Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Boris Johnson vs Ken Livingstone: The rematch

Jed Clampett's picture

When Muhammed Ali first fought Joe Frazier it was the fight of the century. Ali avenged his defeat in the rematch before proving his superiority over Smokin' Joe, emerging victorious from the Thrilla in Manila.

So, now Boris and Ken will square off again in The Cockney Confrontation (it's Friday, that's the best I can do).

What do we think? Will Boris get his comeuppance or is this one come back too many by Ken?

0

I hope...

... Ken kicks his Tory arse this time. I'm looking forward to the debates, they're both entertainers.

0
Johnny Topaz | 24 September 2010 - 2:13pm

Title for rematch:

Bonking Boris vs Livingstone the Lazarus!

0
sirbriancannonhunter | 24 September 2010 - 2:18pm

The second most important job in Britain

according to Ken Livingston. I'm not sure it's even the second most important job in London. About a quarter of my council tax goes on services run by the Mayor/London Assembly; the rest goes to the local borough council. Only one person in the Conservative party interested in running, and only two in Labour, which shows it's not where much real power lies. It gets you plenty of opportunities for publicity though - which is why both of them are so keen on the Olympics.

0
Melville | 24 September 2010 - 2:24pm

I prefer Boris

Though this is academic as I don't get to vote.

0
Spartacus Mills | 24 September 2010 - 2:24pm

It's a wages thing

one's going for the outer London higher wage earner whilst the other will see support from 'inner' London. I've seen Boris at functions and been introduced on several occasions. It's no act. Gawd I hope someone else throws their hat into the ring.

0
MyAmericanMate | 24 September 2010 - 2:38pm

Humphrey Lyttleton called Boris

the thinking man's idiot and I cannot abide Livingstone. Ken has dabbled far too much with some very dubious characters with very extreme views which should fly in the face of everything such a 'good hearted progressive socialist' ought to believe in. If only he weren't such a calculating opportunistic git, but then that could apply to any of our current crop, goes with the territory. I cannot really support either but would support anyone who really could deliver on the capital's shambolic transport system and educate Londoners about the need to be civil in the public sphere. The problem is that the statutory authorities in London long ago gave up on their responsibilities in favour of 'partnerships' with commercial bodies whose interests are not the same as those who live and work in the city. That is very much the case with the Olympics where the definition of compulsory purchase orders has gone beyond what ought to be acceptable, all for the sake of a 3 week jamboree.

0
Francis Barry-Walsh | 24 September 2010 - 2:45pm

Not so much the Thrilla in Manila

as Tedium in Teddington.

0
Mark JF | 24 September 2010 - 3:19pm

I thought, initially

anyone but either of those. Then I read that Lembit Opik is hoping to run for the Liberals. And they both look better.

0
Leedsboy | 24 September 2010 - 5:14pm

Boris hasn't split Blur...

This crime against music makes me understand a little bit better why Graham didn't want to go back to the day job for a little while...


0
badger_king | 24 September 2010 - 11:30pm

Local politics

Would anyone like me to bore them with the local politics of Wolverhampton? Thought not.

1
stuinwolves | 24 September 2010 - 11:31pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd