weird as, when he tries (The Second Coming, the five-part most recent Torchwood), he can be one of the best writers going.

0
Vexed | 2 January 2010 - 12:20am

A fitting farewell.

Bring on the spring!

1
prezbo | 2 January 2010 - 12:43am

anyone else notice that

Jessica Hynes character was called Verity Newman as a nod to the original team and back to the episode featuring Hynes where 'John Smith' says his parents were Sydney and Verity.

ok just me then.....

I have a feeling that the mysterious lady is a Moffat idea that will bleed into the next series. The Master went back to the Time War with the Time Lords. Until he;s needed again.

I thought again the scenes between Cribbins n Tennant were the heart of the whole piece and the final bits of the Doctor raging that he has to die to save Wilf spot on.

The trailer for the next series looks rather good. although there are already people slagging off Matt Smith on the strength of 20 secs of mad shouting. And so it goes.....

0
DogFacedBoy | 2 January 2010 - 1:53am

Can someone explain to me what 'jumped the shark' means?

I have yet to achieve this feat of athleticism so I am a bit confused.

0
Patrick Crowther | 2 January 2010 - 11:34am
Davy H | 2 January 2010 - 11:36am

I see...

I think I prefer 'the point at which a show becomes rubbish'. Thanks for the info.

0
Patrick Crowther | 2 January 2010 - 11:48am

PS: The Moffatt

era will be splendid, just you wait & see.

1
Davy H | 2 January 2010 - 11:38am

Time for a change

Overall it's been one of the best things on TV in recent years, and most of the stories have been highly entertaining. But it's for the best that Russel T Davies is moving on. He has become too fond of the big blockbuster approach in which the Universe is threatened with extinction, and the David Tennant finale was one of the weakest we've seen - way over the top with a comic book performance by John Simm. And the last twenty minutes was dreadful, self-indulgent hash. Hopefully Stephen Moffat will take it in a new direction - smaller scale, more intense stories that are genuinely scarey. We'll have to wait and see what Matt Smith can do in the lead role, but I'm glad they didn't give the part to a name actor who would have brought the baggage of previous high profile roles with him.

1
Rotherhithe Hack | 2 January 2010 - 12:03pm

i actually think

that RTD had pretty much burnt out in terms of Dr Who. As has been pointed out upstream, his plots are beginning to be a repetition on a theme, which was reused this time around as well. I think Moffat will take it back a little to where the original concept was coming from. Interestingly, on the BBC 3 autopsy-of-the-latest-episode prog, RTD seemed to imply that most of the characters that inhabited his rebooted universe may be disappearing, so it may be a de novo start again.

0
BigJimBob | 2 January 2010 - 7:36pm

Yes - Doctor Who has jumped the shark...

....but the good news is, it's one of the few TV shows than can jump back since it can reinvent itself completely with a new cast, new writers and new production team.

In my humble opinion, it jumped during Planet Of The Dead (the Easter special) when the psychic told Tennant "he will knock four times". Lazy scripting for such an important plot element. Everything after - apart from the momentary upward blip of Water Of Mars which was good - has been awful.

I'm not a Russell T Davies hater and even bought and enjoyed the fantastic (but pricey!) The Writers Tale book that detailed RTD's process of writing. Anyone interested in writing should read it. And RTD did reinvent and reinvigorate Doctor Who to be more than a sci-fi nerd interest.

However...RTD and David Tennant overstayed by a year. They should have both left at the end of season 4, before the specials. The last 2 eps of Tennant's reign were embarrassingly awful, made worse by RTD claiming in every pre-air date interview his scripts were "simply brilliant".

And what really galled as a long term Doctor Who watcher was RTD's attempt to undermine the future of the show on the way out. All that guff about the Doctor's regeneration being "like death" was very uncharitable to Matt Smith and the next production team's efforts. Yes, Tennant has been great (up there with Tom Baker) but no actor is bigger than the show and Tennant's extended goodbyes to everyone he'd ever met at the end of his last ep was mawkish and lacklustre. Every other Doctor got a simple but effective send off rather than a tour of the universe before popping off. I didn't feel sorry to see him go by the end which is a terrible indictment of the last year's episodes since he was so good in the part. Hopefully Matt Smith's doctor and new producer/writer Stephen Moffat can reinvent the show yet again.

*phew* Got a little worked up there about, what is essentially, "a kids show"...!!

0
Neil Walker | 3 January 2010 - 8:41am

Can I post this here?

Looks fab. Lots of running and overacting. What you would expect in a children's drama really. The kids will love him.

0
Beany | 3 January 2010 - 1:41pm

this is more like it

let's cut to the chase and stop all the emotional grandstanding.

0
BigJimBob | 3 January 2010 - 5:47pm

Looks like a lot of fun to me!

There's a slightly retro look to it, and it's good to see that they've cast someone weird-looking as the Doctor.

0
Mavis Diles | 4 January 2010 - 8:11pm

Its bothered me for a while

who the new Who looks like until it hit me

Hello????!!! Mcfly!!!

And those Daleks look a bit old skool. New companion easy on the eye, touch of the Lalla Wards.

0
DogFacedBoy | 4 January 2010 - 7:52pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd