Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

All You Need Is... A Point

Martin_Horsfield's picture

Another week, another episode of All You Need Is Love that posed more questions than answers.

How can you devote an hour to the story of country music and omit to mention Earl Scruggs, Hank Williams or Johnny Cash? Or Willie Nelson and the whole Austin scene that was going on at the time of its making? No country rock, either, which I understand was quite popular.

With all the footage of rollercoasters and hotdog stands around Opryland, it briefly threatened to show the other side of the story before veering back up the mountains (and up its own arse). Scores of curious instruments were picked up and plucked without any explanation of what they actually were (Appalachian harp? Two-handed dulcimer?) or why folk in those parts felt such a strong urge to yodel. And, despite plentiful footage of bagpipes, it hardly touched the music's lineage in Scots and Irish folk. Instead we got a Cajun wedding, the Opry's equivalent of a pearly queen, and a rather rubbish child prodigy playing on pop's stoop.

It was the same last week, when the story of rhythm and blues and soul somehow contrived to leave out Sam Cooke, James Brown and Jackie Wilson then ended with Elvis getting signed.

Some of the footage is undeniably great, and the series is best enjoyed as a moving musical tableau, washing over you late on a Friday night in a sleepy red wine fug. It has a dream-like quality, for sure, but absolutely no coherence. Rather than the "the story of popular music", All You Need Is Love strikes me as several stories, with some popular music, lots of unpopular music, and a load of charmingly random other stuff.

Should I stick with it?

0

I must say...

...I've not been terribly convinced of this series' merits either. It just feels more like a collection of great footage to me as well, often very randomly assorted, with a vague approach to chronology. That rhythm-and-blues one I found frankly very disappointing, far too much time and attention was given to then-contemporary white gospel groups and Pat Boone than what its title implied. I don't remember major figures like Otis Redding and Marvin Gaye being mentioned at all.

I thought the jazz one was reasonably well done but many of the others I have found very patchy. The first episode I found curious as well, it seemed like a trailer for what would be in the series but most of what was featured in it has not appeared in the series!

Am glad I didn't pay £40 for it!

0
JJ (not verified) | 29 September 2008 - 10:25pm

Inclined to agree

I can't wait for the first really good episode...

Actually, I thought the almost cut up method of telling the story of rhythm and blues via Jerry Wexler, Ike and Tina Turner, Bo Diddley, Wilson Pickett, Phil Spector and Sam Phillips was a refreshing change. But the series has a strange sense of direction to it. Greatest ever? No way. That title still belongs to 1996's Dancing In The Street.

0
Lucas Hare | 30 September 2008 - 7:06am

Have yet to see 'All You Need Is Love' but agree that

'Dancing In The Street' was high quality stuff.
And as far as I can tell is not available on DVD.

0
Blue Sky | 30 September 2008 - 7:17am

Maybe

a subtle subtitle change, from "The Story Of Popular Music" to "Stories Of Popular Music", would have been vastly more accurate. Seen in that light, it's an excellent series. But I too would love to see "Dancing In The Street" issued on DVD - it was by far the best of this type of series. And while we're fruitlessly wishing on a star, let's have the series based on Pete Frame's Rock Family Trees, out on DVD, too.

0
Paul Vincent | 30 September 2008 - 7:24am

A strange series

Yet I enjoyed it a lot, having watched the whole thing, as was a birthday gift to me. Very much of it's time, often quite pretentious. Never really got bored with it. It's worth it for some unusual selections of artists. Quality depends a lot on standard of interviewees and most of these are key people like Sam Phillips, Jack Good, Bill Graham and Jerry Wexler. Later rock era features quite a lot of Lester Bangs who is highly contentious but entertaining. They very much seem to like to juxtapose rather strong opinions with clips, which sometimes back up the opinion expressed and other times make it look silly. There are quite a lot of clips later on that were less familiar then but many of us will know them well now - from 'Monterey Pop' and 'Gimme Shelter' for example. You Tube can lessen the impact of such things as well. I'd stick with it nevertheless. I'd say that the country music one was the weakest episode.

0
Sven Garlic | 30 September 2008 - 9:06am

All you need is boredom

Don't stick with it. I was a mug punter who gave £35 for the box set. 2 chapters and I can take no more. The series must have cost a lot of money, but a lot more should have been spent on some form of coherant script. Now I know why I can not remember it from the 70's.I don't think drink would do it as after 5 minutes you would be asleep.

0
N2Peach | 30 September 2008 - 8:07am

I realise....

......that I have forgotten to keep watching it. Which probably sums it up for me.

0
Twangothan | 30 September 2008 - 8:38am

I series linked it and sat

I series linked it and sat through the first 3. Have not managed to watch a whole one since. Have sort of taken to reading what the episode is about and I intend to watch them when the correspnd to my interests a little more. Have to say some of the clips etc. were good but I don't have the time to watch 60 minutes for 5 - 10 good minutes.

And glad I didn't buy the boxset.

0
Leedsboy | 30 September 2008 - 8:40am

I'd forget it

Watched the first 2. I found them very dated and for some reason, condescending. Got to episode 3 and just gave up and deleted it from my Sky +. Life is just too short and there is better out there.

0
Springer Bell | 30 September 2008 - 12:26pm

Agreed, agreed...

Series linked the whole lot and struggling through them. Certainly not enjoying them enough to keep up with it. Hello delete button...

0
Hannah | 10 October 2008 - 11:35am

Pitter Patter Yet?

0
Springer Bell | 10 October 2008 - 11:52am

Not yet...

...but due any day now!

0
Hannah | 10 October 2008 - 9:24pm

Enjoy

I actually said that to Mrs S mid birth who promptly and rightly ran me. (I did come back though with a Cosmo for her to read). Unfortunately it did have something like "10 best Orgasms" or such like on the cover. The Midwife practically threw me out on my ear.

But good luck and be safe.

0
Springer Bell | 10 October 2008 - 9:37pm

Haha!! That's classic...

Actually, in terms of reading material, I'm already packed. Apparently laughter's the best thing for making a birth more comfortable (aside from a shedload of pethidine, possibly) so I've gone for Steve Martin "Born Standing Up", Jon Stewart "Naked Pictures of Famous People" and the LRB's "They Call Me Naughty Lola". Fingers crossed it helps...

Thanks for the good wishes!

0
Hannah | 11 October 2008 - 7:24pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd