Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Are there any sacred cows left?

Extra Texture's picture

Those that it's simply beyond the pale to criticise. Every group, no matter how legendary it is gets a critical kick in the stones at one point. And in this age of media saturation and internet bitching, is there anyone left who its simply out of bounds to give an emperor's new clothes style slagging off too?

I've thought about this, and compiled a very slim list (open to change and suggestion) of what might just be those few that its still considered extremely bad form to have a go at.

Johnny Cash
Nick Drake
John Peel
Girls Aloud

Cash, Drake and Peel for solemn, rootsy muso reasons, and (yes, I know) Girls Aloud for the inverted snobbery of the "you must love pop" critical concensus since the NME put the Spice Girls on their front cover. Elvis can be condemned with just the word "cheeseburger", Albert Goldman saw to Lennon, but don't you dare slag off winners in an ITV talent contest. What a strange world we live in.

Also anyone that's displayed too much of a social conscience can be ruled out instantly. Because people nowadays are more interested in calling them a hypocrite for owning a big house than they are in listening to any message they may have.

Any more suggestions gratefully accepted.

0

"Since the NME put the Spice Girls on the front cover..."

Some of here are old enough to remember The Ronettes and have appreciated the value of a great girl group ever since.

Girls Aloud are simply the latest instalment in the honourable pantheon of girl groups.

Inverted snobbery and the NME don't come into it!

0
stimpy | 24 February 2009 - 3:02pm

*dons tin hat*

Nothing sacred about John Peel. Most of what he played was rubbish. I find it hard to warm to a man who called his wife ‘The Pig’. A very poor man's Tommy Vance.

0
Gareth | 24 February 2009 - 3:09pm

Great minds etc

No hat required.

0
kb | 24 February 2009 - 3:18pm

Non-sexist explanation for nickname

"You're well known for enjoying a happy marriage, so why do you call your wife the Pig?
Joe Morrison, Brighton

Sheila is called the Pig because she snorts when she laughs."

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/you-ask-the-questions-jo...

0
Extra Texture | 24 February 2009 - 3:25pm

Dogs

Dogs are sacred cows aren't they?

0
Sheev | 22 March 2009 - 5:56pm

Hmmm John Peel

I agree that he is a sacred cow but I do wonder... His show may have unearthed a few gems, but that's probably it: a few. And of those successes (Undertones, Fall, Wedding Present, Joy Division), there are probably other people with a right to claim patronship. And boy did he not play some godawful shite.

Also, didn't he marry a particularly young woman, possibly in Bill Wyman territory?

0
kb | 24 February 2009 - 3:16pm

15

His first wife was 15 years old. Never seems to be tarred by the same brush as Wyman though. I've no idea why.

0
Gareth | 24 February 2009 - 3:43pm

I believe he was trying to help her out

of a bad home life. I'm not even sure if it was ever consummated. And then it turned out she had mental problems, and died (I think).

0
Douglas | 25 February 2009 - 6:51pm

Wasn't that a recent

episode of Eastenders?

0
Steven C | 25 February 2009 - 7:52pm

Peel was the ultimate exponent of

the school of Zero Criticism, which seems to explain his popularity. He just genuinely liked a lot of stuff and never, ever, dissed music which he didn't like.

I miss him, even if I didn't share every passion...

0
Fridge | 24 February 2009 - 9:48pm

Not entirely true

Emerson, Lake & Palmer were dismissed as a waste of electricity and he said something along of the lines that he couldn't hear anything in U2 to make him want to play them on his programme.

0
Carl Parker | 24 February 2009 - 10:42pm

Yes indeed

I think John Peel developed a rather supercilious, Paxman-like "yeahssss" when he didn't rate someone. Witness his approach to fronting TOTP with Kid Jenson.

He also didn't rate The Stone Roses, probably cos he dismissed them early on and felt he couldn't admit such an error of judgement.

0
kb | 25 February 2009 - 11:55am

He was right

about them.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 25 February 2009 - 12:32pm
Extra Texture | 25 February 2009 - 3:02pm

"That Paul McCartney... he's a bit of a philosopher isn't he?"..

absolute genius! That's why I'll always love John Peel, despite the fact that I didn't listen to his radio shows very often.

0
Patrick Crowther | 25 February 2009 - 3:08pm

and he was right about

U2 IMHO

0
Clerk Kent | 23 April 2009 - 10:44am

Peel and Kid Jensen

Peel was good mates with Kid Pension. There's the great anecdote in Simon Garfield's The Nation's Favourite, where they both hid in the Radio One car park waiting to beat up Simon Bates

0
Extra Texture | 23 April 2009 - 10:26am

It didn't matter whether they were succeses or not

the great thing about his show (and I agree there was a lot which I didn;t particularly like) was that there would be excellent stuff which resolutely refused to become popular.

I seem to remember Pink Industry for instance being rather good. They just vanished, but Peel lliked them and so did some of us, and that was the point.

0
Douglas | 25 February 2009 - 6:53pm

T-Rex

Generally I think John Peel was a Good Thing but he did stretch credibility when he claimed that not only did he not like Marc Bolan in his glam incarnation (his prerogative I suppose) but he thought he 'just wasn't very good at it'....

0
DougieJ | 4 March 2009 - 9:56pm

Sour grapes

By that time there was 'history' between Peel and The Boppin' Elf. Largely as a result of Bolan dropping Peel like the proverbial hot potato as soon as mainstream success beckoned.

0
stimpy | 5 March 2009 - 9:08am

However

he WAS right about Bolan, ghastly preening caricature with his derivative riffing. Even made Kaylan & Volman seem bad by association.

0
Retropath2 | 5 March 2009 - 9:33am

One,

quite literally, despairs.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 3 April 2009 - 10:33am

One

too

0
Sheev | 8 April 2009 - 12:31pm

Girls Aloud

Their next single is called Untouchable. It's nearly seven minutes of pure amazingness. It's their Paranoid Android.

0
lovelyian | 24 February 2009 - 3:21pm

"It's their Paranoid Android"

PLEASE tell me that's going on the press-release...

0
ivan | 24 February 2009 - 3:34pm

"It's their Paranoid Android"

That's the end of any interest in it I might have had then.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 24 February 2009 - 7:43pm

Girls Aloud?

Not everyone is in awe of their 'talent'. I being one. I can't stand them.

I now await the replies saying their records are pop genius... bollocks they are.

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 3:33pm

Girls Aloud...

I have been asked many times by people whose opinion I generally respect what my favourite Girls Aloud song is.
I can't even understand why I would have an opinion on this. Soulless pap.

0
ian s | 24 February 2009 - 9:47pm

Ditto!

I am not having this 'Girls Aloud are good' shite! They. Are. Not. End of story!

0
grac | 24 February 2009 - 3:40pm

I'm genuinely interested...

...in what way are they not good? To me they seem the perfect example of where the manufactured girl group is at present.

