Being Nick Drake
Posted by Martin on 29 September 2008 - 2:41am.
This guy has a load of Nick Drake covers on YouTube. Pretty good I think.
- More from Martin.
- Login or register to post comments
This guy has a load of Nick Drake covers on YouTube. Pretty good I think.
Very good...
particularly the guitar playing.
But if he can play and sing like that, then why is he pouring his energy into recreating the songs of someone else?
Thats what I always felt about Pavarotti!
;-)
No really!
This is what always gets me with tribute acts... I just don't understand why they don't pour their energy into doing something of their own. And if this Nick Drake impersonator guy isn't a songwriter, then he can find someone to work with who is!
It doesn't matter how good he is, it's just superior karaoke.
Yet if it were classical music
his ability to recreate the music perfectly would be be regarded as a virtue.
I don't entirely disagree with you, by the way; I certainly think that if one is doing cover versions one should make the effort to add something or reinterpret them.
Having said that, I have been to see a couple of tribute bands to get a sense of what it must have been like and the fact is that however much The Musical Box or the Australian Pink Floyd might be karaoke, there's something to seeing music live that you cannot get from listening to a record, even a live one.
Reality
The reality is that he probably does write his own songs, has probably had a crack at getting signed etc and this is his second option. On any level, the thought of playing to a more appreciative audience that is larger than an audience for your own work underpins the existence of all tribute acts and singers of other people's songs.
Tribute act
is a bit harsh. If he likes playing the songs, that's fine. He seems to do them well. And he is recording at home and popping them on youtube which is just sort of sharing them with people.
Worlds a better place for that (I admit in a small way).
I know and I jest...
...but maybe he hasn't a creative neurone in him, so has realised his forte in in the works of others. I don't have a belief that songwriting is the end all and be all, but I will ceratinly agree that re-interpretation has more credence, to me, than re-creation. But tributes seem big bucks these days. I note there ia a chap and a bassist forever on tour "doing" Nick Drake and, when not, Gabriel Marques Lorca or some such latin novelist, not being quite sure of whether these would, could or can be mutually sympathetic. At least both Hendrix and ZZ Top have a guitar based similarity, which is how the Hamsters spread their load.....
The Hamsters and Nick Drake thus drawn in together, in but one paragraph. And most would have thought squirrels closer relation....
The notion of a "Nick Drake cover"....
...is not in principle of great appeal.
I've seen him
Actually it is more a covers and the odd original composition act - mostly Nick Drake, a few John Martyn and related late 60s folky numbers, and some originals. Quite a pleasant evening actually.
"Quite a pleasant evening actually"
Get me a ticket quick!
No more, no less. A short
No more, no less. A short walk to the local arts centre, where they serve decent beer - painless....
Not unless he grows a posthumous beard.
.
His guitar sound is superb
and the whole thing is beautifully recorded. Much better sound quality than the usual dross you get on YouTube. I agree that impersonations can seem intrinsically sterile, but this sent a chill down my spine when I heard it last night, and that's the acid test isn't it?
He's very good...
...and Nick's not 'ere.
..but there is something of the robot about him isn't there?
It's nice to watch
I think he's great, he's really captured the spirit of the song. But the main thing he brings is simply this video. I am too young to have ever seen Nick Drake perform and as far as I'm aware there's no film of him playing, so it's nice to watch this song being played for the first time.
You have to respect the bravery in attempting a carbon copy
As any covers band knows, if you try to recreate a song perfectly, as this guy seems to be doing very successfully, you get castigated for the slightest difference.
If you re-interpret it in a way that makes it obvious you're doing so, you're under no such pressure, plus you get a brownie point from those who applaud creativity.
Technically the art of the composer/original performer is entirely different from that of the replicator, and it's a foolish replicator indeed who expects to bathe in the same glory as the composer.
I believe
the All Saints prove your point with their cover of Under The Bridge.
What?...
Richard Hawley on guitar, in tune singing..it's fab!
That's a great cover
Possibly better than the original...
I'm on my own clearly