Entertainment For Lively Minds

Word RSS FeedsWord Magazine on YouTubeWord Magazine on Last FMWord Spotify PlaylistsWord Magazine on FacebookWord Magazine on Twitter

12 years ago TODAY ...

JeffLeopard's picture

..."the biggest band in the world, bigger than, dare I say it, f#cking God" - MURDER BRITPOP via deplorable, über-rotten "masterpiece" LP - trailed by godforsaken lead single:


Aided and abetted by pathetic, subservient UK Music Media who (as part of the process) committed some bizarre kind of collective professional suicide.

Hyperbole aside - fair enough that practically all those fourth rate bands (tarred with the same brush) continue not to be missed - but the damage performed to the British music industry as a whole was incalculable.
...think about it. With a few notable exceptions - radio, singles, LPs, charts, music press, etc - have all been lazy, backwards-looking and RUBBISH ever since. You can't blame the iPod for everything - can you?

Did we ever receive an apology from anyone about this? Don't think so. We all know the guilty ones. Least they could do, no?

0

I remember the five star Q review.

My faith in the magazine evaporated at that moment.

You make an interesting point, Jeff, which, whilst a tad hyperbolic, isn't that far of the mark.

0
Lenny Law | 20 August 2009 - 9:11pm

if my rather porous memory serves

a sometime scribe of this parish did that review, n'est pas?

For what it's worth, I don't hate that album as much as many people do. It's of its time, rather it's of my time. The first two albums came out when i was living the most meagre of existences in college; BHN came out when i had my first job and I realised that whilst i was far from living the dream of Excess All Areas, I at least had, er, a sniff of it. For that reason, I've fond memories of it and reckon (as might have been suggested here before) that a 'Naked' a la Let It Be version of it wouldn't be all bad. For those who like that sort of thing. In other words, I suspect Vulpes won't be pre-ordering it on Amazon or anything like that!

(oh, and to Brother Crowther below, Good Work, Fella!)

0
ivan | 20 August 2009 - 10:30pm
KDH | 20 August 2009 - 11:27pm

"You have to go back, as

"You have to go back, as Noel so often does, to efforts like The Beatles' Revolver, for a set whose every constituent could be spun off into the singles chart. That said, it's a bundle of delights rather than surprises."

Still makes me feel ill - ludicrous stuff.

Charles Shaar Murray's review in Mojo was even worse

0
JeffLeopard | 21 August 2009 - 1:10am

It makes you feel ill

that a record you don't like got a good review?!

0
Chimney Singing... | 21 August 2009 - 11:14am

Uhm

...no.
Did you bother to read the link?
You can't just palm that off as a "good review".
More of a "monstrous dis-service"

..."Big as a Planet", indeed.

0
JeffLeopard | 21 August 2009 - 5:04pm

Actually

the first half of the review is spot on - the album was a monster release at the time, because everyone was anticipating the follow up to WTSMG.

It's the second half where the hyperbole kicks in.

And I fail to see how someone whose tastes range from Chemical Brothers to Crowded House can be seen as visionary!

0
robram | 21 August 2009 - 6:26pm

The equation is something like this...

+

+

+

+

=

0
Patrick Crowther | 20 August 2009 - 9:42pm

Full marks to this post!

Full marks to this post!

0
TJ Dizzle | 21 August 2009 - 12:21pm

Seconded

!

0
soapdodger | 21 August 2009 - 12:38pm

Fun game

I can't see YouTube content at work, so didn't know what band/album you were talking about until I clicked through. Wasn't hard to guess though!

They may have killed Britpop, but I'd say there have been more than a few notable exceptions to the rubbish since then. I would also posit that far more damage has been done to radio, singles, LPs and charts by Pop Idol, X-Factor, Britain's Got Talent etc.

0
Merv | 20 August 2009 - 11:06pm

It needs

stripped down, some of the naffer lyrics replaced (sample: "blood on the tracks and it must be mine, fool on the hill and I feel fine", not to mention that drivel about an assassin) and a time limit of 4 1/2 minutes per track slapped on it, but I still rather like it.

0
KDH | 20 August 2009 - 11:17pm

Whoooshhhhhhhhh. What was that?

Something's just flown over my head.
I've really, really tried with Oasis, but to no avail. I just can't hate their music.
That's not to say I like the Brothers Grimm, or would ever go and see them, or that I have bought their CDs (OK, one exception). And I agree with Mr Crowther's well-made point. But, sorry, I still like the music.

0
Mark Godden | 20 August 2009 - 11:24pm

Well,

I still love the first two albums, and The Masterplan. They may have gone downhill rapidly after that, but those three records are still terrific.

0
Johan | 21 August 2009 - 12:52am

Eh?

What's all this about, eh? Is it that Oasis group? I'm 51, me.

0
chabsy | 21 August 2009 - 2:51am

In defence of the Monstrous Regiment Of Hacks...

...not everybody goes along with waves like the one that carried Oasis. The difference is they don't get asked to express their views.

I remember, at the height of Britpop, having lunch with Mark Cooper of the BBC in Soho. We discussed the seditious thought that Oasis were nothing like as good as Slade, let alone the Beatles. We made sure we did it in hushed tones. At the time the idea that Oasis were anything less than the second coming was an idea about as likely to get a platform as the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade in Tel Aviv.

And when the overwhelming majority of the public are happy believing something that is clearly not true (other examples include the Premier League being the best football in the world, Susan Boyle being the greatest interpretative singer since Frank Sinatra and the late Princess of Wales being a saint) most media tends to go along with it. You're a lot more likely to be successful that way than muttering in a corner like Mark and I were doing. That's what they say about leading popular taste. Find a parade and then march in front of it. That's what those reviews were doing, consciously or not.

And in the end what good does it do to run up to people and say that the thing they love is rubbish? You're not going to change their minds and you might just ruin their day. A lot of people had a lot of fun during Oasis fever and now they've got a load of good memories and a bunch of records that they hardly ever play. There are worse results in life.

0
David Hepworth | 21 August 2009 - 8:05am

The hacks can't win.

Either you're all a bunch of spineless toadies parroting the views of others or, if you take the alternative view, you're just typical British media types knocking something down after building it up.

0
Lenny Law | 21 August 2009 - 4:01pm

So negative reviews are a waste of time ?

The reviews of the time built up the hype. Looking back now, du Noyer's review is hilarious. Did he say what he really felt or was a 5 star review expected of him ?

0
dai | 21 August 2009 - 4:15pm

I'd be interested to know

How long he got to spend with the album. There's a fair chance with a release like that that he'd hear it only once, at a playback.

0
Fraser Lewry | 21 August 2009 - 4:21pm

I got the impression ...

.. at the time he spent all his time with the band and who knows maybe passively bought into their messianic nose ningle musical vision (however narrow). Don't like the band (some songs a wonderful racket but always too long) but I like THEM. Liam and especially Noel are genuinely hilarious and much more fun for journalists and the public than most bands. I am sure that's why they have got away with dreadful lyrics and no progression for so long

0
FakeGeordie | 27 August 2009 - 12:20pm

In reply to David's comment ...

... "what good does it do to run up to people and say that the thing they love is rubbish?", I'd say that there's a difference between saying "I think Oasis' first two albums are great" and "This new Oasis album, which you haven't heard yet, is great".

It's the hyperbole about the unheard item which is the problem, and which threatens the credibility of the music press, I think.

0
Douglas | 22 August 2009 - 6:27am

And in the end...

...it would would have been better to have been told the truth about the merits of the LP. By someone. Anyone.
We paid our money, after all. What choice was there for the rest of us (non-fanatics)?
We were told by every credible "serious" music paper that the likes of this was up there with Sgt Pepper:

And while your "just might ruin their day" maxim sounds philosophical enough - if you try extending this to cover honest, objective music journalism in general - where do you draw the line?
You let the likes of Bay City Rollers, Stock/Aitken/Waterman and all those dross boy-bands (to name a few) off the hook completely?

..."And the Public Wants what the Public Gets"
At least Weller told Gallagher (to his face) that the album didn't cut it.

0
JeffLeopard | 26 August 2009 - 7:30pm

S/A/W dross??

They produced some of the best popular music of the 80s!

They were part of the distinguished line of 'Hit Factories' that stretches from Phil Spector, through Motown, and comes up to date with Xenomania.

0
stimpy | 27 August 2009 - 7:49am

At the time I hated

pretty much everything SAW produced.

Now I still hate most of it, but time has provided a perspective that shows they did actually produce some great records as well.

0
illuminatus | 27 August 2009 - 11:02am

I loathed SAW at the time and now can't be arsed one way...

or the other. But I appreciate that they were brilliant at making pop records. Unfortunately I just don't like any of them. No wait a minute... did they do Better The Devil You Know by Kylie Minogue? If so I like that.

0
Patrick Crowther | 27 August 2009 - 11:16am

Yup


...they were brilliant. You're right - my mistake

ho hum

0
JeffLeopard | 27 August 2009 - 9:06pm

Sounds good to me

Got my foot tapping and brought a smile to my face. I suspect I'll be humming the hook all day as well - what more do you need from a 2 1/2 minute pop song?

Not sure about the video though :-)

0
stimpy | 28 August 2009 - 7:46am

In defence, m'lud...

I present this alternative


0
illuminatus | 28 August 2009 - 3:11pm

At least

it's a record that illicts such a strong reaction, and someone even noticing that it was twelve years ago today that it came out.

You wouldn't get that with whatever shite Bruce Springsteen, Neil Young or Richard Thompson had out in 1997.

My love of Oasis has been well documented on this site, and I would easily give Be Here Now a 7 or 8 out of 10.

However, on the day it came out, I queued with everyone else and won a Liam Gallagher lookalike competition run by ITV in HMV in Birmingham and got the album free, so I spent my pocket money on 'Ladies and Gentleman We Are Floating In Space' by Spiritualized. It was clear even to me in the grip of 'Oasis fever' that the latter was better, but Be Here Now still rocks.

Ahem. I'll leave now.

0
Chimney Singing... | 21 August 2009 - 8:45am

"12 years ago today"

Fairly easy to notice as it's probably the only album in the history of pop music to have it's release date written on the cover !

0
dai | 21 August 2009 - 4:26pm

Be Here Now........

There's a very good record in there struggling to get out over the layers and layers of guitars and snow...

Still believe "It's Getting Better, Man" is a great lost single had the squalling 4 minute cocaine guitar noise been lost from the end.

Magic Pie however..............

0
Six Dog | 21 August 2009 - 8:44am

I was about to post something along the same lines

These days, I liten to BHN more than any other Oasis album - admittedly that's not saying much - specifically because it's just so spectacularly excessive.

It's like the result of a twisted scientific experiement to establish what happens when you give a 25-year old Beatles fan all the money and cocaine in the world and lock him in the finest studio money can buy.

I can imagine the white-coated scientists watching him from behind a one-way mirror making frantic notes. "Hmmm... that's the 27th guitar overdub on Stand By Me".

0
stimpy | 21 August 2009 - 10:03am

Murdered Britpop?

..I'd argue it was the inevitable conclusion. Britpop was an over-inflated balloon ready to burst by 1997.

0
jimmymack | 21 August 2009 - 10:07am

there are...

...bizarre as it may sound....

some of us who *whisper* like "Be Here Now". I like the fact that "All Around The World" changes key 3 times and goes on for 6 days. I like "Stand By Me" in its portrayal of drunken bloke in a pub telling everyone their "mar besht mayt, yoo arr". I like the fact Johnny Depp plays on it. And I like "The Girl In The Dirty Shirt".

It takes all sorts I suppose.

0
badger_king | 21 August 2009 - 6:02pm

It's Not All Bad

Don't Go Away is particularly affecting

0
MrRadio | 21 August 2009 - 6:11pm

i still like

my big mouth. mainly for liam. awful words, crazy screeeeeee of production but if u fiddle with th bass its great.

0
sandamiano | 22 August 2009 - 9:42am

Notice how

a number of people in the thread so far have stood up for various tracks on the album. Yes, OK, it was an comedically overblown gakkfest that had everything turned up to 11. Fact is though, there are some bloody memorable songs on it, aren't there?

Tell me you don't remember D'You Know What I Mean's ludicrous Apocalypse Now-y helicopters in its video, not to mention the gargantunan hook in the chorus. Come to that, Stand By Me is actually pretty bloody good (once again, killer chorus). And personally, if ever I feel down, a play of All Around The World is absolutely guaranteed to put a big dumb grin on my face.

It was not the greatest album ever made, which makes the reviews of the time lok a touch silly. Nor, indeed, was it the worst. No, I think the execrable effort from Menswe@r fills that hole and, in addition, may have been the credibility-defying turd that singalled the true end of Britpop

0
illuminatus | 26 August 2009 - 8:18pm

I well remember...

The one and only time I heard BHN in its entirety. A friend had bought it, we sat in his living room having a drink and a conversation with an unremarkable and unmemorable noise going on around us. Not bad, certainly not great, just ordinary and pedestrian. Then something happens which piques my interest, the sound of a rather well played slide guitar emerges (Fade In/Out). I'm intrigued as I wasn't aware Noel played slide and it seemed unlikely he could have reached that level of proficiency in the time since WTSMG. I get up, pick up the liner notes and discover - somewhat unexpectedly to say the least - that the highlight of this massive juggernaut of an album with, I don't know, 5000 separate guitar tracks on it, is provided by... Johnny Depp. What's going on here, when the supposed saviours of music are upstaged on their own album by Edward Scissorhands.
Still like the track, never listened to the album since. It left almost no impression on me whatsoever.

0
sjc1970 | 26 August 2009 - 8:43pm
Privacy Statement    ©  2006 - 2012 Development Hell Ltd