Entertainment For Lively Minds
Canned Laughter, Ensemble Comedy, Graham Linehan And The Death Of Britcom
I love all the greats – Porridge, Dad’s Army, Likely Lads etc and I think a studio audience is essential to invite a feeling of inclusiveness in the comedy I watch. But since the advent of Curb Your Enthusiasm and The Office, studio based comedy has lost its attraction for talented comedians too fearful of a critical backlash to grace the oldest and best format.
At the end of the BBC Comedy Connections retrospective of Father Ted, Graham Linehan, the series co-creator, says words to the effect of, “it was finished and it was time to put the actors back in their box,” implying that the players had little or nothing to do with the creative process and were merely puppets manipulated by the writers. It was not only insulting to the actors involved, it was also an indicator as to what is wrong with so-called British Comedy at this particular moment in time, and why tripe like The Persuasionists has been commissioned by a BBC desperate for new talent. Every year, the Edinburgh festival spawns a new rash of University educated panel-show fodder (working class comedians having long since been sent packing by production teams more at home with a bunch of Izzard wannabes than the next Billy Connolly. And before you beat me with the old inverted-class-snobbery-bigotry-stick – have you ever considered what it must be like for an uneducated, naturally gifted comedian/comic actor to catch a break these days? ) and these wet-behind-the-ears 'smile-humour' merchants are ceremoniously foisted upon us via BBC3/4/CH4 in half-baked sketch shows and under-developed Office-style sitcoms.
Linehan has taken absurdist-comedy (Big Train, Black Books) to new highs, he's worked with all the modern-day greats, Coogan, Morris, Ianucci etc, he claims to be a great fan of Seinfeld, but fails to see that show's success - and Partridge and The Thick Of It - depend on the interaction of its ensemble players – a group so well integrated and attuned to each other’s quirks that even the most absurd situations seemed believable, if not downright reasonable – in other words, establish character, tone-down the BIG acting, and work on the conversation: John Cleese said, ‘the best comedy comes from two men sitting opposite one-another talking’ – witness those priceless conversations between George & Gerry in the coffee shop – or Dougal & Ted in the caravan. Linehan has tried to repeat this formula with the IT Crowd (such a waste of Richard Ayoade – and while we’re on the subject - Matthew Holness - where are you when we need you most!!?), but the players don’t mesh in the same way, and so to make up for the disparate styles of the individual performers, the comedy has to be crass, shouty and childish: when all else fails, scrape the bottom of the stereotype barrel or just mug (Catherine Parkinson, I’m looking at you). We’ve tuned in every week to be tickled by that same wit that pervaded the best episodes of Ted, but we get another round of office jokes (‘have you tried switching it off and turning it on again’ – please – that was funny 15 years ago) penned by a man who should really go back to his office, seek out a quartet of comedians/players/comic actors whose styles actually complement each other, undergo a long, rigorous rehearsal period to build on the relationships- and include the actors in the creative process. It’s the only thing that’ll work. And please, please write a role for Matt Berry that he can get his teeth into!
I am, of course, well aware that most writers/creators are too pressed for time and cash to undertake any of the above, but unless something is done soon, we’ll be watching shite like The Persuasionists and Horne & Corden from now until doomsday...
Let the bickering commence...
- More from HudD.
- Login or register to post comments







I agree on the whole
Look at recent sitcoms that (generally) are regarded as pretty good: Dinnerladies, Early Doors, The Smoking Room, The Royle Family as examples - all rely on an ensemble and have the quality of acting that's needed to deliver a good script really well.
It is I think the time pressure of modern TV and the desire for instant success that prevents this with a lot of modern sitcoms. Although the fact that The Persuasionsists has effectively been dropped by the BBC after only 3 episodes might be a sign that the penny has dropped among TV executives (we can but hope)
Yes
although I mentionaed The Thick of It, I'm really trying to concentrate on those shows who employ a studio audience - remember the fuss surrounding The Office VS I'm Alan Partridge? In my opinion, Coogan works best with an audience, you can see him adjust his reactions and quirks when he haars the genuine shock, surprise and belly-laughs - it informs his performance and that's what I'm getting at. It's so obvious when a comic actor is working to a laugh-track, and although those sitcoms you mention are of the highest order, they are in fact (with the exception of Dinner Ladies) what i would class as comedy dramas.
Nice to hear from you though, considering the commotion I caused with my last blog.
Actors vs comedians
I think it's fair to say that, on the whole, the best British sitcoms have been those that used 'proper' actors rather than comedians - a tradition started by, I believe, Steptoe and Son (itself a classic example where the darkness, pathos and subtlety inherent in the scripts required something more than a red-nosed, trouser-dropping 'funnyman' to make them work). Half a century on, it's pretty woeful, then, to still have sitcoms that consist largely of 'comics' (not to mention the likes of Amanda Holden) standing around waiting to deliver the next telegraphed 'joke'.
That said, I liked the IT Crowd as there was a genuine warmth there – something its imitators have notably failed to conjure up. And it's funny.
Not that 'proper' actors are a failsafe - a lot of otherwise good actors (and the British tend to be far worse offenders than Americans) seem to go into 'sitcom' mode, presumably under the impression that mugging furiously and shouting is inherently funny. Radio 4 sitcoms are the prime examples of this (although you have to imagine the mugging bit.)
Sure enough,
Galton & Simpsons 'collaboration' with Hancock soured their attitude towards working with comedians, but I would say that Corbett & Brambell (especially Bramble) were (although Corbett would hate the phrase) comic actors with impeccable timing. G & S, in my humble opinion, were the greatest comedy comedy writing team of their generation and had years of radio behind them before they ventured onto TV, a training ground so rich with comic actors at that time that one could hardly go wrong with even the flimsiest of comedy set-ups. Alas, those days have passed, and as you rightly say, we are in a woeful state of affairs at a time when, as an art form, comedy/satire has (arguably) overtaken music & literature.
Funny you mention Richard Ayoade & Matthew Holness...
... and "rigourous rehearsal period." I saw a late-night live improv session they did (I assume one of many) that eventually became "Man To Man With Dean Learner" about a year later. Not that it was a perfect comedy series, but they were clearly working hard (and prepared to do it in public) to build up characters and make them as funny as possible (I'd also say that the original Garth Marenghi stage show is one of the funniest things I've ever seen.)
And I'd throw in "Spaced" as an example of a sitcom that integrates the direction (as well as the cast & script) into the comedy like no other I can immediately call to mind - it just couldn't have been done in front of an audience, but doesn't suffer for it.
Fellow Traveller...
At the risk of being (once again) controversial, I think Spaced was one of the main culprits contributing to the death of the traditional sitcom and was created in the spirit of exclusivity - i.e. a sitcom that could've been penned by Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons -too many in-jokes, Star Wars references and directorial self-indulgence. Smile humour. It spawned two of the most overrated movies of recent times in which the players & director indulged their fanboy fantasies at the expense of character, narrative and a cohesive plot.
But hey, we're talking comedy here, studio audience based, laugh-out-loud all-encompassing merriment! Not Simon Pegg's pecadilloes!
Watching 'Spaced' again recently...
... after several years away, I was struck by - despite all the obscure in-jokes - what a good hit-rate it had for genuinely accessible, funny moments. But I think that's something quite a few non-audience sitcoms struggle with. You've really got to pack the jokes in tightly to make it work. That's one of the reasons I like the traditional studio-based sitcom, filmed in front of an audience - if the audience don't laugh, everyone concerned knows there's something very wrong. Better to find out then, when you can potentially do something about it, than filming a whole series that cast and crew might find funny, and find it falls flat on its face in the wider world.
Python Inspired Bemusement
Andrew, if you check further down I do mention that the first series of Python suffered from this particular problem, but it was completely understandable when you consider it was a ground-breaking show (Spike Milligan having already been taken to the public's bosom thanks to the Goon Show). It's a real poser this one, sometimes i think things should be happening NOW - but then again I think, maybe everyone needs to go away and tour for a while and sharpen their comedy chops.
Izzard's shows become more refined as his tours progress - if you see his recent DVD, there is a lot of dull silences, but, to be fair, this show was recorded at the start of the tour - by the time the tour ends the show will be a lot tighter, he'll sort-out those'dead-laugh-areas' and once again, those lucky sods in America will get to see the the finished, polished article.
If only he'd wait until he gets to NYC before recording the DVD.
I don't think a studio audience
is always necessary. But I do support the point about comic actors rather than "comedians". Ronnie Barker was arguably the finest comic actor of his generation, and although I don't particularly like Only Fools, I'd accept that David Jason is also a great comedy actor. The Thick of It and Gavin and Stacey are the only contemporary ones I can think of that use comedy actors (Alison Steadman, Peter Capaldi) etc, although G&S does use obviously use "comedians" as well
I'm not saying it's impossible to be a successful comedian and actor, but the current vogue for putting stand ups into a sitcom, presumably to get ratings for a "name", is part of the problem.
(rumours that Film 4 are looking to remake "Withnail and I" with Horne and Corden, and Matt Lucas as Uncle Monty, are I hope untrue)
Somebody mentioned Dinnerladies
I seriously love that, a great cast and a creative heart so involved in what she was doing that she nearly had a nervous breakdown. And to date, Victoria Wood has never attempted another sit-com.
Spaced, The Office and Gavin & Stacey(I grew up for a time near Barry, the other half in the East End of London, the characters ring very true to me), all have creators who are part of the cast too, and rely heavily on the ensemble thing. All sit up there as favourites in comedy for me. Spaced in particular was my life.
Victoria is no Sponge
God bless her, but i think the problem with dinner ladies, in repect of the writing, was the size and the stellar-quality of the cast. Imagine having to furnish Maxine Peake, Celia Imrie, Julie Walter et-al with knock-em-dead lines week-after-week! No wonder the woman was fraught. Sitcom writing requires a lion(esses)'s heart and nervous system to match, Larry David was almost a basket case by Seinfeld season 6.
Pro
Well, I don't think The IT Crowd is as good as Father Ted, but what is? I'm pretty sure that G.Linehan would feel that his quote "it was finished and it was time to put the actors back in their box" is being taken out of context. GL has a high regard for the unfashionable three-cameras-and-a-studio-audience sitcom and The IT Crowd is the best UK sitcom in this genre at the moment. I would imagine that anyone who works with any success in this genre will probably say "duh, of course the ensemble of actors is important." I watched the first 15mins of the Persuasionists and was willing it to be better, for the love of Buxton, but when you watched it fail, you could understand that perhaps Linehan makes this kind of thing look easy.
Well,
I'm pretty sure that GL has made other comments about the actors (with the exception of Ardal O'Hanlon whom he seems to like immensely). Being the bore that I am, I've listened to the Ted audio commentaries and, I'm not 100% sure, but he gave the impression that working with the main players was an ordeal he wasn't keen to repeat.
I think
that, perhaps, Linehan's rather throwaway comment is being given more weight than deserved. The Father Ted case is a perfect one to illustrate, considering the Ted Crilly character was based on something Dermot Morgan had been doing for a while anyway.
But the point about comic actors is the operative one. Someon metioned the presence of 'comics' in Gavin and Stacy, perhaps alluding to the presence of Rob Brydon. Anyone who remembers Marion and Geoff surely realises that he's a rather nuanced and fine actor, never mind comedy actor. M&G was heartbreaking at times, watching this poor, deluded man desperately trying to be an optimist in the face of ongoing humiliation.
And it's true, the ensemble is important, but not the most important thing. Put together a good cast (like The IT Crowd) and, if the writing's not quite up to it, things still don't work*. Don't get me wrong, I like The IT Crowd, but it doesn't hit the heights that Father Ted did. Conversely, A great script with an insipid cast won't fly either. You need them both together, as a show like The Good Life proved. It had a good script and may have been fine with other players, but the mix of cast made it transcend what it perhaps should have been into something even better.
* see My Hero (the Ardal O'Hanlan ones)
Good point about the Good Life
Very underrated cast. It breaks my heart when i think that poor old Paul Eddington never got the recognition he deserved - he was an excellent straightman and just as formidible a comic foil. He should've got that last BAFTA, dammit...
British comedy? I thought it was all over and then....
The Inbetweeners came along. I don't know why it works so well but it has restored my faith in British comedy.
Its been a long long time since I've literally cried with laughter at something on the tele. Great chemisty between the writers and the excellent cast.
When was the last time you experienced a genuine "Don't tell him Pike" moment? This show has reminded me that even as I approach my 50th year, I can still laugh like I did as twelve year old.
I must admit..
I haven't seen it yet, but thanks to your recommendation (I too am approaching that dreaded half-century) I'll certainly check it out.
we saw all 12 episodes over the weekend
It still hurts when i think about it.
Just in case, I ought to add that it is full of very adult content (my 15 year old daughter was banned from the front room for most of the weekend).
Enjoy!
The problem with the BBC...
... (well, one of them at least) is the sticoms they put on BBC Three. They flogged "Two Pints..." to death (when it should never have been born in the first place), and "Coming Of Age" has replaced it, and that is 10 times worse. It's become a play-ground for the purile mind.
Since you mentioned it...
BBC3 started off on the worst possible premise - appeal to the lowest common dominator. It's trite, but it's true: if you throw enough shite, some of it will eventually stick, a state of affairs that started with Little Britain and continues to this day. The production companies employed thereon never seem to grasp the fact that a sure-fire way to alienate your potential audience is to insult their intelligence. None of the younsters i know watch it. Unfortunately, Little Britain (a series of inane catchphrases and ill-concieved grotesques) confounded everybody's worst mightmares when it made the transition to BBC1 and things have gone downhill ever since.
And now we're stuck with James Corden and the loathsome David Walliams...
David Walliams
is actually not a bad comic actor (at least based on his portrayal of Frankie Howerd in a BBC4 play). If he could escape his Little Britain persona then he might develop into one of those we are lauding (Ronnie Barker, Arthur Lowe etc)
Oh yeah...
True, he was good in the Howerd play, but his appearances on some of the panel shows have been somewhat less solubrious. Although I'm not a fan of Jimmy Carr or 8 out of 10 Cats, Walliams slapped him - something he could've been prosecuted for in any other walk of life; I got the impression that he is the worst kind of bully - physically intimidating and yet oddly beguiling. A man who had to swim to endear himself to atone for his tabloid-baiting indiscretions
Many years ago, when Matt Lucas had just started
acting like a Ritalin candidate with Reeves and Mortimer (ugh, wash the keyboard, I hated even typing their names), Mrs V and I ventured on a whim into Bristol one evening to see Lucas and Walliams in the stage show based around the Bernard Chumley character. This is long before the ghastly Little Britain had gestated from a long forgotten and abandoned Ralph Steadman cartoon into a TV programme. I think I was merely intrigued to investigate whether, as I suspected, the Chumley character was a simple rip-off riff on the majesty of Sir Henry. It was.
I found the whole production lacking in wit and originality, and I also detected a strangely unsettling atmosphere to the piece. As we drove back to Foxy Towers afterwards, I asked of Mrs V, regarding Walliams, "What did you make of his sidekick?'. She confirmed my own impressions; 'Yeuch. He's creepy, I didn't like him at all'. All the hallmarks of the 'comedy' of the uncomfortable, all the bullying physical presence, and the twisted confrontational unpleasantness were already there.
I have seen nothing since to tempt me to doubt my first impressions.
So I was right?
Sorry about the tardiness of this response, but I was silly enough to post another blog today and i can't keep up.
Yeah, I'm glad it wasn't just me. You know, I am an old fart and I like to know the ins-and-outs of all aspects of popular culture, so I'm one of those bores who take the trouble to listen to audio commentaries. In the Spaced AC, Pegg & Stephenson intimate as much when they comment on an episode in which Walliams acted a performance artist - a psychotic and manic cross-dresser, ithink - reading between the lines, as-it-were, hinting that they found him a bit of a handful too and just as intimidating as the character he was playing.
Also, I saw something once where Lucas & Walliams were on some satellite comedy show and they both had a go at the host, Dominic Diamond... he was trying to interview them and they just kept repeating his name over-and-over... no smiles or punchlines, just Dominic Diamond... Dominic Diamond... over-and-over, their faces fixed in a grimace of contempt. No matter what you might think of the host, ie whether he deserved it or not, it wasn't funny, quirky or droll in the least. Just Creepy.
Very creepy.
any excuse
As funny now as it was then...
You Swine!
I've just notcied you've gone ahead and nicked my Profitability Mental Illness idea! The cheek!
I think it's a fairly well established fact that
the bloke who played Father Ted was a right royal pain in the arse. I recall hearing that even in his obits, let alone years later.
Yes
but in any artistic endeavour that requires the collaboration of two or more people there is bound to be friction and ill-feeling, especially when one of said parties is 'putting words in the other's mouth', as it were. We all have/had to work with people we don't necessarily like to achieve a common goal - sometimes it's the conflicting ideals that bring about the best results, as anyone who's ever been in a band will tell you.
And that's the thing, isn't it?
Music and comedy are so alike in that repect; disparate individuals coming together to make a glorious whole. Good comedy is like good jazz. Seinfeld in particular, when all 4 principals are on the floor together, they meld and move and feel each other out (oo-er) like a well-oiled jazz quartet.
The rise of the middle class comic...
...is due to the rise in "alternative" comedy clubs which started in the late 70s/80s, and the decline in working class comics, probably due to the demise of the working men's club/Labour club etc., which is in turn down to licensing laws-you can drink between 2 and 7 on a Sunday and you don't have to go at 11.20.
Hopefully talent will out, Terry Alderton being a case in point. I believe the Embassy Club in Harpurhey is still going, although its proprietor is long gone.
There is now a huge network of middle class stand-ups getting each other jobs etc., whereas the old school had to compete-only room for one or two comics on the bill.
Which brings us to
Eric Morcambe and Les Dawson. Have they ever been bettered? Can you imagine any Oxbridge educated stand-up inspiring the universal love and repect those two guys inspired? Would they even get a second glance if they played the Fringe this year?
No
except for Peter Cook, of course.
But Les and Eric are pretty much god-like in my eyes.
Cook challenge
It's such a pity that poor old Pete had to drink so heavily to feed that fire in his belly. Can you imagine Stephen Fry and the man himself working together now? T'would be a guaranteed ratings and critical triumph!
Surely
Stephen Fry is generally very well thought of by the british public if not universally?
Well kiss my face and call me Susan
I too think the man can do no wrong. He is, in my humble opinion, the greatest Englishman of the 21st century.
Oh, one more thing...
I thought hippies was much funnier than IT Crowd.
Clearly
no laughing matter.
Unless you're a
BAFTA voter
Yes I think
comedians as talented as Les Dawson and Eric Morecambe would get their chance even today. Every time you make a comedy you are asking for a perfect storm; great script, great acting, great direction. Some work brilliantly with a studio audience, some work without. When remembering the Golden Age comedies you forget that they were the jewels on top of a mountain of crap. They were all made at the same time as a load of terrible stuff. On The Buses? Love Thy Neighbour? Johnny Vegas is doing OK and he's not Oxbridge.
Oh yeah and
Eric and Les ruled when there were only three TV channels.
Yep.
It was nice to be able to sit in your living-room and know that the entire country was laughing at Mainwaring/Steptoe/M&W etc along with you. The proliferation of the media has indeed robbed us of the communal experience of shared laughter. Of course, there was so much garbage in the early days of sitcom, but that's why the good guys shine so brightly.
Also, I forgot to mention that the gay clubs have been an invaluable source for comedy performers, these venues don't seem to provide an invaluble outlet for some great comedians too.
Shit!
that last paragraph came out wrong - should read:
the gay clubs have provided an invaluble outlet for some great comedians too.
Phew! Don't wanna make any more enemies this week...
Good to see you've
stayed around HudD. You've annoyed me and made me feel wholly inadequate your two posts so you'll fit in just fine round here!
I have a deep love for traditional British sit coms and as you and other posters have pointed out great writing and great acting make for great comedy. It's no big secret so why do so many fail so miserably now? As in all aspects of entertainment today people want success NOW there's no time for anything to grow, probabaly Black Adder was the last to be given a stay of execution after the awful first series and look how that flourished. The great comedy writers and actors as you say learnt their trade on the radio so were ready to be allowed half an hour peak time TV once a week. The best comedy of the last 20 years for me was sadly not British, it was Frasier and it follows all the simple rules. Intelligent writing with no real "gags" and proper bona fide actors and guess what? It works. Has there been a better performance in comedy than David Hyde Pierce's portrayal of Niles? Not since Corbett, Bramble, Le Mesurier etc. So we are left with the occasional gem among the tat, I for one hope Miranda Hart is given a second chance because it seems to be going in the right direction I don't see a lot else out there although after this thread I am willing to give The Inbetweeners a go.
Ahhh Frasier
I deliberately didn't mention the might Frasier because i thought it'd open a can of worms we'd never get through in one sitting. To me Frasier IS a britcom. Farce, elegant word play, intelligent needle-sharp writing and exemplary performances - but went horribly astray in the last series with the introduction of the Moon family. Jeezus, that Anthony La Plagia performnace still makes me grind my teeth...
I'm having a bit of a go at G Linehan because, like the many performers he's worked with, he's a true original (a celt, natch) but when you kick open comedy doors you tend to let in a lot of gatecrashers who run roughshod over your carefully furrowed pastures - hence the dread Persuasionists etc, a comedy that isa particular bete-noir for us Wordites for its terrible misuse of poor Adam Buxton - don't fret Ad, we promise never to mention it again and everyone is entitled to at least one cow pat on the CV.
Thanx for your kindness DR - by-the-by... the reason I didn't have a go at Mr Weller in my last rant is because I Love them man. I had a night out with him once and we got on like a house on fire... we bonded - believe it or not... over the Psychedelic Furs!
I kid you not!
jeeeeeeez
things went very quiet after that last post....
Add
jealousy to the list.
Dave!
thank God you came back! I thought I'd offended you!
I don't want to go into it that particular period of my life in much detail, I live in a well-dodgy council tower-block in Belfast, I'm surrounded by nutters and homicidal lunatics, so anonymity is paramount; and as I've already intimated in a previous thread on my Goth post, I'm a recovering alko with a history, so I'll keep it brief.
It was during Paul's Jammin' Records days (I think) - anyway, the Furs Talk Talk Talk had just been released and we both loved it. Paul, who was as inebriated as I was, could be, and I'm sure. still is, a contrary sod and he was extolling the virtue of said disc to aggravate a few journos at a nearby table (again, this is very foggy...) I agreed with him wholeheartedly and it was back-slaps all round.
Anyway-up, the evening ended badly (he had a row with his girlfriend) and I went home and never saw him again.
One thing I can tell you, he seemed genuinely hurt by the other punk bands' attitude towards The Jam, and after seeing various docs & retrospectives, I now know why. It was actually that meeting that soured my view of London bands - like you say - he was an outsider, and sometimes, that maverick spirit and the loneliness it creates, can be as essential to your muse as the love of a good woman/man. It was his cross to bear, but it hasn't dented his determination, only strengthened it.
Good luck. Be safe, be well.
No offence taken HudD
I put my size 11's firmly in it round here when I first discovered the site http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/content/sir-paul-mccartney-what-my-problem I had little experience of this kind of community and thought rattling a few cages would be funny, I was very, very wrong. Maybe elsewhere that is true but this is a unique place full of people who exude, humour, tolerance, patience and a camaraderie that draws you in and doesn't let go. There are upsets and Fraser keeps a firm hand but I would miss it terribly now, so I would need to be really offended not to come back. You have made a splash and for me it is a welcome one.
ooops
It's very confusing this toing-and-froing betwixt the differnt posts - I take it you haven't seen my last post on the Goth threads? If you haven't, read it and go to: www.myspace.com/hudd2.
Me nerves are wrecked!
I agree with most of this
except the bit about the first Black Adder series, which I loved. I liked it much more than series two and almost as much as Blackadder The Third (my fave). But that probably says more about me than anything else.
Just a quickie
Y'know, I too lovwed the first Blackadder. The episode with Frank Finlay, in my opinion, was as funny as anything from the sequels -
Edmund's horse has been accused of witchcraft:
NEIGH!
"Was that a yay or a nay?"
"It was a nay my lord - but I don't believe a word of it!"
Incidently all the laughter on that series is canned.
You are Christopher hitchens and I claim my five pounds!
A bit of background is needed to clarify the Linehan quote in the original post. However, as a preface, I'd like to first say that I don't much care for The IT crowd. why? I've never given it more than 10 minutes 'cos I can't stand The Irish Guy.: and me - a card carrying Irish Ted Worshipper! i actually think that's the difference: in Ted Graham Linehan, along with arthur Matthews struck comedy gold.
However, and here's the rub, what most British audiences don't realise is that, with the exception of Ardal O Hanlon's Dougal, most of the main characters and many of the guest stars had been Irish comedy royalty for years: Frank Kelly had been a central character in Ireland's 1970s TWTWTW, Hall's Pictorial Weekly, while Brendan Grace (The menacing Father Stack in the New Jack City episode) was played by Brendan Grace: a huge cabaret comedian in Ireland.
In terms of casting, the chuckle-merchants were well-balanced with great Irish acT-OR-S, such as Jim Norton (Bishop Brennan) and Nial Buggy (Fr. Todd Unctious)- if you don't recognise him, watch In the Name of the Father.
But, but but but.... Dermot Morgan as Father Ted!!!!!!
Do you know how big he was? He was our Bill Hicks! ('Steady on Vorgon lad, we've all had a drink.') Morgan had been one of Ireland's best-loved character-comedians for years (Fr Ted is based on his Fr. Trendy, which he used ton hawk around in the early 80s) even while Linehan was honing his craft writing piss-your-pants funny Christmas inserts to the Hot Press Yearbook. (If you can find any articles with the Byline,'The Border Fascist' check them out.
However, in 1990 until RTE effectively censored it to premature death, he devised, along with Jerry Stembridge, Pauline Mac Glynn and others, Scrap Saturday - a half hour Saturday morning radio satirical grenade, showcasing his utterly exceptional talents as a mimic (Think an Irish rob Brydon, with even better gags) as well as a fearless gift for 'Fuck you, you undeservedly rich, lying politician redneck' satire. Look, people used to pass tapes to each-other on factory floors on Monday mornings as Leinster House's latest victims would cower in their limos, snailing past the sneering press gauntlet up Kildare Street.
Suffice to say that Linehan was in awe of Dermot Morgan and I personally know how much he loved Dermot and how inconsolably shell-shocked he was in the aftermath of his tragic death.
So maybe you misinterpreted the quote.
Then again, everyone knows that Frank Kelly is a pain in the balls to work with: maybe that's who he was talkin' about Ted.
To be sure...
I know well of whom you speak, and although i hail from north of the border where you'd need a 20 foot pole on yer chimney to get the RTE, many of my mates would regale me with quotes and assessments of likes of Morgan, Grace, Shine et-al and when i finally got to see them, I wasn't disappointed.
I might be accused of being slightly racist here... but Irish comedy, like Jewish comedy, is born of tragedy, slavery and outright hatred, ergo, gallows humour is our stock in trade, so when times are peaceable we can really let fly and show the rest of them how its done - and class, social boundaries or lack of a formal education doesn't seem to dull our wit.
Or is that all just a load of oul' blarney...?
God, Scrap Saturday....
I remember, on a saturday morning in St Jarlaths, when we'd have study and every second person there would sit, between half ten and eleven, with a book studiously open, and the head leaning on a hand which concealed, naturally, one earphone, and the Walkman (remember those) tuned to Radio 1. EVERYBODY tuned in. During the edition where Eamonn Dunphy gave birth to John Giles' baby, an audible titter went around the study hall. People looked up to see had the Dean noticed what was going on.
Had he heck! He was there, reading his Irish Press, oddly enough, head leaning on his right hand, oblivious to the noise around him...
Ta, Vorgon, for reminding me of more innocent times
My Dermot Morgan story...
It's 1996. I was a medical student taking random blood pressures in a shopping centre in Blackrock, south Co Dublin. Along comes Dermot Morgan...
"How are yas!" he says and sits down to get his BP checked. 160/110. Kinda high. "Umm, your blood pressure's a bit high" says me. "Yeah it causes me a lot of trouble. I can't get insurance for work sometimes because of it". He then gave us £20, easily the highest donation of the day. Then I was off: "I just have to say how great Father Ted is and blah blah brilliant blah blah funny blah blah". He was very gracious and said goodbye to me and my pal. Poor sod was dead 6 months later.
And a vote from me to for Scrap Saturday. Great in its day.
Brilliant!
To be honest, the thread that said Morgan was a pain in the arse troubled me, so I'm glad to hear that. Can you think of anybody else who coulda played that part? Neither can I. Oul' Frank Kelly is a bit of a luvvy, but he took a lot of physical abuse on Ted, and the make-up must been an ordeal in itself, so he had every right to give-out every now-and-again.
Just wish Graham had been a bit more effusive with his praise.
Thanks v much.
Cheers hudD!
Nah. I think we're reading from the same parish's hymn sheet. Must arrow you for the passion that you show about comedy, though. On some points I'll disagree, but when I read your expresion of anger about an anti-Morgan thread my heart of stone learnt what it was to become magma......
Yer more than welcome, sir
Be safe, be well. I'm off til bed.
G'night.
Canned Laughter
"Interestingly", I recently watched an episode of MASH with canned laughter, and it completely ruined the feel of the show. Watching it in the 1970s with no laughter track on the BBC made me think it was a bit more high-brow.
I think there are far more similarities than difference between Irish comedy and that comes from the UK. It seems that the characters are hopelessly trapped and deeply unfulfilled and frustrated with their lot i.e. sad most of the time.
Whereas comedy from the States tends to feature characters who are wealthy and successful and are happy most of the time.
No Sex Please - We're Brits
I was thinking about this the other day; in Us sitcoms a majority of characters are indeed middle-class and un-selfconscious about their wealth; in an episode of the Modern Family on Sky last night, I saw on Sky last night, $20,000 changed hands without much of a fuss - but a lot of American TV seems to feature characters that lead aspirational lifestyles (American Dream and-all-that, they tend to say 'good for you' rather than, 'who do they think they are') - and sex is never much of an issue, either.
In Seinfeld (sorry I keep using Seinfeld/Curb as an example, but lets face it, along with Python and the Simpsons, it changed US comedy for the better) none of the principals had any trouble getting sex. If Seinfeld was made in Britain, George would be a lecherous virgin, Kramer would be a drooling grotesque... and Elaine...
Well, there wouldn't have been an Elaine, cuz Britcom writers can't write for women... prove me wrong kids, prove me wrong....
MASH
I knew I wasn't imagining it - I catch the occasional episode of MASH on one of the cable comedy channels and the canned laughter just makes it awful/unwatchable. Watching it on BBC2 in the 1970s it didn't have any laughter track and that's what made it for me (as an impressionable teenager) such a brilliant show. I mean, can you imagine the episode where Colonel Blake dies with canned laughter?
anyone know if the MASH DVDs have the canned laughter on?
MASH it up
That's a good question. Thank God the BBC had the wit to remove the laugh-track from MASH, i reckon the programme would've died on its arse over here otherwise. Again, its a comedy-drama from those days when everything, including the cartoons had to punctuate each line with a round of canned-laughter, and - correct me if I'm wrong, I know you will - but it was commissioned at a time when America was still fighting the Viet Nam war, so anything that featured the US army was already on shaky ground, especially a sitcom, so I think, for American audiences at least, the sound of merriment softened the bleak nature of the set-up. It was a necessary evil to sugar a bitter pill, and I think we can forgive them for that. But what a show, eh?
M*A*S*H DVDs come with the option to turn the laugh track off
Strange how canned laughter is one of those open secrets that no-one gets upset about... which is to say people hate it when it's overdone, but not really on principle. I'm half-surprised no-one's ever tried it on a movie... and how easy would it be for a band to have an "applause" track designed to augment the actual crowd noise at a live gig?
God...
Remember that scene in Annie Hall when Alby's showbiz chum is garnishing his dodgy sitcom with canned laughter? That was the first time it was brought to my attention.I'm pretty sure that was a little good-natured dig at Woody's erstwhile comedy colleagues working in LA.
Jeez, could you imagine a Woody Allen film with a laught-track?
Canned Laughter vs. Obedient Laughter
It was the "Canned Laughter" in the title that attracted me to this thread, and I'm glad to see it being raised. It's a pet hate of mine, and like others here, I'm put off comedy by it.
Almost as annoying is what I call "obedient laughter" as typically produced by the live audiences of Radio 4's 6:30 Unemployed Oxbridge Graduate 'comedy' slot. The show starts with an announcement, followed by a storm of applause which comes on and off as if someone were turning a switch, and the show is punctuated by similar bursts of laughter clearly prompted by the studio team.
It does have its purpose though - without it, you have little chance of spotting the bits that are supposed to be funny.
I must say
that I'm useless at spotting canned laughter, I'm atrusting soul, and it has to be pointed-out to me (especially on the radio!). The only time it is really obvious is when actors' lines overlaps and the uproar becomes more muted.
Sometimes it's necessary to link studio scenes to VT footage or poor editing, but on the whole it's a dreadful practise that should be avoided at all costs - with modern sound-systems, the difference in fidelity can be glaringly obvious. Watching the first series of Python recently, I was struck by the lack of audience laughter, and I have to say, it was jarring. You tend to think of programmes of this calibre to be laugh-riots, but the studio-audience were so bewildered by what they were witnessing they didn't know how to react - and that tells you more about the attitude to ground-breaking comedy at that time than any number of comedy retrospectives - a true audience reaction is invaluable source of research to any comedy writer/performer worth his salt.
Exceptions, exceptions...
You said that the best sitcoms:
"Depend on the interaction of its ensemble players – a group so well integrated and attuned to each other’s quirks that even the most absurd situations seemed believable, if not downright reasonable – in other words, establish character, tone-down the BIG acting, and work on the conversation".
Sounds convincing, and when you look at "The Work Outing", the first episode of the second series of "The IT Crowd", you could see it as an exemplar of everything you would claim is wrong with Britcom: it is overplayed, it is "mugged" and big-acted by the ensemble, it relies on some fairly cheap sterotyping at the expense of the gay and disabled communities, it is unreasonable, unbelieveable, occasionally moronic and is perhaps undermined by a series of inorganic events and interactions which seem to mirror the writer's needs rather than those of the characters.
Despite this, however, it is also the funniest single episode of a British sitcom since "The Germans".
Must go back and look at that
The worst thing is, a lot of younger writers are watching and think that BIG and LOUD are the way to go.
Linehan is known and beloved for Ted, when ITCrowd was commissioned he could do no wrong, and I suspect a large proportion of the viewing audience were the faithful hoping for a repeat success. Like it or not, Linehan & Matthews only hit their stride with Ted, because they were presenting that 'Irish' humour that lends itself to the surreal - a style of comedy RTE has been broadcasting for years - check out some of the threads above. It was new to a young British audience, but we've been watching stuff like this since the 60s.
And don't you think that IT Crowd would be 10 times funnier if it was just Moss and AN Other in the office on their own, getting on each other's nerves, etc? Just a thought...
writing partnerships are
writing partnerships are difficult - after reading well remembered days i'm certain that mathews is primarily the primary reason for FT's genius - one of the few comedy series that can be watched and laughed at time and time again - linehan's rep since ted hasn't been great and the british comedy scene is still as incestuous and pally as it ever was (good to see my townsman john bishop finally getting a crack at 8 out of 10 formualic comedy panel shows)
the golden era of partridge/brass eye/fast show seems a long long time ago now and the domination of baby cow/talkback etc has ensured that the old pals act still operates across comedy now as it did with tarby/brucey/ronny and vic/bob/wossy etc - bbc3 as it was originally intended was supposed to be a place for experimentation and risk taking but with C4 and the BBC (even digital channels) running scared of the daily heil brigade, a culture of cowardice and complacency has succeeded in castrating homegrown comedy. funny to read people like whitehouse and higson pretending that it was difficult to get third rate shite like bellamy's people commissioned - yeah and 'harry and paul' would've got the green light if it wasn't enfield and whitehouse behind it. these self-absorbed whoppers actually believe they're part of the alternative not just another set of industry insiders.
writing partnerships are
writing partnerships are difficult - after reading well remembered days i'm certain that mathews is primarily the primary reason for FT's genius - one of the few comedy series that can be watched and laughed at time and time again - linehan's rep since ted hasn't been great and the british comedy scene is still as incestuous and pally as it ever was (good to see my townsman john bishop finally getting a crack at 8 out of 10 formualic comedy panel shows)
the golden era of partridge/brass eye/fast show seems a long long time ago now and the domination of baby cow/talkback etc has ensured that the old pals act still operates across comedy now as it did with tarby/brucey/ronny and vic/bob/wossy etc - bbc3 as it was originally intended was supposed to be a place for experimentation and risk taking but with C4 and the BBC (even digital channels) running scared of the daily heil brigade, a culture of cowardice and complacency has succeeded in castrating homegrown comedy. funny to read people like whitehouse and higson pretending that it was difficult to get third rate shite like bellamy's people commissioned - yeah and 'harry and paul' would've got the green light if it wasn't enfield and whitehouse behind it. these self-absorbed whoppers actually believe they're part of the alternative not just another set of industry insiders.
I agree wholeheartedly
Thank God someone else found Bellamy's People to be a pile of poo. I thought I'd had all my funny-bones removed. R4 comedy is a good training ground, but this just looked like a lot of half-baked improv.
Being sexist though, I have to say I love Lucy Montgomery and will probably keep watching. Funny women. Sexy as get-out.
Don't know if this fits here or not
but I had to post this somewhere and I can't be arsed reading the whole thread.
This is an acrticle on The Quietus today and features a clip from 'Curry & Chips' which has to be seen to be believed.
http://thequietus.com/articles/03687-box-fresh-emma-johnston-on-the-worl...