Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Magazine on Share My PlaylistsWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

A debate about death on Facebook

Tom's picture

Currently one of those chain-mail(?) statuses is doing the rounds on Facebook in regards to Gary Speed. I will re-post it as I've witnessed it:

"Gary Speed, a sports manager, takes his own life and receives a stupendous amount of respect and homage paid to him.

A soldier from 5 rifles was also killed the same day, half Gary's age and died whilst serving our country, yet all he receives is a 10 second mention on the radio then the world forgets him.

It is sad that Gary Speed died, but did so by his own choice let us remember - but i don't like the fact that we live in a world that the only deaths we concern ourselves with are celebrities, not heroes.

Share this if you too support our glorious heroes, r.i.p ♥"

This has caused some particularly furious debate amongst a number of people in regards to how people should be remembered, or whether or not one death is more important than another. A few of the main points of argument are as follows:

1. A soldier knows what he's letting himself in for.
2. Gary Speed was 'just' a footballer.
3. Depression is an illness and should be treated as such.
4. A soldier is doing a service for the country.

I'm not actually sure why I'm posting this, but I thought it might be worth talking about.

0

Compassion and empathy

aren't part of a competition.

There is an arrogance and ignorance in the comments - as quoted - to state that the soldier will be forgotten by "the world". It's likely his friends and family were his "world" and they will not forget him. Perhaps their preference is for his passing to be remembered privately but according to the person on Facebook the dead soldier needs to be remembered at an equivalent level to a "celebrity".

As for how people "should be remembered" there is no "should" about it: it is an individual choice, not something that needs to legislated in the court of public opinion.

I don't need Valentine's day and a card to remind me to tell my wife that I love her. Similarly I don't need a gobshite on Facebook to tell me how to feel about a soldier who dies or a footballer who dies and to determine for me the quota of empathy I should feel for one or the other.

Some people are f*cking stupid. Really stupid.

35
Ahh_Bisto | 30 November 2011 - 8:21pm

That was my general feeling

You don't tend one grave and deface another whilst you're doing it.

6
Tom | 30 November 2011 - 8:26pm

spot on sir

debate closed.

5
rocker43 | 30 November 2011 - 8:58pm

Those Facebook 'update your status'things

are usually pretty moronic....but that one takes some beating.
I think such things should be treated with the contempt they deserve, as should people who post them.

10
Dr Volume | 30 November 2011 - 8:18pm

What

the good doctor said.

1
grac | 30 November 2011 - 8:53pm

Ahh_Bisto sums it up

0
Spartacus Mills | 1 December 2011 - 2:22pm

Yep, Bisto's done a v. convincing threadkill there.

Dead on. Nothing more to say. Grief or sorrow or empathy is pretty much infinite. Experiencing it for one person doesn't reduce your ability to experience it for someone else. It's like with kids: the love you feel for your first child isn't reduced by half and shared out to the next one. You love them the same, and infinitely.

As a side note, when will the soldier-grief-hero fetish end? I've nothing but respect for soldiers, but every time they're mentioned these days someone has to turn it into a particularly mawkish edition of "Hearts Of Gold".

0
Bob | 1 December 2011 - 2:39pm

Shut up Bob

You either worship our ickle brave angels or you're a Muslim. Simple as. But seriously...I've mentioned before about my mate in the RAF. He takes a particularly dim view of this sort of patronising slush.

4
Spartacus Mills | 1 December 2011 - 2:49pm
Bob | 1 December 2011 - 3:06pm

Heroes

Another overused word.

I support soldiers and it's a risky and brave job, but it's what they signed up for. All this heroes stuff is out of control.

0
Five-Centres | 1 December 2011 - 2:56pm

Not bein funnie or nuffink

But you is a gay member of the IRA may they rest in peace

(I haven't got that quite right have I?)

1
FakeGeordie | 1 December 2011 - 3:10pm

FG, have you ever seen the Twat-o-Tron?

It's on spEak You're bRanes and it automatically generates screeds of fluent Internet Moron:

I cant believe where this country is headed!. Open your eyes people! every single prisoner in Britain is selling us down the river. Time to act: smash the system. What about OUR rights?!?!

Whydo Webother Tunbridge Wells

is thsi not the british broadasting corporation! all right-thinking people know that migrants are getting freebies because i am now ashamed of britain. wake up people! shoot on sight. diana was murdered!!

Smart_Guy Manchester

Typical Nu-Labour arrogance! can't you see tha Arabs are running scared because they are communists in disguise. The only solution is to say enough is enough. This sounds totally crazy, but it s sadly, probably true!

Totally Disgruntled Londonistan

3
Bob | 1 December 2011 - 3:23pm

Bob

You know, every now and then one has to take a small step back from one's life, and in a very real and valid sense acknowledge the presence of a greater power. Some of us call him 'Bob'.

This post has made my life better - thank you

1
FakeGeordie | 1 December 2011 - 3:26pm

are celebrities

are celebrities

are celebrities???

The spelling in these idotic diatribes annoy me as much as the sentiments.

Sport are troops!

0
Art Vandelay | 1 December 2011 - 3:48pm

As others have mentioned

Ahh Bisto managed to kill the thread straight away (I expect a facebook status asking why dead threads aren't remembered in the same way as celebrities?).

What sometimes bothers me is that, apart from the obvious, why is one (of our) dead soldier(s) a 'hero' and another (i.e. the enemy) not? Both men are probably young, have a family & friends and are only being told what to do by a higher authority.

1
Tom | 1 December 2011 - 7:46pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd