Born in the Sixties is best. Here's why.
I landed on this planet in the Spring of 1967--when Sgt. Peppers was on the mixing desk, Rolling Stone Issue 1 was in copy edit. That same year (alone) saw debut albums from Velvet Underground, Pink Floyd, Jimi Hendrix, the Doors, Traffic, Grateful Dead...
Those of us born in the 1960s have the co-birthright claim to the most lasting of all music--be it Motown, the Beatles, Bob Dylan, and so on. Maybe we were too young to listen closely, but we cannot now be removed from history's timeline that we share. (Thanks mom, pop!)
Supporting material:
- We are just old enough to properly appreciate electric guitars
- We are just young enough to appreciate turntables/samplers/DJs/MCs
- The first rock music we heard is forever known as "classic rock" (as opposed to 'oldies')
- We came of age in punk, new wave, metal, AND hip-hop
- Said genres (above) pointed us back to roots rock/blues/jazz for further appreciation
- We had Walkmans in our school years and therefore more listening time than the previous generation.
- We had our jobs in the 90s and spent our money on music and are responsible for the golden heydays of the physical format.
- Something about the 2000's/iPods/blogs/long tail that I haven't figured out yet.
Yeah?
- More from plimsoul.
- Login or register to post comments








Paris Riots and Dead Civil rights .
Now we ( me born 1960 ) are to old to wear denim but still do !
Dream of an entire nights sleep unbroken by the need to piss .
Know first hand (sic) what a proctologist does .
Have been to at least one school / uni mates funeral .
Wondered why Dylan did adds .
Had to explain to a young bass player who Noel Redding was !
Been called " sir " by a copper whilst daydreaming you could " join the dots " on his / her spotty face .
Found platform shoes in parents loft , whilst moving them to sheltered housing .
Wondered where Spangles and Manners went .
And vented by blog .
My father
Departed, now; but he was born in 1942. This made him roughly the same age as Paul McCartney, Brian Wilson or Bob Dylan: 14 when Heartbreak Hotel came out, 17 when Buddy Holly died, 21 when The Beatles took off, 23-25 in the golden pop years of 1965-1967, and nodding sagely at the age of 30 when Don McLean observed in 1972 that, for that generation, it was all over, in American Pie.
Personally, I'd say that's better than being born in, say, 1965 and missing it all; or, God forbid, being born in 1971- like me - and being unable to ascertain the true cause of teenage depression: simple chronology, or the music of the mid to late 1980s.
Nope. I beg to differ.
Those of us who had our jobs in the late sixties and early seventies (i.e. we were born in the FIFTIES) were the ones whose overdrafts and plastic funded the heyday of the physical artifact.
Long Playing records with extravagant sleeves, photo inserts, lyric books, origami and God knows what else were the high point, and the second flourish came with the magnificent outpouring of creativity on the sleevs of 7 and 12 inch inch punk and new wave vinyl.
If you were born in the late sixties, you were too young to fund anything like the "golden heydays of the physical format".
Sorry. History's a bitch.
Close but. . .
my sources tell me that the ideal year to have been born was 1948. That way you're a sentient, record-buying being for the whole kaboodle, from early Elvis to the latest now-and-happeningness.
I was nine years too late. Dang.
The people I feel sorry for are those born in the late Seventies - still cradle-bound and unaware of punk, and becoming aware just in time to lap up Joe Cocker and Tina Turner. . . then some bastard goes and tells them that they were in fact revival acts whose proper heyday had actually been 20 years before. Double dang.
Those of us Born In The Fifties
have to carry the burden of a song written for us by Sting.
Walkmans
I was born in 63 and we didn't have Walkmans at school.You would have to have been born in mid to late 60's to have seen Walkmans as commonplace. Sorry to be so picky but great post nonetheless.
Walkmans
I was born in 63 and we didn't have Walkmans at school.You would have to have been born in mid to late 60's to have seen Walkmans as commonplace. Sorry to be so picky but great post nonetheless.
History is er bunk
If you were born in 1965 you didnt come of age in the punk era which began by all accounts in 1976. An 11 year old punk doesn't cut much mustard i am afraid.
i was born in 1956 and missed it by about 2 years by my reckoning - ie. you need to be about 18 to have come of age!!
I also missed the height of the flower power era by about 4 years but have an abiding memory of that time from the music but unfortunately not from the free love that was around.
I am glad to have been born when I was but more importantly glad to be enjoying the greatest amount of music so readily available and probably the most vibrant live scene in many many years.
Exactly!
I was born in 1959 just across the Mersey from Liverpool.
Grew up with 'local boys' The Beatles as a constant soundtrack to my early years.
Spent the early '70s growing up with, and out of, heavy metal and prog in the 'classic' period.
Turned 18 in 1977, exactly the right age for punk.
Matured through the '80s listening to contemporaries like Weller, Morrissey, New Order, PSB etc.
Now exactly the right age to appreciate the diversity and eclecticism of the 'non-Pyramid' bits of Glastonbury and the classier small festivals.
No better time from my perspective.
Not at all Steve
As someone also born in 1956 we're the same age as Johnny Rotten.
But I did feel at the time that it was something for younger kids and didn't find out I was the same age as Rotten until years later.
I feel the same as you about missing the flower power era as well.
coming of age..
I wholly disagree with your definition of coming of age. 18 is being AT age. You spend about 6-8 years in the coming up. It started for me with the pop-culture magazines for kids. I knew who the Sex Pisols and the Clash were long before I heard them. But I knew they were dangerous and as I was coming of age it was very important for me to know who these people were. And the older guys...the ones who wore jean jackets, smoked (name-checked on Burrito Deluxe) carried around albums by Cheap Trick and the Jam. I aspired to be them.
Readily available music. Check. --though the scarcitiy of music was sometimes the fun of it. I no longer keep a slip of paper in my wallet to keep track of the records I was looking for.
Live music. Check. --As long as you don't count festivals. To which generation do we owe the proliferation of the small venue to and "get in the van" attitudes to?
Agreed (almost)
Born in '58 so all of Paul's comments apply to me and I thoroughly agree!
BUT I can still remember visiting my hippy older cousin in 72 and listening agog to him describing a Led Zeppelin concert he had just been to. So maybe 55 would be the optimal time, always assuming I wouldn't feel too old to see Ian Dury in his pomp in the late 70's
Spot on.
October 11th 1955 to be precise.
"Put on your rose fur coat, baby!"
I feel nothing but pity for anyone who wasn't born into the glorious cultural utopia that was Great Britain in the early 1970s.
At this juncture I can hear disgruntled mutterings from those who are slightly more advanced in years than myself, and who are now wondering out loud what exactly is wrong with The Carter Family, Scott Joplin and The Glenn Miller Orchestra. I like all these acts - may they continue to enjoy fruitful careers - however being born in the 70s, a kid in the 80s and a young adult in 90s was still awesome for the following reasons:
“One day all music will sound like this,” I remarked to the assemblage of stuffed animals who used to watch television with me.
“It was like you knew!” I cried, excitedly waving the CD case in the air, while they stared nervously at their food and diligently avoided making eye contact.
Can't agree
I'm of the same vintage as Plimsoul, having been born in March 67, and surely only need to remind him how horrible 80s music was to make him realise that our youth was hardly a golden age.
80s music was so dreaful that I spent a large part of my teens convinced that Marillion were a great band, and the scary thing is that by the standards of the day they probably were.
time for a new thread on the 80s
The 80s does not mean schlock to everyone.
We could go on and on about the brilliance of the 80s. The actual 80s that flowered into what became alt rock, for example. Not the MTv, 'lunchtime flashback' radio show 80s...but the Replacements, Plimsouls(!), Husker Du, Meat Puppets, Long Ryders, Echo & the Bunnymen, Gang of Four, Jason & the Scorchers, The Three O'Clock, Minutemen, Pixies, Joy Division, Smiths, Silos, powerpop........and so on for another 3 hours.
This whole thread appears a
This whole thread appears a bit like bragging rights, and in terms of technology surely my kids (aged 6 and 4) have come along at the best ever time. But in terms of being born in the middle of the sixties here's my
One of my earliest memories is the moon landings in 69 watched at school on one of those tellies in a metal frame that held it 12 feet in the air...
Aged 12 in 1977 my early record buying and gigging was in the golden era of punk/new wave
Just about young enough to go clubbing for the last true musical revolution in 1989 with acid (it's been basically all retro since then - discuss)
Experiencing pre-PL footie (cheap, standing, terrifyingly violent),and post-PL (sitting down, terrifyingly expensive)
But do agree with eighties music somewhat, there was lots of good music but it was on the margins marginal: New Order, Smiths, Pogues were the only ones we saw headlining big gigs...
This whole thread is getting close
to this song which i think we can all agree isn't a good thing.
curious point even though Sandi thom was a "internet" phenomenom you can't imbed her you tube clip.
so here's someone else doing it. Enjoy is probably not the word.