Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Genius versus Very Good Student

jimmyshoes01's picture

I have subscribed to a couple of guitar magazines and more than once they make the bold statement that the best guitarist in the world is Paul Gilbert and that he is a genius.

I am not familiar with him so I decided to check out a clip on YouTube and he's one of those widdly-widdling Vai/ Satriani things in spandex wresting loons.

There is a huge audience for this kind of nonsense. But isn't a gig just an exhibition of those that did their homework very well, an end of year school awards day?

Have any of these technically proficient shredders written anything with a heart? It's the ability to turn what they have learnt in to something original and soulful that would classify them as a genius in my book.

8

That's

just air guitar with a guitar.

I'd rather watch 4 kids in a village hall play their first gig after only a week's practice than watch Paul Gilbert fret-wank.

I caught Fleetwood Mac's You Make Loving Fun on the radio yesterday morning and was struck for the umpteenth time at how great Buckingham's guitar work is in the service of that song. That's the measure of a great guitarist: putting in the work to make someone's else's song (Christine McVie) be as good as it can be.

6
Ahh_Bisto | 19 January 2012 - 1:23pm

This is it.

Musicianship is about letting go of your ego and doing right by the song. Can you imagine any of these guys going "actually, this song doesn't need any guitar on it: I might try not playing. Or maybe adding a bit of harmonium to the chorus"? Of course not.

That's why I'm suspicious of solos, and have to be really convinced that they're serving the song. Because mostly they're not about making the music sound better, they're about someone's ego.

When they're not, they can be glorious, but I'm a bit of a guilty-until-proven-innocent man on this subject.

0
Bob | 21 January 2012 - 11:50am

In The Service Of The Song

Richard Thompson's playing on Sandy Denny's song "Autopsy", from Fairport's "Unhalfbricking" is surely a case in point. Lovely little fills throughout and an absolutely stunning solo too.

0
Mike_H | 21 January 2012 - 11:11pm

It's entirely subjective

Saying "this nonsense" you close the debate completely because your mind is already made up. I guess people who like a good widdle fest do find it soulful, and may well find "At the dark end of the street" a bit dull. Only a theory. FWIW I find that Gilbert clip boring/borderline hilarious, but I can imagine in a gig if you're a 17 year old guitar totin' metal fan it's brilliant. You're never going to get tasteful though. You might as well say some gangsta rap album isn't soulful. That's part of the point!

I think lumping all such players together is a bit dodgy...Satch is much more song/melody orientated, and Vai with his Zappa background is much more interesting harmonically, though, true, with loads of screaming widdle involved.

Compare and contrast

You're never far from Spinal Tap with any of these guys though...

Let's not forget Yngwie - more an overexcited Ritchie Blackmore (note - I saw this tour and left after an hour)

5
Twangothan | 19 January 2012 - 1:37pm

I have made

my mind up only with the limited amount I have seen. I just don't enjoy it and thus the reason for the post. I wanted examples to try and buck my notions and you have kindly done so which I will watch tonight.

I have just started getting really serious about getting very, very good at guitar and I am grinding out the exercises that these boys seem to have turned into songs. I am genuinely curious.

0
jimmyshoes01 | 19 January 2012 - 1:44pm

Shredders

I find it difficult to appreciate what these guitarists are doing when they play this style of guitar. I can see that there is skill and technical proficiency aplenty but I'm struggling to put it into a context that validates the skill as something truly great and artistic. It feels very contrived to me, the song structure merely a vehicle to carry the guitarist's input. The Satriani track is pleasant enough but when it started I thought it was an instrumental version of Always On My Mind. There's no doubt the production doesn't help: too polished for my liking; a few bars in and it could have been Kenny G about to take the melody on his saxophone rather than Satriani on his guitar. It's a bit muzak for me.

The style and delivery also seems a very generic sound as well, I find it difficult to differentiate between guitarists who play this way.The arrangements are also overly familiar to the extent that the guitarist's input is sign-posted even before the solo arrives so that predictability also lessens the appeal to me. There also seem to be many recurring motifs in this style of playing, variations on a theme that, to these ears, seems quite limited in many respects musically for the reasons outlined above.

I'm self-taught on the guitar and limited myself to rhythm guitar when I played years ago. I'm willing to concede total ignorance on what's going on with these players other than what my ears and musical prejudice tell me. Something in my mind just switches off.

Having said all that I do like many guitarists in the rock genre but I'd rather have a Fast Eddie:

(Motorhead - Fast and Loose)

1
Ahh_Bisto | 19 January 2012 - 5:55pm

Bloody hell.

Let us never go there again.

Yngwie Fucking Malmsteen.

Eighties Hair TechnoWiddle at its very, very worst.

2
Lenny Law | 20 January 2012 - 12:53am

I read years ago in Kerrang that when Yngwie's mum passed on....

.....he said that the only way he knew how to express his grief was to play the guitar.

Yip that's right, when one of the most profound life experiences hits you, break out the guitar and commemorate it with..... scales.

I love you mum (Pentatonic C Major)
I have profound grief (hit out with some Mixolydian shredding).

Oh well, I'm sure she loved him

2
fatMark | 20 January 2012 - 1:07am

I doubt it..

..which was no doubt the reason that the poor boy spent his entire teenage years stuck in a room. Rehearsing bizarre and obscure classical scales. Without any dynamics, or bothering to actually listen to them while he was playing.

0
Marky | 20 January 2012 - 2:34am

I was going to say it's a Midwest thing

but looking at his wiki entry (I'd not heard of him) seems he truly is big in Japan. Huge, actually.

0
MyAmericanMate | 19 January 2012 - 1:37pm

I have to admit I got bored

I have to admit I got bored after about 45 seconds, though there's no doubting his technical ability obviously. I think if I was maybe in my teens I would enjoy this more. Maybe it's to do with testosterone levels?

There seem to be some key rules/guidelines that work across all artforms and one of these is surely that Less is More.

I think jo satriani has done nice soulful stuff - though I cant remember names of any of them. something with blue in the title was quite nice if I remember.

0
Charlie Mingles | 19 January 2012 - 2:16pm

Was it this?

Joe Satriani, Flying in a Blue Dream

or maybe this?
Joe Satriani, New Blues

I'm not as big a fan as this post may suggest, only got the 2 albums that these tracks are from and I think the 'it's good if you're a young lad' theory holds water, in my case at least. When I was learning guitar this was exactly what I wanted to do - make weird, aggressive noises and play at a million miles an hour. Now the only weird, aggressive noises I make come from my ever expanding stomach if I've eaten too much.

1
Cobweb Steve | 19 January 2012 - 3:58pm

thanks steve actually now I

thanks steve

actually now I hear it, I think it was actually 'the other one' - ie Steve Vai. I tend to lump them together I'm afraid. If Steve Vai has something with Blue in the title, then maybe it's that.

0
Charlie Mingles | 19 January 2012 - 4:22pm

with a little research - it

with a little research - it was steve vai. nothing to do with blue either, sorry.

Tender Surrender it was, not so great on the live version here but I used to really love the album version, all the way up to eleven and quite a bit of bluesy soul in there.

0
Charlie Mingles | 19 January 2012 - 7:33pm

I managed 1min 35sec

Maybe it gets better after that ?

Dull, dull, dull - as the OP suggests it's a string of practice exercises strung together and called "a brilliannt solo", which it isn't. Cold and sterile.

Unlike this :

0
Slick | 20 January 2012 - 2:25am

My thoughts exactly

If you want to know what an "arpeggio" is well that's what this guy is playing. They literally sound like finger exercises.

There are two kinds of music, good and bad.

0
Mousey | 20 January 2012 - 2:42am

This song has the only guitar solo anyone needs

Bow down before The N.I. Contribution....

4
Moose the Mooche | 19 January 2012 - 2:29pm

Although I appreciate that

Although I appreciate that they are very skilled guitarists I find this style very soulless & boring.

Slash is one of the few guitarists who I think can bridge the shredding & soulful styles of guitar playing.

For me less is definitely more. I think the lead on this track played by Mr Steve Cropper is the best lead ever

1
seanioio | 19 January 2012 - 2:59pm

Absolutely agree...

...re. Slash. I just wish there was more than one great album - he's been wasted (in more ways than one). I think he's the only "guitar hero" who I have any time for at all.

I was trying to work out, after reading and contributing to the Beano album thread, why I don't like guitar hero music, and I may be off-beam here, but the thing that so often seems to be missing isn't soul, or authenticity, or whatever: it's fun. A sense of fun, a sense of humour. A sense that maybe there's more to life (and music) than being terribly good at the guitar.

Oh, and I'll tell you what else is missing: girls. With a very very few exceptions, it's all about the boys, isn't it? Fans and players alike. I don't know if that says anything at all, or whether it's irrelevant, but it seems somehow telling. Not sure why.

1
Bob | 19 January 2012 - 4:15pm

Fun

That's a good point. There's no sense of actual ENJOYMENT, to me at least.

Also, while I hate generalising about the sex of the listener/player - and tell you all off for doing so the other way round (plus there are always exceptions) - watching/listening to stuff like this (and believe me, as a teenager, I sat through hours of this stuff in between the Marillion and Pink Floyd guff the boys played), is the equivalent of watching men masturbate.

And despite what porn films tell you, watching men w**k (sorry for the rude word, Fraser) is not remotely erotic. Or interesting.

0
JoLean | 19 January 2012 - 7:59pm

Oh well. There go my chances..

3
Lenny Law | 20 January 2012 - 12:56am

I was just thinking

This morning that the musician I most admire is johnny marr. But stuff like this delights me too.

0
Vorgongod | 19 January 2012 - 4:14pm

Now, imagine that played on

Now, imagine that played on a piano...

8
Andy Lynes | 19 January 2012 - 4:23pm

Smiles

What I'd really like to see is a shit-hot piano player doing a job on William it was really nothing....

0
Vorgongod | 19 January 2012 - 4:29pm

Hannah.. You're being called..

0
Lenny Law | 20 January 2012 - 12:58am

RT

This page intentionally left blank.

0
oktapod | 19 January 2012 - 4:41pm

I finally watched the OP vid. Here's my response:

Dear Paul Gilbert,
You have wasted your life.
Yours sincerely,
Bob.

0
Bob | 19 January 2012 - 4:45pm

That's a bit disproportionate I think.

He wasted mine too for five minutes.

[boom (and indeed) tish]

3
Ahh_Bisto | 19 January 2012 - 5:58pm

I was an unashamed disciple...

....of this style of playing when I was 17 years old. I thought that if you could string sweep, double-hand finger tap and play 4 octave scales at the speed of light then you had everything mastered on the instrument. Ludicrous.

A few years later grunge happened, as did the allure of acoustic, folk, quality pop and the realisation that the song is far more important than the technical ability of any one of the musicians in the band. Besides no-one ever cares about fret-wankery. To demonstrate, let's take a look at the actual big-selling hits of a number of yesteryear's shredders:

Paul Gilbert (Mr Big) - To Be With You; Just Take My Heart; Wild World

Nuno Bettencourt (Extreme) - More Than Words; Hole Hearted

Vito Bratta (White Lion) - When the Children Cry

Yngwie Malmsteen - none

Steve Vai - none

Joe Satriani - none

In fact, 'Summer of 69' alone probably out-sold all of the above artists combined, 20 times to 1.

Enjoy the wanking whilst you're young, but never lose sight of the fact that the guitar (and indeed any instrument (including the vox)) is solely there as one of many tools (which may not even be called for at all) to craft as perfect a song as possible.

1
lit doof | 19 January 2012 - 5:50pm

'Enjoy the wanking whilst you're young, but never lose sight'

Sage advice lit doof but easier said than done if my Mother is to be believed

3
Cobweb Steve | 19 January 2012 - 7:42pm

I gave up...

...when I couldn't see my hairy hands any more.

0
nicktf | 20 January 2012 - 3:50am

You should have

slowed down a bit.

1
yorkio | 20 January 2012 - 2:22pm

It's a bit like…

being brilliant at keepie-up. Yet shit at football. You just know that Yngwe would never pass the ball.

6
yorkio | 19 January 2012 - 5:54pm

A lot of people

view guitaring as a technical skill, but what I enjoy is listening hearing the beauty in the, ahem excuse the cliche, 'less is more' approach. Even Hendrix (Wind Cries Mary) and Jimmy Page (Sick Again) had a natural feel and could emote the loveliest feeling from playing a few simple notes. 'It's the feel man' as Mr. Keith Richards would say. As much as I find the above very impressive in a technical manner, as a guitarist myself one thing I've noticed over the years is that a lot of lead guitarists have trouble holding down a song playing rhythm, in the manner of Jimmie Vaughn for instance, which for me is the real sign of a good guitarist. At the end of the day, each to their own, the bloke above and his audience look like they're having a load of fun, hats off to 'em.

0
MrTaylor | 19 January 2012 - 6:26pm

Hear hear

I was listening to Genesis' "Dancing with the Moonlight Knight" yesterday, and not for the first time, thought what a superb guitarist Steve Hackett is. He can do all the twiddly stuff (may even have invented some of it, like "tapping"?), but doesn't do all of his virtuousity in the one damn song.

I think I've read somewhere that he had to invent new things for his guitar to do, because Tony Bank's keyboards could occupy so much space.

Hackett's solos, as a result, are pretty memorable. The one in "Firth of Firth" when the guitar soars up over the keyboards still brings on the old goosebumps.

3
GCU Grey Area | 19 January 2012 - 8:04pm

Firth of Fifth

Hackett's solo on Firth of Fifth is one of those pieces of music that, for me, makes me close my eyes and drift away...... goosebumps on goosebumps.........especially the "Seconds Out" version

0
paulspud | 22 January 2012 - 12:40am

I have to admit that one of

I have to admit that one of my favourite guitar solos is the one in Hello by Lionel Ritchie.

I know ...

Top that

to save you the trauma of watching the whole video, the solo starts at 3.30.

to redeem some credibility back I should say that probably my favourite solo of all time is Walter Beckers solo from Home at last.

weirdly this also kicks in at 3.30. sublime:

0
Charlie Mingles | 19 January 2012 - 7:59pm

I heard Hello...

for the first time in years today - I used to hate it - mainly because it wasn't Echo & the Bunnymen - and that cheesy video with the blind girl. But, you're right, what a well constructed song and that guitar solo (is it acoustic?) is perfect. Easy's got a good guitar solo as well (no fretboard wankery) just a nice interesting break from the lyric - respect to Lionel.

0
Formbyman | 19 January 2012 - 8:27pm

sounds like a classic strat

sounds like a classic strat sound to me.

I'd hate to think I was single-handedly responsible for re-habilitating lionel's career.

theres a version of easy by faith no more which has a great version of that guitar solo as well

0
Charlie Mingles | 20 January 2012 - 12:44am

Ah I take it Clapton isn't

Ah I take it Clapton isn't God then!

0
Ivanovitch | 19 January 2012 - 8:06pm

If I want...

...technical skill coupled with originality and someone who looks as if he's *really* enjoying himself, I'll listen to FZ, who never fails to do it for me. I wonder, though, how many of these stunt guitarists could do a really choppy rhythm/lead like Wilko or Pete Townshend? When I had a vintage Tele, I tried for years to get the guitar part for She Does it Right even remotely near and gave up eventually.

0
Toffee the Cat | 20 January 2012 - 12:57am

Don't diss Yngwie

You'll unleash the f*cking fury.

http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article...

Oh dear (would have paid to see it though).

0
fatMark | 20 January 2012 - 12:58am

Piss off, twin-neck ragtime fretwank fingertap boy.

This is how you play the Maple Leaf Rag.

I've just spent half an hour trolling through YouTube. I love the Joplin piano rags. I think that Joshua Rifkin has recorded the definitive versions of almost all of them, following the notes exactly without putting his own interpretations into them. I think guitarists should try to do the same. This chap seems to have done so.

Watch his left hand. It is not a hand. It is a strange, alien thing which forms unfeasible shapes upon the neck of the guitar, spanning frets which no human hand could do. Were this performed by a human, it might be construed as fretwankery.

Watch.

Listen.

Gasp.

0
Lenny Law | 20 January 2012 - 1:16am

Now, imagine that played on a piano...

at least it would be in time

0
Marky | 20 January 2012 - 2:23am

Watching.

Listening.
Gasping.

0
Dadwardo | 20 January 2012 - 5:08am

I'm not a guitarist but

this doesn't look to me like your typical fret wankery.... this looks like genuine technical skill and yes the piano is definitely the go to instrument for ragtime but it's often not ideal to be carting around your piano with you everywhere you go. Also, the bloke might not be able to play the piano. That shouldn't preclude him from trying his hand at a bit of ragtime.

PS His left hand looks for all the world like a bit of Bruce Bickford claymation.

0
z1000jeff | 20 January 2012 - 2:13pm

Anyone mentioned Peter Green yet?

Now *there* was a guitarist. Judas Priest on a Rusty Moped, I HATE fretwankery.

1
man.of.soup | 20 January 2012 - 1:44pm

Jack Spratt

This kind of talk has it's other side; when I hear people talk about 'soul' in music, it can end up in all sorts of vile 'sincerity' (Paul Young as a soul singer, anyone) and tactful repositioning to gain 'authenticity' (U2 get BB King in to not look like mulleted clowns). Bedroom plank-spankers are rarely straight out of Clarkstone so much as out of a suburb somewhere. Pop and rock music is usually artifice - and a good thing too. Projecting moral goods into it ties you in knots of inconsistency. Sometimes you need a shred - sometimes elegant economy. Good musicians know when to do both.

1
Vincent | 20 January 2012 - 2:10pm

Well said Vincent

And Lenny, I love that Joshua rifkin; pretty amazing too. As Twang said on the beano thread 'Broad tent'

0
Vorgongod | 20 January 2012 - 3:33pm

There's a time to surf...

..and there's a time to wax your board.

This holds true for all musicians (as Vincent has already stated). I have played guitar for a few years now and only recently got into things like sweep-picking arpeggios (playing individual notes of chords mega fast) and tapping.

I appreciate the skill and commitment required to master these techniques but have never really found a practical use for them when playing in bands. A few well considered notes make much more impact than a widdle-fest!

My favourite speed merchant on guitar is Django! Only had two fingers an' all.

0
Muzwano | 20 January 2012 - 3:15pm

In defence of Steve Vai

I'm going to stand my ground here and say that in some places here, Vai has been rather unfairly traduced. Yes, he does do widdle. But he does, and has done a fair amount more. As Twang says earlier he is harmonically more interesting than many others mentioned. For me the best example of that for is the Flexable/Flexable Lefftovers project recorded just after leaving FZ's band: it's a fine album. It has a lot of very Zappa-tinged edges to it, but it has a great mix of the more trad rocky stuff (like The Attitude Song), the kooky (Little Green Men), the poppy (The Boy/Girl Song), the satirical (Details at 10) and the downright weird (Little Pieces of Seaweed). When I was 18 I loved Passion and Warfare. Now I look back and think it a bit overcooked, but I still think there are moments of brilliance on there. And that's before stuff with Dave Lee Roth like Yankee Rose, which is a riot.

Here's something Vai that's not in the least widdly and is rather delicate, from Flexable Leftovers

And here's something newer:

Apologies for multiple videos, but here's The Attitude Song with an orchestra.

Very nice!

2
illuminatus | 20 January 2012 - 3:31pm

Quite

In a sense this is a pointless thread as it is a bunch of people who don't like something disagreeing with a bunch of people who do like something. A nuanced view is that in all music genres there is good and bad. But it's much easier to make sweeping generalisations.

Tumbleweed, come on down.

0
Twangothan | 21 January 2012 - 1:21am

Credit where it's due

First thing to say in the case of someone like Vai, or even Satriani is that they are a genuine virtuosi. The level of skill required is so profoundly high that it's almost impossible for most non musicians to appreciate how high it is. It's like someone suddenly pole vaulting 8m. It's also possible for someone with skill like that to be able to play anything they hear, straight away, with no rehearsal.

But having said all that, is the music actually any good? Is it in fact music or merely a sporting event?

I think it is music that has been broken apart to such a degree technically that it has often lost all its soul. It's also true I'm afraid, that almost none of these players (Malmsteen, Vai, Satriani) or can play with any dynamics. They don't have the natural expressive touch that someone like Peter Green, or Hendrix or Jimmy Page had. So they have worked enormously hard at developing other exceptional skills. Each trying in his own odd way, over a period of more than 15 years, to be the best technician in the world. Any apparent expression in the music is so often rehearsed, it doesn't sound genuine or effective enough. They just don't have the taste to take the foot off the accelerator.

The student or the genius? don't think of any of them as really good students because they somehow missed the most basic thing.

1
Marky | 21 January 2012 - 12:57pm

Duck Baker

I saw this guy a couple of years ago on a Monday night at the Bull's Head in Barnes (famous jazz pub). Probably only 20 people in the audience (mind you, just about every one of us bought a CD or two so he made some money). A very unusual style of playing and repertoire, plus entertaining as well as jaw-droppingly skillful.

"The Art Of Fingerstyle Jazz Guitar" is his standout album. I like "The King Of Bongo Bong" too

0
Mike_H | 22 January 2012 - 12:22am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd