Entertainment For Lively Minds
Advice Please Massive
I hate to put on you at this time of year, but I would welcome your advice.I've been teaching for 33 years now, have 7 year old(Yes, I know)twins , and a 10 year old boy.My Head is basically a bully.He called me in(summoned)today, great timing, and basically said if I didn't turn things round next term that "I should call it quits", and he would begin formal capability proceedings against me.Set me up nicely for Christmas.He describes himself as "idiosyncratic",but several staff have had to take time off, due to his vindictiness, I have put loads of effort into my teaching this term, making drama videos with the kids, for this he aknowledges "You've done a bit". He is a ruthless man, very ego-centric, and I have little doubt he would like to get rid, as he deems me "Old Fashioned". (He is the same age as me 55.)He is a man that doesn't listen, I don't want to burden you, but any suggestions would be appreciated.Thanks.
- More from stevieblunder.
- Login or register to post comments










Join the NUT.
Immediately. Then met up with your local officials and appraise them of the situation.
Are you in a union?
If so, get your rep on it. Now. If you aren't, join one. Now.
Capability procedures in teaching are not as Byzantine as the Daily Mail would like us to believe - it is perfectly possible to fire an underperforming teacher - but the body of evidence to successfully fire a teacher on capability (or any other) grounds is considerable.
Your head will have to show that he has:
- built up a long-term file supporting his view that you are not competent.
- engaged you in a process of support to help you improve, over a sustained period of time. Realistically, I'd be surprised if that could be demonstrated on less than 2 performance management cycles, unless a bespoke support programme has been in place with regular, written, agreed and mutual targets.
He has to demonstrate that not only are you not up to scratch, but that you've been given support and opportunities to improve your practice, and that this support has not worked.
That evidence is then weighed against your own representations, which likewise should include a file of what you've done, what targets you've successfully met, etc. As David says below, document everything.
Is he your direct line manager? If not, has he actively engaged your line manager in monitoring and supporting you? Before I went down a capability procedure, I'd make damn sure I had every scrap of data on the teacher, every missed deadline, every refusal of help, every work sample, every meeting minute. And the meetings should be plentifully present in the evidence file: he should (or an SLT member should) have been meeting with you like crazy and documenting everything.
My suspicion is that he will not have done some or all of the above and is relying on making your situation as unpleasant as possible in order to force a resignation. Which is why you need a union, with teeth: NUT or NAS.
Sorry for your trouble. Hope everything works out.
Advice
Thanks Bob,I don't think he has been speaking much to my Line Manager.
He observed me earlier this term, and said "Nothing wrong here", whwn I reminded him today, he said "Well you're different when you are observed, the kids tell me you're different whwn another adult is in the room".He sits and eats with the kids at lunchtime, constantly quizzing them about staff. He gave me no written feedback.
OK.
Mind me asking what these observations are billed as? Performance management? Support? For the school improvement plan? Or does your school have an open-door ethos/policy?
As for the feedback, I operate a policy of oral feedback the same day, followed by written feedback within 48 hours. That was considered good practice when I was first training to mentor Beginning Teachers, and I've stuck to it. I'm not sure if there are hard and fast rules for formal obs, but I bet there are.
Receiving no written feedback is unacceptable. All observations should come with a full feedback meeting, which may only be waived by the observee and not the observer (although I'd view waiving feedback as terrible practice). The feedback should contain clear written targets, agreed and signed off by both parties.
If he wishes to use evidence bases other than lesson observations - and he should - he needs to make sure those are pretty watertight too. Student evidence should be transcribed and filed. Exam results should be not only present on file, but also compared against national benchmarks, along with both contextual and - importantly in this case - residual value-added scores. (The residuals are particularly interesting, because they compare your students' performance against their performance in other subjects. The higher your residual, the better your students did in your subject than in others.) There should be significant and demonstrable engagement with your head of department.
He should have this stuff at his fingertips. He should be sharing it with you. You should have clear, mutually agreed targets on how to do better. He should be able to demonstrate beyond doubt that you have not performed against these. It should all - ALL - be formal and in writing, regardless of whether or not you're in proceedings. That's just basic good practice.
Contact your union. I really do wish you all the best with this.
Just realised...
...I've assumed you're secondary. If not, the stuff about CVA and residuals may not apply - I wouldn't know. The rest probably does.
Is your school maintained by the LA, or are you an academy?
Bob
Thanks.
So...
This is based on gossip from anonymous children?
Crikey.
This is why we have unions. As others have said, keep a record of everything. Good luck!!
Thank you
Champ.
Union
I am writing as a school governor and someone who worked in HR in a previous life.
My main advice is to contact your Union rep ASAP. Unless they only work term time, there should be someone around tomorrow. They should be able to give advice and calm you before Christmas. If he does start formal procedures about you, they should be with you at every stage.
If you haven't done so already, write down as much of the conversation as you can remember. Keep a record of all subsequent meetings and conversations, particularly any nasty asides in the staff room. Witnesses would be good too.
He cannot get rid of you on his whim, just because he wants someone younger (and cheaper). It would be interesting to know if the Governors are aware of this, but such business would always be confidential and would not appear in the published minutes. You could ask one of the staff governors, just in passing you understand, whether your name had been brought up. (They shouldn't tell you but they might). If it hasn't come up, then as a Governor I would be annoyed and would wonder if this is because it is something they wouldn't support or that there is no justification for.
Hope it can be resolved.
David
APPRECIATED,thanks v. much.
Simultaneous with the above suggestions
I would go for a charm offensive. When you return after the NY, arrange a meeting and say that you have taken on board the conversation today and would like to address any issues he has and improve/change (without shooting yourself in the foot).
Ultimately.... it won't be that easy finding another job....grass not always greener....there may be some truth in his observations (we all coast)... and changing your ways might invigorate you, as well as improve you as a teacher.
I hope this doesn't sound cold or non-supportive; obv none of us knows you or what you are like etc.
And try not to let it ruin the holiday.
Hmmm
Option A. Assume he doesn't know what he's talking about, that you have done nothing whatsoever wrong, and attribute a series of characterisations like "old fashioned" to the man.
Option B. Learn something.
In the long term, one generally finds out that Option B wins out over option A. At least in terms of benefits to yourself. This will be the case both in your immediate situation, where humility will go down better than antagonism. And also in terms of your long term employability and knowledge.
If the OP is correctly
If the OP is correctly representing the situation, the head simply hasn't followed due professional or legal process. I realise we only have the OP's word for that, but since that's all we're ever going to get, it's surely fair enough to point out that the onus is on the head to prove that a capability proceeding is viable by providing evidence and engaging in the set processes.
It's not antagonistic to insist that one's management follow the law and the standard professional practices, and I see nothing in the OP to suggest that stevieblunder isn't prepared to improve, learn and be humble.
Your assumptions then, let's challenge them ...
1 people have a right to be employed in any job regardless of performance. And should immediately look for support from a Union if this is challenged in any way. Even if it's done as a verbal warning, when the right to go through formal means has so far been avoided.
2 That one persons side of the story is always enough to offer direct advice. Seems instead to me like serious warning has been issued. And perhaps that someone who cites optional "drama videos" as some kind of quantifiable achievement, when teaching is a serious and incredibly responsible task .. who knows the full story here? And what the best advice should be? I refer to my previous, and carefully considered general point.
Editing this.
Because, frankly, my entire response can be summed up thus: "whevs".
Merry Christmas, Marky.
If that's you being 'carefully considered'
I'd hate to read you when you're being knee-jerk and inconsiderate.
Reading this thread what I gather is this.
OP feels anxious and bullied, Bob reminds him of what constitutes due process.
I fail to see what is knee jerk about this, or indeed why, even if the headteacher is correct and the OP is in the wrong, due process should not be followed.
I see no implication anywhere in this thread that no one incompetent should keep their job regardless. Whilst admitting that we do only have the word of the OP to go on, his head certainly seems to be quite incompetent.
IMO obviously.
Although...
...I'm pretty sure badartdog was addressing Marky.
Before I realised I couldn't be arsed arguing with Marky, though, my 'whevs' post said much the same thing, gs.
Yes, I was referring
to Marky's post(s). I felt they were rather mean spirited in the circs.
Gangle - I agree with your interpretation of the thread and your view of the Head in question.
To Stevie - the advice given to you by Bob is absolutely spot-on. I also think the school governor's post contained a lot of useful suggestions too. The head is going about this in completely the wrong way. It seems the only actual evidence he has was his good/satisfactory lesson observation. Make sure you go about things in the right way.
Don't let it ruin your Christmas - enjoy the time with your kids.
edit: Read el Toro's post down below then get yourself a mince pie and a mug (or glass) of something tasty - it's the holiday. Happy Christmas.
To be completely honest ...
.. yes they could be read as a little "mean spirited" certainly. But is not the best impartial advice from someone you don't know, likely to be honest advice? May not be what you want to hear, but it's maybe more likely to have value that way, in my opinion. If the "OP" had received absolutely no meaningless encouragement and back slapping however, then I would not have felt so much of an overwhelming need to respond.
