Bored of eMusic

I think I've had enough. 40 downloads a month is great and all that, but there's a limit to what one can listen to and the amount that can be backed up on a 'listen to later' playlist. (Why did I ever download Jens Lekman?) While I love the site, and it's gotten me into some great bands over the past while, I think I'm going to ditch it and spend the money on buying vinyl (a new hobby, though I know my emusic subscription won't get me too far) and going back to browsing through the CD racks. There's just something about picking up something, bringing it home, reading the liner notes, etc (you've heard it all before). Any final arguments before I pack it in and cancel the subscription?

A kindred spirit

There is still a pleasure in stepping into a record shop, (a good one mind not your HMV/Virgin ) and asking "What's new the week?"
Being thrown a few CDs and listening to them there and then. You know you can't afford all of them but you get them anyway because the owner will take it back if you don't like it. You know it won't happen because that clunker will fill the gap between Bonny Prince Billy and the Bonzos, and anyway maybe it will grow on you.

Gordon Kerr | 26 January 2008 - 3:01pm

I know what you mean

Having just had to sort through my music collection - vinyl, cassette and CD - as a result of a major domestic reorganisation and consequent redecoration, I have found myself holding stuff that I had forgotten I had and thinking "now I know why I bought this, let's see if still sounds good". Most of it does, but my head hurts after my dear wife's comments on my lack of progress in my allotted tasks!!

Back to the racks, say I.

Gavin

fifer | 26 January 2008 - 6:21pm

emusic

ditch the subscription. Go back to it when you feel like it and enjoy the stuff that's popped up in your absence.

On the subject of emusic I went to download an album, I'm sure it was Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga by Spoon and it came up with a message saying this was unavailable to download in the UK. I find this an amazing idea that in this day and age, people would still want to put up boundaries like this when people are actually paying for downloads.

Paul Chandler | 26 January 2008 - 9:08pm

Yeah, but..

...it does feature at least 3 new albums a month that get good reviews in The Word, and if they turn out to be a little dull (Bonnie Prince Billy, anyone?) you've only spent £2.50 to find that out - better than shelling out the full subscription cost on one CD and then having to take your chance selling it on eBay if it disappoints. My only beefs with eMusic are that its reviewers are a bit holier-than-thou (the sort of people who think 6Music is too populist) and that it's over-stuffed with music no one will ever, ever want. But I like their model, and you'll find more and more artists going with it as they get fed up with their record companies or vice versa. Stick with it son, it's the future.

johnsey | 26 January 2008 - 9:59pm

I let the subscription slide...

....I too found that a lot of e music stuff I downloaded fell into a playlist marked - "interesting, glad I heard it, never play it again". I found the 40 tracks a month thing - sort of compelled you to buy something or you felt you were wasting money. The argument of "well - its cheap" is sort of quantity over quality - never a good measure

Andrew2 | 27 January 2008 - 1:23am

Exactly

My sentiments exactly. I'm getting worried that it's just a question of taking the 40 downloads and storing them away somewhere when the quality isn't reaching the same standards. I just prefer the relationship that you have with a CD/record when you buy it having thought about buying it, read reviews, etc, rather than just picking up something immediately and being able to listen to it on the spot. I guess I just want that sense of connection with the album back.

KevinO | 28 January 2008 - 1:26pm

Stick with it

I have a 90 downloads a month subscription for £12. 7/8 albums on MP3 with no DRM, some great music to choose from, all legal, what's not to like? I'm sure you'll have a few hits and misses buying vinyl, and you'll get 3/4 of a vinyl album for £12...

Over the last couple of months I've got hold of; British Sea Power, Cat Power, Yeasayer, Seabear, Burial, Raveonettes, Tacks, The Boy Disaster, Joe Henry, Sharon Jones and the Dap Kings, Carbon/Silicon. All of these reviewed in Word at some point and all great (plus a few duffers like Lens). Most of these I wouldn't of bought on CD so would never of heard. My life is richer for it.

I look at eMusic as the equivalent to your local independent record store it should be supported. What's the alternative? iTunes...

PaulHThompson | 27 January 2008 - 2:39am

Obviously, it's up to you

But I will say that I've bought the following recently from emusic - Burial, Pretty Things, Robert Wilkins, Orchestra Baobab, Mr Scruff, Mississippi Sheiks, M.I.A., M. Ward, John Fahey, Justin Adams, Frank Crumit, Chuck Prophet, Augustus Pablo and scores more - none of which I would actually have handed over cash in a record shop for, particularly full price cash. What I value it for is it's the way to pick up things which are on the edges of your normal listening diet.

David Hepworth | 27 January 2008 - 9:59am

Food for thought

I agree with that. I just wonder how much is gluttony rather than what fits into a normal listening diet. I've picked up Ethiopiques, Joanna Newsom, Yeasayer, and a good few other things that I certainly never would have bought immediately, but I wonder if they get lost in the fact that too much music means not enough attention devoted to it. I think I'll have to think about this a bit more.

KevinO | 28 January 2008 - 1:29pm

Communication breakdown

I too had an my emusic subscription which I shared with son as it gave him access to a lot of American hip hop acts which were not available here. My problem was that we invariably got to the end of the month with unclaimed tracks. Poor communication and the fact I worked away from home a lot meant that we lost any unused credits as there was no roll-over system.

I'd had my account for a couple of years before the Word offer and also felt that I was reaching saturation point as there were not enough new artists that interested me. The choice does seem to be improving now so I may go back to it.

JohnB | 27 January 2008 - 6:58pm

I prefer last.fm personally.

I prefer last.fm personally. You can take or leave the recommendations and the way it unobtrusively learns your music taste is genius. Last.fm for recommendations and iTunes (and soon Amazon) for downloads.

sleevelessness | 28 January 2008 - 1:45am

So what's your last.fm id?

lets see what you're listening to

PaulHThompson | 28 January 2008 - 1:55am
Paul Chandler | 28 January 2008 - 10:44pm

E's are good...

I agree that there are occasions, especially if rushing, when there seems insufficient to whet the appetite, but, after 4 years, I have always enjoyed the day of my new 40 arrivals. The "charts" are a bit dodgy, as they obscure all the obscure and arcane bubbling below the surface, and the reviews are all AMG lifts, with the hefty american tastes bias inherent therein, but I usually find some gold. And as Mr H says, the cheapness allows some quality risks. A recent cover disc* alerted me to Marah, and given there is no current CD release of "Kids in Philly" and Amazon quote £28 or thereabouts to find it, it was good to find it sitting there,looking up appealingly, it's 11 tracks and a hidden, going for 11/40 x $10. There are some excellent americana (actually, many are probably straight country, but....)acts, viz Damien Jurado and Chris Knight, lots of jazz, some folk, stacks of blugrass, and lots of "alternative", pre critical acclaim, like Cat Power. Plus bits of Richard Thompson, so no complaints.
*Come on, don't tell me you don't read 'em as well as Word....

Retropath2 | 28 January 2008 - 10:00am