Crisis Consequences: Dig Deep
It really puzzles me why anyone puts out charity records these days. In an age when it's pretty universally accepted that people no longer buy singles, do these releases actually raise money? Or is it all about awareness? And if that's all it is, is it not devaluing the music? And if it is, how much more can music be devalued before we start taking our old records and CDs back to the shops and admitting we're over the whole thing and can we have the cash back, please?
Maybe I'm taking this all too seriously... but has there ever been a decent charity record?
The above track features the likes of Paul Weller, Beth Ditto, Supergrass and Graham Coxon, and is raising money for the homeless charity Crisis. It's no-doubt a worthy cause, and David Gilmour has donated £3 million. Respect.
But he's nowhere near the single.
- More from Fraser Lewry.
- Login or register to post comments








come on
show some solidarity it is May day after all.
Has there ever been a decent charity record ??
Nah
If we're not stricly talking Charity Singles....
....The Help album was pretty fucking good.
The Warchild Help Album
Yeah took it out yesterday. Its actually 13 years old this year, how time flies, and like I said still stands up.
I'm with you Fraser
All the way. Never ever bought a charity single. (Not even Do they know its Christmas, thanks mum). That not the same as saying I'm not charitable.
Never even heard a good one apart from Do they know etc...However I did buy the first Warchild Album 12 odd years ago and I think that still stands up.
A band aid on a tumour
When I was 13, the lower six formers at our school wrote and recorded a single to raise money for a cancer charity. The song was called Together and our music teacher, who was very odd fellow, made us spend a whole double period (1 hour and 35 minutes) singing it over and over again. The execrable opening lines are still etched on my brain:
"Care, something that all of us need
Even when you're 17
you still know what it means..."
Free Nelson Mandela
was a good charity record.
And I suppose even these days if any singles are going to be honestly paid for, they'd be charity ones.
Know what you mean though. I'm an old cynic who thinks most celebrity charity stuff is done to make the celebrity look good. Hats off to David Gilmour though - didn't he also give away his house once? If pop stars genuinely care about this stuff they should put their money where their bleeding hearts are, shut up about it and lay off the lousy records.
Gilmour's house sale...
and the resulting efforts of the charity to spend the money is an incredible saga of London planning and NIMBYism
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/mar/02/socialexclusion.pinkfloyd
It makes you wonder just what is the best way to help...
I don't think
we should tell other people how they raise money/ promote charity, people getting up anmd doing something is positive. Nobody moativations are pure whne it come to charity mother theresa wanted to get into heaven but self serving really? charity singles are hardly the worst things ever, it's very hard for charities to get there courses heard so they do what they can, if babyshambles playing at oxfam shop gets people involved well good on them.
Most charity things
are not a pinnacle of creativity or invention. But they are well meaning and if it generates a bit of cash which helps and raises awarness then thats all right by me.
Its all better than having someone shoving a collecting tin in front of you and requesting that you contribute. There is, of course, the irony of wealthy artists who are very tax efficient making generous donations to worthy causes.
but artists
are dammed if they do dammed if they don't, put your hand in pocket and get slagged off, put your hand in your pocket in secret and get slagged off, don't and get slagged off...
we should all use tax efficent giving.
The irony is more those that
The irony is more those that have offshore accounts, astute accountants and overseas residences to reduce their domestic tax contribution and then either criticise governments for lack of investment or make large gesture donations (with money they have avoided paying tax on).
I do not see Dave Gilmour as part of this - his actions seem particularly genuine to me. But if I could type in an Oirish accent and wear sunglasses all the time and live in France........
i made an awfully similar point
a bit back...
http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/content/u2-can-be#comment-7910
How do you know that they don't pay their fair share of tax?
For the record, Mr Sunglasses doesn't live that far from me and as far as I know I don't live in sunny France although like him I do own a property there.
Don't confuse paying lawful tax and massive ego's.
I'm not going to go there for obvious reasons (my line of work) but in fairnes when it comes to tax and donations Mr Sunglasses is not one to come on all shy. (How the corproate monster is taxed is a separate issue and you would be suprised how many of the great and the good mentioned in glowing terms on this site have similar arrangements. And that is a fact).
I suppose
the point really is that these artists, who are effectively corporations (and at the Mr Sunglasses level) do not pay the same rate of tax as the people they hector to stump up cash for their favoured charities.
And I suppose whilst it may be lawful, it is a bit morally suspect.
Charity by stealth
I was looking through my record collection this morning and was quite surprised to discover seven charity albums - two that I was already aware of (the Help! CDs, which are patchy but good) and five others that I have never really thought of as being charity records.
It struck me that the most effective charity singles are those that don't overtly preach or even mention the causes they represent. Do They Know It's Christmas? hangs on by virtue of its seasonal references, but when was the last time anyone felt a burning need to listen to the original version of We Are The World or the Ferry Aid cover of Let It Be?
The most enduring charity record of all time is probably The Move's - Flowers In The Rain, which began life as an ordinary single, but was subsequently press-ganged by the judiciary into helping charitable causes, thanks to an ill-judged publicity stunt by the band's manager, Tony Secunda.
Secunda's decision to promote the single with a postcard featuring a libellous cartoon, of the Prime Minister, Harold Wilson resulted in royalties from the song being awarded to various charities of Wilson's choosing - a practise that continues to this day.
Just hang on a minute
Neil Young and his wife put together some concerts for the Bridge School for kids with problems and made a damn fine CD 7-8 years ago with Neil, Tom Petty, Bonnie Raitt, Beck, Bowie, Elvis Costelloe and many more . I have it at home and ´tis well worth the 2.50 I paid for it, ironically in a charity shop .
If it's for charity...
... it's going to be made by someone with mass appeal - Boyzone, Girls Aloud and their ilk.
Plus, it's often the charity bit that comes first - then the record. So it ends up being bland and inoffensive.
The first War Child album was (and still is) fantastic, and the follow up from a year or two ago is not bad either. Where they succeed is that they have approached musicians/bands known for the 'quality' of their music - rather than those artist who just shift units.
Foundations: Coming Up From The Streets
...was an excellent double-CD released in 1997, profits from which went to the Big Issue Foundation. Mostly electro dance music, it was a fixture on my CD player for several weeks after I bought it. Included tracks from Radiohead, Orbital, Underworld, 808 State, Bomb The Bass, Scanner, System 7, Leftfield, Massive Attack and The Aloof. A very fine compilation, which I'd have probably bought even if at hadn't been for charideee.