Entertainment For Lively Minds
Cycle Sport - The Glory, The Drugs
Do any readers follow international cycle sport? Most particularly the Tour de France. Alberto Contador the Spanish "winner" of last years event has been given a 1 year ban for drug use.Errr hang on one year! For spoiling the greatest cycling event of the year and contaminating with suspicion all the other riders.That can't be right. Contador has been caught out because he did not stop utilising the growth hormone quick enough and the tests are constantly getting more refined. He put the blame on contaminated beef from Spain (NB - no other case ever reported of this type of contamination). He has now put the back up of the whole of his home lands beef industry. Not clever.
Contador did not do this on his own. The whole team and support network must have been supportive of this abuse. Are they to be punished? As detailed on the Word news letter last week there is still a mighty shadow over Lance Armstrong and his multiple wins. We have even had a recent +ve drugs test on an English rider at a non-professional level. Now when people are utilising drugs to enhance sport as a hobby the world is crackers.
Your thoughts?
- More from N2Peach.
- Login or register to post comments










Speaking of cycling
Cycling and drugs of some kind or other (it's probably the same for a lot of other sports) have a long history with each other.
Tommy Simpson for instance is one particular case, but the following wiki page makes very interesting reading when you look at the dates involved. It's not a new phenomenon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_doping_cases_in_cycling
This is my favourite statement on the page
"The acceptance of drug-taking in the Tour de France was so complete by 1930 that the rule book, distributed by Henri Desgrange, reminded riders that drugs would not be provided by the organisers."
Has there ever been a clean winner?
Maybe Sastre, but I think you might have to go back to LeMond and Roche to take anyone seriously in terms of a winner not taking any drugs.
Lemond definitely clean.
Lemond definitely clean. But, my hero Roche, I'd be less confident of. I think Johan pointed out here before that in the later years of his career he was mixed up with one of the many 'disgraced' Italian doctors banished from cycling with a flea in his ear.
Paul Kimmage
said a while ago that there was only one TdF winner in the last 20 years to whom he was prepared to give the benefit of the doubt (i.e. wasn't on drugs). Not sure who he meant.
Lemond? Gotta be...
I followed the TDF closely last year
And was really saddened by the Contador debacle. This place cheered me up a bit:
http://bikepure.org/
Speaking of cycling Part 2
I'm cycling from London to Paris at the end of May in aid of the National Autistic Society.
If any kind members of The Massive fancy sponsoring me, please contact me and I will give you the details.
Thanks and apologies for hijacking the blog
As for drugs in cycling, it is unfortunately endemic and very hard to stop. But something needs to happen. Cycling is a mass participation sport and the people at the top end need to be role models for everyone.
Let me know how it goes
I am London to Paris-ing at the end of July for Action Medical Research. I'll need top-tips from you! Good Luck!
My top tip:
Eurostar. I'm sure they'll be fine about putting the bike in the guard's van, and it's really quick.
Good Idea
But I could do with losing a few pounds so cycle there and Eurostar back!
katyg - You sponsor me...
And I'll sponsor you.
it's a deal
message me your details (i think that's do-able through this website?)
Sponsorship
I would like to sponsor you. Drop me a line & we can get it sorted out.
Cheers,
Les.
Thanks to....
jackthebiscuit and katyg for your kind offers (I've sent you a note each) and thanks to Drakeygirl for her earlier donation.
I bet you don't get this on the M*j* site!
Isn't there a website where you can set up an event
and people can sponsor through Paypal at the push of a button? I've sponsored a couple of people through it
(Furtles...)
www.justgiving.com seems to be the one I've seen before.
Certainly is
But I didn't want to blatantly post it on here as the rules state something about self promotion etc.
Therefore I'm giving it to people who ask, rather than the other way round.
Good point. Send me the link and I'll sponsor you :-)
Stimpy....Message sent
Thanks once more to the offers and sponsorship from
drakeygirl
katyg
jackthebiscuit
& stimpy
Very kind of you all.
Hmmm
I haven't had a message, but am very happy to sponsor you. I've checked the address on the site, and I think it's worked before - would you mind giving it another go? katy
Thanks katyg
I'm certainly not ready yet. I need to do lots more training but really looking forward to the trip.
Good luck in July (take lots of suncream)
Take drugs, win races...
anyone that believes that doesn't know what they're talking about. I equate drug use in cycling with the blatant cheating that you see week in, week out in football and other sports. Whats the difference? I've been shot down on this subject before but until ALL professional sport is 'pure' I'll not entertain any armchair cyclist telling me the whole sports dirty.
As a cyclist and a cycling fan
I have to admit it's getting harder and harder to get excited about the major events. There's a weird kind of comfort in the fact that doping has gone on since day one, but part of the fun of watching the pros push themselves to the limit going up the side of a mountain is that I know more or less what it feels like to push yourself until you're about to pass out, even though my "mountains" are usually just the biggest hills within reach of my house. But if the blood in their veins has been doctored in five different ways, then the fun goes out of watching them.
I kind of agree with the comment above about the unfairness of cycling being considered "worse" than other sports in terms of cheating. At least they're being caught...
Until very recently, I've always worked on the basis
that EVERYONE is doping so, to some degree, the playing field is still equal.
They might get up Ventoux or Alpe D'Huez quicker and easier than if they weren't all doping but it doesn't make it any less of a spectacle.
I realise I'm damning the few riders who really did do it clean but I'm afraid I became so cynical after 20+ years of watching the TdF that it was the only way to view it.
It's only in the last couple of years that I've cautiously started to believe that maybe some riders really are riding clean but, based on past evidence, when someone is SO much better than the rest of the field, it's going to take a lot of convicing me.
Look at what they have to do in Le Tour
Cycle 100+ km a day for a month including the cimbing of ridiculously high mountains and recover in hours for the next sadistic stage.
Drugs are needed to achieve this.
Another cyclist writes
While I'm an ardent cyclist, I've never been very interested in cycling as a sport. My thoughts on Contador are the same as they are on other athletes who are found to have cheated with drugs: lifetime ban. I think it's crazy that people can get away with one or two year bans, and I can't understand why the sports' governing bodies are so lax. If they want to make any dent in the use of illicit drugs, it's a no-brainer. It seems doubly perverse that, given the advances in testing, they're not pressing home this small advantage (the cheats will always make advances in their techniques too).
My theory about why cycling drug cheats get so much fuss about them compared to other athletes isn't new, I'm sure. It seems pretty obvious that in some sports, using drugs gives you more benefit than in others. I doubt they're of much use in football or table tennis, for example, given that increased stamina is only one component of a successful game. In cycling, it's pretty much all about stamina and the sort of strength which can be aided by drugs.
Changing the subject, I'd love to emulate Katy and Big Guxy and do London to Paris - but I'm committed to the Dunwich Dynamo this year, and I don't think doing both is an option.
Now, about that Massive Bike Ride...
Drugs
have ruined many sports. I used to be quite keen on the athletics but too many retrospective revelations have thoroughly undermined my confidence in the results. I can't even bring myself to truly believe in the achievements of Usain Bolt and i now regard the Olympics as a competition to see which nation has the best drugs.
Cheating in cycling and elsewhere
Without condoning cheating of any kind in any sport, surely there's a HUGE difference between (say) sticking your hand up to claim an illicit throw-in, and regularly injecting yourself with a cocktail of drugs, the potential long-term side effects of which may be completely unforeseeable?
As for cycling generally, sadly my working assumption is that they are all at it, and I am neither surprised nor disappointed by the latest 'revelations' to 'rock' the sport. What would surprise me would be if any of the current top participants were proven to be completely clean.
And that's the real tragedy.
The goose that laid the golden egg
is slowly being killed in top level pro cycling. Sponsors do not want to be associated with a dirty sport and dirty riders. The thrust for change must come from the riders and they must request harsher bans from the UCI. I believe life bans have been killed by the Courts but a minimum of 5 years should do the trick. I agree we shall never get rid of drugs but surely we must try to minimise the consumption? For riders safety and wellbeing if nothing else. Jaques Anquetil died at 50 it is widely understood because of drug abuse, we can't let that continue.
Maillot jaune
I don't quite understand why Contador hasn't been stripped of his TdF winner's jersey for 2010.
If he has been found guilty of a drug infraction surely that should mean he loses it a la Landis. Are there gradations of drug abuse?
I'm being an absolutist on this but, as I see it, being tainted for one day on the tour in failing a drugs test has to mean he's tainted for the whole tour and therefore loses the title.
Has he not?
I know it's only Wikipedia, but it has Andy Schlek as the 2010 winner.
The Winner Is?
Contador has been stripped of the title. I would realy like to know how that works in terms of money. My understanding is all prize money is shared amongst the team. So every body from Contadors team will have to give the money back and shared back to the other teams. Thats not going to be easy and its a good job Contador is banned as he will not be too popular with his ex-team mates.
Not yet
Contador is still listed on the official TdF site as the 2010 winner.
http://www.letour.fr/us/homepage_courseTDF.html
Also the Spanish Cycling Federation is threatening to strip him of his TdF title. How they can strip him of a title won in another country is a mystery, as it would seem to be beyond their jurisdiction. But that is another discussion.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/jan/27/alberto-contador-2010-tour
Double post
Sorry.
And don't forget
He was mixed up in Operacion Puerto, at least tangentially, having been a member of the disgraced Once/ Libery Seguros team, which in its current form, Geox, has been denied a Tour spot this year because of its past.
A bit of previous
In an interview on a late-night sports show on Spanish radio, five-time Tour winner Miguel Indurain was asked if he had ever used performance enhancing drugs. But the interviewer gave him an easy out: if he actually had used drugs to win the Tour but wanted neither to confess openly nor to have to tell a big porky, he could simply refuse to answer.
"Next question," Indurain replied like a shot.
"Let me be sure we're clear what you're saying here," the interviewer persisted. "If you didn't, just say you didn't. Otherwise, you can refuse to answer. Have you used performance-enhancing drugs?"
"Next question."
That was about 12 years ago (not long after Indurain retired unexpectedly, which by complete coincidence was immediately after the announcement by the Tour de France that they were going to introduce blood-testing for EPO). The story was completely buried by the press at the time - Indurain, in those pre-Nadal and World Cup-win days, was by far Spain's biggest national sporting hero - and it's only now beginning to resurface with the Alberto "I Thought That Hamburger Tasted A Bit Funny" Contador shambles.
I'd rather watch wrestling myself. It's cleaner.
Indurain
was the protege of Pedro Delgado, infamously positive in the 1988 Tour.
Former members of Banesto have said there was organised doping in the team. Let's face it, Indurain was 6ft tall and got up hors category cols in the company of 8st climbers before dropping them easily. You think he did that on vitamin C?
Sad but most likely true...
It was watching Indurain haul himself up those hills while I was living in Spain that cemented my love of cycling. Like you say, for such a big man to keep up with the tiny climbers does make you think...
A further eye-opener was the interview cited above where he refused to answer doping-related questions, which I hadn't been aware of. Grim...
Indurain
I'm not making any assertion about Indurain's dope free status, but in his favour he did have massive lung capacity and his resting heart rate was incredibly low. These were natural physical characteristics.
True that
Now that you mention it, I remember being wowed by his freakishly low resting heart rate. He also had a ridiculous V02 max. I think it was the first time I realised that a person could train as long and as hard as they liked, but if they didn't have the genetics, they were never going to compete at the highest levels.
And never forget that
In 1996 when he climbed of the bike and was beaten by Riis, the current owner of Contador's Saxo Bank team, had an alleged haemocrit reading of 60%.
Cycling has to work these tainted people through the system to get to a time where it can make a fresh start.
It needs to invest in the newer teams dominated by Scandinavian, British and newer antipodean riders who have never been involved in the old doping-riddled system.
For the reasons why cyclists dope, Matt Rendell and Ned Boulting covered the New Cycling Pathways conference on October 16 on their Real Peloton podcast (available on iTunes).
There, during the 2010 World road race championships, and with Landis in attendance, some Australian academics revealed the content of interviews with current and recently retired pro stars who had partaken of the dreaded magic needle.
The long academic paper is here: http://www.newcyclingpathway.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/21-NOW-FINAL...
Both the paper and the podcast are very interesting.
Cycling is in an impossible position
Cycling is light years ahead of other sports in terms of drug testing but because of this, the sport's reputation is in tatters. The top riders are still being caught and this makes the sponsors dubious about continuing. Which other sports have banned the winners of their top event? Cycling has now done this two or three times.
I think many of the members of the peloton are now clean which they certainly went 10-12 years ago. Can the same be said for many other sports?
This argument always comes up at some stage
And I have to say I always struggle with it.
Cycling is 'light years ahead of other sports in terms of drug testing' because it has to be - because its participants are light years ahead of other sports in taking the bloody things. *That's* why the sport's reputation is in tatters.
Which other sports have banned the winners of their top event? Many track and field sports, and winter sports - many, many times.
And in 1994
The world's greatest footballer was sent packing from the World Cup in disgrace.
Further Reading
'Rough Ride' by Paul Kimmage
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0224080172/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_r...
Well worth a read for anyone with a passing interest the gruelling world of pro cycling and drugs.
It is 20 years old now and even though the parts about drug taking are by no means the central thrust of the book, he was roundly savaged by all and sundry as a failed and bitter former sportsman. Now one of the more respected sports journalists in Ireland, how he must have laughed as the sport imploded over the following decade.
In terms of cycling cleaning its act up
You have to look at Team Sky, HTC Highroad and the old Garmin team that has merged with Cervelo.
All have a history of open, regular and published drug testing and biological passport analysis.
They have deliberately chosen to stay away from Italian and Spanish riders associated with those teams that were 'known' to have been involved in doping.
They represent a new guard and sit uneasily with an old guard of teams that often have DS's and management who come from the glory days of EPO's introduction to the peloton in the early 1990s.
It is interesting to look, after the fact, at the careers of riders who moved between teams which had (suspected) structured doping programmes. Roberto Heras went Kelme, Postal and then Liberty Seguros. The latter two teams have had retrospective scandals.
Look at all of the Postal trusted lieutenants - Heras, Landis, Hamilton and recently Yaroslav Popovych, all done, or implicated in, drugs scandals.
Perhaps the time has to come to admit that the Grand Tours, and their ever more difficult routes, and dominance of the calendar and commercial rewards, leads cyclists and teams to continue doping, of they have had that history.
Bertie the Accountant is a young man who straddles these eras and these types of old teams.
For cycling to grow it needs to look at the Classics and shorter races rather than focus on the behemoths of Le Tour, Giro and Vuelta.It certainly needs to look at the commercial power of the ASO which runs the tour and a lot of other races, it needs to reform both the UCI and the Pro Tour to address a system that ushered in the modern era of doping.
Less information is more
Really enjoy watching the Tour de France.
The coverage on Eurosport is wonderful as they spend as much time telling you about the chateau they've just passed as the race itself.
The details of the race pass me by though I did find myself recognising our sprint guy.
Sometimes in modern day sport it's best to not know too much.
That's the tragedy of football.
There is no mystery left, we know everything, we know John Terry et al are scumbags (we know they're rubbish n'all).
Now some rugby league guys might also be scumbags but, crucially, I don't know that because it isn't reported 24/7!
So, I can't wait for the Rugby League to start up again whereas if I never see another Premiership game it'll be too soon.
In tomorrow's Sunday Times
there is apparently an interview with Floyd Landis by Paul Kimmage. I imagine Lance Armstrong isn't going to come out of it very well!
Banned no more
It seems the Spanish Cycling Federation are buying his story:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/feb/14/alberto-contador-ban-lifted-...
What a joke
Drugged cows will join cycling's infamous list of excuses alongside Hamilton's unborn twin and the fridge full of drugs for Frank Vandenbroucke's dog.
Jesus...
but won't the UCI and WADA step in?
Well, WADA might,
but the UCI? Hell will freeze over etc.
Not in a Million Years
It was hardly likely Contador was going to be banned when the president of their own federation and the Spanish prime minister weighed in with support. In other countrys an independent tribuneral would decide but in Spain that appears to be too easy. The Spanish federation quite reasonably know that the UCI and WADA will do their dirty work for them and Contador will be banned quite possibly with a longer ban than 1 year at the end of proceedings.Lets be blunt, he is dirty and quite probably are the rest of the team. Odds on when we have the final judgement he will retire.
Mean while the Armstrong investigation winds on.
There's a looooooooooooooong thread on Contador
on the Cycling News forum
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=12396
where they're really going at it. The antis have some great nicknames for Contador, though. My fave so far is "Pharmador", but "Clentador" is pretty good too!
I'd just really like to know
the name of Contador's butcher. I need all the help I can get.
Contador's ridiculous excuse
...is actually looking slightly less ridiculous by the minute. The famous steak has been traced to a slaughterhouse that has - ta-da - been fined and temporarily shut down in the past for spiking its beef with clenbuterol (apparently sometimes used 2-3 days before slaughter for its liquid-retention properties, thereby literally pumping up the volume, and so the weight, of the meat when it's sold).
I still don't believe him for a minute, but his defence is no longer quite as implausible as it first seemed, and it may now be enough to give him the reasonable doubt he needs to claim he's now in the clear. In other words, there's no doubt the forbidden muck was in his system, but nobody can disprove his explanation for how it might have got there.
Exactly!
http://www.onionsportsnetwork.com/articles/contador-cleared-of-doping-by...