Intelligent Life On Planet Rock

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Are there now just too many famous people to keep track of?

David Hepworth's picture

ImageOpening my subscription copy of Vanity Fair I looked at the cover and said to one of my daughters, "who's Robert Pattinson?" Her jaw dropped. This was not the usual "you're so square, Daddio" retort beloved of writers of teen movies. Although they would not say it, my children expect me to know more than most fathers about, er, popular culture. And I do. I know about things I like, of course, but I also have a passing familiarity with Doctor Who, Miley Cyrus, The X Factor, JLS and hundreds of other things I don't have any immediate intention of watching, hearing or reading. But Robert Pattinson? I had literally never heard of him. This is despite him being, according to one of my offspring, "the hottest thing on the internet" for quite a while now. He's the star of some film called "Twilight" which is the biggest thing of its kind since "Titanic".

This has rattled me somewhat. In fact, I'm almost embarrassed to type this. I pride myself on being what they call au courant. Is the fact that this Pattinson chap has become massively famous without me having heard of him proof that I am finally losing my grip or is it a symptom of the fact that there are now just TOO MANY FAMOUS PEOPLE for even the best-informed person to have even the foggiest idea who most of them are? In the 19th century there were probably twenty people in Britain that most people would have heard of: Victoria, Albert, Duke of Wellington, Gladstone, Dickens, etc. Today there are tens of thousands. It's not easy. Now obviously, dear reader, you are laughing behind your hand at me because you know everything there is to know about Robert Pattinson but I put it to you that you must have had similar experiences where you discovered that you were apparently the only person who hadn't heard of someone incredibly famous.

Confess.

1

What's In A Word?

I'd suggest that he's not famous ... merely (currently) popular.

0
Big T | 9 November 2009 - 7:43am

Pattinson

Never heard of him either. I suspect it's a "teen" thing, and I tend not to talk to teenagers if I can help it. I have heard of Twilight, though.

0
Fraser Lewry | 9 November 2009 - 7:50am

Well, maybe

But if it's "a teen thing", I'd suggest the publishing strategy of Vanity Fair is changing. More likely it's "a gay thing".

0
David Hepworth | 9 November 2009 - 8:00am

Also...

...he was in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire a few years back. But I think you can blame Twilight for the accelerated media interest since then.

I doubt I would have heard of him were it not for the fact that my son likes Harry Potter and my daughter likes Twilight (the book, she would hasten to add: not the film).

0
Lucas Hare | 9 November 2009 - 8:08am

RP wasn't in the book though...

Methinks she likes the film more than she's letting on

0
stimpy | 9 November 2009 - 8:43am

I now recognise him (face not name)

He was the guy who got killed competing against HP for the G of F. I would not have known otherwise, and while I know Daniel Radcliffe and Emily Watson I don't know Ron Weasley's name.

To the central point: I feel there are some people that it's right that I don't know, now I am rising 50.

0
kb | 9 November 2009 - 9:05am

How can you forget

a splendid name like Rupert Grint? Could be a HP character in his own right.

0
Captain Underpants | 9 November 2009 - 9:39am

Rising 50

The clue was in my second paragraph. It's now flooding back, as it tends to often.

0
kb | 9 November 2009 - 9:51am

Subset

I think it's only possible to know a subset of all the famous people now.

Do your offspring know who Daniel Vettori is, for example? Or Bob Ainsworth?

0
Inky Fingers | 9 November 2009 - 8:09am

Probably not...

...but neither of them is likely to turn up on the cover of Vanity Fair. And son would recognise Daniel Vettori.

0
David Hepworth | 9 November 2009 - 8:11am

Bob Ainsworth might

in a feature on the return to favour of the moustache...

0
DougieJ | 9 November 2009 - 10:14pm

Oh My Word!...(no pun intended but take it anyway)

You're the only other male I know? that subscribes to VF.You were not alone in exclaiming who's Robert Pattinson??? (I said to myself)

I'm 43 years old and I too take modest pride in being au courant, but that threw me for a loop.I imagine that VF is attempting to attract new readership(Grow their business as it were).So I'm over it now.Phew!

0
bricameron | 9 November 2009 - 8:18am

without opening the whole debate about the saturday night

talent shows again one of the reasons I avoid CCD is when watching the teasers ads I only recognised a few of the celebrities and 50% of these were professional dancers.
I think this problem will get worse due to the narrow cast nature of the internet and the targeted audiences of films etc.

0
Chris G | 9 November 2009 - 8:33am

I have two daughters

I know ALL about 'R-Patz'

0
stimpy | 9 November 2009 - 8:41am

Blimey Robert Pattinson is English

just looked him up and he's English born well there you go, not seen any of the Potter films and or Twighlight.
I think this mirrors why I stopped getting the NME as I realised I read about a number of bands entire careers and yet not heard a note of their music.

0
Chris G | 9 November 2009 - 8:53am

I've heard of him

but that may be more to do with my girlfriend being a "fan of his work". I don't think it's escaped her attention that he's not exactly uneasy on the eye.

I thought I was pretty down with the kids until about a year ago when I realised I knew hardly any of the songs in the top 40 and had only heard of around half the acts in it. I reckon even two years ago I'd have been able to (badly) hum the melody of anything that was in TOTP territory

0
Joe R | 9 November 2009 - 9:02am

Never heard of him

either, but then I had never heard of Steve Redgrave when he got knighted, so what do I know.

0
Twangothan | 9 November 2009 - 9:04am

That's great

you missed him winning 5 gold medals over 16 years!

0
Chris G | 9 November 2009 - 9:05am

Flash in the pan

Easy to miss him.

0
David Hepworth | 9 November 2009 - 9:06am

I know!

Good eh! Not a minute wasted on the Olympics in my life!

0
Twangothan | 9 November 2009 - 9:53am

You may struggle to keep that record up

come the next Games

0
Joe R | 9 November 2009 - 9:55am

Well...

I won't be watching any of it but I imagine it will be hard to ignore!

0
Twangothan | 9 November 2009 - 11:00am

Who's that Bob Dillon bloke

that everyone's talking about recently, anyway?

0
stimpy | 9 November 2009 - 9:14am

he's Matt Dillon's

younger brother played "Cody" in Beverly Hill's 9102 and now recording with Sean Lennon I think.

1
Chris G | 9 November 2009 - 9:22am

I bought NME for the first

I bought NME for the first time in 3 years on Sat. They had a band called Panamour on the cover?? Never heard of them and I'm not anti religion in any way but I was fairly shocked that they were a sort of Christian rock band. On the cover of the NME? Not in my day etc?

0
gelectrox | 9 November 2009 - 9:22am

Is that Paramour?

My knowledge of them comes only from a couple of their songs being included on one (or more) of the Guitar Hero games.

My considered opinion of them is thus: they're bloody awful.

0
Joe R | 9 November 2009 - 9:29am

I kept

hearing the name Blake Lively bandied about and guessed it was someone fairly famous. Imagine my surprise on finally seeing my picture of Blake and discovering... Blake is a woman... and a rather attractive one at that.

(I've since found out she's in something called Gossip Girl, a program which is fairly unlikely to find its way onto the Christmas list of too many of the massive)

0
Joe R | 9 November 2009 - 9:34am

RPatz

I know him because he's all over Entertainment Weekly, which makes me think he's much more famous over there than he is over here. Has the Twilight saga caught on here at all? Not being around teenagers I couldn't say, but I did see a girl literally screaming over his poster in HMV, so he's obviously on the radar.

It depends which branch of famous you follow. I don't know footballers and couldn't point out anyone except perhaps John Terry and Renaldo in a crowd, but I know who everyone from Emmerdale is.

0
Five-Centres | 9 November 2009 - 9:44am

My youngest goes nutso over him;

the whole nine-yards - wallpapered her bedroom with his posters, has the calendar, action figures, 'Team Edward' t-shirt, etc etc. She and her gang have already got their tickets for his next film (New Moon, out on the 20th November).

0
stimpy | 9 November 2009 - 10:20am

I've just recalled...

a time while I was at a useless college, I had a part time job at a convenience store where I obliviously served an extremely famous Sportsman. He looked at me Like I was from Mars! It took everything from him to not spit out "Don't you know who I am? It was only after he'd left that my fellow worker said " You don't know who that was,do you?" I like to think I did his ego good that day.He was, after all, only buying Milk?

0
bricameron | 9 November 2009 - 10:20am

I've just asked a group of 17 year olds

'Who could tell me about Robert Pattinson?' and the reaction was extraordinary. Even the chaps seemed excited.

0
matthew | 9 November 2009 - 10:30am

Was this on a bus?

Or in a classroom?

0
David Hepworth | 9 November 2009 - 10:43am

I'd never heard of him until two weeks ago...

when I received an email from Forbidden Planet which led me to a bewildering array of Twilight action figures, bags, books, posters, coffee mugs... you name it. So much *stuff* concerned with something that had completely passed me by.

0
Patrick Crowther | 9 November 2009 - 10:42am

Ndubz, Tinchy Stryder and Chipmunk

Huge pop stars, apparently. I've never knowingly heard any of their records. And I'm 33 so I'm not that much of a fogey.

Oh, and I never seem to know what the Number 1 single is any more.

0
Mike Wazowski M... | 9 November 2009 - 10:56am

But that's the point.

You've *heard* of them. This guy I hadn't even heard of.

0
David Hepworth | 9 November 2009 - 11:18am

Nor do I and I feel vaguely sad about that.

But I do think there are now things officially "not for me" and I deliberately avoid them. Mr Chipmunk and Ndubz definately fall into that category.

I will say I am 35, I have tried to be vaguely au courant as someone said up there ^^^^^^^ but the Twilight books are just beyond me. I managed three pages of the first one and the whining of the main character just annoyed me so much I couldn't physically read the thing. I am only really aware of them because Mrs Ganglesprocket works in publishing so I tend to get early heads up about this stuff when it takes off.

It's all Radio 4, rioja and rocket with me these days. And Isn't that Unthanks album marvelous? And why isn't James Yorkston racing up the hit parade?

I'm off now to buy a tweed jacket...

0
ganglesprocket | 9 November 2009 - 11:18am

Tweed jackets are very fashionable at the moment

Actually, gangles, tweed jackets are very fashionable at the moment. As are sleeveless Fair Isle jumpers. The Scottish islands are where it’s at.
I know this because there’s a 15 year old girl on the premises. When I asked her about Robert Pattinson she “was like”: “oh my god ... everyone says he’s so buff ... but I’m like (mimes projectile vomit) ... scary ... gross.”
So opinion is clearly divided amongst the young set.

(I agree that the unthanks albums is marvellous)

0
Richard Lowe | 9 November 2009 - 6:51pm

I showed

my young daughter the above VF cover shot and asked her if she knew who he was.
Whilst the resultant look didn't exactly kill, it did carry with it several tons of pity, exasperation and just a hint of superiority.
She gets no pocket money for a month as a result.

3
McLongWhiteCloud | 9 November 2009 - 11:23am

I know who he is...

...but only because a young person of my acquaintance was in a film with him - a half decent indie thing called How to Be. Not entirely sure who Miley Cyrus is, though.

0
mikethep | 9 November 2009 - 11:47am

Grunge

I parted company with NME, Q etc when members of grunge bands were referred to without any helpful brackets - Thingy (Pearl Jam). I think I'd only not bought anything for a month or 2 but I'd been left behind. It felt a little troubling at first. Then I heard the music and saw the shirts I decided I didn't want to catch up any more. I know that Cobain chap, the rest are a mystery.

Now I'm surprised if I have heard of anyone. There does seem to be too many famous or nearly famous people out there.

1
Mike Todd | 9 November 2009 - 11:55am

I'm 40

and I know everybody mentioned as 'who are they?' in this thread. I'm not quite sure how, but I seem to be a sponge for that kind of stuff. My wife, who is still in her 20s and an avid reader of Heat amongst other things, doesn't keep up with this kind of stuff as well as I do.

I'm surprised Robert Pattinson has passed you by though. He is in comparison for instance to the X Factor peeps, in a whole different league of celebrity. He's way up 'there' and they are down over 'there'.

0
SimonL | 9 November 2009 - 12:03pm

I know what you mean

But in my defence if this thread is anything to go by I wasn't the only one.

0
David Hepworth | 9 November 2009 - 12:07pm

It does happen to me as well

But I'm not sure if it's the amount of celebs or the amount of outlets for news/info that exist these days.

In the olden days when it was all fields around here, I got my information from Saturday morning TV, Radio One, Smash Hits, NME, Melody Maker and Sounds, and occasionally from my mum's sunday papers. And that really was about it.

How many thousands of ways does information filter through these days? If you're not online and plugged into Google News for instance you can easily miss stuff. If you're watching the Dave Channel and not BBC Liquid News you're not going to see this kind of stuff. You really need to be plugged into everything to catch everything.

0
SimonL | 9 November 2009 - 12:12pm

Never Heard Of The Young Fella Either...

... why is he "famous"? Is he a very good actor; is he very talented?

Or is he just another pretty boy?

And, yes, there are too many famous people.

0
Nicodemus | 9 November 2009 - 12:34pm

Slightly off topic: Verbosity

Did the VF article about the famous Mr Pattinson struggle to say in 4,500 words what The Word or most other British mags can express in about 1,000 ?

Very - very - occasionally I have read an article in VF that benefits from this meandering style but usually I have lost the will to live by about a third of the way in.

0
cornishmanc | 9 November 2009 - 12:51pm

AND

you have to scrabble to the back of the mag for the last three paragraphs of the article.

0
cornishmanc | 9 November 2009 - 12:55pm

If it makes you feel better

he probably has no idea who David Hepworth is either :)

0
Skuds | 9 November 2009 - 1:14pm

*swoons*

I am of course not quite in Robert's target demographic, being neither a teenage girl, the mother of a teenage girl nor a gay man. However, I am aware of his impressive "body of work", and am currently making plans with friends to see the film the weekend it comes out. I think I am aware of him because apart from this site my main online reading is the feminist blogosphere (ooh that's a terrible word), and the Twilight series is much discussed there - primarily for giving terrible messages to young girls about it being OK for creepy boys to stalk you, and the weird abstinence message that you should never have sex for fear you will die a horrible and painful death.

0
Gauntlet | 9 November 2009 - 1:19pm

Some further info for you.

0
Gauntlet | 9 November 2009 - 1:26pm

It also gives the terrible message

that vampires are nice and glittery (yup, I've seen the film, though I maintain it was through force)

0
Joe R | 9 November 2009 - 1:38pm

Yeah, and the 'youth' won't have seen Buffy and Angel

so won't know the truth about vampires. And I suspect the little girls who love Edward won't be watching True Blood (*swoons*) either.

0
Gauntlet | 9 November 2009 - 1:42pm

And women find this attractive?

Whoda thunk it?

0
Fraser Lewry | 9 November 2009 - 1:46pm

We are mysterious creatures...

Personally I find lots of men attractive, and am currently nursing crushes on a range of men from Robert Pattinson through Stewart Lee to Donald Sutherland.

0
Gauntlet | 9 November 2009 - 1:53pm

Possibly proving Heppo's point

I've no idea who Donald Sutherland is.

I've also realised I can't stand Robert Pattinson either - you know why? I look nothing like him, and that makes me envious, really envious.

0
Joe R | 9 November 2009 - 1:58pm

Some further info for you

Image

1
Fraser Lewry | 9 November 2009 - 2:08pm

Oh, that's disturbing.

I am going to have nightmares now, and it's all your fault.

0
Gauntlet | 9 November 2009 - 2:10pm

Knew I'd heard of him

That bloke out of 24, innit.

0
Lucas Hare | 9 November 2009 - 2:12pm

You should have heard of Donald Sutherland

You just should.

0
Five-Centres | 9 November 2009 - 2:43pm

Think I know who he is

Is he in that awful program Dirty Sexy Money?

Sorry F-C, I know you work in TV (or at least, I think you do), I do know who he is, just didn't know his name.

And Gauntlet, he's what tickles your pickle?! Shame on you! (I was expecting someone a bit more, well... Nornironish)

0
Joe R | 9 November 2009 - 3:08pm

Like I say Joe, it's a wide range,

and may well include some from the Emerald Isle. I have an enormous capacity, and am quite able to hold several at once. (Um, crushes, that is, not men. Although...)

I do like the phrase "tickles your pickle", though, that's a good one. *makes note in euphemism book*

0
Gauntlet | 9 November 2009 - 3:31pm

You do know I'm joking...

...don't you, Five-Centres? Sorry, it's late and I can't tell.

0
Lucas Hare | 10 November 2009 - 12:23am

Somebody told him

that getting spotted was good for his career.

0
Albert Edward | 9 November 2009 - 2:53pm

Is that Mark Ellen?

...

0
ganglesprocket | 9 November 2009 - 2:13pm

Famous

It's nice that yer man Pattinson is famous, at least amongst 'da kids' for actually doing something i.e. he can act, as opposed to being 'famous' for just having his face plastered across the media for no adequately plausible reason ike, oh, Peaches f-ing Geldof, for example.

0
illuminatus | 9 November 2009 - 2:39pm

Did you see

Ferne Cotton interviewing Peaches recently? Talk about the bland leading the bland...

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 9 November 2009 - 4:44pm

No

thankfully I escaped this.

However, if I were a religious man, I suspect this would be on constant rotation on the only TV channel in Hell, together with Piers Morgan interviewing Jordan (or indeed pretty much anyone, for that matter).

0
illuminatus | 9 November 2009 - 5:10pm

Didn't Mayo and Kermode cover this?

Both chaps Of A Certain age with kids Of A Certain Age, Simon reported that his teenaged daughter actually decided that her dad was quite sort of a little bit cool because he took her along to the Twilight premiere, thereby earning the jealosy of every other teenaged girl in her school and, probably, The World. There was, I seem to remember, a lengthy and grumpy discussion of all the matters detailed above.

Anyway. I thought Mr Hepworth and team always listened to the K&M show?

Perhaps they do. Mayhaps David's memory grows more selective with age.

0
lennylaw | 9 November 2009 - 3:15pm

Not just age

Over in Dubai this week - found out that Echo and the Bunnymen were playing, and thought I might go along. One of the other tutors here (my age) said "who are they then? Are they new?"

The Bunnymen didn't turn up by the way.

0
paulwright | 9 November 2009 - 4:26pm

It's not that there's more famous people...

...it's just that the part of you that's g*tting *ld has stopped caring without your permission.

0
Anonymous (not verified) | 9 November 2009 - 4:42pm

Hepworth - DO NOT FEAR

I also had to ask who he was. (Admittedly a few months ago)

And I'm 23. At least you have age as an excuse...

I also like to use the category of fame.

For example:
A-list = Brad Pitt, The Queen, etc.
B-list = most other film actors
C-list = pop musicians of a certain ilk - i.e. Akon, etc
D-list = celebrities who are really famous within own country

right the way down to
Z-list = the Hollyoaks cast

0
badger_king | 9 November 2009 - 4:54pm

Likewise

I'm 26 and fairly clued-up on who's who, but I had no idea who he was either. I'm aware of the Twilight series, which I didn't think was cast with big names. I can see that some of the could become well known names (Daniel Radcliffe etc) but I've not heard this chap's name before.

0
kidpresentable | 9 November 2009 - 5:26pm

Since moving to the States...

...I have very little idea who anyone is when eyeballing the covers at the supermarket. I assume they are sportsmen/women or soapstars of some description.

I've given this example before, but I worked with a guy, perhaps 2 years older than me who, at the height of their TV-presenting ubiquity, was surprised to find that "Anton Dec" was actually *two* people.

0
nicktf | 9 November 2009 - 10:06pm

Well I knew who he was

so perhaps it is time to cancel my subscription to The Word. I only buy it to keep well in with the kids, up to speed on the latest pop chart botherers and like, er, wicked daddio.

I'm off to Saga Magazine.

0
Beany | 9 November 2009 - 10:23pm

I think it's called getting older

when their 15 minutes of fame seems to be literally that. But when we were youngsters that same period of fame (maybe a year?) seemed like a whole career.

Another sign of age is not bothering to read the whole thread, so if someone has made exactly the same point I apologise.

0
Bigsby | 9 November 2009 - 11:48pm

Fame

Who cares about these Z-list slebs? Life's too short and it's going to be dark for a very long time. I think it was Matmus who said that in the future, everyone will be famous for 15 people.

@ bricameron - going off-message here, but regarding not recognising celebrities; I got off a plane in Florence airport, distracted by the naked fear of the flight, the heat and the scrum of people not forming an orderly queue for a taxi when a woman said if she could get a taxi, did we want to share it into the city. Having spent the journey trying to recover while my partner talked to the other passenger, she - the passenger - generously offered to pay the fare. We got out first and my partner asked why I hadn't recognised Helena Bonham-Carter...

2
francisgreavley | 11 November 2009 - 8:23am

My confession is that I couldn't care tuppence for this issue.

Once upon a time, celebrity was generally a by-product of some kind of achievment. Today, celebrity is an objective in itself and we see see thousands of wannabee slebs who don't really care how they get there but who want to be on the red carpet or go to the right party etc etc. And of course the media loves it because it gives them a constant source of material (= £revenue) as they discuss who's in, out, up, down or shaken all about.

I figure that if a film, book, record, sportsman etc catches my attention, I'll decide whether to investigate further. I feel no desire or pressure to keep up with the latest sleb gossip.

0
Mark JF | 11 November 2009 - 8:54am

It occurs to me

that the glut started a while back, which is why it now appears that barely a week goes by without someone we knew and loved (but had completely forgotten about 90% of the time) turning up their toes.

if we slim the ranks back down, will we reach a point where the obit section of any given mag will reach over 50% of total content?

0
spt | 12 November 2009 - 4:23pm

You're not alone

As mentioned above, it has long since reached the point that arriving at the supermarket checkout and scanning the covers of the 'magazines' reveals I have no clue whatsoever. But hey, if they're just celebs like Paris Hilton why should we care anyway.

But I thought at least I'm keeping up with music. I was wrong. Sadly deluded even.... Number one son became infatuated with the movie Cars, got the video, the books, and the CD, which got played to death. It's got a cover of a song I liked back in the day, Life Is A Highway. Ooooh, Tom Cochrane says I, and who the hell are Rascal Flatts, only to find they're the biggest live draw in the US at that point in time. It still bugs me, and I don't know how I missed that entirely, even though they're country and I'd run a mile ordinarily.

0
Harold Holt | 13 November 2009 - 1:29am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2010 Development Hell Ltd