0
stimpy | 24 February 2009 - 3:45pm

Ok...

I don't like their songs

I don't like the Pro Tooled to shit production

I don't like their image

I don't like their lyrics

They generate no emotions in me at all other than a desire to listen to something else. Their popularity amongst older music fans absolutely baffles me. Sometimes I feel there must be two groups called Girls Aloud, one shite and one amazing, and I keep hearing the shite one. Because the positive things people say about their records are in such contrast to the robopop over-produced bollocks that I'm hearing that at times I feel I must be listening to the wrong group.

how's that?

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 3:58pm

but doesn't that describe almost all modern

pop music?

0
stimpy | 24 February 2009 - 4:04pm

My thoughts EXACTLY!

"Sometimes I feel there must be two groups called Girls Aloud, one shite and one amazing, and I keep hearing the shite one. Because the positive things people say about their records are in such contrast to the robopop over-produced bollocks that I'm hearing that at times I feel I must be listening to the wrong group."

And no stimpy, it doesn't. Just the shite stuff.

0
grac | 24 February 2009 - 4:10pm

beautifully put., sir!

i disagree with you completely, Patrick, but I love the 'two groups' argument. I'm gonna replace Girls Aloud with Pink Floyd next time i want to piss off my Dark Side of the Moon loving friends...

(other words might need a birrova tweak as well...)

0
ivan | 24 February 2009 - 4:07pm

I asked before

and It would seem people do really listen to girls aloud not just admire them from sort of ironic cultural studies angle. They genuinely listen to them on when they are on their their own and given the choice of 3 thousand ipod songs from the cream of rocks finest and best there are people who choose to listen to girls aloud. So there you go i was suprised but there's nowt as strange as folk.

I think the likes of john peel and Johnny cash are easy Aunt sally's I'm sure they themselves could have found more reasons not to knock them (they seemed to have plenty of self knowledge) but the world's a worse place for their passing.

0
Chris G | 24 February 2009 - 4:20pm

dunno...

i have a few of their songs in amongst the 5000 others. If a GA song comes up on shuffle, it's rarely skipped as inevitably, to these ears, I find it'll cheer me up, whether I need it or not.

there's loads of other songs by loads of other acts that have the exact same effect - some acts having more credibility than others. I, for one, wouldn't dream of trying to convince anybody why in the hell Girls Aloud are any ruddy good as, I think we're beginning to realise here

a) it's only sodding music
b) it's all friggin' subjective anyway

I've never stopped to consider GA from a cultural studies angle, ironic or not; if I do, I've given my consent to any close friends who catch me to adminster the swiftest of bitchslaps to me and remind me of the two points I've just made.

0
ivan | 24 February 2009 - 4:33pm

I can't stand them either

In a previous post I went on about how I can't stand them and I think they are there with ABBA and the Beach Boys as so unlistenable that I think people just say they listen to them to strike a pose, a bit like my Mum insisting she can't program the video. We are know it is not true and humour each other.

0
Twangothan | 24 February 2009 - 6:02pm

I love Abba...

If Abba are at the very summit of pure pop mountain, then Girls Aloud haven't even reached base camp yet as they're still worried about their hair.

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 6:10pm

That's a big IF

though...

0
stimpy | 26 February 2009 - 12:30pm

This is pop!

You're right - I thought The Buzzcocks were at the top of that particular mountain.

0
JohnW | 26 February 2009 - 4:54pm

If?

there's no if about it. ABBA gold is one of the most fun CDs I own.
Dancing Queen is perfection in every way.

0
Dan Edwards | 14 March 2009 - 11:18am

Hm.

As I've said in a different thread, ABBA were (and remain) too 'West-End Musical' for me. They have more in common with Andrew Lloyd-Webber musicals than pop music as far as I can tell

0
stimpy | 15 March 2009 - 12:12pm

Shifting standards

"people do really listen to girls aloud not just admire them from sort of ironic cultural studies angle. They genuinely listen to them on when they are on their their own and given the choice of 3 thousand ipod songs from the cream of rocks finest and best there are people who choose to listen to girls aloud."

But a lot of people genuinely prefer listening to what is often known as "serious rock", and get sneered for it relentlessly by GA defenders. Tolerance is a two way street. The ultimate taboo is to declare something nowadays like:

"I find the likes of Girls Aloud generic and shallow listening. I much prefer the depth of themes on Dark Side of The Moon and musical complexity of Tubular Bells, they are so obviously to a much higher musical standard, as are songs that make us think about politics"

Where's the acceptance of tastes like those?

0
Extra Texture | 24 February 2009 - 7:17pm

We Talk Of Girls Aloud

as though 'Girls Aloud' *means* something. As though 'Sugababes' *means* something, or Pussycat Dolls...etc.
The songs are sometimes good, sometimes poor, but the rest is interchangeable. 'The Promise' was a good song. 'About You Now' was a good song. Who sings it is irrelevant. So to speak of these brands as recording artists is strange to me. That's the thing I don't get. Two girls were arguing over whether the song on the radio was being performed by Girls Aloud or The Saturdays. What's the difference.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 24 February 2009 - 10:35pm

I was baffled to see them on this list

I know a few people seem to rate them, but the best I can say is that a couple of the songs they've been given to sing would have probably been quite good if someone else had performed or at least produced them. I first heard Call The Shots when Mark Morriss (of The Bluetones) did an acoustic version live, lovely. Upon finding out it was originally performed by Girls Aloud, I looked up theirs and was really disappointed with it. The Promise is the only thing I've heard by them that I though was any good in their own hands.

0
kidpresentable | 24 February 2009 - 11:36pm

In one ear and out the other

May occasionally induce involuntary foot-tapping.

Not bad as such, but fairly anonymous fluff none the less

0
Phil Pirrip | 25 February 2009 - 2:25pm

Girls Aloud...

I listen to them as much as I listen to The Shagri-Las, The Ronettes, The Chordettes, and the like.

They're in the great tradition of girl groups - and that's very much a good thing.

I find it curious that some here seem to think that listening to girl groups is in some way odd or ironic. In many ways they're the purest form of joyous pop music.

(and I don't know what 'an ironic cultural studies angle' is. I'm a pensioner now, we didn't do Ironic Cultural Studies when I was at skool)

0
stimpy | 26 February 2009 - 12:36pm

I absolutely love The Ronettes and like The Shangri-Las...

but I cannot even contemplate thinking about Girls Aloud in the same terms. The Ronettes' records were joyous snapshots of life, Spector's "little symphonies for the kids"... in my opinion the Girls Aloud records seem like depersonalized, robotic, over-produced garbage in comparison.

That was part of Spector's genius, actually... the Wall Of Sound was a very complex thing to achieve, but the music on all his records still had space to breathe. Girls Aloud records (and a great deal of modern R&B) sound like the music is having the life suffocated out of it under the weight of all the compression and studio gadgetry that has been employed.

Listening to Girls Aloud and other modern pop groups makes me feel a bit ill. The overuse of Autotune and Pro Tools creates a sound that for me is extremely unpleasant to listen to... the aural equivalent of having been force-fed 20 Big Macs and a strawberry milkshake.

0
Patrick Crowther | 26 February 2009 - 1:01pm

That was a really interesting post Patrick...

and I especially liked the Big Mac analogy :-)

It's odd because I feel the same way as you describe about (say) The Sugababes, Pussycat Dolls etc but GA seem, to me, to belong in the Pantheon of girl groups.

For the avoidance of confusion can I state that Bananarama don't belong in there either!

0
stimpy | 26 February 2009 - 2:01pm

GA and Sugababes overrated

I've not heard anything from either of these two in the same league as Britney's Hit Me Baby One More Time, Beyonce's Crazy in Love or Christina Aguilera's Genie in a Bottle to name but three far more exciting pop records of fairly recent vintage, let alone comparisons with Abba or the Ronettes. Wishful thinking, I feel. Surely the appeal of Freak Like Me is 90% to do with Gary Numan's peerless riff?

0
DougieJ | 4 March 2009 - 10:10pm

Nick Drake I think it is genuinely hard to be critical of...

as he made just a few records and they are beautifully written, played and recorded. They were made nearly 40 years ago but still sound incredibly fresh and interesting. John Wood must take a hell of a lot of credit for making Nick Drake sound as good as he does on those albums.

Johnny Cash? Some wonderful records, some OK, some total bollocks. Easy.

John Peel? I liked the idea of him more than I liked his programmes. 95% of what he played was garbage.

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 3:46pm

Much of the same mind

on John Peel. Never got to grips with his music show on R1. Never felt any sort of affinity with what he played.

But I did like his broadcasting style. Home Truths on Radio 4 was a delightful programme which he presented and narrated superbly.

His legend is not based on that though. It's based on his Radio 1 persona, which I never grasped.

Each to their own, and its all subjective anyway. The man's no longer with us and he can't reply so I'll just say I enjoyed some of what he did but never bought into his legendary status.

0
Beezer | 24 February 2009 - 4:00pm

A friend of mine

...hates Nick Drake so much that if you play pretty much anyone singing softly with an acoustic guitar he adopts a pained expression, plucks air acoustic guitar and bleats "fruit tree, fruit tree" in Larry the Lamb voice. Takes all sorts.

0
Twangothan | 24 February 2009 - 6:04pm

Send me his address.

I'll reprogram a cruise missile.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 24 February 2009 - 7:45pm

He's just wrong

but I admire you retaining him as a friend.

0
Leedsboy | 24 February 2009 - 10:08pm

Hey ho

We argue about lots of things - he likes the Beach Boys and worships the Beatles who I think are unlistenable and quite good respectively - but rejoice in loathing other things like the Costello/Bacharach collab which we discussed recently and seems to be a love it or loath it thing.

0
Twangothan | 25 February 2009 - 9:15am

Nick Drake I find it genuinely easy to be critical of...

...the voice, the lyrics, the melodies.

Apart from that, though.

0
Stan Halen | 25 February 2009 - 3:55am

Johnny Cash

Man, he knew how to murder a classic and kept on singing about walking some kind of line, or shooting men in dusty Nevada towns... he's dead, his music sounded dead, and he should have stayed in Fulsom Prison instead of wheeling out horrible 'got god' gospel music in the late 70's/early 80's!!

Cool look though!

0
über-über | 24 February 2009 - 4:01pm

Not always cool

Yes - I'm a big JC fan, and I was before his resurection, but he did make some appaling records at times. Didn't always look cool either.

0
JohnW | 24 February 2009 - 8:40pm

All four acts you mention

have been both criticised and lavishly praised on this site.
And liking pop music isn’t “inverted snobbery”. It’s liking pop music. Not a particularly perverse thing to do given that it is music which is carefully designed to be liked.

0
Richard Lowe | 24 February 2009 - 4:11pm

Bob Dylan

Not really a sacred cow cos there's lots of criticism of his output but can't help feeling that at this very juncture in his career, His Bobness could record a disc of throat clearing exercises and universal acclaim would follow.

0
Charlie Gordon | 24 February 2009 - 4:17pm

I'm pretty sure

that he has, actually....

0
ivan | 24 February 2009 - 4:19pm

Wasn't it called 'Empire Burlesque'?

I think it was...

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 4:22pm

Actually...

I really like Dark Eyes

0
Charlie Gordon | 24 February 2009 - 4:28pm

Seconded.

Some of the pre-Arthur Baker mixes aren't bad either. (Arthur Baker - what were they thinking!)

0
Steven C | 24 February 2009 - 5:07pm

Don't know about throat clearing

but a disc of Dylan farting would be a considerably more interesting listen than most of Modern Times.

0
Madrid | 24 February 2009 - 4:30pm

Currently scoring 89 out of 100

On Metacritic.
Love and Theft is at an unbelieveable 93 out of 100 and the 8th best reviewed album of all time on that site!

0
Charlie Gordon | 24 February 2009 - 4:39pm

That's just silly

And I speak as someone who would probably choose Dylan as my desert island artist.

0
Madrid | 24 February 2009 - 4:54pm

Modern Times

is the only Dylan album I bought cos I heard and liked tracks - I have bought others cos I felt I 'ought' to, but Modern Times is the only album of his I genuinely like.

0
badartdog | 24 February 2009 - 6:00pm

The Band

must be high on any list of untouchable acts, if only because of the iconic position occupied by 'The Last Waltz' and their current status as the well-spring of all things 'Americana'. And of course the Band are to Uncut as the Beatles are to Mojo (as RT is to Word, or at least to this website?).

0
Steven C | 24 February 2009 - 5:11pm

the Band love'em but they've done nowt

since 1979, and as for Rt you can count me out of any collective love in as I'm fairly indifferent to him.

0
Chris G | 24 February 2009 - 5:16pm

Are you old enough to remember

the release of Cahoots?
It got fairly panned as did pretty much every subsequent release by The Band. I think the reaction to Stagefright which preceded it was fairly cool as well.
Their reputation lies on the 1st two albums and they are nowhere near being considered as sacred cows.

0
Carl Parker | 24 February 2009 - 7:31pm

I agree with you - 'Cahoots' is a bit rubbish

as is most of what they did between the second album and 'The Last Waltz'. Every album is patchy; a few great tracks and a lot of filler.

I suppose my point is that this is conveniently overlooked by people who currently cite them as an influence. Have they ever really been out of post-punk critical favour? I remember Robbie Robertson's fairly weak solo album being critically lauded (in 'Q' probably), and it's amazing how frequently the surviving members - particularly Garth Hudson - crop up on current releases. It's a neat, shorthand reference for authenticity.

They are rarely if ever criticised by anyone (present company excepted) although their career doesn't really stand up to close examination.

Having said all that, and taken on it's own terms as a sort of covers album, the post-Robertson album 'Jericho' stands up pretty well, and I still rate a solo show by Rick Danko as one of the most moving gigs I ever saw.

0
Steven C | 24 February 2009 - 8:02pm

Storyville

Robbie's second solo album is rather good.

0
Black Type | 26 February 2009 - 1:01am

The album 'Levon Helm and the RCO All Stars' from 1977...

is really good. Particularly the song Rain Down Tears which crops up frequently on my home-made compilation CDs...

0
Patrick Crowther | 26 February 2009 - 8:39am

And last years Dirt Farmer

is fabulous.

0
Retropath2 | 26 February 2009 - 9:08am

It was indeed Retro

Maybe it was Levon that was the genius in the group after all?

I think the Band are the perfect example of a group that crammed so much into their first two albums that - despite little triumphs along the way - they could never really scale those heights again. I love Mark Ellen's 'confession' that he's never listened to the second side of 'The Band' because the first side was so good he didn't want to spoil the experience. It's the very essence of 'Word' don't you think?

0
Steven C | 26 February 2009 - 11:33am

Led Zeppelin

Despite the sometimes acknowledged late 70s dross, this "behemoth" (regular Led Zep word) always seems to be free from much bashing.

0
Charlie Gordon | 24 February 2009 - 5:40pm

except

Stairway to Heaven sure is toss, innit?

0
badartdog | 24 February 2009 - 6:02pm

Nope

it is brilliant, though the lyrics haven't worn well(to some ears - I smile affectionatley at them - "to ba a rock and not to roll" etc). where the 12 string guitars come in and the drums fire up is a hair tingling moment every time.

0
Twangothan | 24 February 2009 - 6:07pm

The guitar solo...

can transport me back to being a 13 year old boy as soon as it begins.

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 7:46pm

Totally.

(adopts screaming Percy voice)
AND AS WE WIND ON DOWN THE ROAD
(rifftastic durr durr n durr d durrr)
(more shouty stuff)
OUR SHADOWS TALLER THAN OUR SOULS
etc etc
Brilliant.
And I'll fight anyone who says otherwise.
Outside.
Now.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 24 February 2009 - 7:49pm

It's wonderful...

but it is a bit silly!

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 7:52pm

Not forgetting the live introductions...

"This is a song of hope... and it starts very quietly so shut up and listen to it!"

On The Song Remains The Same, they only used the first sentence :-)

0
stimpy | 26 February 2009 - 12:40pm

Does anyone remember laughter.....

Ad libbed on every date on every tour.....

0
Six Dog | 26 February 2009 - 7:00pm

It wasn't an ad lib...

...it was a lyric that was omitted from the studio recording

0
stimpy | 27 February 2009 - 11:35am

It rather redresses the balance from the days in the 1980s...

when one could barely mention their name for fear of ridicule. I can't stand the people who suddenly hopped on the 'Zeppelin are great' bandwagon ten years after that... bloody hypocrites.

As for the late 70s dross, they only made one album in that period ('In Through The Out Door'), and whilst it is no classic, it certainly isn't rubbish.

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 6:04pm

I bought The Song Remains The Same

live album by Zep in a sale. My god, it's awful. Dazed & Confused goes on for half an hour. It's dreadful. I'm reliably informed that the actual film is even worse.

0
Futurenoir | 24 February 2009 - 6:25pm

It's not even live

the solo on "Since I've been loving you" is obviously dropped in after in the studio.

0
Twangothan | 24 February 2009 - 7:46pm

Be thankful that D&C was kept short...

...I have bootleg versions where it goes on for well over 40 minutes

0
stimpy | 26 February 2009 - 12:41pm

Pah! What about

26 minutes of Moby Dick? Would a 26 minute drum solo even be legal these days?

0
nicktf | 27 February 2009 - 7:57pm

Oooo, I've got a few Dicks longer than that (missus)

I reckon the longest I've got is a 75 LA Forum show, Moby Dick was well over 30 minutes

0
stimpy | 27 February 2009 - 9:01pm

Here's two

There are definitely two sacred cows in Word circles neither of whom
have ever done anything for me : Nick Lowe and Dave Edmunds. There
, I've said it now and await the backlash....

0
tagbarrett | 24 February 2009 - 6:51pm

No backlash

We're just all ignoring you out of sheer contempt :-)

0
stimpy | 26 February 2009 - 12:42pm

The Ramones

very rarely hear folks 'ave a go...so to speak.

0
simontyler | 24 February 2009 - 6:56pm

Joy Division

A depressed bloke muttering tunelessly over amateurish and forgettable backing... hmmm, this is apparently one of the greatest bands that ever stood on a stage. I must get my ears checked...

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 7:01pm

Syd Barrett

My, the Floyd didn't half come on in leaps and bounds once they ditched old Sid and all the bloody songs about gnomes, scarecrows and bicycles, didn't they?

0
Paul Waring | 24 February 2009 - 7:12pm

No cows

I don't think they are any sacred cows - I genuinely can't think of anyone who is liked by everyone.

Having said that, I can't off-hand think of any slaggings I've ever heard of Otis Redding or Sam Cooke, but then why would you?

(Hoping that someone will now come and tell me exactly why Otis Redding is shite).

0
JoLean | 24 February 2009 - 7:16pm

Otis Redding...

was obviously not shite, quite the opposite... but... I don't own a single record by him. I don't know why, but his music has never really connected with me. And I love soul music. Strange... I've never been able to figure it out.

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 7:53pm

Almost the same for me

Sam and Dave, Arthur Conley, James Carr, Wilson Pickett, James Brown...I listen to them all much more than Otis. Like you, I've no idea why - he was breathtakingly good.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 24 February 2009 - 9:03pm

Otis?

For me, Levi Stubbs and Bobby Womack, to name but two, are far better singers than Otis Redding. Try a Little Tenderness starts off fine but, to my ears, becomes painful, and it hardly needs to be said that Aretha's version of Respect is far superior to the original. I think it's fair to say that Otis was not familiar with the concept of 'less is more'...

0
DougieJ | 8 March 2009 - 11:09pm

Madonna?

I mean you do hear some criticism aimed her way, but it's usually to do with things in her personal life. Try to suggest that you could cram all of her good records (note 'good', not great) on one half of a C90 cassette tape and you're really in trouble...

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 8:06pm

She´s the one with the pointy tits, right?

But it seems to me that even her fans like the icon/myth she has created more than the actual music.

0
Ola Claesson | 26 February 2009 - 6:18pm
stimpy | 26 February 2009 - 6:20pm

You bet there are

sacred cows eh !
just on this blog i give you
Richard Thompson
Fairport Convention and anyone who has played with them.
Clive Gregson
Anyone named Thompson.
Nick Lowe
try saying anything remotely critical of the artists above and then stand well back.

0
Sour Crout | 24 February 2009 - 8:10pm

Context is all.

Ah, of course they are sacred cows on this blog. It's about peer groups, isn't it? It's a fair bet that lots of people who read the Word like that sort of thing, or have checked it out because of the magazine/website (I don't actually own any Fairport or Richard Thompson though). Just as if I walked into my niece's class and told all the girls in the room that the Jonas Brothers were the epitome of crapness, I'd get short shrift indeed.

If I was having a girls' night out though with my old schoolfriends and mentioned Fairport Convention, I'd ever get either blank faces or cackling laughter about 'folk b*llocks'.

0
JoLean | 24 February 2009 - 8:17pm

they're not sacred cows on this blog-

they're just popular - there's a difference. I post frequently on this blog and have bought the mag semi regularly since issue 1 and I dislike all of those artists - they bore the arse off me - Not as much as Steely whining Dan, but as far as I'm concerned they *are* tedious - Aimee Mann too. All tripe. There are no sacred cows.
Except Nick Cave.

0
badartdog | 24 February 2009 - 8:48pm

"they're just popular - there's a difference."

A challenge- Start a post slagging off RT and see what happens.
A lot of people probably agree with you but who,apart from yourself, wants to be shot down in flames ?. Isn't that what a sacred cow is ? people are too afraid to say they don't like them or criticise them ?
I don't like Nick Cave for what it's worth.

0
Sour Crout | 24 February 2009 - 10:13pm

I'm not afraid

Richard Thompson: I don't like his whiny singing voice. He can clearly play the guitar, but I think he should leave it at that.

[Retires to bunker...]

0
Mark Gould | 24 February 2009 - 10:18pm

afraid?

I would certainly hope not. Sure there are some artists more popular than others, artists who are more likely to be defended than others but I don't think anyone here is so blinkered to believe their 'heroes' are, or were, infallible. Apart from Extra Texture and The Beatles obv. ;-)

0
badartdog | 24 February 2009 - 10:50pm

I certainly don't think RT is infallible...

I've heard Sunnyvista.

0
Patrick Crowther | 24 February 2009 - 11:07pm

I agree

badartdog, But after reading a lot of the posts about RT you would be given the impression that he is infallible as are Fairport and assorted friends. That was the point i was trying to make.

0
Sour Crout | 25 February 2009 - 10:57am

I can understand you

Not liking Richard Thompson - each to his/her own etc. But his voice can't be described as "whiny". "Miserable", perhaps, or "mellifluous" but not "whiny".

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 25 February 2009 - 8:36am

You're for it now

Beware of men in Aran sweaters holing pints of real ale. You are in for one hell of a ticking off.

0
Sour Crout | 25 February 2009 - 11:00am

Usual good grasp of the demographic, paul

country music: rhinestones
rock: longhaired hippies
jazz: "nice"

0
Retropath2 | 25 February 2009 - 11:54am

Not really

But i'm right on the folk one, aren't I ?

0
Sour Crout | 25 February 2009 - 12:56pm

Maybe in Barcelona


0
Retropath2 | 25 February 2009 - 2:15pm

Very True JoLean

And in my own way i was saying just that. It's all about demographics. Sounds like me and your Girlfriends have a lot in common though i use another word rather than Bollocks.

0
Sour Crout | 24 February 2009 - 10:13pm

Tom Waits

Tom Waits is (in my view correctly) almost universally lauded. Isn't he?

0
Paul Hewston | 24 February 2009 - 8:55pm

He is.

But really, we all know he's been crap since he let the missus interfere.

Go on. You know I'm right.

*Retires to the sidelines, cackling*

0
Paul Waring | 24 February 2009 - 9:10pm

He used to write nice tunes

But I can't say I honestly enjoy the banging and shouting. I have suspicions of those who claim to.

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 25 February 2009 - 8:37am

There's banging and shouting...

and then there's banging and shouting. The banging and shouting on Swordfishtrombones
and Rain Dogs is marvellous, but his later works in the banging and shouting mould are less effective and less enjoyable.

0
Patrick Crowther | 25 February 2009 - 8:46am

Gram Parsons

I love a lot of his music, but it's also very overrated. Have you ever seen an article mention his name without saying he invented country rock? I don't get it myself, there's not much rock in there to my ears and it sounds similar to a lot that came before it.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 24 February 2009 - 9:15pm

The Pet Shop Boys

3 decent songs. And one of the most annoying voices in pop.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 24 February 2009 - 9:16pm

I thought I

Was the only one who thought that. Thank you.

0
Thomas the Rhymer | 25 February 2009 - 8:33am

Neil´s voice

I´m not a massive fan, I have the odd compilation, but the fact that you can tell it´s Pet Shop Boys as soon as the singer opens his mouth has always fascinated me. Even someone deaf could tell it´s him. (Figure of speech, not actual fact).

0
Ola Claesson | 26 February 2009 - 6:20pm

Neils voice....

Can someone give it back to Al Stewart when he's finished with it, please.

0
Retropath2 | 27 February 2009 - 8:10am

No definitive article...

it's just Pet Shop Boys. This is important.
And what's wrong with Chris Lowe's voice?

0
Black Type | 25 February 2009 - 2:31pm

Chris Lowe's vocal....

Armani, Armani, ah, ah, Armani...

I thank you!

0
Six Dog | 26 February 2009 - 7:03pm

Which three songs...

...out of interest?

0
Fridge | 26 February 2009 - 7:21pm

"The fast one,

the slow one and the talky one"

- pre-emptive strike. I adore them.

0
Black Type | 26 February 2009 - 8:00pm

XTC

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned XTC yet.

0
JohnW | 24 February 2009 - 9:43pm

nah

- again popular in these parts, but there was a thread here last year about some perceived Partridge hypocrisy and the song "Respectable Street'.

0
badartdog | 24 February 2009 - 10:34pm

surely the fab four are deemed beyond reproach

well at least on this blog

0
Junior Wells | 25 February 2009 - 6:16am

Not true!

Only the other day lots of the Massive were slagging them off for having written a load of crap at times.

0
Patrick Crowther | 25 February 2009 - 8:47am

Massive Attack

Seem to bypass the usual hatred most bands receive eventually.
Not that I'm suggesting that they deserve a kicking.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 25 February 2009 - 10:19am

Maybe because

Isn't that because it's hard to hate something so bland?

0
JohnW | 26 February 2009 - 7:17am

Massive Attack

I do like a lot of their records, even 100th Window. However, can someone tell me what the three core "members" actually *do* on the records except occasional rapping? I don't believe any of them are instrumentalists. I genuinely want to know.

0
Andrew Bradley | 9 March 2009 - 4:42pm

They play and mix

other peoples records, don't they? Then they 'sing' over the top. Or something. Wicked.

0
Vulpes Vulpes | 8 April 2009 - 12:29pm

It's why we all write in

we hate the bands you love to love and vice versa. Remember what happened to that Sacred Cow in the welsh ashram they made all the fuss about? No, me neither, just the fuss before he faded into obscurity, or death.
(Mind you, if he could sing and is now dead, probably ripe about now for re-evaluation, our 2nd favourite sport.)

0
Retropath2 | 25 February 2009 - 11:17am

Sense of doubt

It seems when we don't get music, we often assume that those who say it's great must either be deluded or pretending they like it to appear cool in some way. I do try to consider the possibility that people do genuinely believe stuff to be good even though it does nothing for me, and I try to remain open to the possibility that I may change my mind. Of course there is plenty that is truly rubbish, but if enough seemingly knowledgeable or otherwise reliable folk say something's of value I am not inclined to assume crapness just because I'm not getting it.

Then again if we were all to be so reasonable and thoughtful perhaps the lively and amusing rowing, sorry, debating, would suffer. Mind you, the adulation given to Elbow will forever remain a mystery to me, I am sure.

I personally do not wish for there ever to be a consensus on one act in any case and tend toward scepticism when it appears to be developing.

0
Sven Garlic | 25 February 2009 - 1:14pm

Morrissey

I just don´t get the point of all that whining. How about doing something about all his hang ups instead of singing about how lonely he is. Well, try to meet some people then.

Oh, the complaining is the whole point? Sorry, can´t help you there.

I understand that a lot of people grew up feeling isolated from their peers (me being one) but then we sort of leave our teenage years, don´t we?

0
Ola Claesson | 25 February 2009 - 1:16pm

Being a The Smiths fan

I've often frequented the same spots on't net as solo Morrissey fans, and the unadulterated blindness to his utter mediocrity these past...20 years, is simply boggling. Yes, he's had a handfull of good songs, but then aren't they the ones that sound like The Smiths anyway?

You're quite correct in saying he's still a teenager at heart too, he sure as hell seems as if he's been writing the same four songs over and over anyway. Oh England this, loneliness that, I'm an outsider because I'm obnoxious, vegetables aren't just for gays, or something.

There are no sacred cows, or at least there shouldn't be, it just depends where you go and who you converse with really. Each of us has failings, as all artists are fallible too. It just depends on the artist whether we as individuals can forgive or overlook these moments of mediocrity, if we like them we tend to do so, if we don't we slate them.

0
Bucklberry | 25 February 2009 - 2:36pm

Vegetables aren't just for gays

Very true. I just had a cup-a-soup with bits of sweetcorn in it and consider it my right as a hetrosexual to do so. I shall not be oppressed.

0
Gav Leonard | 25 February 2009 - 2:59pm

Fascinating

At lot of people that grew up with an artist, as you mention The Smiths, will then "defend" that artist whatever they do. I appreciate the fact that you can actually admit you don´t like his recent output.

I grew up with Oasis, hearing Live Forever at 16 was a revelation of sorts, probably the perfect age for that escapism and Liam´s level of rebellion, but Oasis 2009? I have friends who say "but I grew up with them", well so did I. Should I like them now just because I grew up with them? As far as I can tell, there are not many other reasons left in their case. Music means more than that to me. But they are still ridiculously big in England, aren´t they?

I suppose every generation has a defining band. I do listen to a lot of sacred cows I´m sure (my favourite band? The Beatles - and there goes my street cred!), but if I did just because I used to like them or because everybody else does, I would disappoint myself.

And I don´t feel obliged to defend Ringo´s solo career, no matter how much I love his drumming.

But now: Frida Hyvönen on Swedish telly.

0
Ola Claesson | 25 February 2009 - 6:43pm

From my perspective

From regularly perusing various music message boards, dominated by dad rock types and indie hipster types the sacred cows for both types are:

Nick Cave
Leonard Cohen
Bruce Springsteen
Tom Waits
Girls Aloud
Radiohead

You will rarely get a positive response if you criticise any of them. They can do no wrong.

0
Danny | 25 February 2009 - 2:43pm

Radiohead....

.....don't get me started on Radiohead (*steam*)

0
Black Type | 25 February 2009 - 2:52pm

Girls Aloud and Springsteen aside...

...I have precious little time for anyone on that list

Add The Smiths and The Cure then you'd have a complete list of artists for whom I have an irrational but total loathing.

0
stimpy | 26 February 2009 - 12:47pm

Scott Walker

Don't get me wrong, I love The Walker Brothers and his 60's/70's solo output, he has a voice to make an angel weep, but the ever-more-'challenging'recent stuff is, frankly, painful. I admire him for sticking to his artistic vision, but it does absolutely sod all for me. There is more profundity in 'The Sun Ain't Gonna Shine Anymore' and 'Montague Terrace', for example, than in anything he has done in the last 25 years. What's more irritating is that on every new release, the critics all stroke their chins, nod sagely, and declare these works 'the new Scott masterpiece'. Call me a philistine, but I don't buy into this myth.

0
Black Type | 25 February 2009 - 2:48pm

hmmm

I couldn't get that Later... clip someone posted here out of my head - despite thinking it was rather painful. I've listened to nothing but The Drift and Tilt this week - they are truly awesome. I'm not sacred cowing him, but, bloody hell I don't think I've ever been as haunted by some music.

0
badartdog | 25 February 2009 - 5:04pm

I think...

you're calling me a philistine, aren't you? :-)

0
Black Type | 26 February 2009 - 1:06am

ha ha -

good lord, no :-D I'd think 99 out of 100 people would agree with you
I've never taken much more than a passing interest in him until this week. Those records have just got under my skin in the way that some of David Lynch's films or David Peace's books do.
It makes my beloved Cathal Coughlan's last cd seem like easy listening.

0
badartdog | 26 February 2009 - 9:28am

Love both of them too...

but Tilt pips it for me - just the right side of "commercial". Farmer in the City is one of my all-time fave toons.

0
Clerk Kent | 23 April 2009 - 11:05am

Wait a moment...

...Edwyn Collins?

For those who only know Girl Like You, they love him (for that), for those of us who know from You Can't Hide Your Love Forever to Home Again, or at least a fair chunk, surely they/we know he's pretty damn good? Then there's the added bonus of his recent recovery from a brain hemorrhage. That's nigh on untouchable surely?

0
Bucklberry | 25 February 2009 - 4:17pm

Hmmmmmm

The sympathy card, always a tricky one. Desperately sorry and all that, magnificent fight back etc etc, but it is still pretty dire fare. I wish it wasn't, because I want to like him. I just can't.

0
Retropath2 | 25 February 2009 - 4:44pm

Tony Hancock

Not funny.
Shouting.
No ...
timing

0
ChaosandMorphine | 25 February 2009 - 4:23pm

True, true, yes very true ...yes that's true, yes, I have to say

you definitely have a point there, yes indeed, very true, true ... (ad lib to bedtime, from cue card).

I recently read his biography and was prompted to pick up a heavily discounted DVD box set in the recent nationwide cull of Zavvi stores. It's everything that survives ... 37 episodes ... I so wanted to love it but I've watched 5 and it's back on the shelf. If it's true that the past is a foreign country then I appear not to understand the language.

0
Steven C | 25 February 2009 - 4:39pm

Very true indeed

And you could extend that to so much British comedy, especially the post-"Office" Comedy of Embarrassment, which equates to the Comedy of Not Being Funny at All.

Examples? "Extras", indeed much of "The Office" itself, the family abortion with Hugh Dennis (renewed for another series, God help us), and "The Royle Family". Sheer, baffling torture. Subjected to any of these I'd confess to anything to make it stop.

0
Rufus T Firefly | 25 February 2009 - 5:41pm

Good point

Although I don't think it's the genre of Comedy of Embarrassment itself that's at fault - 80% of Fawlty Towers, 95% of Alan Partridge and 100% of the toff/gardener sketches on The Fast Show were based on it, and they were funny as hell. I think it's the faux-documentary approach, with shaky cameras akimbo, that's done it in. It's a sitcom, for crying out loud, not City of God.

Bring back the wobbly sets and theatricality, say I!

0
Archie Valparaiso | 26 February 2009 - 11:25am

The Office

Was fantastic. Extras had it's moments, the David Bowie scene was one of the funniest things i've ever seen. And most of the Royal Family was superb.

0
ChaosandMorphine | 26 February 2009 - 11:32am

The Family Abortion

with Hugh Dennis? *fires up iplayer*
Surely you don't mean Outnumbered - much loved round these parts, apparently. Never seen it myself, but you're wrong about the other stuff so it might be good.

0
badartdog | 26 February 2009 - 12:03pm

That's the one

I may have introduced you to a treat.

De gustibus non est disputandum. Well, clearly there is.

0
Rufus T Firefly | 26 February 2009 - 6:30pm

Disagree with clip


0
Extra Texture | 26 February 2009 - 4:10am

A Paradigm Cow

Hancock is. A cow amongst cows - in that regard. Of being regarded. Revered. But I think - in flashes - as in your well selected post - he is a genius.

But, his work is, curiously, of its time and stuck in that time. Its tropes and ticks. Not timeless quite. Unlike, the best Ealing comedy, say, which is roughly parallel.

0
Sheev | 20 March 2009 - 9:05pm

Hancock

I'd quote an entire series if I could.

I love Ealing comedies, but Hancock's Half Hour is more gutbustingly funny and insightful than any of them. The fact he makes references to beatniks and Harold Macmillan doesn't take away from its shining quality in the slightest, in fact it adds colour.

I think comedy criticism nowadays gets hampered by this test of time stuff. Now I'm sure a lot of younger people would sooner watch, say, the Sunday Night Project than HHH, does that detract from its obvious genius? not one jot. Ray Galton and Alan Simpson don't need to be apologised for, the greatest scriptwriters this country has ever produced.

Ah, what the hell, here's 12 Angry Men in its entirety, brilliance, all of it.






0
Extra Texture | 23 March 2009 - 1:59pm

See also Frankie Howerd...

...I've never seen anyone look so uncomfortable in front of a camera, and his timing is Hancockian (Ooooooh! I *say*!)

0
nicktf | 25 February 2009 - 9:39pm

Sorry, but I have to do it

"Ooh, please yourself!"

0
Black Type | 26 February 2009 - 1:09am

Robbie Williams..

..sorry if he's been mentioned already but I've just scrolled down from the top.

Yes he has a certain appeal as a Class Clown and he's been intermittently depressed / overweight / addicted, etc - all of which seems to buy him some sort or credibility as an 'artist', if not exactly a sacred cow. If I went to Butlin's I'd be happy to see him in a red coat performing for the kids, but surely that's the extent of his talents?

0
Prestonia | 25 February 2009 - 5:17pm

He is a latter-day Des O'Connor with a Red Bull addiction...

I can't say any more than that.

0
Patrick Crowther | 25 February 2009 - 6:16pm

Spot on Sir!

Case closed I think..

0
Prestonia | 26 February 2009 - 8:32am

Sacred Cows

I think these guys say it best with regard to Sacred Cows:


0
Ahh_Bisto | 26 February 2009 - 2:04pm

Fabulous

Heard of them but not heard them before. Superb. Felicitous. Insightful. The voice - like Robert Wyatt's foundling child.
A great list and a good way to think

0
Sheev | 20 March 2009 - 8:37pm

The Only Thing...

..that Gram Parsons did wrong was to spawn the dreafull Eagles.
For that crime he should be taken to the desert and.. Oh wait....

0
geacher53 | 26 February 2009 - 7:30pm

Going way back to the original question....

...Kate Bush seems to fit the bill?

0
nicktf | 27 February 2009 - 7:58pm

Don't you dare

call the blessed Kate a cow! :-)

0
Black Type | 27 February 2009 - 10:45pm

Little Feat anyone?

Lowell George era only please.

0
Steven C | 1 March 2009 - 5:54pm

By all accounts he was a very unpleasant individual

...but boy could he play guitar

0
stimpy | 1 March 2009 - 6:14pm

Really?

I love the Feat and think Lowell was a great songwriter and singer as well as musician, but I always got the impression that he was quite a lovable character. I've never heard a bad word about him before. Which accounts are these then? (Genuinely curious).

0
Twangothan | 5 March 2009 - 1:56pm

Brian Eno

is pretty marvellous but also seems beyond criticism. He appears to be a very bright fellow and he's certainly done a lot of extremely good work but his reputation seems to trump any negative appraisal. I'm basically a fan but I think the recent "Everything That Has Happened..." is very ordinary. (Although Eno albums have a habit of doing that to me and then revealing themselves 10 years later, which maybe explains his critical status!)

0
Mark JF | 1 March 2009 - 8:05pm

Eno Collaboration

He has had the mickey taken out of him by Half Man Half Biscuit, in their song "Eno Collaboration"

"Number in Britain and successful in the states
It's time for your eno, eno collaboration!"

which has a wonderful spoken word section in the form of an answerphone message

"Brian's not in at the moment, please leave a weird noise after the tone"

0
Extra Texture | 2 March 2009 - 2:56am

Georg Friedrich Handel

In today's Independent Jessica Duchen has a go at Handel. This questioning of sacred cows has spread. She says he was the Andrew Lloyd Webber of his day. Both businessmen who knew their market.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/classical/features/hande...

I'm typing this just after Duchen appeared on Today on Radio4 so you can hear a debate on Listen Again. This item appears around 8:20.

0
Carl Parker | 2 March 2009 - 8:26am

Ach,

don't get me started on Handel!

0
ChaosandMorphine | 2 March 2009 - 10:03am

The Fall

Had to scroll through the list again to make sure I hadn't missed it.

The Fall - fawned over by 'slumming it' Oxbridge types like Stewart Lee. Still unlistenable.

0
DougieJ | 8 March 2009 - 11:14pm

...and comprehensive school

...and comprehensive school educated louts like myself. They're eminently listenable, just take getting used to that's all. A bit like aural liquorice.

0
Andy Lynes | 9 March 2009 - 12:38am

I prefer to think of The Fall as...

...aural single malt. To the uninitiated, it all seems the same but, with experience and persistence, the beauty and complexity starts to reveal itself.

0
stimpy | 9 March 2009 - 8:33am

Obviously still sacred then....

Or should that be 'obviously-ah, still-ah, sacred-ah, then-ah...'

0
DougieJ | 9 March 2009 - 3:20pm

i used to do a piece called

i used to do a piece called sacred cows for my zine...the list included...

john peel - over-indulged public school enthusiast
bob marley - jibbed black radicalism and paved the way for aswad
robert de niro - most over-rated actor of all time - plays the same part (unconvincingly) in every film apart from mean streets and king of comedy
pele - scored about 10 good goals in a career spanning 4 decades
the beatles - only the band the hollies could've been (eh?)
stephen fry - oxbridge comedy mafia bore - not remotely funny or interesting and that's a scientific fact!
nelson mandela - biggest uncle tom since barack obama
barack obama - biggest uncle tom since charlie williams
charlie williams - biggest uncle tom since stephen k amos

0
WythenshaweLinesman | 9 March 2009 - 4:06pm

still going

is it?

0
badartdog | 14 March 2009 - 11:32am

Ricky Gervais

Quote from recent Times interview http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/stage/... by Bryan Appleyard:

"...If you like someone, they can say horrendous things because you know it’s coming from a good place. There’s no place for machismo or genuine cruelty in comedy. It either comes from a good place or a bad place. You can’t be rolling in the aisles with a stand-up and you hate him. Why I like Laurel and Hardy is they are precarious and they pick themselves up and dust themselves off."

While his analysis of the wellspring of Laurel and Hardy's comedy is spot-on, I don't agree that this is where his comedy is rooted. I am a fan of The Office and much of Extras, but I fear the source of his comedy, and that of Jimmy Carr, is simply schoolboy 'getting away with it' humour rather than anything more profound. At heart, it's legitimising laughing at minorities more than puncturing liberal pomposity like its American counterparts like Curb Your Enthusiasm.

0
DougieJ | 14 March 2009 - 12:00am

The Go Betweens

apols if already mentioned, but does anyone have anything other than love for the Go-Betweens? Perhaps they were never big enough to be considered for sacred status and I appreciate we aren't all going to agree on one act or artist but I can't recall reading anything negative about them for -well - forever.

0
badartdog | 14 March 2009 - 7:55pm

My mates

didn't like them when I dragged them along to a gig. For me they are one of the big 3 along with the Beatles and Steely Dan.

0
paulwright | 19 March 2009 - 1:18pm

Girls Aloud grudingly acclaimed

Not sure about the original comment on Girls Aloud. Initially they weren't rated particularly, the opposite mostly, no doubt due to understandable low opinion of usual reality TV show originated music. I recall Alexis Petridis of Guardian as first one I read giving praise. I think they gained approval grudgingly as records were seen to have quality against expectations. Eventually a certain positive, critical consensus emerged. People who didn't get it then started saying the acclaim was some inverted snobbery, contrived, perverse, cool pose thing. Success (critical and commercial) breeding contempt in this case, as so often it does - especially as many incredulous that anyone could seriously rate this stuff. So not really a sacred cow for me.

Bit late for this now, I know.

0
Sven Garlic | 20 March 2009 - 3:10pm

What about

Robert Johnson?

0
Alex Rowe | 20 March 2009 - 12:08pm

Very Brave Call

But a good one. I get it. Rather I get what I am supposed to get. The legend. The archetype. The Outsider. The Devil. The Crossroads. The Pact. Sex. Jealousy. Death.

Got all that. Play it? Never. The original? Never.

Cassandra Wilson's take on "Come on In my Kitchen". Yes. Stones' "Love in Vain". Check.

Nervous Now. Where'd I leave that black cat bone?

0
Sheev | 20 March 2009 - 6:14pm

If you've really never listened to it

I'd recommend you try it just once. It's astonishing music.

http://open.spotify.com/album/2IWaNq5o4tG1w6yxve5BMU

...is the King Of The Delta Blues Singers album that almost single handedly kicked off the blues boom in the Surrey delta

0
stimpy | 20 March 2009 - 6:48pm

I know it sounds silly

but I don't like the way it "sounds". I mean I have that CD and I have listened to it - but I don't seek it out to play. I kind of know I should. I absolutely know I should. Heathen. Philistine. I know. I know. Sorry - a failing

0
Sheev | 20 March 2009 - 8:47pm

Peelie

I recently discovered a box of old Agfa cassettes, many containing Peel shows from the late 70's which I'd recorded.
Picking one up at random, I played it for ten minutes during which time he played a couple of indie singles, "Waikiki Beach Refugees" by The Flys and something by The Saints.
There then followed an ad trail for some programme which heavily featured the music and personalities of Chic, then enjoying their peerless run of classy disco hits.
Back to Peelie, who sniffily says: "Well this programme follows the one just advertised, and one thing I can guarantee you is you certainly won't be hearing any Chic.
"Now here are Dire Straits...."
In later years I was amused to see Peelie hitch his wagon to any old dance/electronica shite once it became fashionable and I am sure a lot of the stuff he professed to be flying the flag for owed something of a nod of the hat to the mighty Nile Rodgers and Bernard Edwards.

0
Preston74 | 20 March 2009 - 1:46pm

Fairness

In fairness to Peely, I think he accepted when he was wrong (although probably never accepted the mighty Nile Rodgers and Bernard Edwards).

I remember an interview when he talked about how he promoted the 'hippy' and mainly rubbish stuff on his Dandelion label, while Tony Blackburn went on and on about Motown, especially the Four Tops, and how, in retrospect, Tony Blackburn was, of course, right.

0
JoLean | 22 March 2009 - 10:01pm

I have that same feeling

about my teenage years. In the sixth form rec room a bunch of about four or five of us would alienate and horrify just about everyone else by playing Metal Machine Music, Little Johnny Jewel or a Fripp-Eno album or something equally unpalatable as we listened earnestly and nodded sagely to one another, pleased with how hip we were .
How we would mock the girls and the disco boys who wanted to listen to "Oh What A Night (December '63)" or Northern Soul records.
Of course the girls were the ones who had it right, as is ever the case! I hear 70's disco classics now and they sound far more exciting than Kevin Ayers or Phil Manzanera's 801 ever did.

0
Preston74 | 3 April 2009 - 10:32am
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd