Entertainment For Lively Minds
Clinton Heylin's book on Dylan...
"Revolution In The Air"
I'm just reaching the end of this massive first part of Heylin's attempt to put Dylan's entire output in order and critique it.
While one can not question the mans ambition in doing such a thing it also can not be denied the thing is massively flawed.
The first thing one notices is Heylin's insitence on placing himself onto almost every page, usually taking pains to condemn almost everyone else who has written about Dylan. For a man who seems hell bent on the accuracy of others, his assertion that "Lay Lady Lay" was nixed from the "Midnight Cowboy" film in favour of Fred Neil's cover of Harry Nillson's "Everybody's Talkin'" is frankly laughable.
That, however is not my main gripe.
While Heylin is pretty sound on Dylan's trad "borrowings" (and why shouldn't he be, it's all on public record) he is absolutely rubbish on Bob's main wellspring, the blues.
His limitations in this area are apparent in his early statement, "Blues..that most limiting of musical forms". Bollocks..even more limiting than the three chords in "Blowing In The Wind"?
This casual aproach rears its head again and again.
"Maggies Farm" is appraised by Heylin as "..this 12 bar blues." Once again, for any professional rock critic that may read this, "12 Bar Blues" is not a musical style, it's a blues consisting of 12 bars with (usually) a 1 1V V progression, "Maggies Farm's" verses consist of a lot more bars than that (64, I think) and are really over one chord until the V1 V turnaround.
The musical framework of "Pledging My Time" is described as "Leftover strands of the blues" (Jeez, thanks Clint) No, it's a classic 8 bar format that goes back to The Mississippi Sheiks "Sittin' On Top Of The World," though Dylan probably derived it from Tampa Red's "It Hurts Me Too"
These are just two examples, it just goes on and on, God knows what he's going to do with Dylan's later almost excusively blues-based output.
Heylin only had to consult a blues scholar to clarify this, but obviously thought he didn't think it was important enough.
One day someone will write a great book about Dylans MUSIC. We all know that lyrics are important here, but Dylan is a singer/songwriter, not a poet.
P.S Clinton, if you're going to mention someone in passing, like..oh say Van Morrison, best not call him a "cunt" eh?
- More from shane pacey.
- Login or register to post comments









even if he is one?
.
He's already written one..
..on Van.
perhaps he should have done it there, not in a book of (supposed) serious criticism.
re nilsson
My understanding was that Dylan was commissioned to write the song but took too long so they went with Nilsson instead.
Are you saying this is wrong ?
Heylin says..
that it's a Nilsson song, performed by Fred Neil, when as any fule kno, it's the opposite.
It's an easy mistake to make, but galling from a man who spends half of his life berating others for innacuracy.
aaahh
gotcha
Hmmm
I like Heylin's earlier books on Dylan and have always enjoyed his style. I was looking forward to this book enormously. But I'm inclined to agree. It's massively flawed, peppered with careless mistakes and generally a bit of a mess.
The Pledging My Time thing was particularly annoying. What a good opportunity it would have been for Heylin to mention the outtake from Let It Bleed where Jagger sings It Hurts Me Too and then switches to Dylan's song without the merest hiccup.
Heylin didn't discover it...
..so it doesn't exist.
P.S Lucas..
..s'great, innit?
Maybe in future
If he needs to write about Dylan and the blues he should just call Michael Gray.
or shane pacey
.
I'm too busy...
..running the NSW branch of the grumpy pedants society.
Heylin does have form..
...the re-issue post-script of from the Velvets to the Voidoids is pretty much entirely devoted to giving Please Kill Me a kicking.