Merry Christmas
to you and yours.
Apologies sir...
... I had completely misunderstood.
You seem to have forgotten Option C.
It seems to be a fairly common occurrence across many industries, as it reflects the shabbiest side of human nature.
It's a situation that I've certainly come across in my line of work, and one that Mme.Foxy (the same age as the OP) bumped into with a vengeance a few years ago. Twice. Leading to illness, anxiety and depression on both occasions.
She left both establishments of her own free will, effectively telling the Heads in question (both men) to shove it. She's happily employed in a much more pleasant school now.
Oh, sorry, yes, Option C:
He's a bully and shouldn't be in a management position at all.
Not denying that option C isn't a possibility
.. .it's just that even if this happens to be the case, option B is still the course of action liable to be the most beneficial. If only we lived in a perfect world.
Compared to all the
"meaningless encouragement and back slapping", I'd venture that "Learn something" doesn't add much to the debate.
If one concludes that the man in question might demonstrably be a cowardly bully, there are appropriate responses to follow. The "meaningless encouragement and back slapping" includes advice along these lines.
I'm in a similar situation.
I'm in a similar situation. I have a theory they time these things deliberately to screw up your holidays. There's no harm in informing your union, even if it is just for advice.
All I can offer is to echo KB's advice and not let it spoil your holiday, but I know that can sometimes be easier said than done.
Wishing you all the best and hope next year is a far better one for you.
I'm not a teacher
But I know a few. It strikes me that Heads seem to do whatever they want, and get away with appalling behaviour that would get them suspended or dismissed from any other public sector job.
They're given far too much power and incompetence or bad management goes unchallenged. So I hope you stand up to the fecker and win. More power to you sir
DV
Thanks.
punctuation...
?
I don't really have advice
but I've been there and know what you're going through. Sometimes it's the worst thing to stand up to these people - they hold all the cards. For me it was hard but I tried to give an outward appearance of not being bothered - that upset them more than rising to the bait. Bullies thrive on reaction. Your Head won't be there for ever, he/she is not invincible and one day they will push it too far - hubris always leads to nemesis. Keep as low a profile as you can and try to wait it out. It's a horrible situation, my good wishes go out to you. Never forget you're a good person - that wins every time.
Jude
Thank you so much.
Jude
Thank you so much.
a bit of both
Yes joining the union,documenting everything and ensuring you have a file of objectives and achievements compiled is of course sound advice. This is the defensive strategy.
An earlier comment here was also sound suggesting that we all probably coast at some stage or another. I've been in my place of employment for 25 years - I've done it. You have been a teacher for 33 years - surely some complacency/ repetition/preoccupation with hobby horses is possible. O.K., Head may have been heeding the comments of some anonymous possibly vindictive students but what might be their beef? Do you need the frank and trusted feedback of others at the school.
The charm offensive suggested earlier has the advantage of putting you in a positive light by being prepared to listen and take advice and it also forces the Head to specify the alleged deficiencies. Once these are documented these become the benchmark for future assessment.
If the so-called deficiencies are vague and impossible to respond to then he/she will be hoisted by their own petard. If they are clear and objective then you will need to make an assessment of whether they are valid and if you can/want to address them.
good luck
Junior
Thank you.
Just a suggestion.
Inform your union.
Tell the headmaster you have done so.
Professional judgment
Can't fault the advice of Bob and others above. I'm a rep myself, though not in your field, and I recognise the signs. If your assessment of the man is correct that he's a bully, then he will likely collapse like a house of cards ('cause that's what bullys do) when he meets any methodical resistance, such as having to prove that he's followed procedure. Your reps will know what he should have done and will be able to guide you accordingly.
I won't wish you good luck. If you get a decent rep involved, you won't need luck; you'll win on merit.
Cheshire
Thanks!
Cheshire
Thanks!
To criticise punctuation and grammar is Bad Form, but..
..Stevie, if you are submitting any written submissions in this case, please make sure that they, unlike the OP above, are constructed and punctuated correctly.
You are a teacher. Writing in such a fashion does not strengthen your case.
HR Dude speaks
I'd take advice from the experts here - Bob would be the best example
I would also suggest that if you have ANYTHING posted under your name here that makes you identifiable, I'd take this thread down and take the advice to e-mail.
If your Head can link you to the posts you've made here (calling him a bully) then the position in which you are just now will be worse.
if you're sure you can't be identified under your posting name, then feel free to ignore me.
IF (capital letters deliberate) your Head is a bully, then I'd suggest the chances of him following normal protocols for disciplinary will be small. It is not unknown for Employerside to do internet searchie things.
I hope I'm wrong; I probably am. But I'd feel bad if I didn't at least point this out to you.
Another HR person writes
(I can't say "Dude" - even though I work for an American company, I'm in deepest Gloucestershire, and it might scare the sheep)
The only thing I can add to the otherwise very sound advice above (bar 1 post anyway) is to make him do the work going forward. He's said you have to improve next term, so for me the critical bit would be evidence that he has set objectives / expectations that are clear and reasonable, and were communicated to you in a timely and unambiguous fashion. He then needs to establish some sort of review process, so that it's not just a case of waiting until the end of term and then him saying "failed". If his comments were intended in any way to give you a chance, he should do this as a matter of course. If he's paving the way to push you out, making him evidence and justify his decision is the best form of defence.
If you can stomach the charm offensive bit, it's an approach with much to commend it. As much as you can - without accepting any of his criticism of your work up to now - thank him for his input and that you would welcome his advice and feedback going forward. It's the old thing about keeping your friends close and your enemies even closer.
I can confirm
having read your initial post out to mrs toro, who is a secondary head, along with subsequent entries, her view is that Bob is absolutely right.
There is an established process he has to go through which takes time and has to be properly followed and documented. Also, join a union - she thinks this is the key area that they are useful for i.e. helping individuals not to be bullied.
As for life on Planet Marky, where everyone can be dismissed purely for wearing the wrong coloured tie..........
keep your head down
for the time being. It's easy to assume that you are the only one being treated this way - you are probably not. Weather the storm, then gather your wits when the dust has settled and ... jesus I've just realised this is a load of cliches isn't it? Ignore this post imo.
As a fellow member of the profession
I would go along with what Bob says I cannot offer any better advice than that. Your head sounds like they are one of those words we are trying not to use anymore. Keep your chin up and enjoy your holiday. From my own experience of school this won't stop you feeling bad but it is sincerely meant
I work in a school too.
I've seen the difficult decisions that our head has had to make since she arrived three years ago. There were far too many older, under-performing members of staff who had to go, & put up quite a fight until the inevitable.
I'm not, for one minute, suggesting that this is you Stevie because I'm sure you can be honest with yourself about your competency in this stressful job...
If what you said about the head is true, he sounds like he's got it in for you & he should've approached this whole situation in a much more professional manner. Your union will advise you on this.
Good luck.
Yeah, absolutely.
Of course some teachers definitely need not to be in the profession, and being a good head is a remarkably, uniquely stressful and difficult job if the staff are intransigent and less than competent.
I was trying not to make any assumptions about stevie's head, and tried to frame my advice based on "if what you say is true, then..."
Regardless of culpability, there are procedures, and both sides need to know 'em and abide.
honestly?
I think you should listen to the considered advice from people who know what they are talking about from experience. My small addition is that, if I were you, I would be looking to get out of that place asap. Start looking for a new position now. If the Head really wants shot of you he will supply very nice references. Lets face it: you spend over half your waking hours at work - do you really want to spend it in misery, having your self esteem and even mental health undermined?
there is the age factor
being of the same age , 55 , I expect that won't help but agree wont hurt to see what's "out there".
I know this
The fact that he would choose to do this just before the holidays smacks of nothing other than nastiness. Forget him, enjoy your holidays and slay the dragon next year. Merry Christmas.
FWIW
... I reckon Stevie has been offered a lot of sound advice, including that posted by Marky. In any dispute of this nature, you have to look beyond your subjectivity and at least consider the possibility that you might be in the wrong.
Good luck.
This is absolutely right.
Part of the whole "following procedure" thing includes an onus on Stevie himself to engage with his own professional development.
Thanks for taking the time.
Thank you for your input,and everyone else too, I am very grateful. I have been in touch with my union, and feel better for doing so.The timing is , to me, suspicious. He did a similar thing to me just before the end of the summer term, shouted and sreamed at me, in front of witnesses, re. a parental complaint, which I believe to be malicious,telling me to get off-site, adding he was going to be supportive, but because I had involved my union, he wanted me off the premises.I still don't understand why.Anyway, had a good talk to my union, who said his behaviour was bullying and harrassment by drip feed.They have sent me a lot of useful literature.Basically, they say to write down as much as possible, and to write to him and ask him to confirm the things he has said to me over a period of years.He has repeatedly referred to my age, asking me when I am going to retire, adding that I have a "busy life " (Don't we all?)and a young family.
He has also removed me from Performance Management this year, which the union advise me , he cannot do, that he has broken rules.I have also been told he has not acted properly, by giving me no written feedback, that obsevations should have been via my Line Manager, not him.Thank you for all of your support, even Marky.
Bob
Thank you for your input,and everyone else too, I am very grateful. I have been in touch with my union, and feel better for doing so.The timing is , to me, suspicious. He did a similar thing to me just before the end of the summer term, shouted and sreamed at me, in front of witnesses, re. a parental complaint, which I believe to be malicious,telling me to get off-site, adding he was going to be supportive, but because I had involved my union, he wanted me off the premises.I still don't understand why.Anyway, had a good talk to my union, who said his behaviour was bullying and harrassment by drip feed.They have sent me a lot of useful literature.Basically, they say to write down as much as possible, and to write to him and ask him to confirm the things he has said to me over a period of years.He has repeatedly referred to my age, asking me when I am going to retire, adding that I have a "busy life " (Don't we all?)and a young family.
He has also removed me from Performance Management this year, which the union advise me , he cannot do, that he has broken rules.I have also been told he has not acted properly, by giving me no written feedback, that obsevations should have been via my Line Manager, not him.Thank you for all of your support, even Marky.
put a 'sapce'
after a 'full stop' please, it troubles when you don't
sapce?
sapce?
In sapce
no-one can hear you scearm.
best
post
ever.
They
Say there's always someone worse off than you.
I want that
on a T shirt.
Genius.
Oh the irony
If the lack of spacing
is the worse that troubles you this year you're not doing too bad. This is not meant as a dig. Merry Christmas.
Happy Christmas Stevie
Hope you have a good one after all your recent problems.
Wezz
Thanks.
Another teacher writes...
I had a horrendous time with a bullying Head teacher. Having been through someone systematically targeting you was an eye-opening experience. My understanding of bullying changed profoundly because of what I went through. So, thoughts are with you.
You say that other staff have taken time off, and that the bully is using unsubstantiated hearsay and threatening competency proceedings. This sounds worrying familiar; you are probably aware that this is a well known problem in teaching: http://www.nasuwt.org.uk/TrainingEventsandPublications/NASUWTPublication...
My experience was as follows: I joined a small school, and found out that my predecessor had 'had some sort of breakdown, and decided to leave,' according to the head. I was flavour of the month for a term until I began to show some independence of thought. Then the Bullying Headteacher targeted me, using unsubstantiated hearsay and threatening competency proceedings.
I kept a diary, involved my union, tried to address the Bullying Headteacher's accusations. The bully was (and is) a narcissistic psychopath, and if you don't know what that means, you're lucky. Basically, mine was a social inadequate with no empathy, given power, and able to twist facts into a distorted worldview which blamed others for just about everything.
The Bullying Headteacher targeted me because I'm good at my job, get on with colleagues, pupils and parents and because I have independence of mind. Bullies don't target the weak; they target the strong.
There was no 'keeping your head down' or 'making improvements'; either I accepted the bullying and kowtowed, or I was going to be subjected to a vicious mental assault. And it was head-shrinkingly vicious.
I stood up for as long as I could, then left.
If this sounds over dramatic, I'm actually underplaying the emotional turmoil the situation inflicted on me, my wife and my family. It was twelve months of Hell, and I'm still angry about it now.
(For those reading thinking, yeah, we've just got your word for it, I'll say this. That's what bullies want non-targets to think. I now know my predecessor, who had the mental breakdown; she still can't bring herself to record her experiences on paper, and no longer works as a teacher. My successor (who had worked at the school part time whilst I was there) walked out after six months in circumstances similar to mine. After walking out, my successor phoned me to say, 'I want to apologise - until it happened to me, I really had no idea what had happened to you'. Adult bullies have usually done it before, and they are usually MUCH better at it than you might think.)
So, Stevie, if you have ANY inkling that your head is a bully, take it extremely seriously, get Union advice and plan where you want to be a year from now. Get everything on paper, get representation for any meeting you have with the Head and remember that - if you ARE dealing with an adult bully intent on targeting you - don't allow yourself to be a 'victim of bullying' and start to recognise that you are being targeted by a bully.
Also, for what it's worth, I now have a great job, working for a great Head, despite someone trying to wreak my career. I hope that my experience helps you in some way.
These sites might help: http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/teachers.htm
http://www.angelfire.com/zine2/narcissism/
Now THAT'S advice.
And it's great to see it being passed on.
Fridge. You are a fine teacher, if only because I've learned so much just from one reading of your post.
My "up" would be to the power of ten if it could be.