Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Great acts, rubbish album covers

DrJ's picture

Having seen the ad for the new Springsteen album in Word, I have to note that the cover of Working For A Dream is appaling. In general I think all of Bruce's sleeves are poor, certainly all the covers post Tunnel of Love have been dreadful. Tom Joad, Devils and Dust, Magic, all have this hopeless colourblind sepia photoshop bilge all over them.

Same thing goes for The Who. I was really looking forward to Endless Wire when it came out but the cover was drek. Then I remembered all their covers are pretty poor too, in particular Who's Next. Has any other album had such a divergence between the quality on the inside and the picture on the outside?

0

Cannot agree about 'Who's Next'...

I think it's a great image. Truly memorable.

As for Bruce, 'Born To Run' has a classic cover. But I agree about the majority of his albums not being up there in the design department. Actually, hold on... I like 'Darkness On The Edge Of Town' as well, simple and direct. And 'Nebraska' has a stark image to match the rawness of the music.

0
Patrick Crowther | 7 January 2009 - 10:47pm

Seconded.

Rubbishing a Hipgnosis cover is worse than asking for Private Eye in WHSmiths.

(edit) My further reading has revealed that this isn't a Hipgnosis cover, as I'd always assumed. You learn something new every day.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 8 January 2009 - 11:48am

Deffo not Hipgnosis...

Wasn't it taken by a roadie (or similar) on the drive back from a gig?

0
stimpy | 8 January 2009 - 3:06pm

Greetings from Asbury Park NJ....

Has a FANTASTIC cover....all the others are pretty grim. I'd venture that Born to Run is only iconic due to the brilliance of the album, not the pretty bog standard chummy shot on the sleeve.

0
Six Dog | 8 January 2009 - 11:47am

Can't agree

Born To Run is a great picture with a great name and a great design. He turned up for that session with just Clarence, which suggested he had a good idea of how he wanted to position himself. It's one of the great advertising images in pop history.

0
David Hepworth | 8 January 2009 - 1:19pm

One of the bootlegs

of Born To Run outtakes (War Of The Roses? Running Out Of Innocence?) has a similar but different cover - an outtake from the same session.

0
stimpy | 8 January 2009 - 3:04pm

he was evidently happy with the 'image' from that shoot, alright

as the cover of his Greatest Hits album of 94-95ish was from that session also.

0
ivan | 8 January 2009 - 3:10pm

Who's Next...

Quite a cheeky image and fairly witty to boot. Also, a good bit of 'industrial history' (if that's the phrase). Taken on a slag heap near Sheffield apparently... not many of those left these days.

0
Mr Sparks | 10 January 2009 - 6:40pm

Easington in County Durham actually

Easington in County Durham actually

0
Neil Jung | 15 January 2009 - 2:51pm

But, yes...

The cover for the new one is beyond terrible, as is The Ghost Of Tom Joad. Don't have a problem with Devils And Dust or Magic, though.

0
Lucas Hare | 7 January 2009 - 11:10pm

Interesting cover

Indefensibly awful album.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

0
Lucas Hare | 7 January 2009 - 11:15pm

I...

... like Self Portrait, it's a nice album. Far better than Empire Burlesque, Dylan and the Dead or Saved.

0
Niks | 8 January 2009 - 11:05am

Having electrodes attached to ones genitals...

...is a more pleasant experience than listening to Dylan And The Dead - and I speak as a long-term Deadhead and sometime Bobcat.

0
stimpy | 8 January 2009 - 12:33pm

ah, but I'd bet that your

experience of having electrodes attached to your genitals is rather more limited.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 8 January 2009 - 2:02pm

True...

I listened to Dylan And The Dead TWICE

0
stimpy | 8 January 2009 - 4:44pm

Dylan And The Dead

Crap music and crap cover.

0
Lucas Hare | 8 January 2009 - 9:43pm
nicktf | 7 January 2009 - 11:48pm

And another great Who cover

Tells you all you need to know about what's on the album.

Quadrophenia

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 8 January 2009 - 10:34am

Alright

OK but apart from Born To Run and The Who Sell Out, what have the Romans ever done for us...

I really don't like the Who's Next cover. Maybe it's my aversion to public urination.

0
DrJ | 8 January 2009 - 1:00am

Boss Cover

is pretty dire, looks like work in progress of some devilish kind. Reminded me of his last lp cover, which was naff as well.
But as we all know, cover art is not as good now, as we mostly buy cds. Doesn't have the same impact as vinyl.
One of my favourite worst covers, is the collection by The Stranglers, believe it was one of their first greatest hits sets, and by god is it poor.

0
Mint | 8 January 2009 - 1:44am

Without going all proggy

to the ire of certain forum notables, I posit that Fish-era Marillion were a great band with lousy covers.

Right, who wants to lay into Roger Dean?

0
nicktf | 8 January 2009 - 2:00am

Bloody hell that's hideous...

and what, pray tell, is Michael Bolton doing behind the drum kit?

0
Patrick Crowther | 8 January 2009 - 9:30am

and not

Dean, uh-uh, nope, no way..

0
James Blast | 9 January 2009 - 12:33am

No...

Mark Wilkinson, I believe. Just opening the door to abusing painted covers in general, if anyone wanted to run with it. Looks like Roger's safe, though...

0
nicktf | 9 January 2009 - 9:43pm

Of course he's safe round here...

I even went to the Ideal Home Exhibition in (about) 1976 to see the house he'd designed - it was exactly the same as the one in his Views book and looked just like something from one of his paintings

0
stimpy | 10 January 2009 - 3:53pm

I've been to Roger Dean's house

What a lovely bloke. And exactly the way you'd expect a man who's spent the last forty years painting floating islands in space to be like.

0
simonperrins | 11 January 2009 - 2:58pm

a curved ball

no way does this do what's contained within justice

0
James Blast | 8 January 2009 - 2:07am

and, typographically...

...that 'E' in Curve is really upsetting

0
stimpy | 8 January 2009 - 12:34pm

actually

that's the only thing about that cover I don't pour scorn upon

0
James Blast | 9 January 2009 - 12:34am

"Who's Next" is a brilliant cover

It really helped change your perception of the music inside. It was raw and strange and very British and it rescued the music from any taint of pomposity.(Have a look at our Album Cover Atlas to see where it was shot.)
Springsteen's album covers since Tunnel Of Love have looked as if they're plucked from the Hallmark Americana Range. They look like John Mellencamp covers.
Oh, and while I'm at it, this is a perfect place to post this reminder of the days when artists were free to turn their album covers into puerile jokes.
Image

0
David Hepworth | 8 January 2009 - 7:44am

I'd lay real Welsh pounds...

...on that being a Hipgnosis cover. It has ALL the hallmarks of something Storm Thorgerson designed - fussy design, 'witty' visual effects, clever (for the day) graphic effects.

Of course, sometimes, he got it right - cf the Dark Side Of The Moon cover

0
stimpy | 8 January 2009 - 9:38am

The Hipgnosis hallmark of hideousness...

in full effect, even if I'm not sure if it is one of theirs. To think I used to like Storm Thorgerson's 'art'. Euuurgghh...

0
Patrick Crowther | 8 January 2009 - 10:10am

Theres an "Art" gallery......

....in the middle of Brum, where you can buy silkscreen prints of all your favourite covers, from the spread of Thorgerson Floyd ones, to all the Led Zep and (interestingly also mentioned above) Who covers.
How much?
To you, sir, £1500!
(I think they saw you coming.......)

0
Retropath2 | 8 January 2009 - 10:21am

Beg to differ.

The mere fact that Hipgnosis has its own recognisable hallmarks is a triumph in itself.

I'd argue that "fussy" design isn't one of them - there is nothing fussy about one of his best known covers, the one for the Quatermass album on Vertigo.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 8 January 2009 - 11:37am

The Hipgnosis book...

...Walk Away Renee, is still a favourite of mine although I'm always drawn more to the George Hardie designs than the Storm Thorgerson ones. There's something about Hardie's very 'graphical' style that appeals.

(Check Genesis - The Lamb and Wings - Venus & Mars for examples)

Storm's earlier work was fantastic - and original - but I feel that it rapidly became a cliche in it's own right and he pushed it too far.

Walk Away Renee IS an essential read though

0
stimpy | 8 January 2009 - 12:38pm

The Goodbye Look

is also worth owning, can't remember the name of the one after that but it had all gone a bit coffee table overpriced artwank by then. I still think their work is outstanding and I'd be hard pushed to find a fave - tonight's are:
Photobucket
Photobucket
fawcet, geddit?

0
James Blast | 8 January 2009 - 11:52pm

Location of Who's Next cover

According to the Word Album Atlas it was shot at Easington Colliery, Durham. However, the sleeve notes for the CD say that it was shot on the way back from a gig in Sunderland on a slag heap just outside Sheffield.

Which version is right?

0
Mr Sparks | 10 January 2009 - 7:03pm

Surely...

Pet Sounds.

0
Inky Fingers | 8 January 2009 - 8:21am

I second that

Not a surfboard in sight

0
Handsome.P.Wonderful | 8 January 2009 - 11:59am

Cheap 'n' nasty

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Retrospective-Best-Buffalo-Springfield/dp/B00000...
(Sorry, I still don't know how to cut and paste a picture......)
This cover has to be the cheapest effort in the world: you can see the scissor cuts in the "background" allowing the insertions of the smaller images.
O so cruddy.
Good LP tho'.

0
Retropath2 | 8 January 2009 - 8:51am

I think

it's meant to look like that, does that help?

0
James Blast | 9 January 2009 - 12:36am

Can anyone identify a less than terrible

RT album cover? I think it started with 'Sunnyvista' but really blossomed during the solo years. Pretty much great content, goes without saying.

0
Steven C | 8 January 2009 - 9:04am

I really like this one

Image

0
David Hepworth | 8 January 2009 - 9:07am

Best of a bad lot

... maybe.

0
Steven C | 8 January 2009 - 10:26am

I think this is a fabulous cover...

two really striking portraits (Linda is on the back) that reflect the Thompsons' Islamic faith. They also hint at the spiritual nature of much of the music to be found on the record.

0
Patrick Crowther | 8 January 2009 - 9:22am

Seconded

I particularly love the stunning picture of Linda on the back cover (cruelly relegated to the CD booklet on the CD remaster).

0
Gatz | 8 January 2009 - 9:35am

Agreed.

Excellent cover, excellent content. As I said though the rot set in with 'Sunnyvista' and after.

0
Steven C | 8 January 2009 - 10:28am

Fair Point

Most of them are dreadful (though I don't mind Front Parlour Ballads which a lot of people hate, though the album is probably his weakest). Worst of the lot would be Amnesia, if it wasn't for the Official Richard and Danny boot 'Live at Crawley', on which 2 bearded, middle-aged men kiss a breath-takingly ugly baby (RT's youngest, Jack, I'm told). Readers of a nervous disposition should not click through - http://www.richardthompson-music.com/albumart/lac1.jpg

0
Gatz | 8 January 2009 - 10:51am

Working On The Song

Not keen on Springsteen's latest single either, it seems a bit lack lustre and uninspiring. Darkness On The Edge Of Town and Born To Run have simple but effective covers.

0
David Wright | 8 January 2009 - 9:10am

Neil Young surely wins

Has he ever had a decent album cover? Almost universally dire, plumbing spectacular depths with the likes of On the Beach, American Stars n Bars and Zuma. Fine albums all. But he reserves the very worst for his worst music - Everybody's Rocking, Are You Passionate, Landing on Water, etc.
Only passable cover in a 40 year career is Ragged Glory.

0
Madrid | 8 January 2009 - 9:58am

After the Goldrush....

Great cover I thought...

0
Six Dog | 8 January 2009 - 11:50am

Ragged Glory

Great cover.

0
LOUDspeaker | 15 January 2009 - 4:49pm

Squeeze

Great band, awful album covers.

Domino

0
Steve Hill | 8 January 2009 - 10:34am

and another.......

Photobucket

0
Steve Hill | 8 January 2009 - 10:36am

and another...................

play

...and there's plenty more where that came from.

0
Steve Hill | 8 January 2009 - 10:38am

REM

I think Murmur is a good cover but every single one that followed is awful (and they are my all-time favourite band).

0
kb | 8 January 2009 - 10:35am
Chimney Singing... | 8 January 2009 - 10:35am

Undisputed Worst Sleeve

This is awful on so many levels.

0
Leedsboy | 8 January 2009 - 10:41am

In the 1990s...

I did a bit of on-off teaching in art schools around the country and there was a girl on every course running up an outfit like this. Wonder if they still do it.

What makes this cover particularly bad in my opinion is the twiddly coloured thing in the bottom right-hand corner. What's that about?

0
Clerk Kent | 8 January 2009 - 11:21am

broke my heart

Teenage favourites of mine, I knew the Undertones would never, ever be taken seriously after that cover. First record of theirs I could not bring myself to buy... who would want to buy such a thing?

0
paulwright | 8 January 2009 - 12:20pm

should they have called it...

Meat the band...

/coat

0
Glenbervie | 8 January 2009 - 9:50pm

I think

it's wonderful, should I seek advice?

0
James Blast | 8 January 2009 - 11:57pm

An anorak writes.....

The "twiddly" thing is the name of the record label - ARDECK.

Presumably its meant to look arty and modern - just like Morriseys sister with her bacon and back-combing look.

0
Hot Cider | 9 January 2009 - 12:06am

I think thats the Ardeck logo

which was their record label at the time. Crap logo though.

0
Leedsboy | 9 January 2009 - 12:09am
Leedsboy | 9 January 2009 - 12:10am

I'd like to see...

... a return to the day when album covers had the tracklisting on and a picture of the band standing in a group holding their instruments (apart from the drummer who was just holding his sticks), and then on the back one of those fluffy articles usually penned by John Peel or the editor of Rhythm and Blues magazine or some such about how great the band is.

0
Niks | 8 January 2009 - 11:17am
Clerk Kent | 8 January 2009 - 11:28am

Talk Talk....

A brilliant mix of ambient/jazz/folk/classical/avant-garde/psychedelia on the inside

A bunch of pseudo-Dali meets Athena nonsense on the outside

0
jimmymack | 8 January 2009 - 11:51am

There's nothing to say that...

...great musicians are necessarily graphic designers. In fact, as we have just shown, there's plenty of evidence to show that musical ability and graphic ability might be mutually exclusive.

It seems that musicians refuse to believe this, though :-(

0
stimpy | 8 January 2009 - 12:42pm

Hipgnosis

delivered a selection of images for bands/record execs to look at, then did all the graphics, no artist involvement beyond that

0
James Blast | 9 January 2009 - 12:42am

Even FACtory...

...let bands do their own artwork sometimes - check the first James EP - drawn by the drummer

Sometimes it works, of course, cf The Stone Roses, but in general musicians don't make good graphic designers.

0
stimpy | 9 January 2009 - 11:00am

What about this?

Great album, terrible sleeve, terrible haircut.

0
Paolo Meccano | 8 January 2009 - 1:11pm

I'm positive..

... most of you have already google imaged "worst album cover ever " but if you haven't it truly is an eye oener.

This is main contender

[URL=http://img181.imageshack.us/my.php?image=worstalbumcovers07qm6.jpg][IMG]http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/361/worstalbumcovers07qm6.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

0
spinoza013 | 8 January 2009 - 1:35pm

I'm positive...

... most of you have already google imaged "worst album cover ever " but if you haven't it truly is an eye oener.

This is main contender

0
spinoza013 | 8 January 2009 - 1:37pm

didn't so much make my eyes open

as make my eyes water. And not in a good way.

0
ivan | 8 January 2009 - 3:11pm

Nick Drake

Bryter Layter. Wonderful music, my favourite of his three, but that sleeve ... dear God.

0
Johan | 8 January 2009 - 9:14pm

Re: Nick

Isn´t Pink Moon worse? I don´t get that one, maybe wrongly assuming there´s something to get in the first place, but still. Love his music, though.

0
Ola Claesson | 14 January 2009 - 12:08pm

No one mentioned Pet Sounds yet?

An appallingly literal take on the album title, but not even using proper pets! How many of us own a goat as a pet for God's sake?

0
Ricardo | 9 January 2009 - 1:12am

ye'd

never tell that they were all on mind expanding drugs 'tho

0
James Blast | 9 January 2009 - 2:38am

Pet as in petting

American for patting, as opposed to the heavy kind disallowed at swimming pools

0
Retropath2 | 9 January 2009 - 12:05pm

Awful Cover

What were they thinking:

.

0
kidpresentable | 9 January 2009 - 3:56pm

Given the baby's pupils aren't dilated...

...he's not even properly surpised

0
stimpy | 9 January 2009 - 3:59pm

Shit tattoo as well

0
Leedsboy | 9 January 2009 - 5:53pm

That is just shocking...

I can't actually believe he put his name to it. Without a doubt one of the worst sleeves in the history of popular music. Whoever was responsible should really find a different profession.

0
Patrick Crowther | 9 January 2009 - 7:30pm

No but

Thats because he chased some of his fathers/DELETED ON LEGAL ADVICE

0
Retropath2 | 9 January 2009 - 4:20pm

This one would struggle to get a fanclub...

Absolute cack - what a great album, what a cheap and nasty cover (no doubt that's supposed to be the point) - If this took more than 3 minutes to knock up I'd be amazed...

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31FGAVWA8YL._SL500_AA240_.jpg

0
Fergus Higginson | 10 January 2009 - 9:23am

Sorry...

...but I think that's a really good sleeve!

0
Paolo Meccano | 10 January 2009 - 10:35am

nah

the Chief is right. It's cak.

0
badartdog | 10 January 2009 - 6:02pm

I'm with you, Chief...

it looks like it was the last minute art homework completed by a lazy Sixth Former...

0
Patrick Crowther | 11 January 2009 - 8:25pm

Damn!

I was sure that'd work - sorry!

0
Fergus Higginson | 10 January 2009 - 9:26am

Work of Heart by Roy Harper Band

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/40/Work_of_Heart.jpg

This must be one of the worst covers of all time...surely?

0
Mr Sparks | 10 January 2009 - 6:47pm

Surely Not...

A great album. The sleeve, however, looks as though someone drew it on the back of a napkin during their coffee break. As album sleeves go, this was something of a let down after the amazing work by Hipgnosis on previous Pink Floyd albums.

To some hardened Floyd fans, the album itself was a thorough disappointment. I was behind the counter in late 1979, many copies of this record were returned the day after release by unhappy listeners.

The sleeve belongs at the tail end of the era when prestigious acts could leave both their name and album title off finished sleeve designs. Original copies of The Wall were identifiable only by a clear plastic sticker attached to the shrink wrap. (In later years, the logo on this sticker became part of the CD cover). Similarly, the cover for Wish You Were Here was totally obscured by a Smell The Glove-style black shrink wrap. Again, only a sticker (insisted upon by the US arm of the record company) identified the album. Once out of the protective wrapper, these and many other albums of the era gave nothing away as to the record's name or the maker of the record. Led Zeppelin's 4 symbols (or whatever you wish to call it) doesn't even have the band's name on the spine of the album.

The heads, however, didn't need telling. We just knew, man. We knew.

0
kinkywolfgang | 11 January 2009 - 12:58am

do you mean

The Final Cut sleeve or The Wall?

re-read yer post and you mean Scarfe's, eh... stuff

The Final Cut was an Hipgnosis patiche BTW

0
James Blast | 11 January 2009 - 2:40am

The Wall!

I posted the album picture but it keeps coming and going. What gives, Fraser?

0
kinkywolfgang | 11 January 2009 - 9:24am

In through the out door - Led Zep

Not that it was the worst cover of all time, mind... but if you recall there were 4 different versions of the cover and it came in an outer brown paper wrapper so that the purchaser didn't know which cover they were getting.

I had a Saturday job at WH Smith (Wilmslow branch) in the late 70s and I remember the lady who ran the record counter couldn't get her head round this design conceit, so she removed all the outer brown paper covers and binned them! When the manager found out, she had to retrieve them, take them home and iron them flat!

0
Mr Sparks | 11 January 2009 - 12:32pm

and the ITTOD sleeve,

was like one of those kids colouring books where, when you washed water over it, colours emerged.

0
stimpy | 11 January 2009 - 1:15pm
Patrick Crowther | 11 January 2009 - 8:28pm

Family

Worst album cover I've ever seen was (I think)a "best of" type album by Family.It was a hand drawn illustration of the band as afootball team,depicted in action on the pitch.
It has been burned into my brain for many years.It belonged to a friend I haven't seen in a long time,and I've never seen another copy of said album.Sometimes I wonder if it wasn't some awful dream.

0
alastairpurves | 11 January 2009 - 1:46am

I found that

a bit of a laugh and I do Like Family

0
James Blast | 11 January 2009 - 2:41am

This one?

0
kinkywolfgang | 11 January 2009 - 9:23am

Roll over Chappo...

...and tell Robbie Williams the news.

0
stimpy | 11 January 2009 - 1:16pm

Not a bad album

but my favourite shitty cover

0
simonperrins | 11 January 2009 - 3:08pm

I can't believe...

...that Percy didn't have some sort of approval over the artwork and, if so, the fact he signed it off only reinforces my opinion that musicians don't necessarily make good graphic artists.

It could of course be a deliberately 'fourth form' idea in an ironic way but somehow I doubt it

0
stimpy | 11 January 2009 - 3:31pm

Lowell George

Excellent album and all that, but the sleeve looks like one of those paintings that serial killers turn out in jail to show that the're not just about blood and gore, but that they have a tender side as well.

0
Andy Mackenzie | 11 January 2009 - 5:38pm

And, I think I'm right in saying that it's by...

the usually wonderful Neon Park, responsible for those great Little Feat covers. Perhaps he had an off day...

0
Patrick Crowther | 11 January 2009 - 8:31pm

Well it certainly looks like a Neon Park painting...

...but how can it be? Lowell hasn't got a comedy duck's bill

0
stimpy | 11 January 2009 - 8:51pm

When I Paint My Masterpiece

Is that Dylan and Castro in the background or am I drunk?

0
Ola Claesson | 14 January 2009 - 12:12pm

You're not drunk...

the Lowell George cover is based on Édouard Manet's painting 'Le déjeuner sur l'herbe' ('The Lunch on the grass'), also parodied by Bow Wow Wow in a famous / infamous photograph of the band featuring a naked Annabella Lwin, controversial because the singer was only fourteen at the time it was taken.

Here's a link to the Bow Wow Wow image:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bowwowwow_seejungle.jpg

0
Patrick Crowther | 14 January 2009 - 5:03pm

Oh, yes

It dawns on me now that I´m familiar with both Manet, Bow Wow Wow and George, but I certainly didn´t make the connection until just, well, now. I think I have seen something similar featuring The Band, now that I have started to connect the dots.

Another question: what or who is that white thing just to the right of Bob´s head?

0
Ola Claesson | 16 January 2009 - 2:34pm

Ladies and gentlemen.... The Rolling Stones! (well, post-1981)

I lay the evidence before you, oh Word jury, and you be the judge...

0
Patrick Crowther | 11 January 2009 - 9:28pm

Dirty Work

Maybe they should have focused more on Jagger´s crutch? Great looking pants, if nothing else. Wake up, Charlie!

0
Ola Claesson | 16 January 2009 - 2:37pm

and I seee Ronnie...

...missed the point of the pink theme when he opened his sock drawer that morning

0
stimpy | 16 January 2009 - 2:46pm

50/50

Dirty Work was very much 'of it's time'. I always quite liked Flashpoint for it's graphic simplicity, could almost be a FAC sleeve. Steel Wheels is inoffensive enough; if a little dull and pointless.

BUT... No Security and A Bigger Bang are indisputably a pile of poo

0
stimpy | 11 January 2009 - 11:48pm

Sorry, but 'Dirty Work' has a shite cover...

whether it was released in 10,000,000 BC, 1986 or 2009.

0
Patrick Crowther | 14 January 2009 - 5:33pm

Of Fac

Agree on the Flashpoint cover. Though Wilson wouldn´t have signed off on the contents. Even at the tender age of 15 I knew it was sub par. And I hadn´t even heard She´s The Boss. Ah, the good old days.

0
Ola Claesson | 26 January 2009 - 10:29pm

Wot?

...no Bridges to Babylon?

0
Paolo Meccano | 12 January 2009 - 11:52am

I thought five examples of how crass their covers have become...

was plenty, but 'Bridges To Babylon' could just as easily have been included.

0
Patrick Crowther | 14 January 2009 - 5:27pm

The Beatles ?

How about The Beatles' White Album ? Interesting album, but not much effort went into the album cover!

0
Excitable Boy | 14 January 2009 - 1:56pm

Au contraire!

LOADS of effort went into the cover. In 'Many Years From Now', Macca describes the long discussions with EMI re the quality of board to be used, the method to imprint 'The Beatles' and, of course, the fact that all albums had to be numbered as long as the LP remained in print.

THEN there was the insert on which Richard Hamilton (with Macca's help, if you believe him) spent many weeks.

0
stimpy | 14 January 2009 - 2:05pm

'The Beatles'...

has a classic cover; at the time a truly astonishing move for a band to make. The world is anticipating the follow up to 'Sergeant Pepper'... what's the album cover going to be like?... how can they top it?... and then they release a double album in a totally white sleeve. Inspired.

0
Patrick Crowther | 14 January 2009 - 5:30pm
Neil Jung | 15 January 2009 - 2:57pm

"It's so white ...

..., you think "How much more white could that be?", and the answer is, none".

The trouble is, it doesn't look like death, and death sells.

0
Douglas | 26 January 2009 - 9:25pm

Come on lads, surely we can find a worse batch than this!

Listen chaps (and chapettes, if there any reading this). Just about every artist with a body of work has one or two album covers that fall into the category of bloody awful. It is no big deal to find a bad example.

But what we should be looking for here are those artists who (for whatever reason - useless record labels, entrenched misogyny, total lack of style, inability by band members to focus during daylight hours etc) have never had any good covers at all. To my mind, the outstanding band in this respect is Golden Earring.

Do not get me wrong. I think Golden Earring are a rock treasure. They have been around as long as the Stones, and certainly have their fair share of great and good albums and tracks. I have most of their albums in fact, and regard the lack of critical respect for their work as a real failure in rock archaeology. But I have to admit that Golden Earring have only themselves to blame for this outcome. Why? Because they have the longest sequence of crap covers in rock history. Well over 30 albums into their career, it is hard to think of any album cover by them that would ever make you want to play whatever is inside. Go on Amazon and check them out if you don't believe me.

What they have is an endless sequence of vaguely unpleasant and sexist covers of half-nude or occasionally nude women (eg Moontan, Grab It for a Second), or crummy group shots (most of the early albums, most of their live albums), or half assed pseudo-Hipgnosis covers (Contraband, Bloody Buccaneers) or even a black hole (The Hole). Not one of their covers has a modicum of charm.

Not even when album covers were worth looking at (ie the time of LPs)could GE muster a half-way decent cover that told you anything interesting about their personalities or artistic sensibilities. Which is a great way to write yourself out of rock history. A real tragedy.

Can anyone match this run of visual rubbish?

0
brutus_odowd | 16 January 2009 - 4:16am

Blimey

Yes you are right brutus, the Earring covers are pretty cack as a whole, except, maybe, Switch which is old prog style artyfarty but not all bad.

0
Huggy | 22 January 2009 - 9:32pm

Flash Anyone

For truly terrible stuff, have a look at the first two albums covers from prog rockers Flash - the band formed by guitarist Peter Banks when he left/got booted from Yes. The first is a shot of a woman showing only her not very attractive knickers. The second shows half of a topless woman from neck to navel.

The band weren't too bad if you like 2nd division Yes, but they never took off, and many have blamed the dreadful album covers.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Flash-Out-Our-Hands/dp/B0000CD5JZ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=...

0
Excitable Boy | 26 January 2009 - 3:18pm

Out Of Our Hands...

...was an early Hipgnosis effort

0
stimpy | 26 January 2009 - 4:12pm

That Flash album cover...

...you linked to is very similar to this Velvet Underground sleeve.

0
Paolo Meccano | 26 January 2009 - 4:17pm

Great acts, rubbish album covers

The Mighty Diamonds "The Right Time".

0
Sting Ono | 28 January 2009 - 5:16pm
healthymonkey | 30 January 2009 - 12:49am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd