Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Great, Great, Great, Rubbish

hotdoggity's picture

Everyone knows the obvious candidates (Stevie Wonder etc.) where it all went wrong overnight - great, essential material followed by dross. But what about the more obscure artists? I offer up Gomez. Great Mercury winning debut, even better follow up Liquid Skin. Then? Nothing. Blues by numbers, underuse of main weapon Ottewell, nowt but disappointment.

0

My first thought

is Turin Brakes. A pretty decent first album "The Optimist LP" followed not to shabbily by "Ether Song". A 3 year gap (I think, will stand corrected) until "Dark on Fire". Didn't find that one nearly as good as the their two openers. Are Turin Brakes obscure enough for this thread?

0
prettyvacant | 7 August 2008 - 11:40pm

Hang on........

Stevie Wonder: OK, "I just called etc" and "Ebony and Ivory" are dross beyond compare,but are insufficient to damn or blight a reputation such as is his. Yes, it is true he has a deal less prolific a muse as in yesteryear; the gap between new material gets ever longer, but last years (or was it the year before?)"A Time to Love" (2005, I just checked) was not bad by any standard, with at least 2 corkers I will be disappointed not to hear live next month. (So I'm a fan, even maybe a touch biased but....)
He is only "rubbish" to the same sort of degree as is Ray Davies or Roy Wood, which I hope would provoke dissent. Yes, some of the inspiration, or even just the drive, may have dwindled, but, as Ray Davies has shown, there is still a song or two left within him. We await in hope for Roy.
Somehow to compare Gomez and the Turin Shrouds, sorry Brakes, seems a little mean spirited.

0
Retropath2 | 8 August 2008 - 8:07am

Exactly, Retro!

Stevie Wonder on form = joy distilled.


[Sorry, Rets, no sax on this version ;-) ]

0
nigelthebald | 8 August 2008 - 8:31am

Is that What the Fuss?

Awesome tune, it's up there with Superstition and Master Blaster for me.

0
Niks | 8 August 2008 - 9:45am

No, Niks,

see my 8:40 entry - it's an alternate version of S'stition.

0
nigelthebald | 8 August 2008 - 9:50am

Aha

Excitement and YouTube frustration got the better of me. There are no Youtube clips of What's the Fuss which are embeddable but whatever you do seek it out, Prince on guitar and En Vogue on backing vocals - it. is. awesome.

0
Niks | 8 August 2008 - 9:54am

You Tube Frustration.

I'm thinking of getting a t-shirt printed.

0
nigelthebald | 8 August 2008 - 10:02am
Blue Sky | 8 August 2008 - 11:12am

Sorry yes it is,,,,

I should have realised you had already tried this.

0
Blue Sky | 8 August 2008 - 11:19am

Not quite, Scottie!

Double click and it'll play. (I just did and it just did!)

0
nigelthebald | 8 August 2008 - 11:25am

Great, too!

Never heard it before.

0
nigelthebald | 8 August 2008 - 11:31am

Or

Here's the widgetty thing


It's track 12 and it sizzles.

0
Niks | 8 August 2008 - 11:45am

Thankyou for confirmation that it does work

Appreciated.

0
Blue Sky | 8 August 2008 - 11:52am

I hate it when it does that!

Go to You Tube, search for Stevie Wonder Superstition and click on the one saying 'SW in the studio 1973'. Though obviously Retro would prefer the album version, which has a sax as well!

0
nigelthebald | 8 August 2008 - 8:40am

Stevie Wonder...

...I bought 'A Time 2 Love' for £1 in Fopp earlier in the year but never got around to playing it but buoyed by Retropath's post I'll give it a spin.

I have to say I was slightly disappointed by what I heard from The Coral after that debut album. They moved into a more generic indie sound after their earlier work, I felt.

0
JJ (not verified) | 8 August 2008 - 9:01am

The Coral?

No way! Roots and Echoes, their last, is anything but "generic indie".

What about The Beta Band? Their first album, albeit a collection of EPs, was superb. The second was rubbish (even they thought so!); the third didn't really recover all that much ground; and the fourth sank without a trace.

0
Red Umpire | 8 August 2008 - 12:16pm

Belle & Sebastian

They have got worse with each album release. The first 3 are all top drawer (albeit in diminishing quality - nothing beats Tigermilk) but each one after just gets worse until the last one which I can barely listen to.

0
kb | 8 August 2008 - 12:02pm

I disagree....

Dear Catastrophe Waitress is a top album - ok it's not as good as their best (Tigermilk) but I reckon it's at least as good as '...Arab Strap' or '...Sinister'. Live, however, they suck.

0
hotdoggity | 8 August 2008 - 3:09pm

I disagree more

Agh, Belle And Sebastian? I can't stand for one of my favourite bands being done down like this. Dear Catastrophe Waitress and The Life Pursuit are also top drawer, and I've enjoyed both their gigs I've seen very much. I'd say they're one of the bands who totally buck the trend this thread is aimed at!

0
Badgerous | 8 August 2008 - 9:47pm

How's about...

...Jesse Malin? Awesome, raw, natural debut followed by over-produced, unlistenable-to rubbish.

And his buddy Ryan Adams - great as part of Whiskytown, exceptional for his first three solo records, then a distinct lack of quality control set in.

The reverse has to be Elbow: each record has progressively improved up on the last, layering on levels of lyricism and instrumental delight, making the last album simply sublime.

0
popdoc | 8 August 2008 - 10:00pm

No, no, no, no no...

Popdoc, top marks from me for the artists you choose to talk about - Jesse, Ryan and Elbow are three of my favourites.

I agree that Jesse's debut is his best, though I do enjoy The Heat and Glitter In The Gutter. The covers record is bad, though. Ryan, I think Cold Roses and Easy Tiger are two of his best.

0
Badgerous | 13 August 2008 - 9:31pm

Gomes - Blues By Numbers???

Think you've got it wrong on Gomez there, the album after Liquid Skin was In Our Gun, clearly their most experimental release. I find it hard to believe you've actually heard it given that inaccurate description.

0
kidpresentable | 20 August 2008 - 3:40pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd