Entertainment For Lively Minds
Football - bloody hell! Part ####
Posted by DougieJ on 27 February 2011 - 7:36pm.
well done to Birmingham today. Great cup final. Had to cringe at the 'after you Claude' moment that led to the winner though.
On another note - what is it with Mark Hughes and handshakes? He had another flounce up the tunnel today despite the fact that he got a creditable point at his old club. Getting embarrassing to be honest.
- More from DougieJ.
- Login or register to post comments










I didn't see it as I was at work...
but congratulations to Birmingham City. It sounds almost as entertaining as Eric Cantona's recent assertion that Sir Alex Ferguson has something of Gandhi about him.
It was Shilton and Needham
all over again. Very League Cup.
There is no more important phrase
than "KEEPERS BALL!!!" in football, even if the keeper says it in a different language to the rest of the back four. Arsene Wenger is the sort of person who will continue to argue his beliefs, in his case that he doesn't need an experienced goal keeper and centre back, despite all the evidence against him. He should start a thread on it here, he would definitely get a visit from Kid A.
Always good to see a club like Brum
.....win over one of the bore-four (or is it the contrived five?).
Tremendous.
Wenger's assertion that his team were tired (BBC Five, 6.30 p.m.) shows that the route for England to take in the future is to pick players who 'aren't' tired.
If the 'Champions' League/Europa League players are 'tired' in February, is it really any wonder that they're 'tired' every other June?
Time for the players of Birmingham, Sunderland, Wolves, Bolton, Blackburn to clean their boots because these are the players who should wear the England shirt instead of Rooney et al.
Especially happy for little johnny rotten.
ah the old
tired players excuse, even tho he has different sides for different competitions, bless him
well done to the Lulu's
Don't blame the
centre-back or the keeper, blame Wenger. How many trophies would Arsenal have one in the last six years if they had the likes of van der Sar and Vidic at the back? Those two cost Ferguson peanuts by today's standards and are precisely the type of player Wenger should have bought years ago.
It's difficult to understand why Wenger can't see this. After all, his first great Arsenal side was built around one of the best and hardest defences the game has ever seen.
I put five small bets on today.
They included:
Zigic first goal
Draw at half time/Brum at full time
Brum to win in normal time.
Thank you Brum and good luck to you.
Seemed like a proper cup final and nice to see it on terrestrial tv.
It's always a pleasure
...to see the Arse lose.
I know. Petty and small minded and very very enjoyable.
Ouch
Well, that really hurt. No way to lose a cup final.
At the risk of coming over as a Wenger apologist, those putting the boot in on him may wish to bear in mind that he has constructed what is currently the second best team in the country on a net positive transfer outlay.
Okay he's sometimes highly frustrating (today's subs baffled me - how did Rosicky get the full 90?), but the armchair managers pointing out that he should have bought Vidic and Van Der Sar (no kidding!) and that he needs a new keeper and centre backs (best defence in the country since the current keeper stepped in, only conceded two more league goals than what has to be recognised as a very strong Utd back line) should step back and look at the big picture.
Sure, it was a defensive howler. But the team (and club) remain strong and, depending on injuries (which are wenger's real issue - he can't keep his best players fit) and will continue to compete on multiple fronts, at least until Barca put us out of Europe.
As a season ticket holder I'm perfectly happy with the defence (although our 4th choice centre back is a bit dodgy). What I'd like to see is another world class forward to rotate with robin van persie and a recognition from the club that sometimes a bit of old fashioned steel and mental strength is required.
Oh, and finally, well done to Birmingham. For all the criticism of Arsenal that was a great cup final performance and you deserved the win.
I said
"the likes of Vidic and van der Sar" were "the type of players" he should have bought. Not specifically those two, just players of that quality, so don't misquote me, please.
Are you really arguing with that? Who have they had playing at goalkeeper and centre-back in the last few years as good as them?
Johan
Apologies - i didn't mean to misquote you.
VDS and Vidic are the best keeper and centre back in the league, arguably in Europe. Should Wenger buy players like them? I sure he'd love to. But who would you suggest who is available, within budget and willing to come.
Meanwhile, you could say the same about Ferguson's purchases in other positions. He paid £18m for Anderson, which has hardly looked like value. He also bought Bebe and Obertan, neither of whom are much cop.
My point is that you could just as easily watch a poor Bebe performance, ask "what does ferguson know about signing wingers" and suggest that he should have bought Nasri instead (who was almost the same price).
Some Transfers work, some don't. All managers buy players who don't work out, Wenger no more so than most.
Apologies again for the misquote, I just think it's a bit too easy to criticise at times. I've heard a lot of people say Wenger should have bought a centre back in January, but who was available to him? Gary cahill for 15m? The Bolton fans I know tell me he's not worth half that. Chris Samba? Is he any better than what we've got.
Arsene wenger is very, very good at what he does. Not perfect, by any means, but very good nonetheless. If there was a centre back "like vidic" who was available to him then I think chances are he'd spot and acquire him. But the fact is that players of that quality are hard to find, particularly when City and Chelsea are pricing you out of the Market.
No problem
It just puzzles me, that's all.
I don't know who is available of Vidic's quality, but then we tend not to know the names of bargains when they are bought. It's only afterwards that their bargain status becomes apparent. I doubt if many Man Utd fans knew an awful lot about, for instance, Evra when he arrived.
Wenger obviously has a great scouting network, because he does sign some crackers at low prices, but you just get the feeling he's always focusing on further up the pitch than the defence.
One obvious target for the summer would be Shay Given. I bet he doesn't go for him though.
And while not in Vidic's class he could have had David Wheater, recently signed by Bolton. He would have added some steel to the defence.
It's a fair shout
That Wenger prioritises attack over defence.
That said, the defence has actually been a lot more solid this term (as per my earlier stats), though you may not have guessed it looking at us today. Curiously, while we've performed nearly as well at the back as Utd, they're easily outscoring us, which reflects that when Van Persie is unfit we can lack cutting edge, especially as Cesc has had a quiet season goals-wise. Also worth noting that our best centre back has been out pretty much all season - Koscielny is third choice and for my cash has had an outstanding debut season despite being used more than Wenger would have wanted.
Regarding transfer targets, Wheater is a left field shout but I actually quite agree with you on that one. He's young, good in the air, would have been cheap and happy to spend time on the bench.
Given - well, I've heard this argued before and I'm not sold. He's been around a long time and no top club (with apologies to Newcastle and City - both massive clubs) has ever taken a gamble on him. Why? Because he's a shot stopper, not someone who commands his box. Keepers at top clubs need to be dominant in the air (which is what we've lacked until Chesney) and know how to organise a defence. While Given is a fine keeper, The aforementioned aspects are the weakest parts of his game - he barely comes for crosses and the defence he's played behind have rarely looked organised. It's the reason he's been dropped for Joe Hart (who is a better keeper at his young age) and City's defence has been better since. I'd hate it if Wenger brought him in - until today Chesney has looked the genuine article and has had the confidence of his back four (something previous keepers have noticeably lacked).
All keepers make errors, even the best, so hopefully he will bounce back quickly. Lord knows he seems Barmy enough that today shouldn't faze him too much. And let's not forget he made a great one on one stop in the first half to deny Zigic. He'll be a top keeper, mark my words.
Dan & Johan
I have enjoyed reading your banter - thanks. I would just add/reiterate:
* Chesney is our Joe Hart - no point in buying Given now. Or Schwartzer.
* Kos has had a good season overall, and most Gooners would probably have him as 3rd choice behind Djourou and Vermaelen (our Vidic).
* We lost the game up front actually. It might easily have been 3-1 to us but we started very nervously and didn't score when we have that 20 minute domination in the second half.
* In October we thought we had a world class understudy to RvP: I really don't know what has happened to Chamakh.
* I think Rosicky and Clichy have got off lightly - Gael gave the free kick away needlessly (again) that lead up to the goal and Rosicky: nice guy-once great player-injury-lost it.
* Ultimately, it's one of those things. Well done Birmingham, they wanted it more than us and sometimes sh*t happens. Let's move on.
* There is a lot of talk about an imminent Arsenal collapse, I don't think that will happen actually and we will win the league, primarily cos we will be out of the other three tournos by mid-late-March.
* And Birmingham will go down.
"Rosicky and Clichy have got off lightly"...
* Add Song to that list too, he had an absolute "mare"...an awful defensive midfield performance. Hopefully Aaron Ramsey can get back and fill in and shore up the holding midfield position shortly.
I actually predicted as the ball was being hoofed into the box by the keeper that they would score...what I did not predict was that incredible f*ck up! We specialise in last minute wins or losses so the odds on that happening were not too long, especially with our defence :-(
Congrats to Brum...their game plan worked like a dream as they were still in the game with the last 15 to go and nicked it at the end, and they did not park the bus.
Been here before (Swindon,Ipswich,West Ham, Luton finals)life goes on,we will win and lose finals again....but I wish we had bloody won yesterday.
Big Eck
Although from Fife, my son is an Arsenal fan and did not have one of his better days - that goal gets no better every time you see it! I was pleased for Birmingham's seasoned bunch of pros and their Scottish management team (oddly from both sides of the loathesome sectarian divide......)
My side of the said loathsome divide won today,
while the other side lost, so all in all not a bad day!
Not getting carried away by any means, but given our (Rangers) progress to the last 16 of the Europa League, followed by today's results putting our destiny back in our own hands, it does make the analysis about the balance of power shifting to the East End since the last Old Firm game seem quite premature. That said, I fear we will once again be undone by fixture congestion.
McLeish's teams share many attributes with Walter Smith's Rangers teams - particularly building a strong team spirit and work ethic.
Continuing the theme, I think most fair-minded people would admit that Barry Ferguson has more than held his own in the Premier League since moving south again, despite many saying he was over the hill and would struggle. Today obviously meant a lot to him.
But which side is more loathsome?
Only one way to find out!! Oh, hang on....
Let me guess, you support one of those cuddly, family clubs, like Raith Rovers?
McLeish
Fergie's successor?
Good Idea
A Jock fronting the Black Eyed Peas would be grand!
Mark Hughes
He seems to think that there's only one way to behave ... his way. When someone else has a different idea he sulks which as we know is the proper thing to do under the circumstances!
Mark Hughes
seems to be one of these Graham Souness type Managers - the archetypal "hard-man" who is such a "man" that they often refuse to speak to their own players, don't have the guts to tell them they're dropped, sulk and send people to Coventry (literally sometimes!).
Mark Hughes' slightly embarrasing press conference this morning had me squirming "he didn't look me in the eye and shake my hand in a firm and manly enough fashion".
Get a room!
Mark Hughes...
...is a 'winner' type who can't deal with the fact that he is a 'loser'. ie He knows that he is doing OK in an OK sort of club and he failed at the big time. He was such an ace player who won loads and played for the biggest clubs in the world - he can't take the lower standards. (See also Roy Keane, Alan Shearer)
Congrats to Brum
I couldn't really give the game my full attention as I was still recovering from watching West Ham play one of the best 90 minutes I've seen in a very, very long time. And we still gave away the traditional comedy goal - a real "after you Claude" moment, but for once it didn't matter.
Sadly I opted to go to Upton park to see WH play Birmingham a few weeks back instead of yesterdays game. Still, I promise to stay away more if we play like yesterday again.
Well done to
Birmingham, it was good to see a domestic trophy being won by a side who actually consider winning it a big deal for a change.