Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Gervais - Scathing wit or just a bit of a divvy?

Grant's picture

Has Ricky G gone too far this time?

One part of me appreciates his fearlessness in attacking the sacred cows of Tinseltown (who seem unable, en masse, to take a bit of well-aimed ribbing) whilst another side of me cringes at his manner.

Any opinions?

2

Anyone

that can make Robert De Niro laugh like that is okay in my book.

2
doubleyoubee | 17 January 2011 - 9:42am

As far as I can see

he was speaking nothing but the truth.

1
mojoworking | 17 January 2011 - 10:06am

His new teeth

are mesmerising, aren't they?

0
doubleyoubee | 17 January 2011 - 10:09am

Standing in front of a well-heeled awards show audience...

telling jokes is enough to make anyone look a divvy. Now I have no great love for Ricky Gervais, but I thought that was OK. Mildly amusing. And I mean mildly.

0
Patrick Crowther | 17 January 2011 - 10:36am

I Thought It Quite Amusing

probably funnier than some of his films

0
MrRadio | 17 January 2011 - 10:30am

I'm afraid I am bewildered by his celebrity.

This man does not make me laugh, and I am bored with cringing.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 17 January 2011 - 10:32am

I like it very much

I'd much rather watch Ricky Gervais doing this kind of stuff rather than Jonathan Ross or James Corden trying to do this kind of stuff.

1
Leedsboy | 17 January 2011 - 10:35am

I have mixed feelings about him

but that was great. Hollywood actors do their best work at awards nights, smiling through gritted teeth.

0
Mousey | 17 January 2011 - 10:37am

"I warned 'em"

Gervais [...] appeared to bite the hand that fed him by targeting venerable Phillip Berk, president of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association. "I just had to help the HFPA president off the toilet and pop his teeth back in," he confided to the audience.

In interviews last week, Gervais vowed to ensure that he would never be asked back to host the Globes again. Early evidence suggests he may have succeeded. Asked afterwards if he would ever consider booking Gervais again, Phillip Berk fired back a terse "No comment."

- The Guardian

Oh, well. I laughed. OK, so his performance wasn't comedy genius, but it was amusing, I thought - and the funniest he's been for years.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 17 January 2011 - 10:47am

Quite funny...

...but if I can put my po-faced feminist face on, of all the things the vile films of Sex and the City can be attacked for, it seems a real shame the fact that the women are over 40 is the joke. Ho ho ho.

I think it is quite funny, but most of the targets are fish in a barrel aren't they?

1
JoLean | 17 January 2011 - 10:46am

I thought...

...actually he was making that very point. We know that they're 40+ and 50+, we don't care, so why airbrush the poster?

5
Bob | 17 January 2011 - 10:51am

Oh possibly...

...well that went over my head (insert joke about 'not worrying my pretty little head about it' here).

I think you could be right. Perhaps I'm so used to hearing jokes about how 'old' they are, I just assumed it was following the herd.

0
JoLean | 17 January 2011 - 10:55am

They should have put Helen Mirren in SITC2...

I might have gone to see it if she'd been in it. She's really, really old... and sexy as f**k.

4
Patrick Crowther | 17 January 2011 - 11:02am

She would get my vote too

Regarding Ricky Gervais I find him funny most of the time and I particularly liked the film Cemetery Junction that he was involved in.
However whenever I have seen him interviewed he comes across as pompous - maybe he is uncomfortable in the role of interviewee.As a comedian however he is prepared to take risks and the extras series was very funny indeed.

0
Steve Turner | 17 January 2011 - 1:41pm

Since when

has 65 been really, really old? I thought it was the new middle aged. There are lots of other sexy 65 year olds out there - not just Dame Helen.

0
bassclef (not verified) | 21 January 2011 - 10:50am

That...

...was some of the funniest material he's done in a while. Liked it a lot. Frankly, if you book Ricky Gervais, you should know what you're getting.

0
Bob | 17 January 2011 - 10:48am

I'm torn with him

He's a nice guy, but I find his near the knuckle nonsense a bridge too far.

Fame has gone to his head, no matter what anyone says.

0
Five-Centres | 17 January 2011 - 11:05am

Only one slight gripe

I think he's genuinely funny and if there is place that constantly has to have it's pomposity pricked it's Hollywood. But.. at the end of the day the Golden Globes are really no different to M4 Corridor Paper Vendor of the Year 2001 (Wernham Hogg Slough Branch 2nd). Lots on in-jokes and people who "like a mention".

But the one thing that I can't stand about RG is his whiney accent. Sorry if I've offended anyone from Berkshire but it's like listening to finger nails on a blackboard. How amny hours did the "royalty" of Hollywood have to listen to that? Serve the buggers right I say.

0
cradlerock | 17 January 2011 - 11:10am

Has he gone too far?

Not far enough. Most of them could do with a slap.

Wit or a divvy? Bit of both.

0
Georgedivided | 17 January 2011 - 11:16am

I've always though he was a bit of a narse

but that was pretty good. Could take more than five minutes of him though - and I kept waiting for him to do the stupid dance.

EDIT: I meant to type "a bit of an arse" but I quite like 'narse' now.

0
stimpy | 17 January 2011 - 11:41am

Narse

It could catch on you know

0
doubleyoubee | 17 January 2011 - 11:48am

If the only place you can find work

is playing the foole to to a bunch of fooles you gotta go where the money is. Lampooning the land of the lotus eaters has been going on since they bulldozed the first orange groves. It was mildly amusing but no new ground was broken.

0
MyAmericanMate | 17 January 2011 - 12:02pm

Actually I think a tiny bit was

The outing of the two "famous Scientologists" was surely the most overt yet on U.S. network television. Hardly a tough-to-guess "blind item", was it?

1
Archie Valparaiso | 17 January 2011 - 12:27pm

Referring to Tom Cruise as a Scientologist?

Been done, hasn't it? I don't get quite as much Native Culture TV as I'd like to (all arguments to the contrary entertained with deaf ears) but me and my peer group have been aware of Hollywood engrams and e-meters since Karen Black in the late '70's.

No, I still don't think anyone was seriously outed.

0
MyAmericanMate | 17 January 2011 - 12:49pm

it wasn't the 'outing' of Cruise as a Scientologist

that raised eyebrows...

'Also not nominated, I Love You Phillip Morris. Jim Carrey and Ewan McGregor. Two heterosexual actors pretending to be gay, so the complete opposite of some famous Scientologists then.'

0
ivan | 17 January 2011 - 1:08pm

That was done by South Park some years ago

in the 'Come out of the closet, Tom' episode.

0
stimpy | 17 January 2011 - 1:32pm

indeed.

I was setting MAM straight on the 'outing' that went on; calling Cruise a Scientologist is hardly newsworthy. Making the statement that certain prominent Hollywood Scientologists might be hiding their homosexuality was a bit of a bigger deal. Especially in a room full of prominent Hollywood folk.

0
ivan | 17 January 2011 - 1:49pm

Fair point

I must not have been listening close enough. Last few years every time Gervais opens his mouth I just hear noise.

But yeah, there's a huge PC/PI rage going on in the US about whether straight actors can play gay (matron!). I mean FFS, they are meant to be "actors", right?

That said (and ref the South Park note below) I tend to side with Trey Parker and Matt Stone on the place of actors in society.

0
MyAmericanMate | 17 January 2011 - 1:56pm

Made me laugh

Always good to see an antidote to sycophancy at awards ceremonies.

0
Lucas Hare | 17 January 2011 - 12:18pm

Was quite funny

The Tom Cruise suggestion was hilarious.

0
Five-Centres | 17 January 2011 - 12:22pm

I don't really like Gervais

but thought he was great.

Introducing Bruce Willis as 'Ashton Kutcher's Dad' was my favourite moment

0
DogFacedBoy | 17 January 2011 - 12:36pm

Next year

They should ask Karl Pilkington... that'd f*** 'em right up.

0
clivetemple | 17 January 2011 - 12:37pm

But they'd still

have to have Gervais standing behind him, pointing and laughing, yelling 'No, this is funny, I say so, don't you know who I am?'.

2
DogFacedBoy | 17 January 2011 - 12:44pm

It's Jonathan Ross's

schtick (written by some funny people including David Baddiel's brother usually) for the Comedy Awards tuned to the Hollywood mob.
It's perfect for those that need to be brought back to earth every now and then.
Would have been good to see them go for De Niro's choices of late and really go for the big guns.

Talking of the Comedy Awards, Channel 4 are REALLY milking it now they've got the rights eh?
Really helping to turn an irreverent night into something far more mainstream and dull? We shall see.

0
jimmyshoes01 | 17 January 2011 - 12:47pm

Soft targets

..not exactly 'cutting edge' is it?

Its common practice for 'edgy' hosts to have a whipping boy - in the recent past Jude Law I recall was the brunt. So now its The Tourist, Jennifer Lopez, Charlie Sheen etc..wow.

The BBC summary ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-12205469) of his comments is as follows:-

"It was a big year for 3D movies. Toy Story, Despicable Me, Tron. It seems like everything this year was three-dimensional, except the characters in The Tourist. I already feel bad about that joke. I'm jumping on the bandwagon, because I haven't even seen The Tourist. Who has?
I'd like to quash the rumours that the only reason The Tourist was nominated was so that the Hollywood Foreign Press can hang out with Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie. That is rubbish, that is not the only reason - they also accepted bribes.
"I Love You Phillip Morris stars Jim Carey and Ewan McGregor - two heterosexual actors pretending to be gay. So, the complete opposite of some famous scientologists. Probably. My lawyers helped me with the wording of that joke."
"I was sure the Golden Globe for special effects would go to the team that airbrushed [the Sex and the City 2] poster. Girls, we know how old you are. I saw one of you in an episode of Bonanza."
On Jennifer Lopez - "She's just Jenny from the block. If the block in question is that one on Rodeo Drive between Cartier and Prada."
On multi-millionaire Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg: "Heather Mills calls him the one that got away."
While introducing Robert Downey Jr - "Many of you in this room probably know him best from such facilities as the Betty Ford Clinic and Los Angeles County Jail."

Its the arrogance of the man that really grates - his desperation to make a name for himself. The best reaction would be a communal yawn.

0
tim tunes | 17 January 2011 - 6:03pm

He's a comic..

hired to be funny at an award do. Not sure anything in his speech came over as arrogant myself.
Anyway, an arrogant person in showbiz? hardly "stop the press" news is it?

1
Doug B | 18 January 2011 - 4:53pm

Leg Transplant

On multi-millionaire Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg: "Heather Mills calls him the one that got away."

HM: "I won't be outrun again. Not if that promised leg transplant is successful."

0
Mike_H | 23 January 2011 - 3:52pm

For me

He's a one trick pony.

0
davebigpicture | 17 January 2011 - 6:19pm

And it's a very small pony at that...

I've never rated him in any way, and this latest drivel was only further evidence that he can make an extremely small amount of talent go a disappointingly long way.

As a comic, his schtick seems to be 'I say things nobody else has the nerve to say - aren't I naughty?' No, Mr. G, you're not. People have made fun of celebs/Hollywood/Scientologists for years, and in much wittier ways. Rumours about gay A-listers who pretend to be straight date back to the silent movie days of Valentino and Navarro. Why not come up with something fresh?

For proof of his lack of comic ability (despite his obvious supporters), see the Live Earth show from a few years back. I remember him doing a bit introducing The Who or Floyd and simply dying on his feet. He had nothing to say of any worth and, when told he had to fill for a couple of minutes, dried up and had to fall back on that resolutely unfunny dance. Surely in such a pinch a supposed funnyman of any note could come up with a couple of lines from his metaphorical back pocket?

And as for the Office/Extras/his films, I don't want comedy that makes me cringe, I want comedy that makes me laugh, however old-fashioned that might seem. The fact that he's built a career on such thin gruel proves that we are indeed entering the last days.

Phew, I need a lie down...

1
MrLovegrove | 17 January 2011 - 6:46pm

Comedy that makes you cringe...

I have trouble with it as well. The penultimate episode of The Office (i.e. Christmas Special) I found incredibly difficult to watch but I persisted and by the end of the very last was bawling like a twat.

There's a humanity under all that incredibly cras 'public image' (which for the most part just seems to be an extension of the worst parts of his David Brent character). The former can be paid attention to quite easily - watch Cemetery Junction - while ignoring the latter.

3
murrance | 17 January 2011 - 7:01pm

The Extras Christmas Specials...

...are, in my view, quite possibly the most relentlessly bleak and brilliantly executed pieces of Christmas scheduling in memory. Gervais' rant against reality TV ("Fuck you, the programme makers...and fuck you, the audience, for watching it") is rather brilliant, I think.

7
Lucas Hare | 17 January 2011 - 9:56pm

Completely right, Lucas

The Extras Christmas special was a brilliant piece of work and did not get the attention that it deserved.
I don't see why we should universally 'like' a comic any more so than we should universally love everything that they do.
I dislike more of Gervais' work than I like, but I treasure both The Office and Extras.
I hate the Karl Pilkington stuff an a lot of the podcasts and he is

a very overrated stand-up. But that's OK, simmer down everyone, it's acceptable to hold both views.
I also think, and apologies that if this has been noted above, that his monologues at the Globes illustrated the gap between British and Irish humour and that in US. He was just slagging, like.
0
PaddyH | 20 January 2011 - 12:07am

On the other hand

It's great to hear him talking about comedy with someone like Larry David - he has real love of the subject. I can't imagine he feels the same way towards presenting awards ceremonies. Personally, that's the last thing barring Panorama I'd watch if I wanted a proper laugh and if I were him I'd be both stuck for a decent gag and looking for the nearest exit.

0
murrance | 17 January 2011 - 6:54pm

Or...

counting his paycheque and slapping himself on the back for how he has raised his profile

0
tim tunes | 17 January 2011 - 10:21pm

Fair point.

Can't refute that but nor would I blame him for doing so.

2
murrance | 18 January 2011 - 11:51am

He has his moments

and I think that was alright. Nothing groundbreaking, but reasonably amusing.

I find him to be like the kids who sucked up to the hard kids at school in general.

I thought his stand up was highly derivative, particularly of Stewart Lee - which he mentions in one set. Stewart Lee mentions it, I mean.

I like the office and series 2 of Extras, particularly the David Bowie bit.

However, I thought Cemetery Junction was - along with Soul Boy - among the worst films I have laid eyes on of recent years. Utterly dreadful, mawkish twaddle. You can't watch Kes or Billy Liar and then either of those abominations and suggest that they're in any way comparable.

I couldn't believe how horrific it was. And he's a smug looking twat, isn't he? It's not endearing.

0
Buxton | 17 January 2011 - 9:40pm

A Bit One Note

I think reading his links in the edited form are the best bet here. If you saw the show they all got a bit samey after the first half hour - big build up of film/presenter then underscored by a brutal - and predictable- "shock" end. When Tina Fey came on and did some actual free floating silly gags it was a real relief. Far from needing taking down a peg or two I think the A Listers were right in expecting a bit more invention and also rightly detected a too artfully sour note on, lets be honest, somewhere that is RG's idolized home turf these days.

1
Bodhisattva | 17 January 2011 - 10:02pm

I think this interview said most of what needs to be said

Now Shandling *is* a genius ... and for his thoughts on Gervais see

http://www.gq.com/entertainment/humor/201008/comedy-issue/comedy-issue-g...

1
SpaceBoy | 17 January 2011 - 10:23pm

Dunno why it's such a big deal

he did the same thing last year. They bloody love it really, the pampered overpaid fuckwits. I can't believe he'd get anywhere near the stage without an army of laywers tearing the script to bits,

they knew exactly what they were getting.

0
Dr Volume | 18 January 2011 - 12:46am

And as Russell Brand has proved

being outrageous at a US awards ceremony is a sure way of upping your profile in middle America.

That leads to more column inches, more TV chat shows, more movie offers and surprise, surprise, more filthy lucre comes your way.

0
mojoworking | 18 January 2011 - 4:40am

I'd gone off him a bit recently

...but I really enjoyed that.

0
kidpresentable | 18 January 2011 - 2:21am

I enjoyed it

It's what they pay for in that role.
Good jokes.

And at least he didn't do that silly laugh.

0
danh | 18 January 2011 - 7:15am

I once saw

a "comedian" at a stag night. His idea of humour was to prowl around the audience and point at people

"Fuck me that bloke's got a big nose. Oi! Big Nose! Where are you from? Conk City?" For me that is absolutely the worst form of comedy and this is a marginally more sophisticated version of the same thing.

It really is a classic British thing to say that somehow these celebs deserve it because they are successful without having the same values as me. "Ooh look at him all high and mighty, he *deserves* to be knocked down a peg or two".

Well, for me, it's not funny. Not funny at all.

0
VincePacket | 18 January 2011 - 1:59pm

Scorn

If Hollywood stars weren't forever dissecting their "process", joining fly-by-night credo-on-the-back-of-an-envelope cults, blaming their spoiled-brat excesses on their "demons" and "not being in a good place", demanding special treatment one minute and claiming to be "just a regular guy" the next,* I'm sure that everyone, Ricky Gervais included, would leave them alone.

"Being a Scientologist, when you drive past an accident, you know you have to do something about it because you know you're the only one that can really help." - Tom Cruise

"I think that the film Clueless was very deep. I think it was deep in the way that it was very light. I think lightness has to come from a very deep place if it's true lightness." - Alicia Silverstone

"I want to go to Egypt and Namibia and open orphanages - a chain of them." - Lindsay Lohan

* "Sometimes what I actually love to do is go to a farm and get fresh milk or watch a pig get slaughtered." - Jake Gyllenhaal

Come on, Vince - they do deserve it.

4
Archie Valparaiso | 18 January 2011 - 2:37pm

Alicia Silverstone....

Does she take heavy medication?

0
Patrick Crowther | 19 January 2011 - 10:30am

Nothing to see here

Fairly standard 'have a pop at the pampered celebs stuff'. Hand movements and shrug robbed from Rupert Pupkin, seeing as we're talking about de Niro. The scientologist could conceivably have been the star of Saturday Night Fever...

Gervais is sometimes funny, but far too pleased with himself. He's no Morris or Coogan.

0
Hippo | 18 January 2011 - 2:34pm

Easy targets

I have no problem with Gervais having a pop at celebs, but as a couple of us mentioned above, it is the easy targets that I find a bit wearisome.

Hey! Who knew Robert Downey Jr was an ex-junkie and had been to prison? Oh, all of you?

Hey! Who knew about the rumours (may not be true, Word lawyers) that Tom Cruise, John Travolta and Will Smith are actually gay? Oh, all of you?

Hey! Who knew that the SATC women were over 45 and had been airbrushed? What all of you?

A slaying of a few sacred cows wouldn't go amiss. Robert De Niro has not been in a great film for nearly 20 years. And has not been good in OK films for as long as that. Have a go there. Judd Apatow & his 'boys' makes the same film three times a year (clever, beautiful woman will go for any man put in front of her including ugly, stupid, selfish idiots). Have a go there. The fact that 'focker' sounds like fucker has sustained THREE films. Go on, have a go at your mate Stiller for that. Half the women in that audience are unrecognisable owing to the need/desire (perceived or not) to remain young. Nicole Kidman, for example, resembles my Sindy doll after my cousin Richard had run her over on his Raleigh Grifter. Have a go at that.

Go on, I dare you.

4
JoLean | 18 January 2011 - 2:48pm

Seeing is believing

All good points, JoLean, but although there is nothing new in what is being said, I suspect millions of people get considerable satisfaction from being able to watch them squirm as it is said, even if it's only once a year.

As to why Robert De Niro gets a pass, could it be because in his free time he's best known for supporting independent filmmakers rather than cruising Africa looking for suitable people to adopt?

(Yes, the Robert Downey stuff was obvious and old hat, but why was he so pissed off about it afterwards? After all, he was hardly subpoena'd to appear on Oprah - "Sean Penn kicked my door down and dragged me to rehab!" - to relive it... right after this message.)

0
Archie Valparaiso | 18 January 2011 - 3:24pm

Quite.

Puncturing pompous celebrities will never get old as long as their pomposity allows them to inflate to such sizes. And, personally, I reckon all the hoo-hah from all the poor little flowers in the wake of all this suggests that he hit his intended targets right where it hurt.

0
Bob | 18 January 2011 - 3:42pm

RD Jr

I hadn't seen the Robert Downey response until you mentioned it, Mr V.

I agree it is an *incredible* response considering how much mileage he has had out of his rise and fall and rise again on chat shows, etc. Very strange.

I'd hate you to go away with the idea that I don't think that these people deserve a rocket up their arses. They do. I just think it should be bigger rocket up more arses.

Now off to see the Tina Fey that Bodhisattva recommends.

0
JoLean | 18 January 2011 - 4:23pm

well

said

0
tim tunes | 18 January 2011 - 4:00pm

Never mind Gervais

did anyone see Bobby DeNiro spend his whole 5 minute speech trying to get a laugh and failing completely? If you want eyewateringly cringemaking, look no mfurther.

0
DogFacedBoy | 18 January 2011 - 2:41pm

Or just watch Little Fockers

as I sadly did recently. Couldn't wait for it to end.

0
Mr Fade | 18 January 2011 - 2:49pm

You have

my condolences

In his 'greatest moments of your career' montage they showed a clip from Rocky n Bullwinkle which surely was his nadir. That was the biggest laugh of the night for me

0
DogFacedBoy | 18 January 2011 - 3:32pm
ivan | 18 January 2011 - 4:56pm

The Real Point Is..

...not that RG committed some sort of killer raid on the ego's of Hollywood (amongst whom he must be numbered these days and fair enough) but that his script was entirely one note.

The same joke recipe was repeated over and over. Positive build up, "shock" pay off. There were NO jokes for jokes sake. No invention, no real point beyond an insult.

As I say, I think the A Listers were quite right to raise an eyebrow at such artful sourness by one who CRAVES their approval.

Tina Fey was, as usual, just plain funny.

1
Bodhisattva | 18 January 2011 - 4:08pm

Is it true

that Stan Boardman gets a percentage of the Fockers films?

0
Humphrey Plugg | 18 January 2011 - 4:10pm

Only the scene

where some Germans bomb their local chippie

0
DogFacedBoy | 18 January 2011 - 4:56pm

I do always regret

that Stan wasn't buying chips when they did it.

1
Leedsboy | 18 January 2011 - 10:43pm

That's because

he was out on his bike training for the Olympics

0
happy harry | 18 January 2011 - 11:18pm
Dr Volume | 19 January 2011 - 2:49am

The Macca

material was great!

0
mojoworking | 19 January 2011 - 7:45am

Gervais

I saw him do stand up and he was good - not as good as Robin Ince mind, who was his support - but Gervais does nick some ideas from others. He did a whole thing about religion including a line about dinosaurs, as in 'what about them, how do you explain that?' which was pure Bill Hicks. Then there's the Larry Sanders and Seinfeld thing. He's brought these 'influences' to the UK mainstream basically. But the cringe and wince school of humour has got rather tired now. This 'Episodes' show that's on at the moment I find quite unfunny and tiresome for the most part. And the Golden Globes performance is quite lazy. Yet did I laugh? Yes, quite a lot. So unless you are one of those who finds him annoying I'd say he is genuinely a funny guy - though I do feel a little bit tense watching him. But he hasn't done anything of great worth since 'Extras'.

0
Sven Garlic | 19 January 2011 - 10:36am

Episodes

Hmmmm, I had it on for 10 minutes and my lips never curled in a smile. Steven Manghan is not an actor and it felt forced and un-funny.
The problem for Gervais is that "the Office" set a new, very high standard. The second series of "Extras" came close but did not improve on the very original series. Steven Merchant as Gervais agent was by far the most entertaining.

0
N2Peach | 19 January 2011 - 5:43pm

What disappointed me

about "Episodes" was that it was so cliched. Post-"Extras" etc. I was expecting something with real bite. I loved Greig and Manghan in "Green Wing"(Now that WAS funny), but this just seemed really, really tired and obvious. I wanted to like it more, but I just couldn't be arsed.

0
Grant | 19 January 2011 - 11:50pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd