Entertainment For Lively Minds
EMI - the acts won't like it but there's a good idea here
One of the more interesting plans that came out of yesterday's meetings at EMI was that the new company was going to get away from the tradition of paying a big advance for an album. They may even be prepared to put acts on some sort of salary as they record for them and they might be just as interested in single digital downloads as albums.
This seems long overdue. Everybody knows that the success or failure of a twelve track album is actually dependent on the appeal of about three of those songs. They should get them out to market as quickly as possible. If they do well you get to record the rest. If they don't, well, you can always put your own record out on your own label. Less waste, less disappointment and you finance your own self-indulgence.
- More from David Hepworth.
- Login or register to post comments










Sounds good to me...
To my way of thinking, the sweeping changes in the music industry are sending out a long overdue wake up call to record companies that it might be an idea to cut back on some of their more extravagant expenditure.
So I think paying musicians pocket money instead of an advance is a great idea. If a band signed on the strength of their catchy pop-rock songs suddenly turns round to their label and says "What do you think of our innovative "jazz funk meets Arvo Pärt" concept album, those with the cheque book can simply say: "Sorry, lads, that's bloody awful. No pocket money for you this week. I want something you can hum by Tuesday."
To my way of thinking, the
To my way of thinking, the sweeping changes in the music industry are sending out a long overdue wake up call to record companies that it might be an idea to cut back on some of their more extravagant expenditure.
So I think paying musicians pocket money instead of an advance is a great idea. If a band signed on the strength of their catchy pop-rock songs suddenly turns round to their label and says "What do you think of our innovative "jazz funk meets Arvo Pärt" concept album?", those with the cheque book can simply say: "Sorry, lads, that's bloody awful. No pocket money for you this week. I want something you can hum by Tuesday."
DIY most definitely.
"well, you can always put your own record out on your own label. Less waste, less disappointment and you finance your own self-indulgence."
We've done exactly that. Getting on iTunes and all the other download services was easy, so we've got worldwide distribution right there! Likewise Amazon, so physical product is easily available should anyone want it. All we need now of course are some reviews in quality magazines, let's say like Word for example, to attract punters to our quality product and gigs. Am I dropping a hint? You bet I am!!
Z
And your band is called...
what?
You need to work
on your marketing.
No name of band or track?
Tut tut
Just point him...
...to the DIY A&R thread.
I thought
we were strongly discouraged from mentioning our own bands/books/beauty products etc. for fear that the site would become a mini-myspace. I think the Zilster is to be applauded for his reticence. ( Unless, of course, he has bombarded us with tracks and pics in the time it's taken me to write this! )
House Rules
From the posting guidelines, "It's OK to self-link in response to a post by another Word reader, but only if it's relevant to the original post."
'Twas ever thus
Surely major labels have been operating on a very similar scheme for years now. I can think of two bands signed to five-albums deals on modest advances (which covered expenses and wages for about a year between them), who recorded albums' worth of material, only to be quietly dropped after three singles because they didn't chart highly enough. The 'suck it and see' marketing approach doesn't seem to be altering that much in the glorious new interweb age.
Ah, fair enough Fraser.
Thanks for that. So the man didn't even 'self-link'. Even more applause I hazard.....although I wouldn't necessarily employ him as a publicist for my own band which you can find at www.-
no, better not.
Just out of interest....how many of us Word readers still play in bands I wonder??
Guilty
m'lud...
It was a cheeky post
and done in a sleep-starved moment of not-quite-sanity, so my apologies if I was out of line - not something I normally do, but I did feel it was relevent to the original thread. The opportunities are very much with individuals or small companies like us now that it's so easy to get the material recorded and "out there", but it's such a two-edged sword because billions of others are doing it as well so we all get lost in a big fat pile of wannabees. I'll get me coat.
Z
I'm sure
no apologies are needed. I heartily agree with your points and am now quite intrigued to hear your band. ( Take that as your cue...er...as long as it's not actually 'Take That' of course! )
Intrigued eh?
Well, I have a tiny little label currently housing 3 solo artists. I formed it late last year with 3 others and we're all still finding our feet. Only 1 CD is available at the moment, with another 2 products due in late Feb, one of them being download-only. Small-scale, very low budget, in it for the love and the laugh - very much a cottage industry. But obviously we need people to hear about the stuff so we a) stand some chance of getting an audience at any gigs we do, and b) don't all have a big fat load of CDs sitting around the house for ever.
Seeing as I appear to be allowed a little self-promotion, Google "the only record label with a hamster at the helm" if you want to find out more. Now I'll shut up.
Z
Twangothan
Tell us more!