Being Nick Drake


This guy has a load of Nick Drake covers on YouTube. Pretty good I think.

Very good...

particularly the guitar playing.

But if he can play and sing like that, then why is he pouring his energy into recreating the songs of someone else?

Patrick Crowther | 29 September 2008 - 7:15am
Retropath2 | 29 September 2008 - 8:36am

No really!

This is what always gets me with tribute acts... I just don't understand why they don't pour their energy into doing something of their own. And if this Nick Drake impersonator guy isn't a songwriter, then he can find someone to work with who is!

It doesn't matter how good he is, it's just superior karaoke.

Patrick Crowther | 29 September 2008 - 8:43am

Yet if it were classical music

his ability to recreate the music perfectly would be be regarded as a virtue.

I don't entirely disagree with you, by the way; I certainly think that if one is doing cover versions one should make the effort to add something or reinterpret them.

Having said that, I have been to see a couple of tribute bands to get a sense of what it must have been like and the fact is that however much The Musical Box or the Australian Pink Floyd might be karaoke, there's something to seeing music live that you cannot get from listening to a record, even a live one.

Fraser M | 29 September 2008 - 9:16am

Reality

The reality is that he probably does write his own songs, has probably had a crack at getting signed etc and this is his second option. On any level, the thought of playing to a more appreciative audience that is larger than an audience for your own work underpins the existence of all tribute acts and singers of other people's songs.

kb | 29 September 2008 - 2:51pm

Tribute act

is a bit harsh. If he likes playing the songs, that's fine. He seems to do them well. And he is recording at home and popping them on youtube which is just sort of sharing them with people.

Worlds a better place for that (I admit in a small way).

Lee Rimmer | 29 September 2008 - 8:43pm

I know and I jest...

...but maybe he hasn't a creative neurone in him, so has realised his forte in in the works of others. I don't have a belief that songwriting is the end all and be all, but I will ceratinly agree that re-interpretation has more credence, to me, than re-creation. But tributes seem big bucks these days. I note there ia a chap and a bassist forever on tour "doing" Nick Drake and, when not, Gabriel Marques Lorca or some such latin novelist, not being quite sure of whether these would, could or can be mutually sympathetic. At least both Hendrix and ZZ Top have a guitar based similarity, which is how the Hamsters spread their load.....
The Hamsters and Nick Drake thus drawn in together, in but one paragraph. And most would have thought squirrels closer relation....

Retropath2 | 29 September 2008 - 9:19am

The notion of a "Nick Drake cover"....

...is not in principle of great appeal.

David Hepworth | 29 September 2008 - 9:23am

I've seen him

Actually it is more a covers and the odd original composition act - mostly Nick Drake, a few John Martyn and related late 60s folky numbers, and some originals. Quite a pleasant evening actually.

Twangothan | 29 September 2008 - 11:02am

"Quite a pleasant evening actually"

Get me a ticket quick!

kb | 29 September 2008 - 2:54pm

No more, no less. A short

No more, no less. A short walk to the local arts centre, where they serve decent beer - painless....

Twangothan | 29 September 2008 - 3:36pm
Retropath2 | 29 September 2008 - 9:37am

His guitar sound is superb

and the whole thing is beautifully recorded. Much better sound quality than the usual dross you get on YouTube. I agree that impersonations can seem intrinsically sterile, but this sent a chill down my spine when I heard it last night, and that's the acid test isn't it?

Martin | 29 September 2008 - 11:51am

He's very good...

...and Nick's not 'ere.
..but there is something of the robot about him isn't there?

shane pacey | 29 September 2008 - 11:42pm

It's nice to watch

I think he's great, he's really captured the spirit of the song. But the main thing he brings is simply this video. I am too young to have ever seen Nick Drake perform and as far as I'm aware there's no film of him playing, so it's nice to watch this song being played for the first time.

Niks | 30 September 2008 - 9:22am

You have to respect the bravery in attempting a carbon copy

As any covers band knows, if you try to recreate a song perfectly, as this guy seems to be doing very successfully, you get castigated for the slightest difference.

If you re-interpret it in a way that makes it obvious you're doing so, you're under no such pressure, plus you get a brownie point from those who applaud creativity.

Technically the art of the composer/original performer is entirely different from that of the replicator, and it's a foolish replicator indeed who expects to bathe in the same glory as the composer.

Lucky Tiler | 30 September 2008 - 1:10pm

I believe

the All Saints prove your point with their cover of Under The Bridge.

Lee Rimmer | 30 September 2008 - 3:57pm

What?...

Richard Hawley on guitar, in tune singing..it's fab!

shane pacey | 30 September 2008 - 11:10pm

That's a great cover

Possibly better than the original...

Niks | 1 October 2008 - 9:16am

I'm on my own clearly

Lee Rimmer | 1 October 2008 - 4:16pm