Entertainment For Lively Minds
All the kids wanna do is rock (cos they forgot how to roll)
Posted by Patrick Crowther on 31 July 2008 - 7:47pm.

This is a question that has been bugging me for a while - when and why did bands lose their 'swing'? In other words, when did they lose the ability to roll as well as rock?
One of the reasons I prefer listening to rock n' roll from the sixties and seventies is that so many bands nowdays sound terribly leaden and lumpy... they wouldn't know a groove if it came up and bit them on the arse. But back in the day, those cats swang baby!
Here's three examples of how they used to do it...
The Faces - Cindy Incidentally
The Rolling Stones - Can't You Hear Me Knocking
The Band - Up On Cripple Creek
- More from Patrick Crowther.
- Login or register to post comments










Funny you should mention it
I was discussing this only on Sunday - that the bands I really love had swing, knew where the groove was, but also had real heart - when they sang happy, it lifted you up. When they sang about being down you drew reflectively on a rollup, sipped a scotch and thought "I know exactly what you mean". And they could boogie when boogie was required. And they left space in the music so everyone could breath. And the lyrics bonded with the music seamlessly. And here is a perfect example....
Now I'm not saying such bands don't exist today, but can anyone tell me who they are?
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
I've never seen this clip before... wonderful!
I should admit at this point that I am the proud owner of one of Lowell George's guitar picks. Years back a friend of mine's mum lived next door to Lowell George's widow and she gave her one of his picks to be passed on to me. Not bad, eh?!
Lucky lad!
The best I can offer is one of Johnny Winter's, along with a set of his strings! I have got a bit of Rory Gallagher's mic stand too...
The trick is probably to Google
"beards" & "Country amd western" ;-)
Littel Feat
Still going strong as I witnessed on Monday night in Edinburgh, it's Jazz and Blues Festival week.
I wasn't too keen on the seemingly endless jams they introduced into Spanish Moon and Dixie Chicken, which ended up split into 3 instalments, but overall they can still boogie.
The Muddy Waters Blues Legends band were also rather splendid last night, although I was worried that 83 year old harmonica player James Cotton was going to expire before the end of the set.
I also was at .......
....The Queens Hall last night!
Superb show from Muddys former bandmates.
I was pissing myself when James Cotton was pretending his harmonica mike wasn't working near the end. He may have got away with it but the game was up when the other harmonica player Jerry Portnoy offer him his mike. Cotton was obviously exhausted.
Steady Rollin' Bob Margolin was excellent on his telecaster as was David Maxwell on piano. The old boys wouldn't make it on their own but it was great to see them live!
I know it's only 12 bar blues, but I loved the fact that so much of it was spontaneous....the band were anything but tight. Wonderful nonetheless.
The Faces
"Stay With me" there is a song that lurches around so perfectly and a number I have been playing a lot recently.
Also Ronnie Lane could swing like a beech, his first three are cracking, good timey, Rock and Roll. I also have his BBc Concert albums which again have that Band-like feel good and loose vibe.
Little Feat-well what can you say tender and sweet and rocking and savage.
Have a listen to bands like Bon Jovi, Oasis, Coldplay etc they sound like they are dancing with club feet. Leaden and Lumpy for sure Patrick. Stodge would be another apt description. Yet inside their heads I am sure they think they "Rock" God help us all!! I blame big stadium rock, with its reliance on throwing big shape gestures and waaay too loud guitars, they haven't a clue
Doesn't have to be that old either.
This was meant to be the A-side - miles better than Fool's Gold - and boy does it roll.
Bleach Cake by The Blessing?
A little too much jazz?
Who stole the roll?
This is something that has bothered me for a long time.
Earlier this year Uncut magazine gave away a CD of rock 'n' roll "in the spirit of the Faces":
http://tinyurl.com/5v4rym
I need to give it another listen, but nothing jumped out at me when I first heard it.
I think part of the trouble is that the specific sort of "roll" that we're talking about is a fairly thin thread through pop music history, which means that anyone doing it today is immediately condemned as being retro. I think the swagger element of "roll" is still fairly popular (a possible example being "Hang Me Up To Dry" by Cold War Kids) but the strut and boogie seem to be rare.
I love Primal Scream's Stones/Faces impressions; I bet Jagger/Richards would have loved to have written "Movin' On Up", "Jailbird", "Rocks" or "Country Girl". Having said that, Primal Scream did deserve that very cruel pie chart dissection of their last album by our friends at Word.
Here are a few randomly remembered and relatively recent tracks that seem to me to roll, without being straight Stones/Faces/Southern rock pastiches:
"Chicken Payback" - The Bees ("Listening Man" also rolls)
"Woke Up This Morning" - Alabama 3
"Afro" - Jon Spencer Blue Explosion
Every review of Tinariwen seems to mention that they roll:
Yes... Tinariwen!
Great shout... they have exactly that quality I'm searching for in this thread. Thing is, I think the 'roll' still exists in a lot of music around the globe,but it's hard to locate in music made in the USA or UK. Perhaps this is why Tinariwen's last album has been my favourite of the last couple of years...
Agree
about Primal Scream. The songs you name are all wonderful Stones/Faces influenced tracks, but I reckon Dolls beats them all. How was this not a huge hit?
Sorry, but Primal Scream don't swing...
Being able to play boogie and knock off bad Stones imitations isn't what I'm looking for... it's a more elusive quality than that. A lightness of touch, a feel for the music...
Watch the clip of The Band I posted and Levon Helm has it in spades...
Screamadelica
Sorry Patrick but that's cobblers. Ever heard of Screamadelica or did that just pass you by.
Yes, I own 'Screamadelica'...
but it doesn't 'swing' in the way that I'm refering to in this thread. It's danceable, funky etc etc, but that is something different to the elusive quality I'm after here...
Mr Squire
Twice in one day!! I think Patrick is right. Firstly without Andrew Weatherall that album would not have swung the length of the pendulum on a grandfather clock. And Give Out But Don't Give Up is a failed carbon copy of The Stones at their peak, the end of the 60's and early 70's the period that Patrick is actually speaking about.
I love Screamadelica but if Primal Scream did swing then (and swinging is not a way I would describe that album), it was nothing to do with them. Just listen to the original of "Loaded", "I'm Losing More Than I'll Ever Have" and you JUST might notice that its all down to Weatherall.
They do rock as good as anybody, The Counterfeit Stones I might propose. Simply not as good, when the Counters are on form. And to be honest for a band that had so much potential they are probably an example of staying away from bad drugs rather than an example of a swinging band.
And for the last few years Bobby Gillespie tops my list of people I love to chin.
So there.
Rant over.
You mean not like this then.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
This doesn't swing at all. It is derivative and boring from Jonathan Ross onwards. I bet they thought they were really rocking though. You do know what swing means?
It's because a lot of bands can't play their gear
Let me make it clear from the off that I agree that the most important thing about popular music is it's feel and it's spontaneity. You shouldn't have to be a virtuoso to play it with spirit and verve.
But knowing your way around what you're making sounds with is a factor in how you deliver it.
Does anyone practise anymore? Watched Coldplay on telly last month and was struck by just how limited the drummer seemed to be in technique. And the guitar player. I have no doubt that the band agreed the arrangements and they're perfectly happy with how they present their musical ideas - it's not as if the themes of the songs and the moods they wish to create cry out for Buddy Rich fills or Steve Vai widdle-diddling. But they just don't play their instruments at all well. You get no feeling of confidence in them that they could stretch things a little, to swing a little even, and improvise something really interesting.
It's always been part of the deal with pop and rock. It's a medium which celebrates its own immediate creativity. Simple ideas are often the best. But the ability to develop those initial ideas into something else earthier and groovier needs a little more. A bit of understanding of the tool that's expressing your heart.
Razorlight's drummer is shit as well.
I agree
The great records have in the vast majority of cases been made by people who are good players - let's face it, the "virtuoso" rock players are pretty average compared to jazz or classical players - but nonetheless they are pretty good players, who know what they're doing and can place the right fill or lick at the right spot. The ability to play the right thing in the right place is as much a skill in this context as mega playing technique. Let's take Booker T and the MGs - not virtuosos by any standards but spot on the money as players. I think that there is a kind of anti-technique thing around where being a capable player is viewed with slight suspicion. Reading interviews with young players in guitar mags you certainly get that impression, amongst the Brits rather than Americans it seems.
Shouldn't this thread read
'Why isn't it yesterday anymore?'?
That isn't fair!
I'm not suggesting that there's no good music made anymore and that everything was better in the past... oh, hold on... maybe I am!
I'd support that
I think there is always good, new original music being made somewhere at all times. By people that understand 'feel' and can express it on whatever they're playing. Two names that pop into my un-focussed head at this early hour are The Raconteurs and the Fleet Foxes. There are more of course
The prevailing trend among a lot of what I hear though is for lumpy, basic meat and potatoes sounds. Kaiser Cheifs, Coldplay etc. Fair ideas not very well played.
Cheap shot
That is a cheap shot, a nads short of trollism. I specifically said I'm not saying there aren't new bands who can play with heart, soul, swing and can boogie - I said who are they? So, Mr. D, who are they?
You got me there
I have to say, with the exception of maybe The Kings of Leon, White Stripes/Raconteurs, bits of Elbow there ain't much boogie to be had. Live and on a good day, The Fall still have it in spades.
Maybe todays pop kids are so far removed from the basic gut feeling of rock n roll that they can't get that dirty groove. They've got too much image/branding/cool to think about.
The sort of stuff that has that sexy groove is coming more from the young dance stars - the Calvin Harris/Dizzee Rascal chart smash Dance Wiv Me has a saucy stomp.
Good ones
I have the K of L and Raconteurs and I agree they are great - but to my ears the White Stripes absence of bass player and functioning drummer sadly removed their ability to roll.....maybe it is just a style which has fallen out of favour. I think the boogie thing is I like a band to be able to boogie as required, but as part of a wider stylistic pallet - much as I love Canned Heat in small doses the endless boogie gets a bit much. Mind you I did once listen to "Let's work together" 6 times serially whilst walking round Waitrose.
Jack the White
While White Stripes may not have a bassist to provide the 'roll' Jack surely makes up for the lack of bottom note with his primal bluesy guitar and Meg swinging the shit out of her drums?
I think the rot set in when.....
.....they started to spell jass with zs.
It's a British thing...
...as pointed out by Twangothan and Andy in above posts. I think Elbow's 'Grounds For Divorce' rocks along handsomely, but 'proper' rock is a dying breed in Britain- hard to pinpoint where this started. There's also few vocalists that match legends like Robert Plant, Rod Stewart, Paul Rodgers, Terry Reid or even David Coverdale (make what you will of Whitesnake but he's a first class vocalist, I think).
Also, many of these 'club footed' UK bands are thrust into big stadiums/festivals fairly quickly and they look embarassingly out of their depth compared to performers from the rest of the world.
in order
1.Stewart- Not only Britain's best "rock" singer but arguably its greatest R & B singer when he was in his prime.
2.Plant-The only great stadium rock vocalist all the rest were copyists who don't even come close.
3.Terry Reid-Never made it, don't now why. His "The River" is a masterpiece.
Paul Rodgers was a stodgy, dodgy "grunge" singer well before grunge was invented and I know there is the consensus out there that he is the great British Blues singer. But why?? Even poor old John Mayall is a better blues singer in my opinion.
Coverdale, knob head "rawk" singer, doesnt sing doesn't swing.
how about Steve Marriot, Jess Roden and Chris Farlowe???
John Lennon????
Farlowe!
Eeek, the Foghorn Leghorn of british blues-rock, aka the curse of Colosseum.
Naaaaaaaaaaah
I bunged "Made in Japan" onto the iPod the other day, and guess what - I think Ian Gillen is without doubt a better singer than Planty, much as I love him. Gillen rocks, where Planty has that slightly irritating mince in his voice.
Good call on Jess Roden - I can smell the SU bar just seeing the name. "Ballad of Big Sally"?
Syncopation's what you need...
I think we're still going through a period where post-punk/new wave is a major influence in rock (especially British rock), so "jagged", "angular" and "choppy" guitars abound which don't usually co-exist with the looseness of "roll".
And so much American rock hasn't yet cleansed itself of grunge, which is perhaps too angry to create the laid-back groove that we're talking about.
And bear in mind that...
Lowell George, Keith Richard, Ron wood and all the rest of them spent their formative years as musicians listening to, and wanting to play like, Muddy Waters, Big Bill Broonzy, Howlin' wolf, Sam Cooke, Arthur Alexander, Willie Dixon....the list is endless. They absorbed groove and swing as they learned how to play.
I've no idea
(where are you, Fraser?) how to embed this, but I've just been watching Nick Lowe (ex Woodbridge School - yay!) on the wonderful BBC i-Player (my cold insisted I shouldn't stay up until midnight), and I think "I Knew The Bride...." meets the criteria pretty nicely. It starts at about 51:30, but of course you should watch the whole show.
iPlayer
You can't embed it, but you can link to the page featuring Mr Lowe.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b007t3kj
Not quite as green
as I am cabbage-looking, I'd worked that out. Just thought you deserved another mention after yesterday's help...
Indeed it does
NL swings beautifully but he is hardly a new act.
Guilty
as charged, Your Honour. I was carried away by my excitement at watching an hour of Basher at a time when my sadly-depleted resources could cope. (Still going for the sympathy vote...)
Entirely understandable
the great man lifted me from the depths of damp despair at Cornbury a few weeks ago...
Mentioned before in this thread, but this one rolls purdy good!
Nice bass....!
Like it a lot
But it's a bit tribute band and not really as good as the originals. That's the thing - how do you avoid just ending up trying to re-do what's already been done? See also Raconteurs and the like.
Swill
Sounds like a stodgy stomp to me. There's no strut, no lightness, no elegance. Obviously Bobby Gillespie being a hopeless, tune-averse (in both senses of the word "tune") front man doesn't help, but even with a decent singer this wouldn't do anything for me.
Lest I seem like a hopeless Luddite, I think the Raconteurs are ace. They play like a proper team, with a lot of groove. Their bass player is a fabulously strange looking cove, and has definitely Got The Rhythm.
I've only seen them once each, on Later, but both Yeasayer and Reverend and the Makers seem to have some 'roll' to go with the rock. They also have singers who can't really sing (at least not live), a perennial bugbear of mine, but I've checked out Yeasayer's album on Emusic and like it; a lot of interesting stuff going on.
Another one
I defy your toes not to tap in this masterpiece of swing and timing. Sorry Eddie, more white boys blues.
A fat Midge Ure on vocals...?
What happened there?
No need
to apologise to anyone for that, Twangers - that was truly fabulous.
The mighty Kim Wilson
And it's a scientific fact that his gob iron playing was even better when he had the turban on.
Can I just say...
...that the closest thing there is to these hoary old shouters mentioned above in recent times is that blokey from out of Stereophonics and the blokey out of Reef?
Not a good thing, surely?
Howzabout,guys'n'gals
The great Frankie Miller?
I blame Black Sabbath
Their dull, leaden lumpy sound can be heard in the doomy shouty metal that comes out of my son's room.
Um, this might be a little contentious, but....
Could it be that today's practitioners don't listen to black music, unlike their predecessors? That's where the 'roll' came from originally. Today's recording techniques - all click tracks, locking and autotuning - don't help, being designed to cut out any sloppiness
I think you've made a fair point...
A good example is Metal bands that cited Led Zeppelin as an influence but lacked any hint of their subtlety and musical diversity. Zeppelin created the music it did because each member brought something different to the table... they were listening to folk, rockabilly, r&b, soul, blues, jazz, classical music, Motown, funk... you name it. Put all those influences through the mixer and you come out sounding like Led Zeppelin. And at their heart, they had John Bonham; a drummer whose passion was for black music. Consequently, he had the funk. He was NOT, at heart, a rawk drummer. Consequently Zeppelin's music rolled as well as rocked. The Metal bands, however, grew up listening to... Led Zeppelin. Hence they sound one-dimensional by comparison.
Just came across
the section toward the end of Ian Macdonald's 'Revolution in the head', entitled 'Chronology', where he suggests that modern records are inferior because of the way they are made. In many cases they are built up layer by layer against a mechanized rhythm, like making it up as you go along, whereas sixties records tended to be mostly made live in the studio predesigned, with the rhythm being found after the melody had been devised. So those old recordings are more rhythmically varied than those of today. The conclusion is that pop has declined in quality, also because lyrical ideas tend to be derived from earlier records but their meaning becomes obscured and there is a staleness - but that's another story. Anyway that's his view , which is contentious, but I tend to agree with it, much as I like plenty of music since those times. It's just an opinion of course.
"We built this village on a trad. arr. tune"
I think we're homing in on some good, solid answers here! You get interesting food from interesting ingredients. John Peel was famously wooed by the White Stripes when they showed their knowledge and enthusiasm for Gene Vincent- not just Nirvana, for example.
You sometimes feel like setting certain bands (and their producers) some homework. Put your instruments down, go away for a while and study some quality primary sources, from the blues, country, folk, early rock 'n' roll and elsewhere - classic reggae perhaps. Then have another go. And if you still come up with the same grey, lifeless dross, with its nerdy rhythms and its sixth-form lyrics, give up. Go for that accountancy degree your parents hoped for.
The roll
Some thirty years ago, the roll had to be got rid of. The roll had been responsible for endless, depressing examples of unimaginative, deeply uninteresting sexist drivel - chooglin' an' fooglin' and booglin' down the ol' hah-way wi' mah bay-beh blah blah fucking blah. "Stay with me" is the worst example, but there are too many to name. The 1970s weren't Life On Mars, they were Love Thy Neighbour, and music was no different. Getting rid of the roll (temporarily) was like chemotherapy for pop - painful and horrible, but necessary.
Older Guys
Browsing on the you-tube and I came across this: I think this sort of sums up Patricks conundrum. These old fellas can really play, better, to my mind than in their original version, irrespective of however many erstwhile members have left. Never mind 6 days on the road, more like, especially the bassist, 600 years on the road.......
(Oh, BTW, it's Juicy Lucy)