Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Can the Massive recommend some hi-fi speakers please?

Vulpes Vulpes's picture

The recent upgrade of an amp, and the enthusiastic employment of the Cambridge Audio volume control has brought the age of my treasured Mission loudspeakers sharply into focus. In other words, they are knackered. I've ordered a re-foaming kit from some hi-fi bods in the Netherlands, but I fancy getting some new speakers really, letting the Missions, once fixed, retire gracefully to the office room.

The retiring Missions are 700s, and their measurements in imperial terms are about 1 ft by 1 ft by 18 inches. When the speakers were new their dimensions were described in terms of cubits and spans.

So here's the challenge: I have about £400 to spend, and I don't want any floor-standing things that look like tower blocks; they won't fit where they need to in the room they're destined for.

The new speakers will have a hard life punching out just as much orchestral or chamber stuff as they will Lee Perry, Little Feat and King Crimson. So all rounders are the order of the day. The room opens onto the conservatory, and they will therefore be made to work at some volume on sunny afternoons (i.e. at least three times a year).

Anyone bought any mid-range speakers recently and been super pleased, or even been drastically disappointed?

0

I thought you meant after dinner speakers

for a moment. I hear Jeffery Archer's very entertaining.

0
Five-Centres | 20 August 2009 - 4:30pm

Good point, title now edited.

I'd pay that much to avoid him, except I've probably already paid that much in taxes to keep the devious criminal bastard fed and accommodated at Her Majesty's pleasure.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 20 August 2009 - 4:47pm

I bought some quite small Dynaudio speakers...

a few years ago that sit snugly against my living room wall. They were a bit more expensive than what you want to spend... maybe £500, I can't remember exactly. But they're great. A faithful, pleasant sound that is good to listen to.

Sorry, I'm not a hi-fi geek so I can't get all technical, but I would listen to some. I imagine they come in different price brackets.*

* I just looked online and they might start at around £600 now. But perhaps you could investigate a used pair. They really are very good.

0
Patrick Crowther | 20 August 2009 - 6:21pm

Quest on hold

I've been looking on and off but eventually had to give up on this for a while as my partner has these [1998 model]

http://www.flickr.com/photos/21793313@N08/2102704250/

and I have these [must be mid-late 80s, bought 2nd hand in 91ish]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission_Freedom_Loudspeaker

and nothing new I have yet heard appeals to me as much.

I have heard people enthuse, like Patrick, about Dynaudios (and Proacs) but haven't heard them. On design/size grounds was quite taken with these:

http://www.bowers-wilkins.com/display.aspx?infid=1065

which are about in the price range you are looking at.

I am still intrigued by these (at £400)

http://www.avihifi.co.uk/neutron.html

though, as they offer the possibility of replacing my amp by adding an active sub later on and the size looks ideal-I plan to try and borrow some eventually. Their bigger, also active, brother, the ADM9 was v impressive on audition but at about double your budget.

0
NickW | 20 August 2009 - 8:00pm

Oooh.. temptation..

I'm rejigging the front room as we speak and the hi-fi will be messed about with. I'm very tempted to retire my enormous Eltax floorstandy whatsits but I'm reluctant to sacrifice sound quality. And they do sound glorious.

Should I?

0
Lenny Law | 20 August 2009 - 9:51pm

No.

There's no substitiute for shifting big volumes of air.

0
stimpy | 31 August 2009 - 11:48am

The new Diamonds

I've got the Wharfedale Diamonds 9.1 but I've just heard the 10.1 this week.
There £200 but sound about £4-500 worth.
I use Cambridge amps and CD so can recommend them highly.
Other than that The Dali Lektor 2 are very good as well.
Although I'd save the £100 and put it towards the new Cambridge 650 CD player it's a peach

http://whathifi.com/Review/Wharfedale-Diamond-101/

0
Gordon Kerr | 20 August 2009 - 11:06pm

Monitor Audio

I've always liked Monitor Audio's - they are not the bass heavy like Mission's can be, but have a very clean mid-range which is what I like. I don't think they are overly expensive (although I've had mine 10 yrs now so I'm way out of touch....)

At the end of the day, speakers are the one area of HiFi that really does come down to personal preference and so you really have to amble along to the nearest HiFi emporium and have a listen.....

0
chrisf | 21 August 2009 - 1:18am

I am interested to see

that the advent of digital media is further developing a trend that I as far as I know started with Meridian and recording studios, and is threatening the traditional division of boxes between source(s), amp, and speakers.

The current division of roles made perfect sense when you had to have a pre-amp, because you had a phono stage, because you had a weak analogue signal from a record deck. This was quite logically kept as near the power amps as possible and typically in one box.

Now that sources do (or will in future) nearly all have a digital output, and the phono stage is an enthusiast's option it is interesting that more designers are combining the power amps with the woofer, and minimising the size of the tweeters for flexibility. This has been around in computer speakers for ages of course, e.g.

http://www.cambridgesoundworks.com/store/category.cgi?category=mul_spk_c...

and by high end companies like Meridian, but now it when applied more widely in hi-fi it is starting to result in interesting designs like the one I mentioned:

http://www.avihifi.co.uk/neutron.html

, where you can locate the speakers pretty much anywhere, and hide the sub as long as you have a way of ensuring its control eye is in view. Crucially the products are also starting to have enough analogue inputs as anybody who goes this way is probably going to need to interface FM tuners, turntables or even VCRs (!) for a while.

Makes me wonder quite how long we will be using traditional stereo amps for now, and what Richer Sounds' balance of products will be in 10 years time-the Cambridge Audio brand has been very good for them but the crustal plates are moving again .... In fact it would be interesting to know how much of their revenue comes form audio versus Av, insofar as one can actually separate them. Arcam, Linn and Naim seem to be responding in very different ways to this world, the most dramatic example for me being the dropping of Arcam's budget separates (the DiVA range) entirely, leaving only the one box Solo range and the expensive FMJ range-quite a turn up for a company founded on this amp

http://www.retrohifi.co.uk/ar_cambrige.html

(I had one for about 15 years)

0
NickW | 21 August 2009 - 6:14am

Interim report back

I spent half a day listening to the Mordaunt Short Mezzo 2s, which were presented to me as 'neutral' speakers, which is what I want. I was reasonably pleased I suppose, but not overwhelmingly so. They just don't have the ability of the Missions to go from quiet to LOUD without any perceptible change in their voicing. I can't see myself settling for them, to be honest.

The Dali Lecktor 2s will probably get a listen next, though their tiny woofers don't hold out much hope.

I might spend some time with the Dali Ikon 1s instead - at least they have two reflex bass ports. Of the speakers I've found that are in the price range and size range I want, they probably offer the best likelihood of meeting my wants, if the blurb can be believed.

Does anyone have some of them, or listen to some regularly?

Overall I've been sadly unimpressed with what's out there in the £400 range at the moment, and my faithful Mission 700's once re-foamed might triumphantly continue to occupy their position in the living room after all.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 31 August 2009 - 12:12pm

Hey big Spendor

Sadly not too surprised that this has been your experience so far, I'd have been quite happy to buy the B&Ws I mentioned above if they had sounded as nice as they looked.

I think it's partly a cost issue, though quite a few companies (e.g Quad) now manufacture outside the UK; and partly that long usage does tend to tune your ears to whatever you have and like. The 700s, as far as I know, like AR18s and some other classic speakers of that era had a very distinctive feel, as do my 770s.

At a more expensive price point I have been more impressed by
Spendor's S3E, which you might find at a good price

http://www.sevenoakssoundandvision.co.uk/store/southeast/brighton/3444/c...

and the studio-bred PMC DB1

http://www.pmc-speakers.com/product.php?mode=view&pid=170

I wonder if these would suit you ?

0
NickW | 31 August 2009 - 2:49pm

Cheers, Nick.

The (little) Spendors for about £600 is a very tempting option; I'll have to see if I can engineer a listen to a pair in my neck of the woods.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 31 August 2009 - 5:25pm

Good luck

They seem to be no longer in the range at

http://www.spendoraudio.com/

so if I've got that right then hopefully that may make them easier to find a good price on; and at least Audio T and Sevenoaks carry them, which makes them easier to find than some brands.

0
NickW | 31 August 2009 - 6:58pm

It seems to me that, unlike the rest of the reproduction chain

speakers are still a mechanical device and can't be computerised, miniaturised, put on a chip etc.

They will always be 'machines' and, as such, won't necessarily be subject to the incessant price reductions of electronic kit.

Good speakers will always be expensive, relative to the rest of the chain.

0
stimpy | 31 August 2009 - 11:52am

You're probably right,

maybe I need to up the budget a tad. Given that I haven't got room for electrostatics, do you have any insights into the relative merits of any conventional speakers of around the size I'm looking for?

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 31 August 2009 - 12:15pm

Electrostatics

are, along with The Grateful Dead, something that I've learned to keep quiet about around here until asked to comment :-))

0
stimpy | 31 August 2009 - 12:16pm

ProAc Studio 110

A little more research, and a deeper dig into the coffers, has lead me to want to listen to these next.

Anyone have some?

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 3 September 2009 - 11:05am

No

but the dealers who were suggesting Spendor and PMC to be also think higly of Proac, I think you'll find something in that bracket.

Out of idle curiosity, what model of amp did you get ?

0
NickW | 3 September 2009 - 6:04pm

Cambridge Audio

I bought the CAMBRIDGE AUDIO AZUR 650A, and it's very good.

Until I get the speakers sorted one way or the other I won't really know if it's as good as the much beloved 27 year old (!) JVC AS-5 it has replaced.

The JVC still works fine, but has been moved to my Office (so I can really hammer out the music while at the PC, heh heh).

I was quite surprised to find that I could replicate most of the features of the JVC, as it was a brilliantly thought out amp in its day: decent relay protection on power up, drives two sets of speakers, has RCA Phono tape input and output sockets on the front panel, very good quality switchgear, and of course sports a phono stage. The Cambridge doesn't have output sockets on the front, but does have both a line-out and a second tape-out (line out but via the tone controls) facility via the rear panel. It's also lacking a phono stage, but I anticipated that that would be the case and I bought the CAMBRIDGE AUDIO 540P as well. I've also gained a couple of extra input channels, including a phones level MP3 player input socket (3.5 mm jack) on the front panel. The very thought of Mark Ellen's cackle on the Word podcast at house-filling volume fills me with dread.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 3 September 2009 - 6:38pm

Two (slightly) distorted guitars

Never mind the cackling one, on looking it up at Richer sounds was delighted to see this endorsement: 'Do your ears a favour and play Tubular Bells through a Cambridge Audio system' - Mike Oldfield, Composer ;-)

0
NickW | 3 September 2009 - 7:09pm

The Revel Concerta M12 is

The Revel Concerta M12 is about £400, I believe. Good, crap-free bookshelf design, but I think it might need to be placed a foot or so from the back wall. It uses a 6.5" bass driver to knock out good bass (about two octaves below middle C) for a relatively small box, too.

The Revel has more bass than the Missions, but at first you might think otherwise. The Mission 700s had a deliberate 'lift' around 80-120Hz (low E to low A on a guitar) to make any three-chord rock sound larger than life; it might take you a little while to get used to a less 'enhanced' sound, but the end result is worth it.

0
Gobby Styles | 4 September 2009 - 11:48pm

Interesting...

I'd always found the Missions to be pretty neutral, but given that I was listening almost entirely to dub reggae when I bought them, noticing the lift you describe would probably have been difficult, lost as it would be in the already bass heavy mix.

If I see some of these I'll have a listen. At the moment I'm heading for a session with some Proac Studio 110s first, and possibly the B&W 685s, which come highly recommended at that price point.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 5 September 2009 - 9:09am

SORTED

Thanks to everyone who contributed to my thought processes in this thread.

I am pleased to say that I've now found myself some new speakers; in the end I went for the Spendor S5E. I won't tell you how much I paid for them, as you will weep if I do. Suffice it to say that I got a bargain, and kept within budget.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 11 September 2009 - 8:50am

Art Dudley agrees

Unless you want to count an inability to reproduce the very bottom octave (20-40Hz) with as much weight and impact as, say, a 10' Klangfilm horn, I couldn't find any significant flaws in the Spendor S5e's performance. Sure, other speakers imbue solo instruments and voices with a little more presence, and others go just a bit further down the road of clarity of sound (and utter transparency of the sound around the sound), and still other speakers can do some or all of those nice things under the heady influence of less power than the mid-efficiency Spendor requires. But I've never heard anything near this price and size that has the Spendor S5e's combination of strengths.

The S5e is an uncolored speaker that gets the notes and beats so essentially right, and is so emotionally direct and honest, that, for once, exceptional sound enhanced the music-making rather than distracted from it, howsoever prettily. The Spendor S5e has what I consider a virtually perfect amount of bass in proportion with its clean, open, and pleasantly airy top end. I can't imagine an honest listener who would consider this speaker to be too bright, too dull, or lacking in any other such way.

Over the years, I've owned a few Classic Spendor loudspeakers that have been classics—I mean that both colloquially and in the literal, trade-name sense—and I've loved them for what they were. Yet the new S5e has things that simply weren't part of the earlier Spendor recipe, including scale, drama, and utterly faultless pacing. That the S5e does all that for $1649/pair is remarkable. I can't recommended it strongly enough.

so you really are a big Spendor (owner) ... ;-) My guess is you'll be as attached to those in 20yrs time as I am to my Missions, and you'll feel they would have been cheap at the list price

0
NickW | 11 September 2009 - 9:23am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2010 Development Hell Ltd