Can a 'Volume 2' ever be any good?

A comment I just made to a different thread got me thinking; can any album with the words 'Volume 2' or 'Part 2' in the title ever be any good?

- Bat Out Of Hell 2
- Tubular Bells 2
- ELP's Works Volume 2

Clunkers, the lorrovem

Yes, sometimes

Jackson Browne's Solo Acoustic Volume 2 springs to mind.

Lucas Hare | 12 October 2008 - 5:13pm

I guess

The Complete Stax/Volt Soul Singles Volume 2 isn't what you meant. Apart from that Josh Rouse Bedroom Classics Volume 2.

Simon Ford | 12 October 2008 - 5:48pm

The Travelling Wilbury's Volume 2

takes some beating.

Vulpes Vulpes | 12 October 2008 - 6:08pm

Very Good!

It's kinda 'ambient'

John Waite | 12 October 2008 - 8:04pm

You mean Volume 3?

There was no Vol 2 (Nurse! The rib repair kit!)

Stan Halen | 13 October 2008 - 1:13am

Often, I'd say

Tubular Bells 2 basically led me to my current career (creating and messing with audio and music), so I quite liked that. It does sound a bit early-90s now though. That said, the original sounds quite 70s.

Tubular Bells 3 shouldn't really have been called that in my opinion, but it may have been a marketing move given that Mike Oldfield albums tend to sell better when they are called Tubular Bells.

Rufus Wainwright's Want One and Two go together well, and the first three albums by the Afro Celt Sound System went by Volumes 1-3 (as well as having proper titles too). The same could go for Peter Gabriel's first four albums. Also excellent is Aphex Twin's second volume of Selected Ambient Works, although it's probably the kind of thing you need to be in the mood for.

I'm not sure about Oxygene 7-13 though. Or the third disc of stuff on the re-released Blade Runner soundtrack.

matt_cochr | 12 October 2008 - 6:13pm

Peter Gabriel's first 4 albums...

...didn't have titles (on original UK release, anyway).

I guess you could make an argument that the title was 'Peter Gabriel' in each case - but they definitely weren't 'Volume 2', 'Volume 3' etc.

stimpy | 12 October 2008 - 6:55pm

Issue 4

That's true, but he's been quoted as saying that he didn't give them titles them because he saw them as consecutive issues - like a magazine - rather than as individual works. So it's really close to being volumes.

matt_cochr | 12 October 2008 - 7:56pm

Led...

Zeppelin II.

Patrick Crowther | 12 October 2008 - 6:42pm

Tin Machine II?

I'll get me coat.

Futurenoir | 12 October 2008 - 6:47pm

Never as bad as...

...part 3!!

marmiteboy | 12 October 2008 - 6:51pm

UB40

...Labour Of Love II....no!!!!!!!!!!

SimonL | 12 October 2008 - 6:56pm

Scott

2,3 & 4?

DogFacedBoy | 12 October 2008 - 11:43pm

Reasons to be cheerful?

I never heard parts 1 and 2, so can't comment.

Retropath2 | 13 October 2008 - 9:14am

Cortex...

Volume 2. Though I don't think there was a Volume 1.

ceepee | 13 October 2008 - 11:45am

I'll venture

Tindersticks II

Joe R | 13 October 2008 - 12:04pm

Apple Venus volume 2 (aka "Wasp Star")

from the mighty XTC. it's a cracker.

Hannah | 14 October 2008 - 7:24am

Biscuitbiscuit.......

Don't raise your voice, this will be likely a career limiting question for me, but with the concurrent thread about BareNakedLadies, is there anything in the fact that I think I don't don't like XTC as much as I feel I should either? Are they the "same" thing?

Retropath2 | 14 October 2008 - 7:39am

'Tis just a co-incidence, I reckon

They are entirely, but entirely, different.

Thing is, there are always going to be some groups that just don't do it for you and it's probably not worth forcing it. I bet there's enough music that you do genuinely love to keep you busy! Personally, I'd love to *get* Neil Young and Van Morrison, but neither of them have ever set me on fire.

To go off on a tangent, I don't enjoy eating fish. I'm aware it's my loss, and millions of people love the stuff, but I just don't enjoy it and that's that.

Having given you a strange fish analogy, if you're still interested, I'll put together a "very best of, promise no annoying singles" XTC / BNL playlist for you, with absolutely no offence taken if they still don't float your boat.

Hannah | 14 October 2008 - 8:24am

Ooooo...

...that's fighting talk. Post it here so all us XTC/BNL-heads can rip it apart

stimpy | 14 October 2008 - 2:49pm

I will, I will...

...but you might have to wait a bit (I've gone into labour... no better way of killing the waiting time than pootling about on here!)

Hannah | 14 October 2008 - 2:55pm

Crikey

Go girl, etc.

Fraser Lewry | 14 October 2008 - 3:05pm

I've gone and come back...

Baby Bickie arrived safely. She's very cute. I prob won't be posting so frequently for a while though...!

Hannah | 15 October 2008 - 9:07pm

Heartiest congratulations

(from us all, I'm sure). I'd just asked for a progress report on the XTC thread and then saw the above.

nigelthebald | 15 October 2008 - 9:37pm

Ditto

Congratulations from all at The Word.

Fraser Lewry | 16 October 2008 - 8:00am

Thanks for all your good wishes!

...now, if anyone can arrange me a good night's sleep I'll be delighted ;-)

Hannah | 16 October 2008 - 7:53pm

Just be thankful

it's not twins...

nigelthebald | 16 October 2008 - 10:15pm

You're telling me...

My hubbie has younger twin sisters, so I was a bit worried...!
I asked them to double, triple check at the ultrasound that there was only one bubs in there...

Hannah | 17 October 2008 - 11:09am

"Huntley and Palmers make 'em......

....like biscuits out of beans"
Never understood that, but congratulations anyhow.

Retropath2 | 16 October 2008 - 8:23am