Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Football - for and against

Andy Lynes's picture

Just out of interest - in light of several recent football related threads, am I alone among the Word faithful in loathing and despising nearly everything to do The Beautiful Game?

Its not that I don't appreciate the sport - I quite like watching the occasional international. It’s just everything that surrounds it from the moronic punditry to the way supporters say "we" when they mean 11 multi-millionaires, to the thuggish behaviour of premiership players and the relentless parade of clichés that constitute the obligatory after-match interviews that makes me feel ill. Does anyone share that view or should I fetch my overcoat?

0

I share that view

yet I can't look away...

0
ChaosandMorphine | 26 January 2009 - 3:22pm

No...

you are not alone.

0
grac | 26 January 2009 - 3:42pm

Bores me silly

Give me a 5 day test or a good super 14 or six nations game anyday.

0
Darthfarter | 26 January 2009 - 3:43pm

I don't loathe it

I am generally indifferent and ignorant about it though.

The only slight problem with this is that footie is often the way one bloke will try and open a conversation with another he doesn't know, and people either don't believe it is conceivably possible that a man doesn't share their interest, or, however much you try and get across that you're not making any value judgement about football, they take it as some sort of insult.

Then they try suggest I'm into rugby. Gradually it comes out that I don't have any interest in sport whatsoever.

I generally try and get them onto music instead. And then announce I like Marillion...

0
Fraser M | 26 January 2009 - 3:52pm

Two teams

I will happily watch Newcastle (perhaps 'happily' is the wrong word, again, this season) or England play but in general I really don't give a toss.

I'm waiting for the premiership to topple in on itself when all the Russian and Asian billionaires get bored and empty the coffers. Just seeing keen, local young blokes playing for a team for more than two thirds of a season might be good.

Actually, that will never happen. I wonder what will though.

My pet-hate is badge-kissing. When an openly mercenary career footballer kisses the club emblem on his shirt on scoring a goal. We all know that as soon as a better deal is struck for him elsewhere he's outta there. Loyalty, my hairy arse. Just play. Don't give us all that faux love.

0
Beezer | 26 January 2009 - 3:59pm

Here in Southampton

We have a lot of home-produced, keen young local blokes who are being played simply because of a lack of money to pay anyone else. Sadly, for all their enthusiasm and, I suspect at this stage in their careers, love for the club, it still means we are kept from the bottom of the table only by the ineptness of the other club whose results I also follow.

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 26 January 2009 - 8:46pm

Badge-Kissing.....

Should be an automatic yellow card.

Chav-tastic tattoos a straight red.

0
Hot Cider | 27 January 2009 - 10:30pm

Toony Too

Will watch the footy & enjoy it when I do, but aside from Newcastle & England (Juventus aswell actually) I don't actively switch it on. Would much rather watch rugby union, snooker or motorsport of any sort.

About the badge kissing, I think the whole sport is so fake anyway. From the constant diving to owners with interests in money alone & not the clubs benefit & glory of the club 'fans'.

Give me the world rally or the motogp any day.

0
vylisaxj220 | 17 February 2009 - 10:21am

A wild guess

You watch Juventus and total a six-pack so you can pretend that proper football is being played at St. James's Park for once.

I suspect many Leeds fans follow Real Madrid for similar reasons.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 17 February 2009 - 10:48am

They're on to me!

Yep! It does come from the fact they play in black & white & I have found myself visualising the Toon with the talent they've got in Turin. But if it came down to it I'm a Mags fan forever... Oh hell, I really don't care that much anyway... Can't wait for the motorsport season to kick in again.

0
vylisaxj220 | 17 February 2009 - 11:49am

Me and ye, pet

doon the front

Or, more likely given the feelings shared, not.

0
Beezer | 18 February 2009 - 2:04pm

Nah

We follow Tranmere for the same reasons

0
Leedsboy | 17 February 2009 - 12:48pm

World Rally is as bad as professional football...

...these days.

It lost all it's appeal to me when a they moved to a standard formula and 'office hours rallying' was introduced along with the abolition of Group B in 1986

The nail in the coffin was the centralisation of each rally at a single location with a small number of stages. Part of the attraction was chasing an event around the country knowing the drivers were driving at the limit for three non-stop days and nights; seeing the cars pulling up in country lay-bys for service and refuelling; encountering rally cars mingling with the regualr traffic on the roads between the stages.

These days it's all just a show for TV...

0
stimpy | 17 February 2009 - 4:52pm

Used to love the game...

...but as I've grown older I've become more disillusioned. Don't know if that has something to do with being a Leeds Utd fan!
Much prefer cricket these days.

0
Native | 26 January 2009 - 4:02pm

Love football.

It's a daft, thrilling, dumb, elegant, fast, slow, clumsy, vicious, truculent, partisan, balletic ride.

It's a poem. With balls.

0
eddie g | 26 January 2009 - 4:05pm

I understand that some people refer to it as

"working class ballet" but I can't be doing with ballet either...
It strikes me as something that you have to cultivate an interest in (much like musical theatre or gardening) and to me life is short enough already.
chacun à son goût, eh?

0
Pete Kavanagh | 26 January 2009 - 4:14pm

I hate it too

Fr'instance, the whole Kaka business just looked very wrong. Especially as it's the followers who end up footing the bill. It's absurd and ridiculous and disgusting. I'd gladly cop a feel of Mr Gerrard's special area though, but that's not for here

0
lovelyian | 26 January 2009 - 4:23pm

Depends how you look at it

I follow a team; I know more about them and follow their results far closer than any other team. However, I've been to about two games in six years, mainly due to the ridiculous cost of getting in.

I really do like football though. I enjoy watching it on the TV and keeping up to date with what's going on. Asian billionaires buying clubs for hobbies isn't ideal, but I prefer to focus on the actual game itself. If you can see through that and avoid the cliches then it's the same as it's ever been.

I'd liken saying you don't like football purely because of the money issues or diving or whatever to saying you don't like music because you think what's in the Top 40 is rubbish.

0
Joe R | 26 January 2009 - 4:32pm

Bleaugh...

...I actively hate the game, as well as the whole scene that surrounds it.

Not that fussed about Six Nations Rugby or test cricket either but I'll gladly watch my local club teams.

When the chance persents itself, watching the quiet middle day of a County Championship game at Worcester from the tranquillity of the pavilion bar is a fine, civilised way to spend a day.

But soccer/football? No.

0
stimpy | 26 January 2009 - 4:39pm

Soap opera

I agree with Eddie G.

The Premier League is one of the most compelling soap operas in Britain today with every extreme of the human make-up evident every week...oh and some football thrown in too. It is far better than most fiction on the TV currently and I hope it eventually comes crashing down in a Dynasty/Dallas style shoot-up to the tune of Barber's Adagio etc

Well maybe not the last bit.

0
Charlie Gordon | 26 January 2009 - 5:00pm

double post, i know

i put this in the 'shows that shouldn't work' thread, but it's more suited here, after your post, charlie.


0
ivan | 26 January 2009 - 5:16pm

I also agree with Eddie G

Music is my first passion and football my second. Oh, hang on, that should be, Mrs W is my first passion...

0
Handsome.P.Wonderful | 26 January 2009 - 5:04pm

I watch Barcelona most weeks

simply because it's almost guaranteed to feature a goal every quarter of an hour or so, with lots of proper stuff to watch in between. Apart from that, I'll watch Manchester United for old time's sake towards the end of the season (i.e. when the results count for something and they at least try), but it's not what it was, no.

That said, for all the talk of foreign squillionaires taking clubs over and the prawn-sandwichification of the game - which I don't much care for either - I do think there's a good smattering of selective memory going on here. The likes of Abramovich and the Glazers are supposed to be worse than the "traditional" club chairmen like Louie Edwards - the bent butcher, supplier of condemned meat to school kitchens, and cooker of books extraordinaire, who presided over Old Trafford during the Best/Charlton/Law era - exactly how?

It used to be seamy and crooked; now it's glitzy and crooked. But at the end of the day, it's all about ninety minutes, isn't it, Brian?

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 January 2009 - 5:50pm

Barcelona

"now it's glitzy and crooked" sums them up behind the scenes to a tee.

0
Sour Crout | 26 January 2009 - 8:37pm

Yabbut

Leo Messi made a Giggs-like declaration of eternal loyalty yesterday, which surely counts for something in these Have Massive Nike Sponsorship Deal Will Travel times.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 January 2009 - 8:40pm

Time will tell

We will see.Actually he is sponsored by Nike. When he realises how much he can make elsewhere he might look to move.
I think he's going to injured badly in the next few years and have to retire early.He's a target for defenders and what with his Medical history(Needed growth hormones.) Just a hunch but as an Espanyol season ticket holder it can't come soon enough.(I honestly don't wish him any harm).

0
Sour Crout | 26 January 2009 - 10:38pm

Ah....near enough the exact quote Luis Figo used.....

He'll be dodging the pig's heads soon enough!

0
Six Dog | 27 January 2009 - 5:24pm

I love football but ....

... I also hate moronic punditry, the thuggish behaviour, etc etc.

In other words all the things that Mr Lynes loathes and despises about the sport..... but all of that's not going to stop me throwing money away at York City every other weekend.

It's about as related to the football I like as X Factor is to the music I like.

0
Grimmer | 26 January 2009 - 5:35pm

I'm with the football addicts

A small time, home town club supporter who sadly I don't get to see in the flesh much these days.

Love to watch most footy on telly, whatever the standard.....even the ladies cup final (the goalies are hilarious)..........BUT

can't abide the goings on of the players, the media, the owners, the managers and generally anybody thats involved first hand in the "industry".

Football shouldn't be about business....it will never work or pay as a business without a billionaire to bankroll clubs. Those who think it will, including the Premiership officials are deluding themselves and abusing the "addiction" of the fans who will support their teams through hell or high water.

The Kaka deal would have been "good business" per Mark Hughes. Dream on......at over £100m and for an alleged/reported £500k per week (no doubt net) - how can that be good business? City fans deserve better, as do all supporters.

It will all implode one day, just like the City and the financial system as a whole - it suffers from the same issues broadly i.e. greed and self interest and is effectively unregulated.

Obscene amounts of money changing hands and paid to a bunch of guys who football has saved from a life of crime (well.....saved most of them anyway) who are advised by a bunch of opportunists lining their pockets at the expense of clubs who are now too scared to make a stand.

When it all ends in tears there are few of us who will regret the system falling apart - at least that way the smaller clubs, to whom a week of Kaka's wages would seem like manna from heaven, might start to see some sort of parity restored. And (*irony alert*)it will be interesting to see every premier league club starting with 30 points deducted just like poor Luton when they've all gone bust.

Sorry about that guys.........probably totally incomprehensible but just felt like I needed a rant....I'm going home for a lie down now.

Is there a match on tonight by the way?

0
el toro calvo grande | 26 January 2009 - 6:14pm

All the politics, personalities and passion

as described here makes football sound really exciting. But, like Formula 1, it just isn't.

0
Rufus T Firefly | 26 January 2009 - 6:39pm

We v 11 millionaires

We football supporters refer to the club as "we" because when the 11 millionaires are retired we will still be turning up to cheer the next lot on. We invest emotion as well as money.
There is also the mistake you've made in equating the Premiership where the millionaires parade their talents with the rest of the structure down through the Championship, Divs One & Two to the minor leagues. To say nothing about most Scottish clubs, and Welsh and Irish clubs.

0
Carl Parker | 26 January 2009 - 6:50pm

I invest a lot of emotion in

I invest a lot of emotion in music, but I don't say "Do you remember when we played the ULU in 1980" when reminicing about the last time I saw Joy Division.

0
Andy Lynes | 27 January 2009 - 9:41am

That is because

Joy Division are not a club that an individual can support, join and in rare instances, play for. Football and music are different (hence football records are shit and watching pop stars play football is shit). Your analogy is as irrelevant as me saying that Joy Division's performance was hindered by the managers performance tactics.

The supporter thinking of his team in terms of a club that he is part of is a good thing and does influence the way the club runs (albeit less so in the top tier).

0
Leedsboy | 27 January 2009 - 12:00pm

Spot on Lee

On top of that music doesn't have a season that commences with high expectation and often ends in profound disappointment, if not despair.

0
Carl Parker | 27 January 2009 - 12:11pm

Your last sentance

sums up being a Leeds supporter to a tee.

0
Leedsboy | 27 January 2009 - 12:16pm

Sorry, I love it

Natch I despise the wages and the greed. Strangely not the really big money, but the middle-rankers who command ridiculous salaries. EG Jimmy 'not fit to lace even Ray Parlour's laces' Bullard going to Hull but "not for the money"...

0
kb | 26 January 2009 - 7:32pm

Foopball?

...I'm with Molesworth...

0
nicktf | 26 January 2009 - 7:49pm

I'm a season ticket holder

who was, actually not too disappointed when we got relegated from the Premier League after two seasons (our first in the top flight since the team formed in 1871) and do love the game - but I guess like a lot of Word readers and their attitude to music, I am a bit of a purist, I hated all that the Premier League stands for.
In other words I despise what has happened to the game in recent years - the relentless pursuit of money, the greed, dishonesty, PR spin, corruption and inept officials running the show.

I hate the sheer lack of decency and morals - the boring, dull and stupid celebrities, the cliches, the sound-bites and the fact that football thinks it operates in a parallel universe where rules, and codes of conduct do not apply.

The Afur Daleys, sheepskin coats with pockets stuffed full of backhanders, the Agents greedily touting their players around like whores. The cheating, diving primadonas, writhing on the floor while looking at the referee pleading to send the opponent off.

But I will be there tomorrow night in the freezing cold, cheering the bunch of Championship cloggers on at the top of my voice...!

0
Retro Man | 26 January 2009 - 8:30pm

So ....

... that'd be Reading then?

Does this mean you would prefer them to not go back up again then? Which in it's own way would be a bit like not wanting a band you like to make it big ... as it would no longer be "yours" and be somehow corrupted ......

.... I can definately understand that!

0
Grimmer | 26 January 2009 - 8:44pm

Yes, I never thought

I'd see Reading in the Premier League, mind you I never thought we'd move out of the corrugated iron stands and concrete terraces of Elm Park, and when we did get to the "Best League in The World" the novelty and thrill wore off very quickly.

It's a good point you make and why I did bring music into my post - the dilemma of a fan and supporter, do you want your team/band to make it big and get the recognition you think they deserve and run the risk of things changing for the worse - or do you want to keep them all to yourself unsullied by fame and fortune...!? Shame that you can't often have both.

0
Retro Man | 27 January 2009 - 12:07pm

I love football...

but I don't love Premiership footballers, at least most of them.

I'll always remember a documentary made a few years ago about Kieron Dyer that for me summed up a lot of the problems I have with the modern game. The programme showed Dyer returning to his childhood haunts and he was going to great lengths to show that fame and riches hadn't spoilt him and that he was still in touch with his roots. Later in the programme he was showing off a diamond earring he'd just bought, which cost something like £50,000. No Kieron, you haven't lost touch with your roots at all, have you?!

Too many flash harry dickheads in the Premiership, although I support one of the Premiership teams....

0
Patrick Crowther | 26 January 2009 - 8:29pm

At the risk of being sued for libel

I've heard from more than one source Mr. Dyer's favourite trick is to try and bribe bouncers to let him skip the queue and get into nightclubs and when they refuse, set the £50 note he's just offered them alight

0
Joe R | 26 January 2009 - 10:23pm

Recommendation

At this point can I recommend Tom Bower's book Broken Dreams; Vanity, Greed and The Souring Of English Football? It's a few years out of date, although a revised version came out a couple of years ago.
The scales will fall from your eyes if they haven't already gone. Very few people emerge with any credit, especially not Terry Venables, Ken Bates, Harry Redknapp and a plethora of agents.
Once you've read this, you'll understand, for instance, the reasons why Harry Redknapp and Tottenham are so active in the transfer market.

0
Carl Parker | 26 January 2009 - 9:21pm

Don't know what Redknapp has done before...

but given he's been exonerated time and time again would lead to accusions of something of a smear campaign. I can't imagine his current employer allowing the kind of "free reign" that he had at other clubs.

0
Six Dog | 28 January 2009 - 1:52pm

No free rein?

I give you Pascal Chimbonda.

0
Carl Parker | 28 January 2009 - 10:54pm

It would be better if...

What really gets me is the constant pushing, shoving, obstruction and shirt-pulling. Wouldn't it be better and more skillful if all that were stopped? Also, I don't understand why the FA let managers and players slag off the referees so much. Neither of these behaviours would be tolerated in my sport (hockey).

0
Mark Godden | 26 January 2009 - 9:24pm

Love Music, Love Football

It's a both thing for me. Leeds United and Yateley Shields U10 (who I manage sort of) do the football. Occasionaly watch Reading and Aldershot as they are local to me. Don't watch it much on the telly though as Leeds are rarely on.

I don't hate any other sport. Can't be bothered - live and let live. I suppose football is a bit ubiquitous though if you don't like it.

0
Leedsboy | 26 January 2009 - 9:51pm

At the risk of alienating or offending

I think that the only thing more boring than football is people talking about it.

0
Lucas Hare | 26 January 2009 - 10:10pm

Fairport Convention

Feel the same about them but each to his own.

0
Sour Crout | 26 January 2009 - 10:39pm

Think you're mixing me up with Lucas, pb

.....but good to brush past brusquely. Lucas does Dylan.
(Wasn't going to bother reading this, being no lover of ballgames, but, hey, who'd have guessed I'd miss out on my old chum.)
Only jesting Paul, am I right that, like the ZZT drummer of your same surname, you don't have one?

0
Retropath2 | 28 January 2009 - 8:18am

It's the only thing some men can talk about

Because all women love shoes and all men love football, right?

0
Five-Centres | 27 January 2009 - 11:36am

Some men love shoes...

and some women like football. What a crazy, mixed up world we live in, eh?

0
Handsome.P.Wonderful | 27 January 2009 - 1:27pm

Numbers

There are 88 senior teams in England (and those from Wales) who are not global branding phenomena ... there are also 38 teams in Scotland who are not Rangers or Celtic ... which means that the ultra-hyped, hothouse atmosphere surrounding Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Man Utd (and to a lesser extent Celtic and Rangers) is not replicated for the vast majority of punters who actually go along on a Saturday (Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday - my lot to the best of my knowledge have not played on a Friday in living memory) who are not watching the same carnival as people who "support" the Big Four (and Big McTwo) - so the initial vehemence of this thread may be a tad displaced

Away at Falkirk on Saturday and looking forward to it ...

0
Glenbervie | 26 January 2009 - 11:16pm

well said

spot on sir

0
Sour Crout | 26 January 2009 - 11:28pm

Falkirk

My brother moved up to near Edinburgh and instead of deciding to go with the either the big two from Glasgow or the two from Edinburgh decided to support his local team which is Falkirk.
I'm pretty sure there are no millionaires in the Falkirk team.

0
Carl Parker | 27 January 2009 - 12:16pm

Be thankful

Many of the the comments posted earlier are true enough, but, speaking from afar, I have to say, enjoy soccer (whoops), and, consider the alternatives in the sports world domination stakes. Take a look at Baseball, Basketball and Football (US variety)and the dimwits that play the games. When was the last time a soccer player a) accidentally shot himself with his own gun in a crowded nightclub b) tried to strangle his coach, c)got caught by the cops in a motel room with a bunch of hookers and a large pile of the white stuff. I could go on ad nauseum, have you guys heard of Alex Rodriguez?, or Fraudriguez, as we know him round these parts. He's as baseball player for the Yankees, his current contract pays him $126 million, like I said, it could be worse. Of course, it goes without saying that Mr Rodriguez has not come close to earning that astronomical sum, but he's entitled to it anyway, he'll tell you that himself.
Soccer is flawed, but, it is a beautiful game, and, is the worlds game for a reason. Embrace and enjoy.

0
garygrills | 27 January 2009 - 12:05am

Where's the pleasure, the escapism?

I'll watch the World Cup if I've no shelves to put up, otherwise I don't get it. In Britain it's played in the grey months by men in shorts with visible breath, a mixture of handsome, begloved Europeans (shorts and gloves, what's that all about?) and home-grown, potato-faced troglodytes. And most of the crowd look like the kind of people you wouldn't want allowed into your favourite pub.

I was never into gangs as a kid so why would I want to join one now, whether it's called England, Poland, Arsenal, whatever?

Oh, and you could go home disappointed too if your favourite act "fails". I'll stick with Prince, thanks.

0
Stan Halen | 27 January 2009 - 3:50am

Where's the pleasure?

It's in seeing something like Fernando Torres's volleyed back heel that led to the Liverpool equaliser last Sunday. Totally exquisite and it hurt like f*** to see it, as an Evertonian.

0
Carl Parker | 27 January 2009 - 12:19pm

Oh, and the language

Volleyed back heel ?????

But if my landlord raises an eye when you come through the swinging doors I'll say: Geoff, it's cool – Carl's in the Word Massive.

0
Stan Halen | 29 January 2009 - 2:45am

That is what he did

The ball was in the air when he struck it therefore it was a volley. He also hit it behind him with his heel therefore it was also a back heel. How else could I describe it?
I'd rather he hadn't done it, but I have to endure the consequence.

0
Carl Parker | 29 January 2009 - 2:03pm

Volley

It's just not a word sport refusniks ever learn

0
Stan Halen | 30 January 2009 - 4:22am

Indifferent

I don't closely follow, but here in Singapore its an obsession so its hard not to know what's going on. Due to the timezone, most games are on at 10 / 11pm and so I may sit and watch at the end of a Saturday night if there is nothing else on. If its a good open game then I may even enjoy.....

I grew up with Rugby and Cricket - have no qualms about staying up til 2am to watch a Six Nations game, but don't tend to watch Cricket as I'm mainly interested in the 5 day game and its not broadcast as often.

One of my favourite pastimes is starting debates with colleagues here on the merits of footballers vs rugby players and how most professional footballers are a bunch of big girls blouses - I still haven't figured out why a slight clip of the ankle can cause a footballer to roll around in agony when a rugby player gets his head stamped on, gets up and gets on with the game.....

0
chrisf | 27 January 2009 - 4:12am

It's because rugby players

are dumb.

( And too fat to play football ).

0
eddie g | 27 January 2009 - 10:44am

Funny isn't it.....

.....that its the effeminate public schoolboys that end up playing rugby and kicking 9 shades of shit out of each other, yet the hard nuts from the streets (a la Kieran Dyer post above) end up the big girls blouses on a football field. Huge generalisation, I know (and maybe putting me in Andrew Collins territory....).

I went to a normal comprehensive by the way. Just can't stand the play acting in the modern game of football.

0
chrisf | 27 January 2009 - 11:17am

Yeah, I know.

I love the game but I'm not an admirer of all that artistic tumbling either. Even when my own team does it. ( Cardiff City since you ask! ). But then I'm one of those eminently kickable middle class, educated types who ruin the game for everyone else.

0
eddie g | 27 January 2009 - 12:53pm

"Effeminate public schoolboys"

When you put that charge to Ugo Monye, Paul Sackey, Phil Vickery, Gareth Thomas, Mark Cueto, Gethin Jenkins and, oh, thousands of others, can I hold your coat? And possibly your teeth?

0
David Hepworth | 27 January 2009 - 6:19pm

Huge Generalisation

I know ... and like I said - huge generalisation. I was just using an extreme to make the point that these professional football players are just a bunch of big girls blouses. Nothing against either public schoolboys (some of my best mates are such) or rugby players.

0
chrisf | 28 January 2009 - 3:54am

You forgot this guy!

0
Patrick Crowther | 29 January 2009 - 9:44am

I played rugby at school...

and have some sympathy with Billy Bragg's assertion (although made many years' ago) that, if someone put a bomb under Twickenham when there was a home game on, they'd put the fascist cause in Britain back 10 years.

0
Handsome.P.Wonderful | 27 January 2009 - 1:30pm

I quite like football..

...I grew up with "Shoot" magazine in the 70´s, collected the wallcharts, the pannini stickers and can name all the teams that have won the World Cup in correct order.
I still follow the game, but not as much as when I adored Liam " Chippy" Brady and The Arsenal.
However, I find , I can rarely sit down and watch a full 90 minutes on the box anymore, my mind wanders, I read the paper, play Nintendo or flick back and forth through the channels.
I suppose I prefer the idea of football than actually watching it. Much prefer watching rugby.

0
On The Fence | 27 January 2009 - 7:29am

Football is super

But I agree, I really need to be committed/interested to sit through ninety minutes. Much prefer Match of the Day-style highlights than the whole enchilada.

0
Austin | 27 January 2009 - 8:43am

I used to love football...

...but somewhere along the line my love has diminished.

Growing up as a supporter of Cambridge United, we always had hopes of promotion/cup runs etc etc but this hope has largely disappeared over the years. The chances of Cambridge making it into the Championship (where they have been for two periods in their history) are now virtually non-existent with the way the money in the game is now distributed.

Since moving to Holland, I have become a season ticket holder at FC Utrecht. In the last eight seasons they have finished ninth or 10th in six of them. They are currently ninth. Sometimes they play football which is a joy to watch but mostly they don't and it is now a social thing more than anything else.

I cancelled my cable TV three years ago and now use my TV for watching DVDs. If I want to watch a sporting event I go to the pub. This means I regularly watch rugby in the pub but I can't recall watching a football match in the pub in those three years.

0
UtrechtSimon | 27 January 2009 - 8:44am

Thuggery & Violence

Corruption & Greed,
Working class boys turned millionaires, loved and hated in equal measure for what they've become. Bribery, death, court cases & Jail!
It sounds like The Soprano's....

0
ChaosandMorphine | 27 January 2009 - 9:51am

Bores me to tears

I hate the way it's been taken over by the chattering classes and especially women who claim they're huge fans. It just doesn't ring true.

0
Five-Centres | 27 January 2009 - 10:40am

This is worth a look

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/article55...

As a 'non-believer', I find that you need to approach it with a healthily detached view of how absurd it all is.

Mrs H is the season ticket holder in our house. First time I went to a game, she couldn’t understand why I kept laughing at her fellow supporters who, I’m afraid, are just hilarious to listen to when the red mist descends from 3.00 onwards for a couple of hours.

I can happily watch the odd game here and there, and Soccer Saturday (as mentioned elsewhere) is bizarrely diverting viewing. But there is an awful lot of nonsense talked and written about football. And what other business can you think of where contract negotiations are so glaringly conducted in the public eye ?

And I’d love to get these billionaire owners to watch the penultimate episode of “The West Wing” where CJ talks ‘Bill Gates’ into doing something worthwhile-but-unsung with his vast fortune – there’s probably a better use for £100m than buying Kaka.

"Fever Pitch" is a cracking read though...

0
Simon Hoyle | 27 January 2009 - 11:30am

My rattle's in mothballs

Used to love it, as a season ticket holder for several years at Stoke City no less.
Can't be bothered nowadays. The dominance of the "big four" has made it all exceedingly dull. Unless the smaller clubs are able break this situation, it will remain so. Best of luck to Aston Villa.
I also have a bee in my bonnet (bonnets suit me) about "non-local" supporters, an affliction which affects Man Utd in particular; legislation should be passed so that individuals are forced to support the league team which is closest to their place of birth or where they currently live, like it or lump it. For me Stoke and Crewe - glamorous eh? Get to it Mr Brown - complex legislation, and you may have trouble getting it through the Lords, but it's more important than all this economy rubbish you seem to be obsessed with at present.

0
longtonian | 27 January 2009 - 1:46pm

...and clubs can only play

players born within the catchment area.

0
stimpy | 27 January 2009 - 1:58pm

good point!

Never thought of that one

0
longtonian | 27 January 2009 - 2:27pm

Makes sense dunnit?

You're born in (say) Stoke, you support Stoke and you go and see a bunch of Stokeians (??) play.

It's more likely to mean a team has only one (maybe two) really good players

0
stimpy | 27 January 2009 - 2:47pm

It would also favour

the highly populated cities and towns. And just make sure that players moved to local homes.

Should apply to rock bands - it would stop Oasis coming near my house.

0
Leedsboy | 27 January 2009 - 3:02pm

Good idea...

...it'd mean the Mott reunion would take place midway between Hereford and Ross-On-Wye - not far from me!

0
stimpy | 27 January 2009 - 3:19pm

Bad idea

We'd have to have Robbie Williams back from LA and possibly even Slash, who lived here till he was 4 before being shipped off to LA too.

0
longtonian | 27 January 2009 - 3:39pm

Slash & Robbie...

Could make an interesting live pairing at Trentham Gardens

0
stimpy | 27 January 2009 - 4:40pm

Yes

We could play Stanley Matthews, who was born in the Potteries, but he sadly died a few years back. This would be taking the idea of the "veteran" player a bit too far.

In any case, he may well have been born closer to Port Vale.

There's always Garth Crooks though; but he's put on a bit of weight and I don't like his bizarre Stokie/Southern accent much.

0
longtonian | 27 January 2009 - 2:54pm

Yes....

Working for a team currently plying their trade in the Premier League, I still find both the game and the industry at different turns nauseating, bewitching, thrilling, political and mesmerising.

0
Six Dog | 27 January 2009 - 5:30pm

Football is brilliant if only for one reason

Every single week it throws up at least one story that proves that the world is slightly more preposterous than it was the week before.

0
David Hepworth | 27 January 2009 - 6:21pm

This week's is Spurs

Spending the money they got for Berbatov on two players they sold not long ago for less and a goalkeeper. Football's absurdity is its saving grace, all the more so because the participants take it so seriously.
If it's pure sport you're after (and I know I'm leaning against an open door with Mr H on this one) watch Six Nations rugby coming soon to a terrestrial TV near you. If any sport has benefited from football's massive surge in popularity, it's rugby. Mindful that their game was a tough watch for the uninitiated & that football wasn't, rugby administrators dumped many of the arcane laws seemingly designed to allow fat blokes to lie in the mud all afternoon. The days when Wales could play Ireland and the ball be in play for less than 20 minutes are long gone.

0
Graham Johns | 29 January 2009 - 10:08pm

REAL MEN

REAL MEN WATCH FOOTBALL. It is the only drug of choice.

0
CharlieB | 27 January 2009 - 9:26pm

Real men *watch* football?

Real men *play* rugby

0
stimpy | 27 January 2009 - 9:44pm
Leedsboy | 27 January 2009 - 9:55pm

Real men

Distance themselves from those who would be labelled Real Men.

0
Stan Halen | 29 January 2009 - 2:57am

A real man writes:

(Quite a good song actually)
"Take your mind back - I dont know when
Sometime when it always seemed
To be just us and them
Girls that wore pink
And boys that wore blue
Boys that always grew up better men
Than me and you

Whats a man now - whats a man mean
Is he rough or is he rugged
Is he cultural and clean
Now its all change - its got to change more
cause we think its getting better
But nobodys really sure

And so it goes - go round again
But now and then we wonder who the real men are

See the nice boys - dancing in pairs
Golden earring golden tan
Blow-wave in the hair
Sure theyre all straight - straight as a line
All the gays are macho
Cant you see their leather shine

You dont want to sound dumb - dont want to offend
So dont call me a faggot
Not unless you are a friend
Then if youre tall and handsome and strong
You can wear the uniform and I could play along

And so it goes - go round again
But now and then we wonder who the real men are

Time to get scared - time to change plan
Dont know how to treat a lady
Dont know how to be a man
Time to admit - what you call defeat
cause theres women running past you now
And you just drag your feet

Man makes a gun - man goes to war
Man can kill and man can drink
And man can take a whore
Kill all the blacks - kill all the reds
And if theres war between the sexes
Then therell be no people left

And so it goes - go round again
But now and then we wonder who the real men are" Joe Jackson

0
Retropath2 | 29 January 2009 - 9:44am

Thuggery & Violence

Sometimes I get a bit fed up with the demonisation of what is predominantly a few arrogant, selfish, immature prima donnas. If the age group and number of football players was taken into account it is actually,relatively speaking, a miniscule number that appear sporadically in the tabloids. What would the press have made of footballers acting as the English cricketers did following the Ashes success. Instead of being seen as 'high jinks'and over exuberance following a night of lively celebration the footballers would have been castigated and completely destroyed by our southern based predominantly middle class media.

And without becoming over emotional ( which I admit I struggle with) being in Istanbul in 2005 when Liverpool won the Champions League Final was the best/worst/most frustrating/most disappointing/most euphoric night of my life.....without exception.

0
Larry Bee | 27 January 2009 - 10:17pm

Rugby supporters

Similarly with rugby supporters. They get up to "high jinks". Yet if the behaviour I witnessed on a train I was unfortunate enough to board, which was full of Oxbridge students on their way back from Twickenham after the Varsity match, had been carried out by football fans, the train would have been stopped and police would have been swarming over it and many would have been working their hangovers off in police cells.

0
Carl Parker | 27 January 2009 - 10:53pm

Rugby Supporters

Absolutely....a few years back I used to visit a nearby rugby club to support a few mates on the playing staff - This eventually resulted in me joining them 'on tour' which was obviously an excuse for a bevvy for the weekend somewhere miles away from prying eyes. These trips were generally massively enjoyable but occasionally lapsed into being a bit embarrassing to say the least when non-tour people were inadvertently involved when in the vicinity of the 'japes'.
I have followed 'my' football club countless times on away trips (domestic and european) and despite the popular myths haven't seen or been party to anything involving rivers of puke or violence just a huge amount of laughing ,flag and badge swapping, bevvy buying and trips to 'their' bars . Maybe I've just been lucky.

0
Larry Bee | 27 January 2009 - 11:06pm

There's just too much of it

I didn't mind it so much when it was an hour or two on Saturday but now in the age of Satellite TV Mr GWP can find some kind of significant match to watch just about every day of the week.
And his shrieks of excitement & groans of disappointment disturb the cats.
Catie
PS When I first met him his team were not doing so well so I had no idea what I was in for! Just as well I'm happy to tiptoe off and listen to music isn't it?

0
gollywollypogs | 28 January 2009 - 12:20am

Oh my God!...

I didn't know my wife read this blog.

Hang on, though - she's called Anne, not Catie

As you were.

0
geedubyapee | 29 January 2009 - 2:00pm

There is never a bad time to post this....


From the ever wonderful Half Man Half Biscuit

0
Nick | 28 January 2009 - 5:42am

Birmingham city season ticket holder

Was there last night and the quality of football was dire even though we are third in the Championship. The problem is it was still a lot of fun - the banter, shouting expletives t your own players, goading the opposition. Yes, it is tribal but there is something addictive about it even though on numerous occasions I have said 'thats it, I am not coming next year".
Also, someone earlier in the postings said that it is ultimately the fans that are paying the wages of the likes of Kaka. This is completely untrue - the days of gates receipts even remotely covering the wages of the players in the team disappeared years ago. The costs are met by TV revenues and rich benefactors.When these disappear the sport may once again return to its working class roots.

0
Steve Turner | 28 January 2009 - 8:48am

Ubiquity and Tribalism

Like many here I've followed the game in the past and become disillusioned and bored with the whole thing. Occasionally there will be a spark of interest and I still play in goal for the company team (not a good idea at my age). But the two things that really get my goat are (1) its ubiquity and (2) the tribalism.

The radio clicked on this morning and was I met with another story about a footballing non-entity being accused of some serious sexual offence. This was the lead item. There then followed a report based clearly on virtually zero real information other than a bit of hearsay and more waffle about who kicked who and the tragedy of being sent off last night. Another day, another punch-up, speeding tickets, public expectorating ... I'm not interested.

And then there's the tribalism. I support Oldchester Rovers and wear red, you follow Riverside United and wear blue therefore you're a c**t and I'm supposed to hate you. Why? Beats me. Perhaps someone could explain.

0
Phil Pirrip | 28 January 2009 - 9:12am

Forgive me, being of scottish stock.

The colours are actually blue and green and it is all to do with being either protestant or catholic, in other words, something well worth killing people for. Or so it sadly seems. All else stems from that sort of inherent prejudice: whether there ever were a difference of religion between the 2 Manchester, the 2 Liverpool, 2 Nottingham teams I don't know, but, in the dim mists, I bet there was, especially in Liverpool.

0
Retropath2 | 28 January 2009 - 9:37am

United used to be Catholic

With Louis Edwards* and gang on the board, Matt Busby on the touchline and half a dozen Catholics on the pitch, but George Best - the Van Morrison of Dribble - ended all that.

Nowadays, of course, they're managed by a man who was a Rangers fan as a wee 'un.

(*See above.)

0
Archie Valparaiso | 28 January 2009 - 12:16pm

There's usually a big group of Irish fans at Old Trafford...

...both Northern and Southern Irish. There are also strong links to Celtic (until they sing "You'll Never Walk Alone"). Having said all this, United seem to attract all nationalities and religions (witness the group of Sikh lads to the right of the away team's dugout)

0
Handsome.P.Wonderful | 28 January 2009 - 5:34pm

Hatred/Rivalry

Agreed that some of it stems from Catholic v Protestant biffo in the past but much of the hatred/rivalry is brainless rubbish. I met a Colchester United fan in a pub in Auckland (NZ) recently who asked me who I supported. I told him Ipswich and he seranaded me with a song with lyrics about why Ipswich's ex-manager is a c-word and how he hopes he "dies of aids". Now I support Ipswich and I am supposed to "hate" local teams Norwich and Colchester. Yet I don't.

I also follow England and this means that I should be glad when Scotland fail. I don't - I genuinely want them to do well too. I actually think I am in the majority. It's just the loudmouths are, well, louder.

0
Austin | 28 January 2009 - 10:12am

Indeed...

...I like to watch local club cricket, rugby and motorsport but I don't 'support' any team. I just want to watch a good game.

Similarly, if I watch the Six Nations in the pub, I don't care who wins or loses, I want to see an exciting, interesting game.

The only time I ever have any 'emotional investment' in the result of the event is when I'm taking part myself.

0
stimpy | 28 January 2009 - 10:26am

I think you are in the majority

I have had many great experiences at football with opposition fans. Sat with some Charlton fans in the Charlton end to watch Leeds. Had a great conversation about Derek Hales, why the Charlton fans were only booing Danny Mills and not Lee Bowyer.
Also was very warmly received by a bunch of Arsenal fans in the Hope & Anchor before a game at Highbury - they even bought me a drink.

Idiots exist. Go out on a Saturday night and there are quite a few. But not everyone who goes out and drinks is an idiot. Its just more acceptable to stereotype football fans.

0
Leedsboy | 28 January 2009 - 10:44am

As an atheist football hater from the west of Scotland...

... I blame Celtic and Rangers for almost everything that's crap about where I come from. My irrational hatred of this sport becomes less irrational when I think about sectarian bigotry which is perpetrated by the idiotic followers of these two teams.

This is a conversation I had with a group of one teams supporters as I tried to evade a beating (not saying which as I equally dislike the blue clad and the green clad sides). It finally persuaded me that I should consider fleeing Scotland...

"Hey you, whit team de ye support?"
"Partick Thistle" (a useful get out clause in these circumstances)
"Whit school did you go to?"
"I was taught at home by my parents."
"Whit religion are you?"
"I'm an atheist"
"Are you a catholic atheist or a protestant atheist?"

At that point I ran away...

0
ganglesprocket | 28 January 2009 - 10:27am

Boom tish!

"Gangle's here all week, try the veal" etc etc

0
stimpy | 28 January 2009 - 10:33am

hmmmm...

0
ivan | 28 January 2009 - 11:40am

Sheesh ironic violent bigots...

... I guess my irony-ometer wasn't working that day. Oh well...

0
ganglesprocket | 28 January 2009 - 1:29pm

Admirable sentiments.

I suspect many scots aspire to supporting only 2 national teams: Scotland and Whoevers-playing-england. Thankfully my interest in football is so little I really do't care enough to. Having said that, at my one experience of international Soccer was Scotland versus Switzerland at Villa Park some years ago, I found myself enormously moved and in sympathy with the Tartan army, giving a huge swansong to their team, who, I think even after winning the game, hadn't won enough, and exited whatever competition it was. As one bedraggled, internally and externally, supporter said to me, "Scotland; best losers in the world........" Sadly, certainly not inexperienced.
That day was earlier highlit by the complete astonishment and amazement by the local Rastas about Villa Park, knowing not what to do at all about the massed ranks of bekilted men rampaging joyfully, shouting goodnatured banter at all the local womenfolk, behaviour that would have brought about stern retribution if carried out in trousers. Made me quite proud.

0
Retropath2 | 28 January 2009 - 10:33am

Sad thing about football is

that I’m not sure kids know how to play it anymore. I remember watching a curious scene in my local park last summer. A group of young lads turned up, all kitted out in pricey gear etc., with more drifting in and joining them until there were about 12 of them. They made a goal out of bags etc. and proceeded to “play football”. Now it pains me to come over all “when I were a lad” but in my day this would have involved dividing up into two teams and playing a game. Not anymore it seems. Now it involves showing off fancy flicks etc. Crossing and headers/ shots. They didn’t make two goals, just the one. It was bizarre. I know quite a few young lads who are “into football”. They have the shirts and what have you. But they never play it. They just watch it on the telly. Football’s becoming one of those things you passively watch or follow, rather than actively do. Wasn’t like that in my day when it was all fields round here.

0
Richard Lowe | 28 January 2009 - 3:53pm

But there is far more

well organised, well equipped football going on in the football clubs than when I was a boy. I manage an U10 team and the kit and training we have is far better than when I played. We start them earlier in 7 a side, small pitch games and it really is very well done. My son has been playing since he was 5. We play in a league with 9 divisions and 8 - 10 teams in each division. Multiply by each age group and that is 9,000 plus players.

0
Leedsboy | 28 January 2009 - 4:33pm

Jumpers for goalposts

I’m sure lots of very good people organise lots of very well-run football teams for young kids. But you don’t seem to see the same kind of natural, spontaneous, distinctinctly “unorganised” games that used to be normal. Maybe the modern way is better, I don’t really know, but my point is simply that things have changed since I was a girl.

0
Richard Lowe | 28 January 2009 - 5:24pm

Kids aren't allowed to be kids any more

Now all their play and sports activities are moderated/facilitated/supervised/completely spoiled by grown-ups (er, not you Lee).

Surely the whole point - the character-forming blah blah - is that they should have to work things out for themselves ("If you make me play on Spew-Arse's team, I won't show you my brother's Lactating Shaved MILFs in Uniform, so there..."), breaking neighbours' windows and getting chased off by park wardens brandishing rakes, if necessary.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 28 January 2009 - 5:55pm

Round are way, the rule was...

Whoever kicked the ball into Grumpy's garden had to go and ask for it back. No excuses or cop outs allowed. No sending big brothers in your place.

You do the crime, you pay the price

AND it were a proper 'casey' leather pill. None of this fancy modern stuff in our day

0
stimpy | 28 January 2009 - 6:10pm

And there are a hell of lot more cars now

so our spontaneous games on bits of green and even in the road can't happen now.

We used to play a game called Kerbsie which involved throwing a ball from one side of the road to get it to bounce off the opposite kerb. You couldn't do that in most estates now - you can't see the kerbs for parked cars.

0
Leedsboy | 28 January 2009 - 8:06pm

Heh...

We used to play that as well!

0
stimpy | 2 February 2009 - 4:35pm

I have my moments I reckon

but we are in Div 9 of 9 so we don't take it too seriously.

0
Leedsboy | 28 January 2009 - 8:06pm

Showing my ignorance here.....

.... but what is an MILF ???? and why do they wear uniforms ?

0
chrisf | 2 February 2009 - 2:00am

It's a bit rude

It stand for Mother I'd Like to F***.
I first came across it in an episode of ER a few years ago when a kid referred to Dr Lockhart as a MILF.

0
Carl Parker | 2 February 2009 - 7:36am

"It's a bit rude"

Reason enough to delight in this blogging lark! The wonder of abashed understatement. Thanks for making me smile, Carl.
Nearly as smile making as the Matching Mole track I listened to on the way in, with a delightfully english woman talking over the music, presumably as she engages in something carnal: "that's nice, o, that is nice etc etc"
(Hmmm, me thinks I overdid the prog, purchasing the first Hatfield and the North LP, Matching Moles Little Red Record, Eggs Polite Service and the Khan debut. Quite, um, chewy all in one go.......)

0
Retropath2 | 2 February 2009 - 8:43am

The man who...

John Cale's The Man Who Couldn't Afford To Orgy from Fear also features a female voice over. "oh, you can really do it to me, John..."

0
Carl Parker | 2 February 2009 - 1:37pm

It's like a GILF...

...but some years younger

0
stimpy | 2 February 2009 - 4:38pm

GILF??

Have you just made that up? I can guess what the G stands for, but it sounds unnecessary.

0
Carl Parker | 2 February 2009 - 9:34pm

Nope...

I've seen it used genuinely to describe ladies of 'a certain age'

0
stimpy | 3 February 2009 - 8:55am

Ooops

Did some of us think G was for girl, when Stimpy (and indeed many of us now) realises this is grandmother. And no harm in that either!

0
Retropath2 | 3 February 2009 - 9:08am

Isn't that....

... one of the characters in Lord Of The Rings ?

0
chrisf | 3 February 2009 - 1:07am

Blame TV

Two things are undermining the perception of the modern game:
1) The fact that a lot of Premier League players are childish, overpaid arseholes.
2) TV highlights. Match of the Day is awful these days, consisting of more talk than action, a lot of silly clips accompanied by faux rock music, and smart arse editing that is only there to go on the producers' CV.

0
Rotherhithe Hack | 28 January 2009 - 8:27pm

Stevie Gerrard’s court case

Bound to be a disappointing draw.

0
Richard Lowe | 29 January 2009 - 9:49am

As a Man U fan...

I hope it goes to penalties

0
Handsome.P.Wonderful | 29 January 2009 - 12:01pm

As an Evertonian...

I'll settle for penalties with a red card.

0
Carl Parker | 29 January 2009 - 2:05pm

Do the decent thing

And support your local team.

I abandoned my Scottish Premier League team of 30+ years standing for an adventurous time traipsing round the country watching Edinburgh City and Spartans in the semi-pro East of Scotland League.

How else would I have seen the delights of Dalbeattie Star and Easthouses Lily on a cold, winters day, with a 50p cup of tea, a £2 programme and a £3 admission. Proper footie.

0
zeitgeist | 29 January 2009 - 3:59pm

Fans are challenged

It's the same with every modern "big league" sport in any country -- a crushing layer of corporate marketing, cross-promotion and celebrity journalism has been plopped on top of a brilliant game now played by bigger, fitter, faster and better trained athletes.
The challenge is ignore all of the former to take pleasure in the latter. It's difficult to do.
With tickets so expensive, marketers have taken up the challenge of making the matchday experience "fun and memorable" even if the home team never wins or is off its game. This rings entirely false to the genuine fan. Part of the pleasure of caring is to be pissed off if your team plays poorly and, of course, to be elated when it plays well.

0
dda9966 | 29 January 2009 - 5:14pm

Can't stand it..

..especially when people ask "who do you support?" without first finding out "are you interested in Football?".

I wouldn't ask someone for their favourite Neil Young album without first assertaining if they were a Shakey fan.

0
kidpresentable | 29 January 2009 - 6:48pm

"Shakily Yours"

Would be my choice.

0
Austin | 29 January 2009 - 8:29pm

My usual answer is...

..."a wife and two kids"

0
stimpy | 29 January 2009 - 9:19pm

I might use that line...

..if you don't mind.

0
kidpresentable | 30 January 2009 - 12:56pm

Tabloidism

I love football, both watching and playing, but I have to say the below;

Without intending to sound too snobby (although sod it, I'm a snob and I don't care), the likes of people who regularly read daily comics such as The Sun, and base their chants, opinions, and attitudes on what they see on Soccer Am each saturday, are influenced by the afformention ill informed, hype building, mob inducing, 'lad' culture which get spoon fed into their empty heads.

If people actually took the time to look into the facts and various arguuments of issues which they then force upon others as their own opinions, then football fans as a whole wouldn't be such utter morons, and it would make the day-to-day football culture so much more appealing.

0
rhubarb69 | 30 January 2009 - 1:15pm

Footy

Can't quite fathom this. Football is pure poetry, always the same always different (actually, that means it's probably more like The Fall) You can enjoy watching the FA Cup Final and nothing else, you can immerse yourself in the game completely, you can play (or not) at any level or age, you can collect the autographs, the stickers, the shirts, the programmes; you can enjoy the muscular artlessness of the local leagues as much as the lightning artistry of the premmier league. It's endlessly fascinating and beautiful.

Oh, and rugby's just rubbish!

0
Finzigod | 30 January 2009 - 3:31pm

Is the correct answer

Go to the top of the class.

0
meretrician | 31 January 2009 - 4:22am

.

.

0
meretrician | 31 January 2009 - 4:22am

Sayun vs Riyan

Yemen Republic circa 1998. Better than tribal war.

Photobucket

A home win for Sayun - 2-0, if I remember correctly.

0
backwards7 | 31 January 2009 - 4:23pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd