Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Bob Dylan and the "Judas!" Myth

roryks's picture

Heckler: Judas!

Dylan: I don't believe you. You're a liar.

That's the mythology - no doubt perpetuated in recent years by the Scorsese documentary, No Direction Home, which sharply edited the audio to make it a much quicker exchange between the artist and his detractor.

The truth is, of course, that the gap between the cry of "Judas!" and Dylan's garbled reply is much longer. It seems far more likely that Dylan is actually replying to a second heckler, who shouts out something that is not so easy to decipher.

Jim Boggia has had the audio cleaned up as best as he could, and he asks: Who was Dylan really calling a liar? What does the second heckler shout? http://www.archive.org/details/Jimboggia-WhosTheLiarA40thAnniversaryReex...


My best guess, he is saying, "You can't just create this big Dylan phenonenon..." then he gets drowned out, or his voice drops away, maybe because he loses confidence in his challenge; but he might be finishing with, "...just by playing faster."

To which Dylan replies, "I don't believe you. You're a liar!"

What do you think? Leave your thoughts here, and maybe send a message to Jim, if you want to - I'm sure he'd love to hear from you.

0

To me it sounds like...

"Go on [or possibly "go home"] you useless pillock..."

0
Raymo | 27 November 2009 - 4:52pm

Thanks: I'll give this a listen

The most interesting thing about Scorsese's (Pennebaker's) film of this episode to me is that, upon finally seeing the exchange and not just listening to it, it looked as if it wasn't Dylan that ordered the band to "play it fuckin' loud". In Scorsese's film, Dylan seems far less rattled by the whole tour than popular myth thus far would have us believe. It always struck me that "play it fuckin' loud" was the sort of thing that Robbie Robertson would have said. Mickey Jones has always maintained that the voice sounds like a British roadie, but I don't agree with that. Anyway, I look forward to giving this a listen.

0
Lucas Hare | 27 November 2009 - 5:10pm

I think I agree

I'd wondered that myself after hearing the Bootleg Series Vol 4. I thought after the applause following Judas the only word I could half make out was "bollocks". Which may be utter bollocks. But it had struck me that the gap was too long to be a response to the Judas heckler.

0
Carl Parker | 27 November 2009 - 6:23pm

Was "bollocks"

in common useage in 1966?

0
Johan | 27 November 2009 - 10:58pm

Yes...

... it certainly was.

0
Inky Fingers | 28 November 2009 - 7:22am

It definitely was

But that's neither here nor there. To me it's what it sounds like part of what the guy is shouting.

0
Carl Parker | 28 November 2009 - 2:11pm

Hmmm. What always got me about the exchange...

...was the incongruity of Dylan's 'response' to the heckle.

What I mean is - if someone called me 'Judas', my response would likely be 'That's not my name' or 'No, not me'. I wouldn't say 'I don't believe you'.

What I'm trying to say is that calling someone 'Judas' - either literally or figuratively - is a statement of fact, not of belief. So to say 'I don't believe you' always - to me - sounded like an answer to a different question.

Well it made sense to me anyway. Anyone else know what I'm blathering on about - who can explain it better?

0
Paul Waring | 27 November 2009 - 6:39pm

I tend to agree...

and although his response is still pretty unusual, I can shoehorn it into being a retort to someone who says, "You can't just create this big Dylan phenomenon..."

Dylan: "I don't believe you. You're a liar."

In other words: "I flippin' well can create this Dylan phenomenon..."

It seems an arch reply - or, just plain fed up and confrontational - to all the inanity going on around him at the time.

Maybe...

0
roryks | 27 November 2009 - 7:01pm

Clear as mud

Sorry, just listened to the 'enhanced' version. Still can't make it out.

0
Lucas Hare | 27 November 2009 - 6:50pm

Yep

still can't pick anything out as English with my ears either

Maybe he was answering the voices in his own drug fuelled brain - 'oi, Bob, wouldn't a Christmas album be a good idea?'

0
DogFacedBoy | 27 November 2009 - 7:47pm

hmmm

I hear "Everyone... this is Bob Dylan... he's not that good" - I imagine he is gesturing at the stage.
Honestly, that's what I get.

I never believed the Judas story, and especially not after hearing the gap on the bootleg series recording.

0
Mavis Diles | 27 November 2009 - 8:18pm

or maybe

"Everyone... this is Bob Dylan... stop heckling him"
I think it's an American accent, too.

0
Mavis Diles | 27 November 2009 - 8:21pm

"Do some old!" shouts...

a bespectacled and bearded man wearing a roll neck jumper, corduroy trousers and sandals.

2
Patrick Crowther | 27 November 2009 - 8:22pm

I always thought there was a second Heckler...

... on the grassy knoll.

Oliver Stone needs to do a film about this.

4
Nicodemus | 27 November 2009 - 10:27pm

Back

and to the left

1
Sheev | 28 November 2009 - 3:56pm

I agree with Paul

never thought 'I don't believe you' made sense as a response to that particular heckle. He's responding to someone else off mic.

Great story though. I'll stick with the legend.

Always thought the hotel that now occupies the site (and facade) of the Free Trade Hall missed a trick by not calling it's bar 'Judas!' or 'Liars Bar' or something.

0
Dr Volume | 28 November 2009 - 2:17am

Emphasis matter:

Having listened to the exchange a number of times on the Bootleg Series, I came to the conclusion that the emphasis of Dylan’s “I don’t believe you,” was on the “believe” rather than the “don’t” (shades of Victor Meldrew), thus making the meaning along the lines of “you’ve got to be joking – you really said that?” rather than “you’re talking bollocks”. I assumed he was letting the "Judas" sink in a bit. "Play f***ing loud" then seems a natural follow up, even given the pause.

Then again, it is Saturday and I'm stuck at work rather than doing something sensible like relaxing. It's possible that I (like many others) am thinking way to much about this...

0
Sam Fiddian | 28 November 2009 - 2:19am

"Play fucking loud"

Is definitely NOT Dylan in my opinion, and I wrote a letter to Mojo saying this when the "Albert Hall" bootleg series volume came out. Sounds like Robbie Robertson to me.

0
masked tortilla | 28 November 2009 - 2:26pm

Wheras

to me it sounds EXACTLY like Dylan

0
DogFacedBoy | 29 November 2009 - 7:34pm

As much as I love...

...the "Albert Hall" recording (particularly the oft-overlooked acoustic half, which is just as fantastic), the whole "Judas" thing has surely become ludicruously overblown.

By the time he did those concerts in the UK, there couldn't have been anyone who'd want to go and see Bob who could have in anyway been shocked by his "new direction". The electric "trilogy" had all being released by May '66 , and it was well over a year after his appearance at Newport.

It's clear from listening to this and other recordings that the vast majority of attendants were more than happy with the racket he was making, and that the handful of luddites that had the time, money and inclination to waste enough of their life booing at him probably didn't number enough to fill a washroom.

Dylan was clearly no pushover. He arrived in New York from the boondocks friendless in one of the coldest winters on record, and he had the gumption, the resolve and the cunning to stone-step his way on to the folk circuit at a time it was madly over-subscribed, so to speculate that he got upset over some overfed Stalinist student throwing his dummy at him is just plain stupid.

Martin Scorsese's film even makes matters worse. At a time when Dylan's sanity was probably being stretched by drug abuse, overwork, and the lunacy of celebrity, we're somehow supposed to believe that he was either sentient or soft enough to let some commie heckler alone force him into a retreat.

I suspect neither Dylan - nor anyone for that matter - even gave that "Judas" rubbish a second thought until the bootleg surfaced some three years after the concert, at which point buffoonish mythologists like Greil Marcus started to spin the words of a moaning folkie heckler into the symbol of Dylan "going electric" as the most insecurrectionary cultural sine qua non since the first performance of "The Rites Of Spring" or The Armoury Show exhibition some fifty years earlier.

I was born the year before The Free Trade Hall concert, so I can hardly claim to be a primary source, but please, can anyone who was musically aware during this period please tell us whether this incident had any significance at all before people like Marcus started telling us that it did?

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 28 November 2009 - 2:55pm

The right Rite

A pedant writes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rites_of_Spring
American Hardcore band

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rite_of_Spring
The *Rite* of Spring [aka *Le* Sacre du Printemps]

(and to add some value to my carping, check this out:
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-8137393125612191818&ei=xWARS8...

)

0
SpaceBoy | 28 November 2009 - 5:46pm

pedants don't write;

they type.

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 28 November 2009 - 11:47pm

a fair point

anyway, thanks for a very interesting posting re Dylan--and to all of you in above thread, I had wondered slightly about what he had meant and these new interpretations do make a bit more sense.

0
SpaceBoy | 29 November 2009 - 9:15am

Jaysus, who cares...

who said what to who. Five Star goy called a bunch of wankers on Saturday Superstore once. Or was it winkers. Someone should write a book about it.

Bed.

1
FreakGene | 28 November 2009 - 11:59pm

Crikey

I've just seen the next blog after this one......i feel slightly spooked.

0
FreakGene | 29 November 2009 - 12:03am

I don't belive you man...

.

0
skirky | 29 November 2009 - 12:12am

Goy

That typo's kind of ironic. Oy vey.

0
Sven Garlic | 30 November 2009 - 12:32pm

At Free Trade Hall Manchester

Someone asked 'was it a big deal at the time' Yes and no yes as in so much as the venue at that time did not have hecklers. Plus Dylan up till then could do no wrong. No in that by today's standards the outbursts would seem tame. As someone who was there (sat on stage because they gave our seats away and had to put us somewhere) It made the night all the more interesting. Folk) keep saying the stage hands there were none only a few rougharse fans. We got involved in shouting back now and again at hecklers. As a result I've been asked many times was the fucking loud bit me. My answer is always the same at the time we were steamed up and very much for Dylan and the Hawks. Did I ? no bloody idea anyway just adding to the chat as one that was there.

2
kevsauntry | 27 February 2010 - 12:06am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd