Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Backing the wrong horse

Ghost's picture

Like Stimpy I was thinking about David Lee Roth this weekend, but I was considering the fact that at the time of his initial split from Van Halen all the smart money (well, the overriding view in Kerrang!, anyway) was that he would go onto mega-stardom and the brothers and their bass player would sink from view. Wrongity wrong! (Actually, I've no idea why anyone would assume that Eddie Van Halen, in particular, would fade away, but there you have it)

So who else has upset the odds after a band has split?

I'll start the ball rolling with another example. I reckon that most Uncle Tupelo fans would have backed the intense, slightly mysterious Jay Farrar to still be going 15 years later, but Jeff Tweedy? Probably not. Nowadays Tweedy leads the ever-evolving, acclaimed, and pretty succesful (Top 10 US albums, sold out shows, TV appearances, etc) Wilco, and Farrar is playing small clubs with a version of Son Volt that is really just him + 4 others, puts out soundalike albums every once in awhile (no bad thing IMO) and appears to have a bald patch developing to boot. I still think both are great but I know who would hold the upper hand in any re-union discussion.

0

Robbie Williams & Gary Barlow

It was expected that once Robbie Williams left Take That he would disappear and that Gary Barlow would be the succesful solo act.

Is the first mention of Take That on the Word Blog?!

0
David Sutherland | 16 March 2009 - 6:50pm

...and a few years later...

...everyone thought the Take That reunion would die on its arse without Robbie's involvement.

0
Paul Waring | 16 March 2009 - 7:27pm

So the legend goes...

though I don't like either it seemed obvious to me that Williams had the star potential. Sure I wasn't the only one.

0
Mr Fade | 16 March 2009 - 8:56pm

Every member of every other defunct boy band...

must look at Take That's spectacular rebirth and seethe with jealousy!

0
Patrick Crowther | 16 March 2009 - 9:26pm

No

Some of us harbour a fondness for a little of the That's recent singles and have admitted so in these pages. Rule The World is a gem and Patience is fine as well.

0
Leedsboy | 16 March 2009 - 11:32pm

Rule the world

I think that's the one I thought was Coldplay when I first heard it. As Mitch Benn sang "Everything sounds like Coldplay now".

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 20 March 2009 - 11:37am

Shine...

Very ELO, isn't it?

0
Six Dog | 20 March 2009 - 12:19pm

Human League

when Ian Marsh and Martyn Ware left to form Heaven 17, leaving Phil Oakey on his own with the visual director Adrian Wright to carry on with the League, all the money was most definately on H17......How very very wrong they were

0
Mint | 16 March 2009 - 7:39pm

Beatles split - smart money on John but ...

it was George and Ringo that set the pace, the former with critical acclaim, Bangla Desh Concert, and (see an earlier thread) probably the best Fabs solo album, and the latter with four years of singles chart success both in the UK & US.

Meanwhile John tails off spectacularly, and Paul takes three or four years to hit his stride.

(Coat on, outside, waiting for taxi)

0
Steven C | 16 March 2009 - 7:41pm

Was it?

Genuine question - obviously you wouldn't have expected it to be George or Ringo, but I would have thought all the 'smart' money would have been on Paul (with John off doing weird stuff with Yoko possibly).

Dunno - I was a mere child at the time.

0
Paul Waring | 16 March 2009 - 8:30pm

Double post - sorry!

.

0
Paul Waring | 16 March 2009 - 8:32pm

Fishy

Marillion have survived the loss of Fish and Steve Hogarth has now been singer longer than the big Scotsman himself. I admit neither have gone on to have massive albums sales, but both parties fanbases and tours seems to be in a pretty healthy state these days.

0
David Wright | 16 March 2009 - 8:41pm

10cc

The sweet commerciality of Stewart/Goldman and the inventiveness of Creme/Godley gave us some of the best and original "pop" songs of the early 70s: I'm not in love/ Life Is A Minestrone/ and especially Rubber Bullets. When they split, both duos went to hell in a handcart*.A classic case of the sum of the parts being greater than the individual talent.

*Godley/Cremes "Cry" being a notable exception.

0
geacher53 | 16 March 2009 - 8:51pm

Not strictly true...

Good Morning Judge, The Things We Do For Love and Dreadlock Holiday were all hits after Godley and Creme split. If you mean 10cc weren't as good after they left, then I probably agree.

First band I ever saw, 10cc... bloody excellent.

0
Patrick Crowther | 16 March 2009 - 9:35pm

'Proper' 10cc

were a quality band - the British Steely Dan - and still get listened to regularly chez Stimpy. Long overdue for a critical reappraisal.

When Godley & Creme left, the wheels fell off and all the wit departed.

0
stimpy | 16 March 2009 - 10:40pm

Agreed

Love 10cc, my affair started when listening to 'Original Soundtrack' when I was tucked up in bed as a young kid. Ever since then i've listened to them on a regular basis, afore mentioned lp and 'How Dare You' are wonderful records. 'Une nuit in Paris' is a cracker, if only I could find a band doing stuff like that now.

0
Mint | 16 March 2009 - 11:10pm

Sheet Music

as always been my favourite

0
stimpy | 16 March 2009 - 11:30pm

Have not got the first

two as seperate albums. Bought what I thought was a cheap compilation many years ago, after a bit of research found it to be the first two albums cobbled together onto one cd. Would like to get them as seperate lps though at some point. And yes they are both great.

Stimpy you are right, they are due for a critical appraisal soon. They were a great band until they went there own ways

0
Mint | 16 March 2009 - 11:44pm

Consequences

Still got the box set. 6 sides of vinyl. man! OMG, it's on CD at Amazon. £50. Uh-oh...

0
kinkywolfgang | 17 March 2009 - 8:13am
Paolo Meccano | 12 April 2009 - 12:23pm

"The British Steely Dan"

Apologies, but it's as plausible as the Taiwanese Proclaimers.

0
Stan Halen | 17 March 2009 - 1:24am

The Taiwanese Proclaimers

Now *that's* a band I'd play good money to see!

0
stimpy | 17 March 2009 - 9:59am

I'd walk 5000 miles to see 'em.

It's about that far anyway......
"Gaioxing no mower, Jiayi no mower, Xinzhu no mower, Taibei no mower etc etc"

0
Retropath2 | 17 March 2009 - 10:16am

Hmm, who then?

Agree 10cc aren't up to the job. The British Dan is perhaps not a thing that could (should?) exist. But. A case can be made for Dury/Blockheads. Wry observations, characters urbane/arcane, idiosyncratic delivery over well drilled funkishness.

Prefab Sprout?

Incidentally, not seen Taiwanese Proclaimers but have seen an All Girl Phillipina band in Dubai that did AC/DC, Zep and, I seem to recall, "5000 miles" covers. Fab they were too.

0
Sheev | 22 March 2009 - 12:30pm

Hair today ...

The start of his solo career was an unfortunate time for Dave Lee Roth to start going bald. I'm telling you, if he'd kept his mane he would have been much more successful!

0
Johan | 16 March 2009 - 9:14pm

Aye

Certainly helped Phil Collins

0
Mr Fade | 16 March 2009 - 9:29pm

Yes but

Phil wasn't seen as a kind of rock god lead singer in the era of poodle-permed metal bands, like DLR!!

0
Johan | 16 March 2009 - 10:32pm

Patrick....

..Thats EXACTLY what I meant... Good Morning Judge etc were absolute dross... Tho' I have got a soft spot for I'm Mandy (Fly Me). It's in the back garden, and the hole is already dug!

0
geacher53 | 16 March 2009 - 10:22pm

I'm Mandy was pre-split....

...hence it's good!

0
Paul Waring | 17 March 2009 - 9:27am

Ok so Cobain's death forced the split...

...But Dave Grohl really re-invented himself rather than disappearing under a large pile of money.

0
nicktf | 16 March 2009 - 10:22pm

Curiously often the drummer....

As nicktf notes, circumstantially necessary, but who'da thought the drummer would be the guitarist in a bigger band, commercially, I suspect, than ever were Nirvana. And ex-Jesus and Mary Chain drummer Gillespie, B: Primal Scream haven't done bad. Phil Collins probably was bigger than Genesis at the time of his first 2 solo album. If his group hadn't been the Beatles, I guess Ringo would have outsold most others, but then he arguably had to be a Beatle first. (OK, unarguably!). Evan Dando drummed for the early Lemonhead incarnations, but they only broke thru when he switched to guitar. Or is that switched to being visible and amoral? Bobby Harrison, ex Procul Harum drummer and singer of SNAFU sank like a stone tho', and the Charlie Watts Tentet never quite broke thru', did they?

0
Retropath2 | 17 March 2009 - 9:18am

Ringo ...

actually did pretty much outstrip each of the other three in the singles charts for the first three or four years post-split, here and in the US. Then ... well .. we'll leave it there.

0
Steven C | 18 March 2009 - 10:53pm

Bad Company?

Free from Free - the drummmer and the singer. The one workaday, proficient, un-stunning but a platform, a glue, a leader of sorts. The other - sublime, soulful, alpha male. Some say - I would - the best (British) ever.

The band they became were Bad in name, and, well, not that good actually. Less than the sum of their of their constituent parts. Free/Mott/Crimson. Bigger than those three together put? Tick. Sell out tours? Stadia? Merchandise. Tick. Tick. Tick.

Only goes to show...something or other.

0
Sheev | 22 March 2009 - 5:03pm

Don´t know if I should say this

But I prefer Foo Fighters to Nirvana. Not as much whine about, well, everything. And Grohl is quite a renaissance man, isn´t he?

0
Ola Claesson | 19 March 2009 - 3:48pm

A renaissance man?

He plays the guitar AND the drums? Michaelangelo would have been impressed :-)

0
stimpy | 19 March 2009 - 5:47pm

And

He sings, writes and produces as well. Foo´s first album was a solo album, only featuring Grohl. Have you heard Michaelangelo´s productions? Haven´t aged that well, have they?

0
Ola Claesson | 20 March 2009 - 11:06am

So, he's a pop musician and singer?

He doesn't present plays, produce opera, publish poetry, write novels, represent his country at sport and/or represent his country at the UN.

In the pantheon of 'Renaissance Men' he's hardly CB Fry or Jonathan Miller; let alone Leonardo or Michaelangelo

0
stimpy | 20 March 2009 - 1:07pm

Always a problem this

When you "talk" to someone you don´t know in person irony tends to dissapear somewhere down the line. I´m not seriously saying that Grohl is up there with Michaelangelo or Da Vinci.

That said, I didn´t know Da Vinci and/or Michaelangelo worked for the UN. And Dag Hammarskjöld, who was the Secretary-General of the UN, didn´t produce solo work that matched Grohl´s anyway.

0
Ola Claesson | 20 March 2009 - 1:56pm

No, but CB Fry did...

(well, the League Of Nations - he represented India), as well as holding the world long-jump record, captaining England at cricket, playing in a soccer FA cup final, becoming an MP, publishing many books, starting two magazines, etc etc

AND he was allegedly offered the throne of Albania when King Zog died without issue.

That's a renaissance man :-)

0
stimpy | 20 March 2009 - 2:36pm

BUT

Did he ever sing duet with Lemmy? I still feel I have the upper hand here, if you don´t mind.

0
Ola Claesson | 20 March 2009 - 6:35pm

Oddly enough...

I have a crackly wire recorder bootleg of Lemmy and CB Fry jamming together down the Athenaeum in 1949

Lemmy was 4 and Fry was 73

(*OK, so I'm lying... I haven't)

0
stimpy | 20 March 2009 - 6:49pm

Return Of The Jedi

After having read about CB Fry - impressive CV indeed - I realize I have to raise the bar. Hold on to something now. Before Benny Andersson became the man with the beard sitting behind the piano in Abba he was the guy without a beard standing behind the organ in sixties pop sensation Hep Stars. And this just a couple of years before Waterloo happened (the song, not the battle). The song I´ve linked may not be my personal favourite, but it features moving images - welcome to the future!


Had you not included that last explanation I would have had no choice but to wave the white flag.

Could CB grow a beard, sit down and move from organ to piano in just three years? I´m back, baby!

0
Ola Claesson | 21 March 2009 - 11:55am

Damn, foiled at the last minute

OK, Ola, you win! Who needs men like Jonanthan Miller and CB Fry when you have a follically-versatile Swede and a Vox Continental? :-)

0
stimpy | 21 March 2009 - 1:01pm

Mo-ha-ha

Thank you and I´m sorry I had to cross the line with a level of rhetoric almost unknown to man. But since Grohl didn´t seem to impress you I tought a Swede who suddenly grows a beard would be impossible to argue against. And yes, the Vox is somewhat a masterpiece in itself, isn´t it?

Surely it´s no coincidence there´s not a cloud in the sky today? But I will try to learn more on CB Fry. Hadn´t heard of him before and he seems quite fascinating.

0
Ola Claesson | 23 March 2009 - 10:40am

And why?

Is it that so many of our "Rock Legends" still have a full head of (usually black) hair?
My circle of friends (55+) are all in varying degrees of baldness and/or greyness?
Is the hair loss/ miscolour gene somehow related to musicall ability?
I think we should be told!

0
geacher53 | 16 March 2009 - 10:34pm

The Housemartins

Who would have picked Norman Cook going onto superstardom?

The Housemartins spawned The Beautiful South and Fatboy Slim (not to mention Beats International).

Apart from The Beatles, how many other bands have produced two or more successful off-shoots?

0
Blue Sky | 16 March 2009 - 11:50pm

bands that spawned two or more successful offshoots

buffalo springfield for one

0
unionjackass | 19 March 2009 - 6:23pm

Stone Roses spring to mind

Who'd have thunk that after this lot dissolved, the tonally challenged singer would establish himself as a solo act, while the supposed creative and musical powerhouse would make a turgid and lacklustre album
with his new band then pretty much disappear without trace?

0
Theo Zoffrok | 16 March 2009 - 11:51pm

Stone Roses spring to mind

Who'd have thunk that after this lot dissolved, the tonally challenged singer would establish himself as a solo act, while the supposed creative and musical powerhouse would make a turgid and lacklustre album
with his new band then pretty much disappear without trace?

0
Theo Zoffrok | 16 March 2009 - 11:51pm

Time Changes Everything?

Certainly not turgid in my view...

Tonally challenged in a very much Brown manner, Squire's solo output, especially the first one rather than Marshall's, is a pretty decent album. Some strong songs, nice light guitar lines and a decent production. Likeable and listenable I thought. In fact, I'm going to stick in on the iPod on the way home....!

0
Six Dog | 20 March 2009 - 12:23pm

Stone Roses spring to mind several times...

Sorry about that folks.

0
Theo Zoffrok | 16 March 2009 - 11:54pm

Stone Roses

I find them a little repetitive.

0
Leedsboy | 16 March 2009 - 11:58pm

Morrissey

A 25-year solo career (not all a huge success, but still), while Marr disappears into anonymous session muso-dom. 25 years!

And Suede, for a while at least, defied the odds of replacing "Senior Creative Force" Bernard Butler with a 17-year old by going on to be huge with Coming Up and Head Music (even if the latter was around 72% balls).

0
Cadabra | 17 March 2009 - 12:35am

I'd have backed Moz

Anyone who's read a bit about the Smiths knows he was always the driven one. The dope smoking (and other drugs) did for Marr.

0
Danny | 17 March 2009 - 12:31pm

Not sure that anything has 'done for' Johnny Marr

I suspect he's more than satisfied with his lot!

0
Paul Waring | 17 March 2009 - 12:40pm

I don't think anyone doubted

his drive, rather his ability, as a non-musician, to make a decent solo career without the best Guitarist Of His Generation.

0
Cadabra | 17 March 2009 - 8:56pm

Took his time

Butler took his time to find that second wind, didn´t he? Now he´s succesfully involved as producer and songwriter with Duffy for example. Well done!

I aslo tought his solo debut People Move On was far better than Coming Up, but no one seems to agree with me on that.

0
Ola Claesson | 19 March 2009 - 3:51pm

People Move On

Was a fine album; the follow up was a complete stinker.

0
Neil Jung | 19 March 2009 - 6:02pm

Agree

It´s way too "you should try to produce a hit, Mr Butler". Haven´t heard it in a while (ten years or so) but I seem to recall it was West Coast in all the wrong ways.

0
Ola Claesson | 20 March 2009 - 11:13am

They're very different albums

People Move On is a chilled, self-effacing "it's the music that's important, man" muso-record, with more than a slight tip of the hat to Neil Young.

Coming Up is a wild, brash, day-glo, aimed-direct-at-the-top-of-the-charts, POP! teenager of a record, bowing down to the Bolan.

I think both are great, and together demonstrate why the Anderson-Butler partnership just couldn't carry on. Even if I really, really wish it had.

(I'm, sorry, The Tears, nice try but it's too little, too late).

0
Cadabra | 19 March 2009 - 8:39pm

Both follow-ups

were complete cobblers, though.

0
Cadabra | 19 March 2009 - 8:40pm

People Move On is the best

People Move On is the best Phil Spector/Neil Young/Pink Floyd/Nick Drake-clash one could ask for.

I too like them both, but I don´t return to Coming Up quite as often. It feel a bit too plastic now. The Tears was surely a nice attempt, but something was missing. Heart perhaps.

0
Ola Claesson | 20 March 2009 - 11:17am

"Those muppets won't get anywhere without me"

Ladies and gentlemen, the ever-so-prophetic words of Roger Waters. (Who used to be in Pink Floyd). Cue 20 year long soul-searching.

0
Klaus Joynson | 17 March 2009 - 1:15am

They certainly didn't get anywhere artistically after he left...

as A Momentary Lapse Of Reason and The Division Bell were poor efforts to say the least. Their enormotours of the 1990s were hugely successful, but it always seemed strange to me that the bloke wot wrote most of the songs they were playing was off somewhere else playing to half empty arenas.

0
Patrick Crowther | 22 March 2009 - 11:09am

Mmmm...

Whilst I've seen all the tours since Waters left, they always struck me as an adequate Floyd tribute act, especially when compared with the Floyd of (say) the In The Flesh tour.

The Australian Pink Floyd Show do a much better job than the 1980s/90s Floyd ever did.

0
stimpy | 22 March 2009 - 12:33pm

Fat Mattress, slim pickings...

Re: backing wrong horses, I can't help recalling some major label (remember them...?) gave Noel Redding a colossal, hitherto unprecedented advance when he left the Jimi Hendrix Experience and formed Fat Mattress. I understand he went off, spent it and eventually delivered an unloved slab of vinyl. The warning signs should have been there for even a late 60s, over-monied, over-zealous record biz imbecile to see: (a) it involved Noel Redding, hitmaker to the, er, um... (b) it was called 'Fat Mattress', which even then must have been perilously close to calling your band 'Utter Drivel', (c) Jimi wasn't involved in it in any way. And didn't somebody make the same mistake by giving Andrew Ridgley a solo album deal after Wham? Called 'Son Of Albert', wasn't it? SURELY it can't have been A&Red by the same guy who gave Fat Mattress the deal? Did record labels keep guys like that around for when they needed a tax loss...?

0
Colin H | 17 March 2009 - 2:01am

The warning signs were on the JHE tracks with Noel singing...

...A rather unfortunate speech inflection on "Little Miss Strange" has Noel singing "wraunches attack me from her neck". Lyrics not much cop either - shame though, if a list of "Musicians comprehensively screwed by the industry" were made (new thread?), Noel and Mitch would be right up there.

0
nicktf | 17 March 2009 - 8:06pm

Libertines

I thought the smart money would be on Carl Barratt. How many people can name Pete Doherty and not Carl? I know that's probably down to the tabloids, but Babyshambles have done arena tours whilst Dirty Pretty Things faded and split. I wouldn't have expected Doherty to be the one to make a solo album with Stephen Street and Graham Coxon either.

I still prefer Barratt's stuff, myself.

0
kidpresentable | 17 March 2009 - 2:49am

Depeche Mode again

At the height of their initial fame, songwriter Vince suddenly quits the band to form Yazoo and Erasure, and then sells millions of records.

The remaining Essex boys, rudderless, paddle-less and canoe-less
will have been forgiven for sharing a collective shrug and going back to their day jobs. Instead, they hire someone who can read music to replace Vince and slowly start to rebuild.

By the end of the 80s, Depeche Mode had eclipsed the success of Vince and overtaken him - making them Basildon's massivest band ever.

0
Austin | 17 March 2009 - 4:26am

Forget Collins

what about Gabriel - I much prefer his solo stuff to the Genesis stuff without him and his credibility far outlived theirs although I concede possibly not his bank balance.

0
Steve Turner | 17 March 2009 - 9:15am

Steve Hackett

also did very well outside the band.

In fact, almost all the members of Genesis have sustained solo careers of greater or lesser success.

Collins
Gabriel
Rutherford
Hackett
Banks
Phillips

0
stimpy | 17 March 2009 - 10:50am

Apropos my earlier posting on this subject

wasn't Gabriel a drummer first too? And he had a small one on stage back in the early days, didn't he, I recall. Just a small bass drum and pedal, was it?

0
Retropath2 | 17 March 2009 - 11:50am

Yup...

Up until The Lamb tour, he had a kick drum on stage.

0
stimpy | 17 March 2009 - 12:31pm

The Floyd

I'm sure I watched some Floyd documentary where the original Floyd management said they stuck with Syd after he left - no brainer as he was the talent and all that.

0
Occam | 19 March 2009 - 12:21am

Has anyone mentioned Fleetwood Mac?

Front men have breakdowns, management tries to run off with the name but, against all the odds, the *rhythm section* manages to make itself the biggest band in the universe. It's like the people you can't name in Coldplay becoming bigger than the Chris Martin version.

0
David Hepworth | 19 March 2009 - 3:19pm

Plastic Bertrand

I may be wrong here, but didn't somebody - possibly even somebody connected to Word, I honestly don't know - put Plastic Bertrand on the cover of the first 'Smash Hits'? And that was the last anyone ever heard of the fellow...

0
Colin H | 19 March 2009 - 3:30pm

I think it was Blondie on the first one

I think Plastic Bertrand pre-dated Smash Hits. There were similar magazines around at the time that simply contained the words to pop songs. I think it was one of those.
Smash Hits took that format and added the occasional review and a letters page.

0
Austin | 19 March 2009 - 7:25pm

Issue One

It was Plastic Bertrand. And it pre-dated involvement from any Word-types, as far as I know.

Image

0
Fraser Lewry | 20 March 2009 - 9:43am

I stand corrected

Thanks.

0
Austin | 20 March 2009 - 9:46am

Phew...

...that's a relief. My subscription can remain uncancelled...

0
Colin H | 20 March 2009 - 1:42pm

A moment of silence, please...

...for Billy Corgan's Zwan. And Audioslave. And solo Chris Cornell. (Hey, what on earth ever happened to Soundgarden's guitarist?) And everything Krist Novoselic has done post-Nirvana. All "projects" with presumably high expectations, all come to nothing.

By the way, Lennon "tailed off spectacularly" while Ringo racked up the hits? That's funny, I seem to recall an album (& song) called Imagine doing at least as well as Back Off Boogaloo.

0
Ian McGillis | 19 March 2009 - 4:41pm

Reed/Cale

I have spent more money on duff Lou Reed albums than I care to calculate, and continue to do so, all out of a hope that one day he will revisit the dizzying heights of Transformer, Berlin or even New York, but mainly out of a totally blind, stupidly unquestioning loyalty to the Velvets and the memories of Reed's fledgling solo career which many like myself cottoned onto via getting into Bowie circa 1972.
A few years ago, myself and a similarly-afflicted buddy went to see John Cale in concert, basically the "Fragments From A Rainy Season" solo show which he hawked around for many years, just him and a guitar and a piano, before discovering Pro-Tools.
It was packed to the gills with songs of a uniformly excellent quality which Uncle Lou must only dream of as he slips a few of his latest atrocities, random chord sequences all and even more randomly spewed-out lyrics, between his standard crowd-pleasing fayre of "Sweet Jane" "Perfect Day" "Wild Side" etc
My pal actually looked at me as we awaited Cale's encore and said: "We've spent 30 years following the wrong Velvet haven't we?" It was difficult to argue

0
Preston74 | 19 March 2009 - 6:21pm

Gulps, blinks back tears

"We've spent 30 years following the wrong Velvet haven't we?"

...one of most evocative sentences I've read for ages...

0
JoLean | 20 March 2009 - 11:28am

Truth hurts

You were right though...

