Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Creep me out!

Meat Whiplash's picture
0

I think Fraser has rules

about (not) posting this sort of thing... Ye gads, there should have been a health warning about looking at that picture.

0
Mark JF | 19 December 2011 - 3:42pm

I wouldn't want to be his brother today

He's a magazine editor. Perhaps he had the day off.

0
Five-Centres | 19 December 2011 - 3:43pm

I saw this in the Telegraph

What a pair they are. Here we have Ian decking Paul Daniels because,

I was a bit punchy when I was in my 30s. I think he must have said something to contradict what I was saying.

Further on we learn the truth about that 'beanstalk' accident which laid Wee Jimmie low.

they did take time away from the pantomime circuit after Jeanette's fall from a 10ft mechanical at Glasgow's Pavilion Theatre in 2004.

She shouldn't have been on him in the first place, no natter how tall he was, but as the piece makes clear they both had form in that area.

0
Gatz | 19 December 2011 - 3:47pm

Each to their own

My own tastes in the bedroom are as middle-of-the-road as a Snow Patrol album track, but y'know, consenting adults and all that.

1
Spartacus Mills | 19 December 2011 - 3:48pm

I see no reason...

...why the tiny potato-faced molester-bait community should be denied access to the more Bacchanalian side of life. Although I've often wondered what their marriage and her alter ego might say about his proclivities.

Gah.

2
Bob | 19 December 2011 - 3:52pm

Fan'dabi'dozi!

Let us not forget this record peaked at number 46 in the UK Singles Chart in February 1981. Any excuse to get them a feature in The Word and a gig in The Lexington.

0
Beany | 19 December 2011 - 3:59pm

When I first heard this

this morning, my first thought was of the detumescent horror of hearing "Fan'dabi'dozi!" at the, ahem, moment of crisis. Bleurgh.

Still, every cloud and all that, so I wonder if, in true Monkey Tennis fashion, BBC3 would be interested in a pitch for Dogging wi' The Krankies?

0
illuminatus | 19 December 2011 - 4:13pm

Oh God

The Daily Mail's version of this story leads with a photograph of a prone, skinned Orville laying between the saucy pair.

I think this could be the tip of the iceberg. I fear the Blackpool seafront will rock with sordid revelations for months to come.

0
Spartacus Mills | 19 December 2011 - 4:06pm

Ding dong

has just taken its place alongside bonking on my list of unappetising euphemisms.

0
yorkio | 19 December 2011 - 4:08pm

On this very subject...

Reminds me of the classic letter to Viz magazine. It went something like...

"I've been having sexual fantasies about Jimmy Krankie. Now I don't know whether I'm heterosexual, homosexual or a paedophile."

10
Bamber | 19 December 2011 - 4:11pm

Even without reading the article...

I can honestly say that I have always found The Krankies deeply disturbing. They freaked me out as a child and they freak me out now. I really wish they'd go away.

0
Patrick Crowther | 19 December 2011 - 5:55pm

Question

Is it physically possible to unread something?

I need to know.

3
Skuds | 19 December 2011 - 6:55pm

In defence of the Krankies

They're a good old fashioned turn, and real troopers. I'm reliably informed by a Scottish pal that they do excellent Panto. They came across very well in that series Louis Theroux did a few years back. Thoroughly down to earth and entirely comfortable with, and grateful for their place in the world of light entrainment (i.e. At the end of the pier). Compare to Keith Harris who clearly thought he was entitled to his own prime time series and let it eat away at him.

2
Dr Volume | 19 December 2011 - 8:10pm

You're a long time dead

I find the title of the post and some of the comments above a bit dispiriting. Presumably there wouldn't be this degree of revulsion if the subject matter had been Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

The Krankies had sex in unusual places and maintained some kind of open relationship, while at the same time sustaining a romantic and working partnership that has lasted almost their entire adult lives.

Good for them. I hope they had and continue to have a bloody good time. I hope that the sex is amazing and that they have few regrets.

18
backwards7 | 19 December 2011 - 8:19pm

You are a better man than I

There are some combinations I would just prefer not to know about. And that article has many of them. The reason is not that they are less than perfect physical specimens - I'm in no position to criticise there. It's that there's something intrinsicaly creepy about someone who makes a living from impersonating a small schoolboy being such an enthusiastic shagger. I mean, didn't she question the motives of any of them?

3
Lando Cakes | 19 December 2011 - 8:31pm

What Motives?

You're not seriously suggesting any of her 'shags' were wannabe paedophiles who were opting for a sort of legal loophole by getting off with Jimmy Krankie instead?

They'd have been disappointed.

Stu Francis from Crackerjack there I see....hey you don't think..nooooo! I wonder if she "crushed his grapes"?

4
Dr Volume | 20 December 2011 - 3:27am

I didn't read the article...

Just the mention of their name is enough for me to feel revulsion.

0
Patrick Crowther | 19 December 2011 - 9:02pm

Armchair psychologists to thread

Patrick, do you wake up under your duvet, sweating, clasping your hot-water bottle, troubled by sexual thoughts of Jeanette Krankie? Has this been in your subconscious, nibbling away at you all these years?

You can tell us; you're among friends.

2
Brookster | 19 December 2011 - 11:26pm

Trust me...

I have never, ever, ever had any thought of a remotely sexual kind about that creature.

I honestly can't understand why every sentient being doesn't feel the same way about The Krankies as I do. Evil. Pure evil.

I mean *look* at the photo in the original post... it looks like something from the Doctor Who story The Talons of Weng-Chiang. Terrifying... freakish... ghastly...

0
Patrick Crowther | 20 December 2011 - 2:01pm

I don't care if the sex is amazing

It's still the most vile thought. I mean, look at them!

Life's too short to think about it.

0
Five-Centres | 20 December 2011 - 2:25pm

Well, yes

I stand by my 'each to their own' comment but stop someway short of hoping the Krankies have great sex.

0
Spartacus Mills | 20 December 2011 - 2:41pm

As far as I know...

...Angelina Jolie hasn't made a career out of dressing up as a little schoolboy while Brad Pitt pretends to be her dad.

1
Bob | 20 December 2011 - 9:16am

... Yet.

1
man.of.soup | 20 December 2011 - 1:16pm

a bit fuckin' high minded

of you b7, personally I find 'swapping' 'dogging' etc. repulsive and if the missus suggested it, I'd be packing my bags

takes all sorts, I guess

1
Meat Whiplash | 26 December 2011 - 12:19am

Grown adults dressing up as schoolboys?

Ban this sick filth now!

9
Brookster | 19 December 2011 - 9:10pm

To be fair

In the original radio broadcast it all seems to be a bit of a giggle

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b017w1mg

0
Ralph | 20 December 2011 - 8:34am

Just wrong

I haven't eaten since I read this.I wonder if Little Jimmy kept his uniform on?

Sorry that image is just too disturbing.

0
marmiteboy | 20 December 2011 - 10:33am

It's the possibility of the cries of

Fan'dabi'dozi at the crucial moment that's keeping me off the crisps

0
fortuneight | 20 December 2011 - 12:52pm

I think this discussion

says more about some of the posters' neuroses than the Krankies' stage act. Like Alan Partridge and ladyboys.

It reminds me of a colleague who went ghostly pale when I offered the opinion that another male colleague was very good-looking. It was as if agreeing with me might turn him gay.

The concept of dressing up to do a stage show (it's called acting, I believe) and leading a normal life off-stage (or even an eyebrow-raising one in this case) seems to have passed you all by.

I find Britney Spears dressed as a schoolgirl, in a sexually provactive way, far more unpleasant than wee Jimmy Krankie.

5
Brookster | 20 December 2011 - 12:01pm

Fair play to them

but, while not about neuroses, the only image we really have of them is the persona they adopt for the audience. So that information, juxtaposed with the pubic image is, you have to admit, just ever so slightly jarring, even if only in a faintly amusing (not creepy) sense. There is just a touch of the ol' cognitive dissonance going on there.

My earlier post about this meant to talk about it in that fashion, in a vaguely amusing way, but I don't have any deep seated aversions or hang-ups about it.

0
illuminatus | 20 December 2011 - 12:14pm

Yeah, I posted...

...much the same earlier on. Neuroses schmeuroses. It's just that, in most of our minds, their personas are father and small son. Which is, you know, fine. Sort of. Right up until you consider spending most of your own professional life with your wife pretending to be your little boy. At which point, come on, it's funny in a rather GAH! sort of way.

And anyway, to paraphrase Christopher Hitchens, if the thought of Wee Jimmy Krankie going dogging isn't funny, then there's no such thing as funny.

2
Bob | 20 December 2011 - 2:27pm

Re: The good-looking male colleague

I've never understood that. I've known male friends be asked 'is your mate good-looking then?', only for them to reply 'how would I know? I'm not gay!'.

I'm straight and I can tell whether a man is good looking or not.

1
Spartacus Mills | 20 December 2011 - 12:32pm

True

but I understand why it might be said.

Sometimes the question might be framed in a way of meaning "good looking = attractive to women/gay men", being neither I wouldn't know what criteria to apply, as "good-looking" can be fairly subjective.

0
illuminatus | 20 December 2011 - 1:29pm

This is just weird

The Krankies and a huge knob

Photobucket

6
Captain Underpants | 20 December 2011 - 12:05pm

Jesus wept...

That is hideous. Hideous.

They are an unspeakable abomination...

0
Patrick Crowther | 20 December 2011 - 2:05pm

Patrick...

...what IS it you're trying to say? really, these Delphic utterances and veiled allusions are quite beyond us...

0
Colin H | 20 December 2011 - 2:11pm

As Aaron Neville says...

tell it like it is.

0
Patrick Crowther | 20 December 2011 - 5:52pm

Dr Anthony Clare

to thread. (Is he still around?)

Mind you, I don't have room to talk; I started a very long discussion based on my phobia of cotton wool.

0
Brookster | 20 December 2011 - 2:26pm

I'll raise you this

1
Dr Volume | 20 December 2011 - 2:56pm

Yikes

I won't come back to this thread its too weird

0
FakeGeordie | 20 December 2011 - 5:59pm

Could I just add to the mix,

with the thought of John Major and Edwina Currie at it like knives.

0
hubertrawlinson | 26 December 2011 - 12:47pm

"Aren't I a terrible flirt?"

The latest Popbitch.

The horror, the horror.

0
Lando Cakes | 6 January 2012 - 1:27pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd