Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

Andy Murray - What's Up?

Gatz's picture

Has everyone seen Andy Murray's Twitter (complete bio, 'I play Tennis')? http://twitter.com/andy_murray
Bless him. He comes across as the same slightly baffled naif as he does in interviews. I can't see anyone beating Federer but I wish Murray all the best, and not just because I'm Scottish.

0

I Can't See Anyone Beating Federer Either

but to get to the final will have been a tremendous achievement

Good Luck Andy

0
MrRadio | 2 July 2009 - 9:15am
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 9:24am

I don't wish to be le poopeur de la partie, but....

isn't Murray's magnificent surge to this Wimbledon final a bit like the three non-Warsaw Pact weightlifters' magnificent surge to the medal podium at the 1984 L.A. Olympics?

No Russians then. No Nadal now.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 2 July 2009 - 9:58am

That will constantly be the flaw in the diamond

if Murray does indeed go on to achieve History.

However surely part of the game is making sure you are fit to compete throughout the season... if Wimbledon was Rafa's goal then he maybe should have concentrated on being fit for it.... Andy has done a ton of work to get into condition for this tournament.

that's my get out clause

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 10:09am

Whenever..

someone in Britain achieves something there's always someone else to knock him/her down. We even start the process before he's won.

If Murray wins it will be an incredible achievement and History and, quite rightly, the British public will not give two figs for Nadal's absence.

0
Charlie Gordon | 2 July 2009 - 10:29am

And that....

ladies and gentlemen of the jury, is why British sport has generally been so crap since 1966. One laurel, however flimsy, and we rest on it for decades.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 2 July 2009 - 10:32am

British "football" Archie.......not "sport"....see below...

Even then, Celtic, Rangers, Man Utd, Spurs, Liverpool, Nottm Forest, Aston Villa and Everton all achieved huge successes in Europe in the interim period with teams made up of British kids.

0
Six Dog | 2 July 2009 - 10:57am

Absolutely...

no wonder kids would rather be a champion on Xbox instead

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 10:33am

Nonsense.........

Just look at the kids currently getting yer actual gold medals in swimming and cycling (huge participation sports in the UK) and even more kids coming through the junior ranks with world beating times....Whilst they don't receive the massive media coverage that football, rugby (world champions and finalists at the last two tournaments) and, once a year, tennis, doesn't denigrate these achievements.

It's easy to knock.

0
Six Dog | 2 July 2009 - 10:54am
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 11:02am

You can only beat the people who turn up

It's hardly his fault if Nadal can't play; if he wins the final, he will be a worthy winner.

0
Neil Jung | 2 July 2009 - 10:11am

So far

the media is all very excited that Murray is in the semis. Even if Nadal had made it to Wimbledon, the draw was such that Nadal and Murray could not have met until today, so Nadal's withdrawal hasn't had an effect thus far (excepting of course, various permutations of players moving round the draw due to Nadal's absence).

Anyway, if Murray wins Wimbledon by beating Haas rather than Federer, people will be on his back because he won't have played anyone from the Top 5.

0
Joe R | 2 July 2009 - 10:34am

Not saying he won't be worthy

But will he be remembered outside the UK? Or will he be like those Australian and Italian (oh yes) weightlifting medallists?

0
Archie Valparaiso | 2 July 2009 - 10:34am

How dare you imply that Alan Wells...

is not world famous for his 100m win in Moscow 1980?

I think if Murray wins he will be as well known globally as Nadal was last year for his win.

Actually, Britain has had sporting success since 1966...do I really need to go through all of it? Obviously it can't compare with the sheer brilliance of Australia or Spain.

0
Charlie Gordon | 2 July 2009 - 10:44am

How come nobody mentions

seb coe's gold in moscow in negative way?
Also Archie I think this like when you slagged off Susan Boyle's singing technique trying to prove she had no right to be popular. Murray has a lot of popular support rightly or wrongly and trying to deminishes his acheivements by trying to prove a negative (ie x or Y didn't turn up)is pointless. obviously winning a number of majors will secure his reputation but there's plenty of time for that.

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 10:58am

Coe...

Was a multiple world record holder and Golden League meeting winner long before Moscow or LA. None of the boycotting countries at the time had any athletes that could get within 3 seconds of Coe, Ovett or Cram.

0
Six Dog | 2 July 2009 - 11:00am

and Alan Wells was 1st over line

in Moscow. Jimmy Reeves could have been the best player at 1966 world cup final but he wasn't on the pitch.
The history books don't show the americans didn't turn up or indeed that great "lost" south african runner unknown because he never got a chance because of state oppression or indeed the American kid who lost a leg and so didn't get past the high school sport team. You can only beat those who turn up.

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 11:10am

It's REAVES!!!

The G's silent and invisible.

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 11:24am

ooops

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 11:32am

Jimmy Reeves wasn't on the pitch...

He was elsewhere, perhaps recording this:


0
stimpy | 2 July 2009 - 2:32pm

Yes as the giant steam roller

of the Word massive has made clear my typo has opened the gates for a stampede of country and western clips :-)

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 2:47pm

Heh...

You should know by now that any typo is seized joyfully upon :-)

0
stimpy | 2 July 2009 - 3:30pm

Hang on

Before Nadal won Wimbledon he'd won Roland Garros four times. And he wasn't even the first Spaniard to win Wimbledon.

Despite having Santana under their belt, Spaniards haven't spent the last 40-odd years crowing about it the way we do about the Incomparably Epic Achievements of Sir Alf or Seb 'n' Steve. Yes, Spanish people certainly felt pleased enough for Miguel Indurain when he equalled Eddie Mercx's record for consecutive Tour de France wins, and for Fernando Alonso when he won the Formula 1 championship two years running, but the explosion of jingoism was nothing compared to what surrounded Hamilton or is now (I predict) dooming Murray to similar Best Not Talk About That damp-squibhood.

I don't really give much of a stuff about Murray or even tennis, but our tendency to bring out the Union Jack bunting every time someone does well in an individual, elitist sport where they represent nobody except themselves, purely because their passport happens to be the same colour as ours, is culturally peurile behaviour of the highest order. And - shock horror - as a result it makes the UK something of a laughing stock overseas. (A case in point: Diego Maradona being remembered as an "Argy cheat" for the Hand of God rather than for having scored, in the same match, the greatest goal ever seen in an international.)

Britain: home of Eddie the Eagle.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 2 July 2009 - 11:23am

Spanish sporting fans are of course perfect

in their treatment of Hamilton.

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 11:34am

also

what sports today aren't elitist ?

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 11:39am

Spain...

home of nationally tolerated racism (re. Lewis Hamilton and black football players) and bizarre cruelty to animals (goats thrown out of bell towers).

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 11:43am

A farrago of lies and vile innuendo!

The hurling of goats was outlawed in 2004. They use papier-maché ones now.

(I am not making this up.)

0
Archie Valparaiso | 2 July 2009 - 11:52am

Let's not fall out over this

spain has it faults as does the UK (2 police dogs died unecessarily in an over heated olice car yesterday) and plenty of foxes still get run to their deaths.

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 11:56am

On the other hand...

Barcelona have had a black manager lead them to La Liga title twice and the Champions League once. That's not going to happen any time soon in the UK.

All nations tolerate racism. And they all do it in different ways.

0
Fraser Lewry | 2 July 2009 - 12:02pm

yeah even those

dastardly kiwis... oh I see what your saying Fraser to true.

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 12:10pm

Yes but he...

wasn't a Spanish black manager - as their haven't been any in La Liga.

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 12:45pm

have there been

many English black managers in the premiership?

0
Captain Underpants | 2 July 2009 - 12:48pm

No...

but one more than none.

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 12:59pm

One

And he was useless....

Ruud Gullit lead Chelsea to a few trophies though. And he speaks better English than Paul Ince.

0
Six Dog | 2 July 2009 - 1:03pm

I'm amazed John Barnes

didn't give it a go... wasn't he director of football at Celtic or something?

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 1:12pm

He's the new manager of....

Tranmere Rovers.

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 2:35pm

What about

Paul Ince at Blackburn?

0
Rich Goodall | 9 July 2009 - 8:25am

I support Murray

cos I know his Family and he lived 6 miles away...he has also put the work in and he's great to watch ...that's all.

Generally I'll support anyone who is excellent and provides great entertainment at the expense of a great amount of effort and dedication.

The same goes for music.

Would people care less whether The Beatles were British or not?

I see a lot of parallels between Andy Murray and Gordon Brown.. both dour Scots trying to do a job to the best of their ability in the face of a media that are obsessed with the cult of personality and celebrity.

Looks like Andy is getting things right but I'm just waiting for his character to be assassinated again if he fails.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 11:35am

people wouldn't mind gordon Brown

being dour is he hadn't help mess up the entire economy and then lied to us after the event.

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 11:38am

Alas, that does appear to be the case...

I do think he is trying very hard...maybe the job of Prime Minister post Blair really does require people to like you...that way your lies are forgotten quicker.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 11:46am

In Formula 1, the press and 'opinion'

doesn't seem to regard it as a British victory when a British team wins, it has to be a British driver (even though he invariably lives in Monaco).

Almost all the Formula 1 teams are based in England and employ predominently British staff, yet having a driver with a different colour passport suddenly makes the team somehow 'not British'

0
stimpy | 2 July 2009 - 2:36pm

A word in defence of Eddie the Eagle

I get a bit fed up when Eddie Edwards is invoked as an exemplar of all that's crap in British sport [and that may not be your point, though it looks like it, and it's certainly the prevalent view of him]. To hear and read people discussing him now, you would think he slid down the ski-jump ramp on his arse and landed on his head, with a best jump of ten metres. Actually, he performed a minor miracle getting to the modest standard he achieved: if I remember correctly he was largely self-taught, part of that process taking place in his back garden. The clip below shows someone doing a recognisable ski-jump. If we must categorise him he ought to be counted as a plucky (or rather, bloody brave) amateur rather than a hopeless loser.


0
Theo Zoffrok | 2 July 2009 - 5:03pm

I'll second that

It looks terrifying on YouTube, and it's even more so in real life. He deserves a knighthood. Or at least a little more respect.

0
oops | 2 July 2009 - 6:44pm

I think it was all sour grapes

as they banded amateurs after ed and can anyone name a famous ski jumper since!

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 6:59pm

It was the overkill

My only point by mentioning him - and I did slip it in a bit on the sly, you're right - was that he was famous not because he was any good (he wasn't) or risibly bad (he wasn't that either), but because he was British By God, rubbing shoulders with Horst and Helmut from Garmisch-Partenkirchen. The whole thing smacked of Anything Johnny Foreigner Can Do, By God, So Can We.

The overkill - if it had been today, he'd have been on the Question Time panel - was so extreme that, as Azeem says, it backfired. As happens so often, he fell from the nation's favour (well, the redtops' favour, which is much the same thing) as swiftly and inexplicably as he'd been granted it, going from plucky to plonker overnight.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 3 July 2009 - 9:07am

I've seen him interviewed recently

and he seems a decent chap who does work encouraging kids to get into sport. As for the winter olympics it's all been downhill since Ingemar Stenmark retired...

0
Chris G | 3 July 2009 - 9:33am

That's assuming

he wins no other Slams

Whether he wins Wimbledon this year (or any other) - I believe the laddo absolutely has The Right Stuff - and will win a Slam or several before's he's dun volleyin'

0
Sheev | 2 July 2009 - 10:48am

The stats don't lie

Archie, I submit the following piece of evidence in response to your post which seem to imply he is just a plucky local hero:

http://www.atpworldtour.com/Rankings/Singles.aspx

No doubt Federer and Nadal are the outstanding players of the time but number three in the world is not to be sniffed at, surely?

0
DougieJ | 2 July 2009 - 7:44pm

reply to own post...

...to apologise for not reading the myriad other posts which point out the current rankings. D'oh!

0
DougieJ | 2 July 2009 - 7:46pm

Well he's got a fan in John McEnroe

if that's not good enough what is?

He's beaten Federer the last 4 times...he's ranked No.3 in the world.

Now I know a lot of people would prefer he was a pure bred Anglo-Saxon but let's face it that seems unlikely for a long time.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 10:43am

how can you be pure bred "anglo-saxon" ?

I just wish he'd talked the same way twice in an interview!

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 10:47am

Ask Nick Griffin

he's an expert

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 10:49am

To All The Knockers..

he's 22, he's no. 3 in the world, he's in the semi-finals of Wimbledon - he's having a f**king go!

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 11:11am

And...

his girlfriend is not the least attractive person I have seen

0
Sheev | 2 July 2009 - 11:16am

Yes...

she handles herself very well.

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 11:28am

Jimmy Reeves could have been the best player at 1966 world cup f

Chris G ..... Jimmy Reeves couldn't have played that day in 66 as he was dead. This was number 1 that year though.

0
McLongWhiteCloud | 2 July 2009 - 11:20am

and didn't Ramsay say

that England played some Animals in the quarter-final?

0
Sheev | 2 July 2009 - 3:32pm

My Scottish friend at work...

...wheeled out the "yeah, according to the BBC and the media, he's only Scottish when he loses, English or British when he wins" line. After years of listening to such chip-on-shoulder bilge, I asked him to produce an example because I don't believe I have heard anyone at all call him English.

"Maybe" he countered "But they're always calling him British!". I replied, somewhat intolerantly, "So are you! Get over it!".

I'm available for mediation work in Palestine.

0
Austin | 2 July 2009 - 11:34am

I'm Scottish and I hate that whingy line too...

I love the Confidence, quaintness and eccentricity of England. Combined with the Fatalism, dry humour and presbyterian pragmatism of the Scots it makes for an interesting but well rounded nation.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 11:41am

It's like alot of local rivalries

it can be bit one sided I remember talking to Dutch Colleague about an upcoming Holland v England match and talked about us wanting to beat the Dutch and he said they didn't care about the English it was the Germans they really Hated.

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 11:47am
Doods | 2 July 2009 - 12:19pm

Masterclass



Deep fried Heroin !!! HA! HA!

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 12:22pm

Fantastic

As a fully paid up member of the 'Scotch' race (baiting a Glasgow audience takes some Cojones) I have to say that was brilliant. One of the best stand-up routines I've ever seen in fact.

Stewart Lee is someone who I used to instinctively dislike, but having seen his recent Comedy Vehicle he's won me over. The kind of thing Ricky Gervais aspires to do. Technically brilliant.

0
DougieJ | 2 July 2009 - 9:23pm

Interesting quotes from Mike Gatting in today's Times...

...where he talks about the English habit of whinging even in victory. If Murray goes out in the semi or loses in the final he'll just go back to working hard to improve. If he wins he'll take all the credit himself, which he will richly deserve to do. I don't think the question of nationality will enter his head. He just wants to win.

0
David Hepworth | 2 July 2009 - 11:43am

And good luck to him

The reaction to my posts above simply reinforces my point, I think, that we feel represented by people who have neither the motivation nor the desire to represent This Once Great Nation Of Ours. As you say, they just want to get on with it.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 2 July 2009 - 11:55am

You creep!!

Heppo speaks and you start fawning like a love-sick schoolboy.

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 12:09pm

Er...

I said nothing I hadn't already said in previous posts in this thread: that taking national pride in the achievements of private individuals is sooooo 19th century.

Speaking of which, I wanted to talk to you about that Sir Francis Chichester commemorative dinner service of yours. Have you checked it out on eBay? You should. It may well be worth a pretty penny or two by now.

(By the way, I don't do fawning. Faining - interest in people's passports if they whack a small ball over a net with somewhat more efficiency than the other bloke - perhaps, but fawning? Not really. Especially as I've known "Heppo" since he was hawking Greg Kihn records to an incomprehensibly cloth-eared public.)

0
Archie Valparaiso | 2 July 2009 - 12:48pm

Ooooh look..

there you go again. You don't like it when you get a bit back do you?

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 12:55pm

Well done, Valparaiso

Meet me round the back of the tuck shop and I'll see you're all right for Eccles cakes.

0
David Hepworth | 2 July 2009 - 1:00pm

He'll want...

more than Eccles cakes.

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 1:01pm

Greg Kihn's

For You - is the best Bruce cover ever

Can I have Eccles cake too?

0
Sheev | 2 July 2009 - 3:35pm

In its day, Beserkley had one of the finest artist rosters

Jonathan Richman
The Rubinoos
Greg Kihn

What's not to like in there on a summer's day? :-)

(Can I have some butter on my Gateau D'Eccles, please)

0
stimpy | 2 July 2009 - 3:44pm

aren't chorley cakes

better?

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 3:46pm

Welsh Cakes

are best of all!

0
stimpy | 2 July 2009 - 3:49pm

aren't they technically

scones?

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 3:53pm

Very possibly.

Not sure what the technical definition of a scone is but Welsh Cakes are similar to flat scones.

Now - shall we start a discussion about how to pronounce 'scone'? :-)

0
stimpy | 2 July 2009 - 4:17pm

Top notch, chaps!

In this one little aside we have a deconstruction of nationalism, the subtle beasting of a bully, and a heated debate on flat cakes. This is exactly why I come here. Where or where will it led us next?

By the way, it's pronounced 'scone.'

edit: 'heated' not 'hated'. Pffft.

0
Captain Underpants | 2 July 2009 - 7:10pm

butter,

Stimpy? Duck butter perchance? smirk, snort.

0
badartdog | 2 July 2009 - 7:19pm

You must admit though...

..the prospect of playing in the Davis cup would be like Macca being asked to perform at a Merseybeat musical review.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 1:09pm

Ah..

so you don't like the game. Here I was thinking you didn't like Britain and actually it's that "elitist" sport tennis.

Denigrating individual achievement is really very British or maybe Spanish...I can't work it out

0
Charlie Gordon | 2 July 2009 - 2:13pm

Yes...

and he doesn't mind singing Nadal's praises - but it's probably not an elitist sport in Spain.

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 2:41pm

Sigh

You really can't see it, can you. That we are discussing the nationalities of these people at all is a symptom of the bizarre obsession with those who are "one of us" that I'm on about.

Why should you care that a British player does better than one from Belize or Burkina Faso? Please explain. I seriously, genuinely don't understand it.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 2 July 2009 - 3:34pm

Nation states versus..

the global community. Do we really want to get into this?

0
Charlie Gordon | 2 July 2009 - 3:37pm

So Archie are you putting

aside your flukey team loyalties and cheering on Man City and Real Madrid?

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 3:42pm

Maybe not

It's probably time to get back to the Incredible String Band; you're right.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 2 July 2009 - 3:42pm

It's an ancient form of resolving tribal disputes

Many societies [The Greeks and the Celts as an example]often chose Champions such as Achilles or Cu Chullainn to assuage clan grievances through single combat and thus avoid mass bloodshed.

now it may be anachronistic but it was quite a progressive concept and it's vestiges have remained with us through the arena of sport.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 3:44pm

Fair enough

But a Murray vs Federer match is not a UK vs Switzerland event, so their success or failure does not reflect on the country in the same way as the Davis Cup or the Olympics (Alan Wells breathes a sigh of relief).

I can just about see Bobby Moore, Daley Thompson and Ian Botham as our champions, because they were specifically selected to represent the country at the sports they excelled at. That's not true of tennis players or racing drivers.

0
Archie Valparaiso | 2 July 2009 - 3:56pm

this champions business

could end up like a bad pepsi commercial.
But isn't it natural to pick sides in sport, if you turn on random sports channel in some Chilean motel room I bet most people have chosen their side/player with in 5 mins. Probably based on something spurious like the colour of the shirts, or some obscure link to your usual team or because they playing left to right.

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 4:07pm

It's local boy done good for me...

..if that encourages one kid off the skag then that's a good thing in my book.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 4:17pm

Well why care about anything if that's your argument?

and if you check back you'll see I never mention Murray's nationality - and you brought Spain into the debate. But as it happens I think the majority of Scottish people might be supporting him. To explain - it's because he's Scottish - and through-out history people have tended to support people they share a national identity with. It seems strange that you can't understand it - but that's life - and that's what people do. It might not be a good thing in your opinion (and in many cases I would agree) but this is a sportsman.........oh fuck it, I can't be arsed.

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 4:11pm

Heppotitus ?

I hear it attacks the spleen.:)

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 12:13pm

Certainly a lot of truth in what Gatting says..

we're getting it at the moment with Jenson Button, if he wins all the time it's because his car is great, same thing when Hamilton won it last year same when Damon Hill and Nigel Mansell won their titles.

The amount of personal skill, talent, dedication, physical and mental strength that it takes to win and race consistantly through a year to win the championship regardless of what car your driving seems to be totally ignored.

0
jimmymack | 2 July 2009 - 12:30pm

The fact...

that they all live in Monaco or Switzerland doesn't escape us either.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 12:37pm

I'd move to Monaco tomorrow..

it looks f**king ace!

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 12:38pm

me too

.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 12:40pm

I'll book the flights...

you sort out the accommodation.

0
Formbyman | 2 July 2009 - 12:56pm

There's a clip of Graham Hill walking to the start of the Monaco

Grand Prix. He won it five times. The balconies are full of locals cheering him and he's smiling and waving back. It's shot in the cheap, colour film of the era. It was part of BBC4's recent documentary about Graham Hill. It's a very pleasing clip.

0
Robin Clarke | 2 July 2009 - 9:05pm

Graham Hill was 'a dude' :-)

They don't make 'em like that any more


0
stimpy | 3 July 2009 - 7:26am

Jenson Button's success this season...

...is proof* (if anyone needed it) that an okay driver in the best car will always beat the best driver in an okay car.

*(Prior to this season, his record was one win in 155 races)

0
Paolo Meccano | 2 July 2009 - 1:10pm

except

didn't lewis Hamilton say it was a shame he hadn't been given a car that he could defend his title in?
(or as some hack on Fighting Talk interpreted it 'boo hoo boo hoo whiney whiney whine whine'.

0
badartdog | 2 July 2009 - 2:43pm

The current McLaren...

...is an absolute dog, though.

0
Paolo Meccano | 2 July 2009 - 3:09pm

maybe moving to switzerland

is the problem!

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 3:44pm

Trebles all round at the Fred Perry marketing department

Don’t care much either way about either Blur or Andy Murray, but it’s certainly been a good week for the marketing department of Fred Perry. Obviously they knew about Murray and Wimbledon but they wouldn’t have anticipated Damon Albarn raiding the Britpop dressing-up box for Glastonbury in the same week.

0
Richard Lowe | 2 July 2009 - 12:39pm

Fred Perry polo shirt on a 42 year old pop singer.....

A good look? Possibly not Fred Perry's target demographic?
Suppose Albarn has the lithe frame to get away with it more than most.....

0
Six Dog | 2 July 2009 - 1:07pm

I’d say it probably is Fred Perry’s target demographic

I once worked on a board game for Spears and they told me that roughly 80% of board games sold never get played. They’re bought as gifts, usually boring “sensible” gifts as far as kids who get them are concerned. So the focus of devising a board game is not so much the game itself but coming up with a theme/package that will tick the right boxes for the gift buyer.
I’d say the percentage of “sportswear” sold that never actually gets worn to play sport in is probably nearer 95%. They’re fashion brands. And Fred Perry’s “core brand value” is nothing to do with tennis. It’s about its iconic status as a British youth fashion staple, a timeless style “classic”. And it‘s perfect for middle aged blokes who want to wear something normal and sensible - i.e. the ubiquitous three-button polo shirt - while at the same time hinting that they’re a notch above the common herd (who buy the £3 Tesco or Asda versions) and still “with it”, or rather “with” what was once “it’. So the frontman of a band stealing the show at Glastonbury with a triumphant “reunion” is probably a better billboard for Fred Perry than a losing finalist at Wimbledon.

0
Richard Lowe | 2 July 2009 - 2:27pm

Fred Perry Tennis/Polo shirts

should not be worn by anybody other than skinny and possibly spotty 17 year olds.

Ralph Lauren should not be worn unless you are an out of work Investment Banker

Calvin Klein, YSL, Boss should simply never be worn - ever

And if you're contemplating Pierre Cardin - words fail me

0
Sheev | 2 July 2009 - 3:44pm

I have 3

by F & F - is this ok?

0
badartdog | 2 July 2009 - 7:36pm

By this token...

...Murray should have withdrawn when Nadal did on the grounds that winning the tournament wouldn't count.

You can only beat who has entered the tournament, and in case people hadn't noticed, the greatest tennis player who ever lived is still in the thing!

Plus, if and when Murray wins and he's still a bit dour, you think what a massacre at your Primary school might have done to your sunny disposition.

Good luck my son, we are all behind you.

0
Hollywood_Town_Hall | 2 July 2009 - 2:26pm

according to his Mum

Jamie showed the most promise and enthusiasm for the game...it was only Andy's desire to win and beat his brother at all costs that led him to overtake him. Perhaps his dour personna on court is the secret of his success... Jamie on the other hand looks like he's having a ball [sic] when he plays and hence is better suited to the doubles game rather than the loneliness of the long dstance run that is the singles life.

Maybe he'll be a happy winner... I look forward with hope to finding out on Sunday.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 2:53pm

aren't most sportsmen dour?

it's hardly siegfields follies on most premiership pitches? Bruce grobbelaar got called a clown for having wobbly legs and making off colour jokes about his team mates. Wearing a false plastic chest would get you a seat at football's algonquin round table.
So is murray really that dour?

0
Chris G | 2 July 2009 - 3:01pm

I personally think

he's just serious about winning...

I think the essence of sport is that the spectator can live vicariously through their chosen conduit... and when we personally would feel ecstatic about an achievement we'd like it to be reflected some way by our chosen avatar... I mean we've suffered with you god damnit ...we've pulled our hair, shouted at the screen promised deities to be a better person... just let us revel, through you, in our abstracted joy.

I just hope the laddie wins after all his hard work.

0
spinoza013 | 2 July 2009 - 3:15pm

so let's see chippy jock

bottles it and looses Wimbledon .
tries to blame wrong kind of batter on marsbar, latter revealed Murray refused to pay for confectionary claiming "you'll no be havin a sale......

0
Chris G | 3 July 2009 - 5:59pm

Daily Mail site, right now

Andy Murray crashes out at the semi-final stage. The Scot was out-played [...]

The other one they had ready was "Andy Murray storms through to the final. The Brit out-played [...]

0
Archie Valparaiso | 3 July 2009 - 6:56pm
spinoza013 | 4 July 2009 - 3:24am

Or Later, while we're at it?

fannybaws.

0
spinoza013 | 4 July 2009 - 3:27am

The devil

paused once more over SW19. The torturer, the tormenter, the cold blooded killer.

"Who me? The devil..? Oh no (he laughed) - I think you'll find I'm from Switzerland"

He said in several languages

0
Sheev | 3 July 2009 - 6:12pm

You been reading Bulgakov?

.

0
spinoza013 | 5 July 2009 - 7:08am

The Spurs reject

now at Man U?

0
Sheev | 5 July 2009 - 7:17am

Would like to

express disappointment at Murray's exit. He played well & deserved his place in the semis. Feel pleased for Roddick - he deserved his win. I'm not Scottish or American. I just like watching good tennis. I would like to see a Brit in the final someday.

0
Adman | 3 July 2009 - 6:33pm

It will never happen...

Sorry to be so negative, I can`t help it. I put Andy Murray in the same camp as Colin Montgomerie and David Coulthard. He`ll never win a major championship. And I thought this before his exit from the Wimbledon championships this evening. Maybe I`m just a cynical Scotsman. Tell me otherwise.

0
gerry d | 3 July 2009 - 7:09pm

oh yes it will.

He's got the mental toughness to win a Grand Slam and he's constantly improving in one of the competitive eras in mens tennis ever seen. It was disappointing to see him go out in the semis but he played some great tennis and showed what he is capable of. If he can improve the consistency of his first serve he could win several Slams.

0
Adhoc Man | 4 July 2009 - 10:44pm

He's Only 22

So he has time on his side even though he still has to get past Federer and Nadal

0
MrRadio | 3 July 2009 - 7:24pm

He will clearly win

a major at some point. And whoever wins this Wimbledon, it will not be devalued for the lack of Nadal. Look at Nadal's physique. He's too big for a tennis player and his knees giving out are, I suspect, just the first problem in what is going to be an injury prone career.

0
DavidC | 5 July 2009 - 9:51am

very true

Wimbledon is the major that many players want to win as it seems to be the most prestigious ... if you want to win it you have to focus your whole season on being prepared for it.

Let's take the Olympics as an example... this is a 4 year process for every athlete...everything they do is in preperation for this, making sure they peak for that 1 week...

Now maybe Nadal was more interested in winning the other Grand Slams but if he was truly aiming to win Wimbledon this year he perhaps should have made sure he was fit to compete.

Now I know you can't control every injury but in my opinion the build up and preperation is as important as the actual Matchplay. It's all part of the game.

Andy Murray has worked so hard to improve and he just fell short this year. He had to improve over last year, he did. He'll spend the next year improving and maybe that will be his year.

0
spinoza013 | 5 July 2009 - 10:12am

No one beat

Federer then.

0
Fear Manach | 5 July 2009 - 9:11pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2010 Development Hell Ltd