0
paulwright | 23 March 2009 - 4:14pm

Barclay James Harvest

Became Les Holdroyd's Barclay James Harvest and also Barclay James Harvest Through The Eyes Of John Lees (featuring Wooly Wolstenholme).

Bet the latter is a bugger to get on the t-shirts.

0
Beany | 20 March 2009 - 10:03am

Wooly and co

Thank goodness they weren't joined by Woody Woodmansey as well

0
Preston74 | 20 March 2009 - 11:11am

Les Holroyd's possessive apostrophe's etc etc

One of the funniest/most tortuous assemblage of words I ever read in a music mag concerned the imminent reissue of a Wooly Wolstenholme solo album. At that time he had, presumably, changed horses to Les's version of BJH - maybe to actually get his name fitted onto the T-shirts, who knows. The sentence announcing this reissue began, I kid you not:

'Les Holroyd's Barclay James Harvest's Wooly Wolstenholme's solo album...'

Imagine Alan Freeman having to say all that at high speed in a chart run down. Not that it charted (I assume)...

0
Colin H | 20 March 2009 - 11:16am

MockinGGGbird

Which was the, presumably, midlander of their singers, who pronounced the G ever so obtrusively in this shocker, as opposed to his co-vocalest who didn't.:
"Theres a mockinbird" echoed by "mockingerbird"
Now you will never be able to hear it without hearing it, not that I guess many will bother.

0
Retropath2 | 20 March 2009 - 11:23am

It think Carly pronounced the G's

and James didn't


0
stimpy | 20 March 2009 - 1:51pm

Not that Mockingbird, this one:



Now I've had to listen to it, you bastard.
And it is so much worse than I remember. And it is the "sinGing songs in the trees" that offends me, so at least accuracy is restored.
Thank goodness I had the presence of mind to flog the LP off in 1973 or whenever.......

0
Retropath2 | 20 March 2009 - 2:47pm

Pity really

It's worth £10,000 on eBay.

That will be Zimbabwean £ methinks.

0
Beany | 20 March 2009 - 6:40pm

I got more than that!

I think I got about 75p, which converts to about 1,000,000,000 zim dollars nowadays. Sorry, I stopped to answer the phone mid response, it's now 4,000,000,000,000,000.
Show off zone: I've actually been to Harare, 15 years back or so, and was taken to a very divey night club, full of scary looking men escorting female young american youth corps workers. On stage that night, room capacity perhaps 80, why, only local boy Thomas Mapfumo. which was nice. Excellent, in fact.

0
Retropath2 | 20 March 2009 - 7:05pm

Oh! So that's why punk had to happen!

I've always been confused by that, but after listening to Barclay James Harvest I understand. I really do.

0
Patrick Crowther | 22 March 2009 - 11:14am

Rage Against The Machine?

Anyone predicted that Tom Morello and t'other agit rockers would team up with screechy singer from Soundgarden for world domination? (and no matter my preconceptions of Cornell, Cochise is a quite brilliant single)

Zack De La Rocha? Residing in the where are they now files in between RATM re-union gigs?

0
Six Dog | 20 March 2009 - 12:28pm

General Public

Having the two vocalists from The Beat, you'd have thought General Public would be the banker, but Fine Young Cannibals were far more successful.

0
theListener | 23 March 2009 - 6:16pm

Yes, but...

...the way those two goons with bass and guitar in FYC minced around in the videos you'd think they'd just FALLEN off a wrong horse, or been hoofeed in the groin by one at the very least.

Do we all agree that was THE most ludicrous and unappealing USP of any pop combo ever - the wobbly-leg quantum-Shadows thing those guys did? Or am I missing something?

0
Colin H | 30 March 2009 - 9:33pm

They had legs and they didn't know how to use them

I couldn't agree more Colin H, and I think you're right - I cannot think of a more annoying gimmick. Steve Tyler's scarves around the mic stand annoys me a bit as does the way Gary Kemp held his guitar but these pale in comparison to the stumbling FYC guitarists.

0
Austin | 30 March 2009 - 10:23pm

Noooooooooooooooooooooooo

I loved it. I still base my dance style upon them, but, sorry girls, I'm taken.

0
Retropath2 | 31 March 2009 - 8:01am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd