Entertainment For Lively Minds
Creep me out!
Posted by Meat Whiplash on 19 December 2011 - 3:30pm.

I think I'm going to be sick - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-16244795
- More from Meat Whiplash.
- Login or register to post comments










I think Fraser has rules
about (not) posting this sort of thing... Ye gads, there should have been a health warning about looking at that picture.
I wouldn't want to be his brother today
He's a magazine editor. Perhaps he had the day off.
I saw this in the Telegraph
What a pair they are. Here we have Ian decking Paul Daniels because,
Further on we learn the truth about that 'beanstalk' accident which laid Wee Jimmie low.
She shouldn't have been on him in the first place, no natter how tall he was, but as the piece makes clear they both had form in that area.
Each to their own
My own tastes in the bedroom are as middle-of-the-road as a Snow Patrol album track, but y'know, consenting adults and all that.
I see no reason...
...why the tiny potato-faced molester-bait community should be denied access to the more Bacchanalian side of life. Although I've often wondered what their marriage and her alter ego might say about his proclivities.
Gah.
Fan'dabi'dozi!
Let us not forget this record peaked at number 46 in the UK Singles Chart in February 1981. Any excuse to get them a feature in The Word and a gig in The Lexington.
When I first heard this
this morning, my first thought was of the detumescent horror of hearing "Fan'dabi'dozi!" at the, ahem, moment of crisis. Bleurgh.
Still, every cloud and all that, so I wonder if, in true Monkey Tennis fashion, BBC3 would be interested in a pitch for Dogging wi' The Krankies?
Oh God
The Daily Mail's version of this story leads with a photograph of a prone, skinned Orville laying between the saucy pair.
I think this could be the tip of the iceberg. I fear the Blackpool seafront will rock with sordid revelations for months to come.
Ding dong
has just taken its place alongside bonking on my list of unappetising euphemisms.
On this very subject...
Reminds me of the classic letter to Viz magazine. It went something like...
"I've been having sexual fantasies about Jimmy Krankie. Now I don't know whether I'm heterosexual, homosexual or a paedophile."
Even without reading the article...
I can honestly say that I have always found The Krankies deeply disturbing. They freaked me out as a child and they freak me out now. I really wish they'd go away.
Question
Is it physically possible to unread something?
I need to know.
In defence of the Krankies
They're a good old fashioned turn, and real troopers. I'm reliably informed by a Scottish pal that they do excellent Panto. They came across very well in that series Louis Theroux did a few years back. Thoroughly down to earth and entirely comfortable with, and grateful for their place in the world of light entrainment (i.e. At the end of the pier). Compare to Keith Harris who clearly thought he was entitled to his own prime time series and let it eat away at him.
You're a long time dead
I find the title of the post and some of the comments above a bit dispiriting. Presumably there wouldn't be this degree of revulsion if the subject matter had been Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.
The Krankies had sex in unusual places and maintained some kind of open relationship, while at the same time sustaining a romantic and working partnership that has lasted almost their entire adult lives.
Good for them. I hope they had and continue to have a bloody good time. I hope that the sex is amazing and that they have few regrets.
You are a better man than I
There are some combinations I would just prefer not to know about. And that article has many of them. The reason is not that they are less than perfect physical specimens - I'm in no position to criticise there. It's that there's something intrinsicaly creepy about someone who makes a living from impersonating a small schoolboy being such an enthusiastic shagger. I mean, didn't she question the motives of any of them?
What Motives?
You're not seriously suggesting any of her 'shags' were wannabe paedophiles who were opting for a sort of legal loophole by getting off with Jimmy Krankie instead?
They'd have been disappointed.
Stu Francis from Crackerjack there I see....hey you don't think..nooooo! I wonder if she "crushed his grapes"?
I didn't read the article...
Just the mention of their name is enough for me to feel revulsion.
Armchair psychologists to thread
Patrick, do you wake up under your duvet, sweating, clasping your hot-water bottle, troubled by sexual thoughts of Jeanette Krankie? Has this been in your subconscious, nibbling away at you all these years?
You can tell us; you're among friends.
Trust me...
I have never, ever, ever had any thought of a remotely sexual kind about that creature.
I honestly can't understand why every sentient being doesn't feel the same way about The Krankies as I do. Evil. Pure evil.
I mean *look* at the photo in the original post... it looks like something from the Doctor Who story The Talons of Weng-Chiang. Terrifying... freakish... ghastly...
I don't care if the sex is amazing
It's still the most vile thought. I mean, look at them!
Life's too short to think about it.
Well, yes
I stand by my 'each to their own' comment but stop someway short of hoping the Krankies have great sex.
As far as I know...
...Angelina Jolie hasn't made a career out of dressing up as a little schoolboy while Brad Pitt pretends to be her dad.
... Yet.
a bit fuckin' high minded
of you b7, personally I find 'swapping' 'dogging' etc. repulsive and if the missus suggested it, I'd be packing my bags
takes all sorts, I guess
Grown adults dressing up as schoolboys?
Ban this sick filth now!
To be fair
In the original radio broadcast it all seems to be a bit of a giggle
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b017w1mg
Just wrong
I haven't eaten since I read this.I wonder if Little Jimmy kept his uniform on?
Sorry that image is just too disturbing.
It's the possibility of the cries of
Fan'dabi'dozi at the crucial moment that's keeping me off the crisps
I think this discussion
says more about some of the posters' neuroses than the Krankies' stage act. Like Alan Partridge and ladyboys.
It reminds me of a colleague who went ghostly pale when I offered the opinion that another male colleague was very good-looking. It was as if agreeing with me might turn him gay.
The concept of dressing up to do a stage show (it's called acting, I believe) and leading a normal life off-stage (or even an eyebrow-raising one in this case) seems to have passed you all by.
I find Britney Spears dressed as a schoolgirl, in a sexually provactive way, far more unpleasant than wee Jimmy Krankie.
Fair play to them
but, while not about neuroses, the only image we really have of them is the persona they adopt for the audience. So that information, juxtaposed with the pubic image is, you have to admit, just ever so slightly jarring, even if only in a faintly amusing (not creepy) sense. There is just a touch of the ol' cognitive dissonance going on there.
My earlier post about this meant to talk about it in that fashion, in a vaguely amusing way, but I don't have any deep seated aversions or hang-ups about it.
Yeah, I posted...
...much the same earlier on. Neuroses schmeuroses. It's just that, in most of our minds, their personas are father and small son. Which is, you know, fine. Sort of. Right up until you consider spending most of your own professional life with your wife pretending to be your little boy. At which point, come on, it's funny in a rather GAH! sort of way.
And anyway, to paraphrase Christopher Hitchens, if the thought of Wee Jimmy Krankie going dogging isn't funny, then there's no such thing as funny.
Re: The good-looking male colleague
I've never understood that. I've known male friends be asked 'is your mate good-looking then?', only for them to reply 'how would I know? I'm not gay!'.
I'm straight and I can tell whether a man is good looking or not.
True
but I understand why it might be said.
Sometimes the question might be framed in a way of meaning "good looking = attractive to women/gay men", being neither I wouldn't know what criteria to apply, as "good-looking" can be fairly subjective.
This is just weird
The Krankies and a huge knob
Jesus wept...
That is hideous. Hideous.
They are an unspeakable abomination...
Patrick...
...what IS it you're trying to say? really, these Delphic utterances and veiled allusions are quite beyond us...
As Aaron Neville says...
tell it like it is.
Dr Anthony Clare
to thread. (Is he still around?)
Mind you, I don't have room to talk; I started a very long discussion based on my phobia of cotton wool.
I'll raise you this
Yikes
I won't come back to this thread its too weird
Could I just add to the mix,
with the thought of John Major and Edwina Currie at it like knives.
"Aren't I a terrible flirt?"
The latest Popbitch.
The horror, the horror.